Reconciling Science and Innovation in Israel – Lessons Learned Prof. Hagit Messer-Yaron Tel Aviv University Pargue, April 21, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COMMERCIALIZATION AS A TENURE CRITERION: A POWERFUL INCENTIVE FOR FACULTY INVENTORS Stephen W.S. McKeever Vice President for Research and Technology Transfer.
Advertisements

© Hagit Messer-Yaron, 2011 Prof. Hagit Messer-Yaron Novi Sad, Oct. 12, 2011.
2nd Panel, Best Practices: “ IPR in Successful University-Industry Collaborations” Dr. Tamar Raz, CEO Hadasit, the Technology Transfer Company of Hadassah.
ACADEMIC TECH TRANSFERT IN FRANCE USTH workshop – September, 25, Setting-up of a new model Géraldine Karbouch Director, Technology Development.
Development of Intellectual Property Policies at Universities and Research Centers Mr. Ryszard Frelek, Division for Certain Countries in Europe and Asia,
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980: Policy Model for Other Industrial Economies? David C. Mowery Haas School of Business U.C. Berkeley & NBER Bhaven N. Sampat University.
Technology Transfer from A-Z! Office of Technology Licensing
Intellectual Property Rights Margaret Lawlor Business Development Manager Faculty of Medical Sciences 2015 copyright©NewcastleUniversity 2015.
Jerusalem ID Card Key Facts Population 2002: 680,300 Forecast Population in 2020: 946,500 HUJ (80 years): 24,000 students,10,000 graduates 1100 Academics.
Dr. Eli Opper – Chief Scientist Ministry of Industry, Trade and Labor Early Stage Financing Strategies for High Tech in Israel January 2005.
February 25, 2014 SERIES 4, SESSION 2 OF AAPLS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Material Transfer and Confidentiality Agreements.
RAD Group High-Tech Project “Engineers from the Periphery” Presented by: Yehuda Zisapel Proposal for a national undertaking in Israel.
Perceptions of Management Issues in Biotechnology in Thailand A Presentation by Associate Prof. Siriyupa Roongrerngsuke, Ph. D. Sarote Phornprapha, Ph.D.
Intellectual Property and Senior Design Projects.
National innovation strategies and policies - Republic of Slovenia Dr. Klemen Grošelj SIPO Novi Sad,
Israel Science Foundation April, Description of Israel – Size Haifa U. Technion Tel Aviv U. Bar Ilan Weizmann Ben Gurion Hebrew U. 120 miles!
Management of Intellectual Property at Iowa State University Contributing to Economic Development Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State.
Excellence in scientific research Prof
Universities in the 21st Century: Funding of Universities Prof. Georg Winckler President, European University Association Rector, University Vienna, Austria.
© Hagit Messer-Yaron, 2013 Prof. Hagit Messer-Yaron President, OUI Budapest, April 15, 2013.
WIPO Dispute Resolution in International Science & Technology April 25, 2005 Ann M. Hammersla Senior Counsel, Intellectual Property Massachusetts Institute.
Intellectual Property in the Context of Growth and Development of the World Economy Luciano Daffarra, Attorney at Law Daffarra, d’Addio & Partners China-Italy.
Presented by Vladimir Yossifov Consultant, IP Services “IP Universities” Istanbul, May 16 to 18, 2012 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY.
A Basic Primer on Intellectual Property Kathryn Atchison, DDS, MPH Vice Provost, Intellectual Property and Industry Relations Associate Vice Chancellor.
Overview OTL Mission Inventor Responsibility Stanford Royalty Sharing Disclosure Form Patent View Inventor Agreements Patent.
A Dual Role Principal (Rector) of Heriot-Watt University Chair of the regional economic development company.
Industry-University Relations In Israel Can we do better at this critical time? Moshe Oron, Ph.D. Chief Scientist – KiloLambda Technologies, Ltd. Chairman,
1 Promoting Science and Research for developing Innovations and Entrepreneurs OGADA Tom WIPO National Roving Workshops on Intellectual Property Strategy,
CRUI - WIPO Training Programme on intellectual property and management of innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises, Universities, Spin off and.
National Innovation Strategy of the Republic of Moldova. Implementation, mechanisms and measures Ghenadie CERNEI Director, Agency for Innovation.
© Hagit Messer-Yaron, 2012 Prof. Hagit Messer-Yaron President, OUI Baku, October 24, 2012.
PUBLIC R&D POLICY IN RUSSIA Restructuring Government S&T Institutions Tatiana Kuznetsova STATE UNIVERSITY – HIGHER SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS Institute for Statistical.
2 nd Panel – Best Practice: IPR in successful University-Industry collaboration Prof. Hagit Messer-Yaron Vice Chair, The Council for Higher Education,
Innovation as a major Growth Engine of the Israeli Economy Israel Makov Delegation of Hospital CEO’s from North America February 5 th, 2012 Tel Aviv.
The Challenge of Establishing World-Class Universities Jamil Salmi Fontainebleau 30 April 2009.
1 The role of Government in fostering competitiveness and growth Ken Warwick Deputy Chief Economic Adviser UK Department of Trade and Industry.
S CIENCE AND T ECHNOLOGY TRANSFER IN I SRAEL I SRAEL F RANCE INTRODUCTION MEETING E REZ E TZION T EL A VIV U NIVERSITY 20/2/2011.
© Hagit Messer-Yaron, 2014 Basic Science, Big Science and Higher Education in Israel Prof. Hagit Messer-Yaron Vice Chair The Council for Higher Education.
WIPO Pilot Project - Assisting Member States to Create an Adequate Innovation Infrastructure to Support University – Industry Collaboration.
Policies Promoting IP Development in Universities and Higher Institutions of Learning In Africa OGADA Tom WIPO National Workshop on Intellectual Property.
1 U.S. Science & Technology: Issues and Outlook by Erich Bloch Director September 26, 2005.
“IP Universities” Istanbul, May 16 to 18, 2012 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY IP Policy for Universities Tamas Bene, IP manager University.
World Intellectual Property Organization DCPPS 1 presented by Mr. Vladimir Yossifov WIPO NATIONAL WORKSHOP ON INNOVATION SUPPORT SERVICES AND THEIR MANAGEMENT.
Public-private Collaboration From Research to Market Yigal Erlich, Founder Yozma.
© Hagit Messer-Yaron, 2013 Prof. Hagit Messer-Yaron President, OUI Budapest, April 15, 2013.
Academic Technology Transfer Operations and Practice Knowledge Economy Forum IV Istanbul, Turkey March 22-25, 2005 Alistair Brett Oxford Innovation.
NATIONAL CONFERENCE Intellectual Property Policies for Universities and Innovation dr. sc. Vlatka Petrović Head, Technology Transfer Office Acting Head,
HUMAN-BASED ECONOMY Largest IT engineering force in CEE: manufacturing, engineering students 40% of R&D Legacy of Soviet Union 2.5 billion and.
Policy on the Management of Intellectual Property in Technology Transfer Activities at CERN CERN/FC/5434/RA Technology Transfer Network Meeting – 10 th.
Why an Intellectual Property Policy? Sofia, November 24 and 25, 2015 Mr. Evgeniy Sesitsky, Department for Transition and Developed Countries, World Intellectual.
Wayne Huebner Vice Provost for Research University of Missouri-Rolla Rolla, MO presentation to: F 3 August 15, 2006 Research UMR: Serving the needs.
HOW DO PATENTING AND LICENSING AFFECT RESEARCH? JOAN S. LEONARD VICE PRESIDENT AND GENERAL COUNSEL HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE The National Academies.
Technology transfer – The Hungarian experience Legal background Innovation Act: - Public R&D institutions are required to establish IP policy - IP created.
Vermont's 21st Century Economy: Building an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Dr. Corine Farewell Director, Office of Technology Commercialization University of.
How to establish a successful IP Policy for Universities and Research Institutes Anton Habjanič, D.Sc. director of TechnoCenter at the UM ERF-FEMISE Expert.
Welcome to EGI Community Forum 2014 May 19 th, 2014 Anita Lehikoinen Permanent Secretary.
HMY 2012 Prof. Hagit Messer-Yaron President, OUI INTER-REGIONAL SEMINAR ON: Economic Issues of Intellectual Property Rights Sept. 11,
International Trends in Governance Reforms Jamil Salmi Global Tertiary Education Expert Sofia, 19 March 2012.
"Innovation-based Growth – the Development and the Future Challenges of the Finnish Innovation Environment” Timo Kekkonen Director, Confederation of Finnish.
Internationalization of Universities
The swedish research barometer 2016
Technology Transfer Office
Annex: Berlin Contract
April Chancellor’s Forum
Nicholas S. Argyres and Julia Porter Liebeskind
Gilbert Nicolaon Kiev June 10, 2008
IP Ownership, Benefit Sharing and Incentive for Researchers
Israel: The Start-Up Nation
Prof. Kiran Kalia, Director NIPER Ahmedabad
Presentation transcript:

Reconciling Science and Innovation in Israel – Lessons Learned Prof. Hagit Messer-Yaron Tel Aviv University Pargue, April 21, 2016

University vs. Industry- Contrasting Cultures: University Social responsibilities Basic, curiosity driven research Create new knowledge Freedom of research Publications & collaborations Sharing of material Open, global community and sharing of research results Corporate Shareholders responsibilities Applied research Develop new products Specific objectives, product focused Ownership and secrecy Control of material Aiming to global market

Academia Science "Valley Death" Products Industry The Death Valley

Commercialization of research results – not “all win” Why YES Direct contribution to short term growth. “Fair” and efficient use of public support. Improves exploitation of knowledge to the benefit of the public (e.g., new drugs). Why NO Risk the base of the academic culture: openness, freedom of research, diversity of topics, etc. May hazard innovation and therefore growth in the long run. Calls for bridging over the death valley by RESPONSIBLE TT

Responsible Technology Transfer: bridging over the gap, not closing it To be able to maintain excellence in science AND successful entrepreneurship in universities and research institutes the different cultures should be respected. IP policy and TT process should carefully consider the needs of BOTH sides.

Ex: Guidelines offered for responsible technology licensing by: CalTech Cornell Harvard MIT Stanford UC U of Illinois, Chicago U of Illinois, Chicago, Urbana-Champaign Univ. of Washington Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Yale AAMC (Assoc. of American Medical Colleges) March 2007 In the Public Interest: Nine Points to Consider in Licensing University Technology

The necessary conditions for academic research: Academic Freedom Research Community: Group of Colleagues to work with (critical mass) Research Conditions: Ongoing research funds Laboratory equipment (if relevant) Large Research Infrastructure (if relevant) Recognition & Personal rewarding Position, promotion system Salary & terms (incl. teaching duties) … Responsible TT Responsible TT is about commercializing research results while keeping and fostering all these conditions

Bridging over the “Death Valley” – HOW? Bridging over the “Death Valley” – HOW? Technology transfer mechanisms: Traditional: Teaching and students practice Individual entrepreneurship Modern relations between universities and industries: New venture formation/Spin-offs R&D agreements Licensing deals Academia Science Products Industry Responsible TT needs clear, transparent policy, aiming at keeping universities as mainly intellectual engines

Reconciling Science and Innovation YES Can it be done? YES How? By practicing “RESPONSIBLE TT” By whom? What is it? How does it work?.... Index of innovation Quality of Scientific Research Source: World economic forum, 2010

The Players: The Players: Industry, university, government industry university knowledge money Researchers (people!), Faculties, Administration, etc. Entrepreneurs VCs Productions Marketing Management Stocks holders etc. Technology Transfer Government

The Role of Governments 1. Financial support for academic, basic research. Public support is essential for academic freedom. 2. Legal infrastructure: intellectual property rights (IPR) laws, taxations, innovation law, etc. Should governments do more? My claim My claim – let HEIs be autonomous in running their TT business. Governments can be facilitators, e.g., by initiating intervention programs for “bridging the gap”. IPR

Mid-talk summary Scientific success depends on a culture of openness and freedom. Institutional responsibility for implementing TT as a complementary mission of the university Transparent guidelines are necessary Government involvement should be limited to facilitation ……

Science Lessons from IL experience – How to maintain top level Science together with successful High-Tech Industry?

14 Israel: Some Basic Data Area 22,072 sq. km. (NJ - 22,608) Population ~ 8.2 million (NJ ~ 8.4 million) GDP 306 billion $ ($38K per capita) State Budget328 billion NIS (2015) Education Budget45.5 billion NIS ( 13.8% from states budget ) HE Budget9.2 billion NIS ( 2.8% from state budget )

R&D statistics The expenditure on civilian research and development (R&D) as a percentage of the gross domestic product (GDP) : Source: World Economic Forum

R&D statistics The expenditure on civilian research and development (R&D) per capita : Source: ISRAEL CBS

Source: OECD Patents per 1000 population (2010)

Israel: Recent Nobel Laureates Arieh Warshel, Michael Levitt Chemistry, 2013, Weizmann Inst. Dan Shechtman,Chemistry, 2011, Technion Ada E. Yonath, Chemistry, 2009, Weizmann Inst. Ada E. Yonath Robert Aumann, Economics, 2005, HUJI Robert Aumann Aaron Ciechanover, Avram Hershko Chemistry, Technion Aaron CiechanoverAvram Hershko Daniel Kahneman, Economics, HUJI Daniel Kahneman

Publications/Capita, Switzerland Sweden Denmark Finland Israel Norway Singapore Netherlands Australia Canada New Zealand UK Belgium Austria USA Germany France Taiwan Greece Spain No. 5 in scientific publications/capita (in ‘84-’88 this was No. 1)

20 Average citations/paper : Israel, OECD, World, Avg. of 5.57 Citations/paper

Indicators of scientific research and innovation 2010 Index of innovation Quality of Scientific Research Source: World economic forum Israel

Source: OECD Normalized index relative to the median values in the OECD area (Index median = 100) Patents filed by Universities and research labs per $ of GDP – 2010

Where does it come from? HEIs in Israel 2014/15 Where does it come from? HEIs in Israel 2014/15 INSTITUTIONS 63* Research Universities 7 Open University 1 Art Academies 2 Comprehensive Colleges11 Engineering Colleges 7 Teachers ’ Colleges21 Non-Budgeted Colleges14 * All HEIs in IL are independent legal entities. Their institutional academic freedom is guaranteed by the CHE law (article 15)

24 HE in IL: Facts & Figures – 2014/2015 Students ~310,000 Bachelor 240,000 Master 60,000 Ph.D. 10,000 Faculty ~ 7,000 Tech & Admin. ~ 10,000 BUDGET (est. all sources) ~$3.6 billion

CHE/PBC Org. Director Staff The Higher Education System and its Interfaces The state Knesset Government Others Finance Education CHE Chair Vice Chair PBC Chair Higher Education Institutions Universities Budgeted Colleges Non-Budgeted Colleges Teachers’ Colleges Law 1958 Government Decision 1977

The 7 research universities 1923: The Technion 1925: The Hebrew University in Jerusalem 1934: The Weizmann Institute The establishment of the State of Israel (1948) 1955: Bar Ilan University 1963: Tel Aviv University 1969: Ben Gurion University 1972: Haifa University

Research University vs. College Teaching: Undergrad Teaching & research: Faculty, Graduate students Research: Grants, TT, Facilities, Inst. PRO HEI

Academic Ranking of World Universities – 2012 Israel World RankInstitutionCountry Rank 53The Hebrew University of Jerusalem1 78Technion – Israeli Institute of Technology2 93Weizmann Institute of Science Tel Aviv University Bar-Ilan University Ben-Gurion University5-6 * Institutions rank within the same rank range are listed alphabetically IL Universities in Shanghai ranking

Technology Transfer in Israel – How does it work? Generic IP legislation (Patents, Copy rights) Government’s involvement is limited to intervention programs Each university decides on its own policy and regulations independently. However, they share common principles Each university has its own TTC All TTCs are for-profit companies, own by the universities. TTCs are handling universities IP and are responsible for commercialization, following the university’s policy.

IP legislation (and more) in Israel The patent law (1967) defines “service invention” as one which has been invented by an employee as a result of his/her service to the employer. The law doesn’t cover many aspects of academic life, as: students, visitors, sabbaticals, retired stuff, etc. Thus, universities had to regulate it internally. No legislation w.r.to industrial R&D projects done in universities. It is up to the parties to agree on the conditions. In general, government doesn’t claim ownership of publicly sponsored research.

Weizmann InstituteYeda 1959 Hebrew UniversityYissum1964 Tel Aviv UniversityRamot1973 Each university has its own TTC

Main common TT principles: Researchers must disclose to the university any research of commercial potential. Universities own the IP of “institute inventions” (service invention). Institute inventions are discoveries of employees and others, related to the university. Institute inventions are commercialized solely by the TTC. Commercialization revenues are shared by the inventors (40- 50%; 50-60%) and the university. If the TTC chooses not to file for patent, the inventors can do it at their own expense.

The technology transfer process at TAU Revenues IDF Discovery & Innovation Evaluation Patenting & Marketing Strategy Business Development Follow Up on Contract Academic Basic and Applied Research “Bridging the Gap”Sponsored Research publications To inventors

Intervention Programs by the government KAMIN 100% 90% 60%

Approximately 400 new patent applications were filed each year in Israel and abroad by the TTCs (approximately 94% of total applications filed abroad). TTCs have been involved in the establishment of 151 startup companies, of which 44 startup companies are non-operational. In , approximately 1,000 IP invention disclosure reports were submitted; of those, the TTCs decided to protect approximately 700. Commercialization of Knowhow- Survey of technology transfer and IP companies

Lipimix | Tubilux Lipimix | Tubilux Exelon ® | Novartis Exelon ® | Novartis Doxil ® | J&J Doxil ® | J&J Cherry Tomatoes | BonTom Cherry Tomatoes | BonTom Periochip | Dexcel Periochip | Dexcel Selected TT Success Stories: Yeda, Yissum & Ramot (2009) QuantomiX TM | QX Capsule QuantomiX TM | QX Capsule Copaxone ® | Teva Copaxone ® | Teva Rebif ® | Merck Serono Rebif ® | Merck Serono Encryption Algorithm | NDS Encryption Algorithm | NDS GeneCards TM | XenneX GeneCards TM | XenneX NanoLub TM | Nanomaterials NanoLub TM | Nanomaterials Dunaliella | Nikken Sohonsha Dunaliella | Nikken Sohonsha Erbitux TM | ImClone Erbitux TM | ImClone Total sale of Weizmann based products €6 Bilion/year

International Comparison 200K Israel is internationally leading in ID, patents and revenues per researcher (about 200K euro commercialization income per a university researcher)

University-industry collaboration in R&D Level of innovation Source: World economic forum Israel University-Industry collaboration in R&D 2010

Univ. of California system297 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft182 CNRS146 MIT131 Univ. of Texas 96 California Inst. Tech. 84 Johns Hopkins 76 Univ. of Michigan 74 Columbia Univ. 68 Riken 67 Univ. of Florida 67 Hebrew Univ. 56 Weizmann Institute 54 Stanford 54 Academic institutions with more than 50 PCTs/year (2004)

Summary Most Israeli Universities had Technology Transfer policy and programslong before the BDA of The government has not been involved in the universities TT policy and/or implementation. IL TT policy is (was) VERY successful, with top universities leading both in academic achievements and in TT revenues. RESPONSIBLE technology transfer The key for success is their ability to practice RESPONSIBLE technology transfer - policy and implementation.

Future trends autonomy TT in IL has started by the research universities as a bottom-up operation, under their autonomy and the self-definition of their mission. Its success, and the 21-century trend to convert HEIs into “Economic Engines” have caught the attention of the government. After few unsuccessful attempts to regulate the universities TT operations, the top-down involvement has turned into adaptation of their best practice tools and applying it to other potential knowledge/technology sources.

Ex.: National TTC To explore the potential TT in colleges (and others), the government initiated “a national TTC”. Its structure of the operation is similar to universities’ TTCs, but it is financially supported by the PBC. This TTC must provide subsidized TT services to budgeted HEI, and can provide TT services to others.

Thank You