Richard F. Friedman Neal & Leroy, LLC Chicago, Illinois.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fort Myers/Lee County Enterprise Zone. Enterprise Zone Areas targeted for economic revitalization Areas targeted for economic revitalization Prior to.
Advertisements

HISTORIC Preservation Easements Michigan Historic Preservation Network May 29,2008.
Historic Preservation Tax Credits The Process and Avoiding Common Problems National Park Service, Technical Preservation Services.
Historic Preservation Tax Credits The Process and Avoiding Common Problems Charles E. Fisher New York City, June 2009 National Park Service, Technical.
Historic Preservation and Affordable Housing National Historic Tax Credit Conference Chicago September 2008 Judith L. Kitchen, Ohio Historic Preservation.
The Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office & 106 Reviews
State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) ACMP Conference Juneau, AK 2007.
Richard F. Friedman Neal & Leroy, LLC Chicago, Illinois.
HOPE VI Main Street Grants Contact Lawrence Gnessin Office of Public Housing Investments, Washington, DC
Economic Basics of Historic Preservation David Buck, Oshkosh Planning Services Steve Cummings, Oshkosh Landmarks Commission & Common Council.
Methods of Preserving Historic Neighborhood Character.
Preservation Tax Incentives for Historic Buildings A Joint Program of the following agencies: Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service Department.
Section 106, Section 4(f) and You!: The Role of Consulting Parties in Transportation Projects Kevin Mock, Historic Preservation Specialist Pennsylvania.
“TOD” Development Opportunity Case Studies for Reference & Historic Preservation Opportunities Moline, Illinois October 18, 2011.
NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT of 1966 as amended Garry J. Cantley Regional Archeologist Bureau of Indian Affairs.
SAN JUAN BAUTISTA THIRD STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT PROPERTY OWNERS INFORMATIONAL MEETING October 7, 2008.
Cultural Resources Management in the USFWS. Overview of Laws & Regulations 1906 – Present.
Historic Preservation in Indianapolis: Government Programs Presentation to Chapters of The Daughters of the American Revolution November 14, 2009 Indianapolis.
November 22, 2011 Historical Commission Mission : To promote, preserve and protect Alachua County’s historic resources.
Woodland-Larchmere Commercial Historic District Cleveland, Shaker Heights, Cuyahoga County, Ohio National Register Public Hearing May 21, 2015 Barbara.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
City of Dover Downtown Development District. Downtown Development District Act Approved unanimously by General Assembly in June 2014 Designation of Downtown.
Federal Preservation Activities: Part 1. What did With Heritage So Rich (1965) and the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 provide to administer.
Zoning The legislative division of an area into separate districts with different regulations within each district for land use, building size, and the.
Historic Preservation AMCV1550, Week 4. Movement’s beginnings Mount Vernon Ladies Association (1853) Designated National Historic Landmark 1960 – Role.
Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credits Federal Incentives for Preservation.
Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development Affordable Housing Cost Study May 15, 2009.
Driving Indiana’s Economic Growth. Management and Preservation of Indiana's Historic Bridges: A Programmatic Approach Thanks to Mead & Hunt & FHWA-IN.
COSCDA Workshop Renovation, Reconstruction and Renewal of Historic Properties and Neighborhoods Section 106 and Programmatic Agreements Overview.
Tax Increment Thomas Chapman Raymond James John Repsholdt Ehlers Steven Langert Consolidated High School District 230.
Cultural Resource Management An Introduction to Federal Heritage Preservation and the Law.
Municipal Tax Increment Financing Daniel Stevenson, Office of the Commissioner, DECD Phone:
Saving places. WHY A CHAPTER ON HISTORICAL RESOURCES in the MASTER PLAN ?  A Master Plan is required by Zoning  A Historic Resources Chapter is to aid.
© 2013 All rights reserved. Chapter 10 Municipal Agencies1 New York Real Estate for Salespersons, 5 th e By Marcia Darvin Spada Cengage Learning.
David Preziosi, Executive Director Mississippi Heritage Trust.
Local Government Preservation: Preservation where it counts.
The National Trust and its Programs. Developing the National Trust According to Charles Hosmer the discussion of a National Trust began with the English.
National Historic Districts And Why Taylor Should Be Among Them.
EM500-1 Environmental Foundations and Principals April 14, 2011.
Historic Preservation Memoranda of Agreement. What is an MOA? As part of the Section 106 review process, it is an agreement among an agency official,
Department of Sustainable Development and Construction Proposed Revision to the Historic Preservation Tax Exemptions and Economic Development Incentives.
“ Grand Landings North” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing March 3, 2015.
ARCH 5325 Conservation Policies Chapter 2 The Preservation Movement in the United States.
Financial Incentives June 25, Background 2006 – Landmark Commission established the adoption of financial incentives for historic properties as.
CITY PLANNING ACADEMY HISTORIC PRESERVATION CITY OF SACRAMENTO PRESERVATION OFFICE Community Development Department March 23, 2016.
How can we get from vacant to vibrant? Federal, state and local assistance.
Anth January 2012.
National Historic Tax Credit Conference Chicago September 24-26, 2008 “How Credits Become Capital: When and How to Syndicate” John M. Tess Heritage Consulting.
New York | Washington DC | London | Paris | Frankfurt | Hong Kong | Shanghai COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY- CURE Controls on Property: Zoning and Land Use David.
State College Borough Historic and Architectural Review Board
Redevelopment & Rehabilitation Projects
“Palm Coast 145, LLC” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning Planning and Land Development Regulation Board December 21, 2016.
101 New London Road Newark, Delaware
CLG Training Spokane, WA September 26, 2017 Karen Gordon
Palm Coast 145, LLC Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing September 5, 2017.
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission September 26, 2017
Department Activities
1133 Westchester Avenue, Suite N-202
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
Susan Barnes Vice-Chairman Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
May 8, 2018 Marion Werkheiser, Cultural Heritage Partners
National Historic Preservation Act
National Historic Preservation Act
2480 Oswego Street Application for Landmark Designation
Rochelle downtown Historic District
Protecting What We Love Building What We Need – The “H” Factor
Interior exterior Projects over $ State Commercial Permit
Browne’s Addition Local Historic District Plan Commission Workshop #1
National Historic Preservation Act
National Historic Preservation Act
Presentation transcript:

Richard F. Friedman Neal & Leroy, LLC Chicago, Illinois

 Masterwork Crown Hall on IIT Campus – Ludwig Mies van der Rohe

 Historic Site Site of Mrs. O’Leary’s barn Old Chicago Water Tower 4

 Ensemble Royal Street, French Quarter, New Orleans 5

 Future landmark Sharp Center for Design, OCAD University, Toronto, Will Alsop,

 Identify common heritage  Honor  Innovation  Beauty  Accomplishment  Tangible example of past  Sustainability  Tourism 7

 International—UNESCO World Heritage Site  National—National Historic Landmark or listed on National Register of Historic Places  State—listed or designated  Local—Locally designated landmark Cahokia Mounds near Colllinsville, IL 8

 International—protection from Fed. action.  National—limited: “take into account” / Fed. involvement  State—not used  Local—protection against change or destruction Alta Vista Terrace 9

 Elimination or reduction of economic exploitation 10

 Elimination or reduction of economic exploitation 11

 Additional governmental involvement in private property  Designation  Review and permit process  Must be open to the public (not!) Madlener House 12

 No objective standard for designation or review of demolition or modification application. Prentiss Women’s Hospital, Bertrand Goldberg,

 Early days – private preservation  George Washington’s estate, Mount Vernon, Virginia, purchased in 1858 by the Mount Vernon Ladies’ Association 14

 19 th and early 20 th Centuries – governmental Civil War veterans return to Gettysburg battlefield 15

 Urban renewal - -“With Heritage So Rich”  1960’s – local preservation laws  National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 Schiller (Garrick) Theater, Dankmar Adler and Louis Sullivan,

Fifth Amendment: “Nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation” Regulatory takings v. physical takings 17

 National Register of Historic Places  Submission through State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO)  Listing by United States Dept. of Interior  Local Designation  Recommendation (after hearing) by Landmark Commission  Approval by City Council/Village Board 19

 National Register of Historic Places  National Register Districts  Contributing structures  National Historic Landmarks Sheridan Plaza Apartments, 4607 N. Sheridan 20

 Limited to Federal funds or permits  No prohibition against demolition  agency must “take into account”  Sec. 106 of NHPA  Stronger protection in transp. projects  Demol. only if no prudent and feasible alternative  Sec. 4f of Dept. of Transp. Act 21

 Analyze project for federal or state involvement, such as:  Federal  Section 404—Wetlands-U.S. Army Corps of Eng.  Public involvement or approval—HUD; University  Major projects—NEPA Environmental Impact EIS  State  Ill. Environmental Protection Agency ▪ Sewer permits 22

 Process delegated to the states  SHPO administers  In Illinois Ill. State. Hist. Pres. Agency (IHPA)  Consultation with federal funding or permitting agency  Consultation with Advisory Council (ACHP)  Consultation with “interested parties” 23

24

 National Register of Historic Places  State Web site  HARGIS-Historic and Architectural Resources Geographic Information System  Local designation  City Web site and FOIA  Buildings recognized but not protected  Non-historic review ▪ Zoning ▪ Architectural review boards 25 Historic and Architectural Resources Geographic Information Sys Historic

 Determination of Eligibility for the National Register  By the SHPO  Orange-rated (Chicago) 26

 Individual structures  Historic Districts 27

 Building/demolition permits are reviewed by landmark commission  Inconsistent remodeling is not permitted  Designation does not include interiors (unless exceptional)  Private landmarks are not open to the public 28

 Certificate of appropriateness  Certificate of economic hardship  Owner must prove no economic benefit or return  Penn Central standard  It is insufficient to show a mere reduction in value 29

30

31

 Deductible as charitable donation to non- profit organization  Permanent surrender of right to modify or demolish protected element  National Register or local landmark district 32

 Better than a tax deduction  National Register or local historic district  Tax credit = 20% of rehab costs  Rehab must be certified as historic  Credits may sold to provide immediate funds  Commercial, industrial or residential rehab  Must be for-profit 33

 Not a landmark or listed on National Register  Tax credit = 10% of rehab costs  Rehab need not be certified as historic but must retain historic walls  Credits may sold to provide immediate funds  Residential rehab not eligible  Pre-1936 buildings only 34

 Single-family up to 6-unit (owner-occupied)  National Register/local designation or district  Eight-year assessment freeze, then four-year kick up  Certified rehab Charles N. Loucks House 35

 Class L  Available to Class 3, 4, or 5a or 5b (commercial)  Nat. Reg. property or local dist.  Approved by City Council  Tax rate reduced 60% for 10 years  Rehab must be certified by IHPA  Investment = 50% of assessed  value of improvement Chicago Board of Trade 36

 State tax credits  Fee waivers  Grants  Advice  Zoning bonus—Adopt-a-Landmark  TIF and other development assistance  Not specifically historic 37

Richard F. Friedman attorney at law Neal & Leroy, LLC 120 N. LaSalle St. Suite 2600 Chicago, IL