Multimedia Advances in Evaluation: The Use of Skype, Elluminate, and 3D Virtual World Technologies in Conducting Focus Group Interviews Evaluation, Assessment,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A GUIDE TO CREATING QUALITY ONLINE LEARNING DOING DISTANCE EDUCATION WELL.
Advertisements

STEM ACTION CENTER HB 150 Applied Science 7 th and 8 th Grade STEM Pathways and Certification.
Investigating Distance Professional Development: Lessons Learned from Research Michael J. Bossé & Robin L. Rider East Carolina University.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS TRAINING 2-Day Training for Phase I, II and III *This 2-Day training is to be replicated to meet.
From Computer Based Simulations to 3D Virtual Learning Building Bridges to Collaborative Learning Spaces Diane D. Chapman, Sophia J. Stone, Dede Nelson.
OCTOBER 25, m-NET Mobilizing National Educator Talent (“m-NET”) is an innovative, nontraditional program to help special education teachers earn.
Noyce Program Evaluation Conference Thursday, December 6, 2007 Frances Lawrenz Michelle Fleming Pey-Yan Liou Christina Madsen Karen Hofstad-Parkhill 1.
Dogan Seber, PhD San Diego Supercomputer Center University of California, San Diego I. DLESE Library II. DISCOVER OUR EARTH Earth Science Resources for.
PROJECT SHARE: THE BIG PICTURE. Karen Teeters Need Help with Project Share or OnTrack ?
Benefits of Blended e-Learning in Education
McWeadon Education, USA
How to Teach a Science Course Online. Y Generation (1982–2001) Is Our Educational System Designed For Them? ➔ View lectures as boring and uninteresting.
TEKS & Activities Desktop Publishing.
1 Welcome to Julius West MS Middle School Reform Phase II:
Career Cruising can be translated into Spanish!
PROJECT SHARE: THE BIG PICTURE. Karen Teeters Need Help with Project Share or OnTrack ?
Blackboard Strategies: Using Blackboard Pedagogically.
Feb. 2006RUFO- 2nd Workshop Al-Quds University Rashid Jayousi, PhD Computer Science Dept. Experiences in E-learning.
Addressing the Pre-service Learning Needs of Education Majors in Math and Science Through Technology
WHAT IS “CLASS”? A BRIEF ORIENTATION TO THE CLASS METHODOLOGY.
The Integration of Embedded Librarians at Tuskegee University Juanita M. Roberts Director Library Services Ford Motor Company Library/Learning Resources.
1 DR. BADRUL HUDA KHAN MCWEADON EDUCATION, USA DR. BADRUL HUDA KHAN
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
The Mechanics of Putting Your Courses Online Summer Institute 2003 Lesley Blicker, Office of Instructional Technology
Learning and Teaching Technology Integration Dr. Brush Research Group
Teaching with Multimedia and Hypermedia
Teaching and Learning with Technology  Allyn and Bacon 2002 Distance Education: Using Technology to Redefine the Classroom Chapter 11 Teaching and Learning.
Transition to Teaching Recruiting, Preparing, and Retaining Science Teachers through TTT Beatriz Ceja, Gillian Cohen-Boyer and Thelma Leenhouts U.S. Department.
SUCCESSFULLY PREPARING ALL STUDENTS FOR THEIR FUTURES SE 256 TH STREET, KENT, WA | TECH TALKS: TOOLS WORTH KNOWING Professional.
EEA 2012 – Middle School STEM Day 1, PM Content Session.
STEM Can Lead the Way Marcella Klein Williams California STEM Learning Network.
Models of Online Learning – Identifying Components Week 3 Introduction to Web-Based Mentoring and Distance Education.
Work Group on Student-Centered Learning in High School August 20, :00-3:30pm.
The Evaluation of IMPACT V Jeni Corn, Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College of Education.
Using virtual collaboration tools for designing innovative education scenarios Gabriel Dima University “Politehnica” of Bucharest, Romania.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
September 2007 Survey Development Rita O'Sullivan Evaluation, Assessment, & Policy Connections (EvAP) School of Education, University of North Carolina-Chapel.
STARTALK: Our mission, accomplishments and direction ILR November 12, 2010.
USING TECHNOLOGY TO PROMOTE CULTURAL UNDERSTANDING IN HIGHER EDUCATION CLASSROOMS.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
Evaluation of the Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program 2010 NSF Noyce Conference Abt Associates Inc. July 9, 2010.
Professional Development Opportunities for the New Math Standards.
STEM EDUCATION TRANSFORMATION Barbara McAllister May 2013 INTEL’S MODEL FOR.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
1 NH PACE Tier 2 Leadership PLC Session 1 September 28, 2015.
Science Department Draft of Goals, Objectives and Concerns 2010.
UNC Deans Council The North Carolina K-12 Digital Learning Transition Glenn Kleiman Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Government of Nepal Ministry of Education National Center for Educational Development.
The combination of traditional Learning and e-learning.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
Cynthia Brown, DNS, RN, AHN-BC,CNE University of West Georgia Bekir Mugayitoglu, EdD(c) Duquesne University Sharon A. Cumbie, PhD, RN, CNS University of.
Learning & Innovation Hot Topic Conversations CLAS : Connected Learning Advisory Service TAFE.
Fostering Sustained Impact: Lessons Learned from Geoscience Faculty Workshops Ellen Roscoe Iverson, Cathryn A. Manduca, Science Education Resource Center,
REDUCING COGNITIVE OVERLOAD IN THE VIRTUAL CLASSROOM Sylvia Reeves EDU697 Capstone: A Project Approach Instructor Dennis Lawrence February 1, 2013.
A Professional Development Series from the CDC’s Division of Population Health School Health Branch Professional Development 101: The Basics – Part 1.
Creative Intervention Planning through Universal Design for Learning MariBeth Plankers, M.S. CCC-SLP Page 127.
Welcome to the Zone-Level District Trainer Program Helping you to plan and conduct training meetings that support effective Rotary clubs.
A Framework for Assessing Needs Across Multiple States, Stakeholders, and Topic Areas Stephanie Wilkerson & Mary Styers REL Appalachia American Evaluation.
Using Blackboard as a Tool to Teach Online Technology Skills in College Classrooms Dr. Victoria Haddad Adjunct Professor, College of Technology Wilmington.
AEA Coffee Break Webinar Series: Graduate and Certificate Programs in Evaluation Evaluation, Assessment, & Policy Connections (EvAP) School of Education,
Expand Your Online Course Catalogue with a Capacity Building Approach Barbara Treacy, EDC/EdTech Leaders Online Tracy Sanders, South Carolina Virtual School.
Madelyn Valine-Taylor. Synchronous Learning Agenda Advantages Disadvantage Strategies Tools for Enhancement Video/Audio Questions.
Multiple literacy Standards for the 21st-Century learner
Collaborative Leadership
Building Academic Language
Building Academic Language
Building Academic Language
Continuous Assessment Establishing Checkpoints
Presentation transcript:

Multimedia Advances in Evaluation: The Use of Skype, Elluminate, and 3D Virtual World Technologies in Conducting Focus Group Interviews Evaluation, Assessment, & Policy Connections (EvAP) Dr. Rita O'Sullivan, Director School of Education, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill 919/ Johnavae Campbell, Corliss Brown, Jessica Milton, & Lauren Kendall AEA November 2010

Demonstration Agenda I. Introduction II. Web-based technology III. Choosing a medium IV. Preparation- evaluator/participants V. Demonstration: Elluminate, Teleplace, & Skype VI. Summary AEA November 2010

Evaluation, Assessment and Policy Connections (EvAP) EvAP builds evaluation capacity, effectiveness of organizations, and sustainability of successful programs 1. Conduct evaluations of educational, community, and service organizations 2. Provide training and technical assistance in evaluation, assessment, and strategic planning 3. Offer Evaluation Institutes for building understanding in systematic, collaborative, program evaluation

Introduction Advantages of web-based technologies for focus group evaluation research include: Reduced costs – logistical and travel expenses Accessibility and flexibility Increased recruitment opportunities of participants Innovative ways for participants to articulate their experiences and opinions Multiple methods of communicability Increased engagement and participation Provides relative anonymity and can minimize the perception of power differentials Expedites respondent communications and document exchange AEA November 2010

Technology Components Each program has at least five basic components:  Real-time discussion capacity  Chat/Instant messaging capabilities  Document sharing  Free trial services  Online tutorials

AEA November 2010 Choosing a Medium Start with your evaluation plan. Ask yourself the following questions to help determine if one of these options may be right for your team. What do you hope to accomplish? Remember, not all topics are appropriate for web-based focus groups. If you are interested in sharing things like photos, documents, or stories this is a great tool. Who is your audience? Are you working with students, teachers or a demographic who may have access to computers or a lab? Are they comfortable using a computer to share information? If not, this may not be right for you. Where are your participants located? Are you interested in working with participants who are not in the same geographic location? This may be a great option!

AEA November 2010 Preparation- for evaluator Learn Program  Are there training sessions offered? Have you used the program before? Create Focus Group Protocol  The focus group protocol should be created based on the evaluation plan. As always, the questions may change depending on the responses and dynamics of the group. Plan Virtual Focus Group  Decide how you will use the technology. Will participants use audio, chat, visual, or a combination? Do you need to show the participants documents or applications? How will you ensure all attending are engaged and able to participate? How much time will you need? Will you do a pilot test?

Preparation- for participants Invitation to focus group.  Who is participating?  What preparation/material/equipment is needed?  What program is sponsoring the focus group?  When is the focus group (include log-in time)?  Where can participants gain access (internet link)? Introduction to program  Training session. In-depth instruction on features of the program and how-to access program  Brief Introduction. Overview of features of program and procedures for focus group AEA November 2010

What is Elluminate? Elluminate Live!® enables instructors and students to interact and collaborate in real time to combine blended online/onsite learning activities. Elluminate refers to it as Edu 2.0, similar to Web 2.0, allowing for dynamic, shared content building in real-time. AEA November 2010

Why use Elluminate? UNC-BEST Program Goals of Program  place teachers in high-needs schools  attract minority teachers to math and science  provide high quality research and laboratory experiences As part of the evaluation focus groups were conducted with the instructors, seniors, and graduates from the previous year. Graduates were teaching in various parts of North Carolina AEA November 2010

An Elluminate Focus Group Question-based discussion  Chat  Audio  Polling/Emoticons Document-based discussion  Microsoft Office document sharing  Live website sharing Data Analysis  Recording AEA November 2010

Elluminate Demonstration Moderator Link Participant Link Recording Link AEA November 2010

Teleplace: A 3D virtual meeting space Program Background  Evaluated an NSF funded grant that used 3D immersive virtual world technology to;  Increase STEM interest among participating middle school students  Increase 3D technology integration among participating teachers AEA November 2010

Teleplace: A 3D virtual meeting space Evaluation Questions  What was the perceived quality of delivery of the summer workshop?  Did students teach teachers 3D technological skills?  Did students adequately prepare to teach teachers?  How did students collaborate in the virtual world during the summer workshops?  How have students collaborated since the summer?  How have teachers engaged students in the use of 3D world tools to explore solutions to real world problems?  Are middle school students more motivated to pursue ICT careers after participation in the STEM-ICT 3D program? AEA November 2010

Teleplace: A 3D virtual meeting space Virtual interviews were intended to;  Find out more about their experiences in the summer workshop (including the worlds they created) and since the summer workshop  Assess students’ interest in STEM and STEM ICT careers  Engage students in using the technology AEA November 2010

Teleplace: A 3D virtual meeting space Decision based on following factors;  Students spread out geographically  Needed access to students during the school day  Student-created worlds in Teleplace  High-level of engagement with technology AEA November 2010

Skype Demonstration Program Background Burroughs Wellcome Fund Career Award for Science and Mathematics Teachers (BWF) program goals: Increase pedagogical and content knowledge of science and mathematics Increase professional development and collaboration with other master science and mathematics teachers Develop teachers as leaders in the field AEA November 2010

Skype Demonstration Virtual interview was intended to:  Provide technical assistance in developing Evaluation Logic Models  Frame program activities  Determine desired program outcomes  Identify data collection strategies  Plan for process and outcome evaluation of program activities AEA November 2010

Skype Demonstration Decision based on following factors:  Geographic barriers  Convenience of choosing location  Expedite respondent communications and document sharing  Innovative way to communicate Features utilized during the session:  Document Sharing  Audio and Visual Communication  Audio Recording AEA November 2010

Skype Welcome Page AEA November 2010

Skype Calling AEA November 2010

Skype Talking AEA November 2010

Skype Conferencing AEA November 2010

Skype Group Talk AEA November 2010

Skype Document Sharing AEA November 2010

Synopsis Considerations  Cost: What will it cost the evaluator and participants?  Access: Do participants have access to computers with Internet?  Participant Engagement: Will participants be comfortable using this medium?  Communicability: How do you want participants to communicate (text, talk, etc.)? AEA November 2010

Synopsis cont. Refer to your evaluation plan Choose the appropriate medium  What, if anything, does an internet-based focus group offer or allow for that a face-to-face focus group does not? Prepare as the evaluator  Consider additional technology-related factors (connectivity, availability, accessibility)  Determine how you will utilize the technology and practice using it (responsibilities of moderator/assistant moderator)  Prepare protocol, including specific measures/instructions for participants  Pilot-test Prepare participants AEA November 2010

Contact Information EvAP: Find us on the web at: (919) Rita O’Sullivan, Director: Johnavae Campbell: Corliss Brown: Jessica Milton: Lauren Kendall: AEA November 2010