Cosmic Ray Positron Fraction Observations during the A- Magnetic Solar Minimum John Clem and Paul Evenson* * Presenter AESOP Departing Esrange, Sweden.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QUICK QUIZ 23.1 (For the end of section 23.2)
Advertisements

Uncovering the Global Slow Solar Wind Liang Zhao and Thomas H. Zurbuchen Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences, University of Michigan.
Chapter 26: The Magnetic Field
ELENA VANNUCCINI ON BEHALF OF PAMELA COLLABORATION Measurement of the Hydrogen and Helium absolute fluxes with the PAMELA experiment.
E. Mocchiutti, INFN Trieste - CALOR th June 2006, Chicago E. Mocchiutti 1, M. Albi 1, M. Boezio 1, V. Bonvicini 1, J. Lund 2, J. Lundquist 1, M.
Investigation of daily variations of cosmic ray fluxes in the beginning of 24 th solar activity cycle Ashot Chilingarian, Bagrat Mailyan IHY-ISWI Regional.
S. Della Torre 1,2, P. Bobik 5, G. Boella 1,3, M.J. Boschini 1,4, C. Consolandi 1, M. Gervasi 1,3, D. Grandi 1, K. Kudela 5, F. Noventa 1,3, S. Pensotti.
At the start of the 20th century, scientists have been puzzled by the fact that the air in electroscopes-instruments became charged or ionized no matter.
GLAST The GLAST Balloon Flight experiment was performed with the collaboration of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center,
The Movement of Charged Particles in a Magnetic Field
Magnetism The Magnetic Force x x x v F B q  v F B q   v F = 0 B q.
Shantanu Menon Thomas Irons Michael Jacoutot. Cosmic Rays  High energy particles (mainly protons) from outer space.  Have up to 10 million times more.
1 Observations of Charge Sign Dependence in Solar Modulation Kiruna 2006 LEE (Low Energy Electrons) August 17, 2005 John Clem and Paul Evenson GSFC Collaborators:
Paul Evenson, Waraporn Nuntiyakul,
Physics of fusion power Lecture 6: Conserved quantities / Mirror device / tokamak.
2/xx/07184 Lecture 221 PHY 184 Week 6 Spring 2007 Lecture 22 Title: The Lorentz Force = q v x B.
Five Spacecraft Observations of Oppositely Directed Exhaust Jets from a Magnetic Reconnection X-line Extending > 4.3 x 10 6 km in the Solar Wind Gosling.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8: Conserved quantities / mirror / tokamak.
Presented by Steve Kliewer Muon Lifetime Experiment: A Model.
Neutron Monitor Detection Efficiency John Clem University of Delaware 2004 Annual CRONUS Collaboration Meeting.
Absence of a Long Lasting Southward Displacement of the HCS Near the Minimum Preceding Solar Cycle 24 X. P. Zhao, J. T. Hoeksema and P. H. Scherrer Stanford.
CLEO Particle Detectors Thomas Coan SMU What to detect? How to probe? What is a “detector?” Putting it all together Some examples.
Chapter 28 Magnetic Fields Key contents Magnetic fields and the Lorentz force The Hall effect Magnetic force on current The magnetic dipole moment.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 7: particle motion.
MP BACH MultiPixel Balloon-borne Air CHerenkov Detection of Iron Cosmic Rays Using Direct Cherenkov Radiation Imaged with a High Resolution Camera 1.
Paul Evenson January Low Energy Electron Observations (LEE, AESOP and the Historical Context) Paul Evenson and John Clem University of Delaware.
AP Physics C Montwood High School R. Casao
MPBACH MultiPixel Balloon-borne Air CHerenkov Detection of Iron Cosmic Rays Using Direct Cherenkov Radiation Imaged with a High Resolution Camera 1.
MP BACH MultiPixel Balloon-borne Air CHerenkov Detection of Iron Cosmic Rays Using Direct Cherenkov Radiation Imaged with a High Resolution Camera University.
John Clem and Paul Evenson University of Delaware 30-June-2010 Source of Funding/Grant : NASA Solar and Heliospheric Physics SR&T / NNX08BA62G AESOP Anti-Electron.
Solar Modulation: A Theoretical Perspective Modeling of cosmic ray charge-sign dependence in the heliosphere Marius Potgieter Unit for Space Physics North-West.
ASEN 5335 Aerospace Environments -- Radiation Belts1 The Radiation Belts A radiation belt is a population of energetic particles stably-trapped by the.
Group 2.  Students in grade 12 or 1 st year university (depends on the country and the program)  Prerequisite knowledge:  Electric and magnetic fields.
Keep the standard candle of electron observations burning Provide an intercalibration with PAMELA and AMS Search for the origin of the turn up in the low.
Observations of Charge Sign Dependence in Solar Modulation John Clem and Paul Evenson GSFC Collaborators: Louis Barbier John Krizmanic University of Delaware.
1 Observations of Charge Sign Dependence in Solar Modulation Kiruna 2011 LEE Low Energy Electrons P.I.C. June 30, 2010 John Clem and Paul Evenson.
When charged particles move through magnetic fields, they experience a force, which deflects them Examples of such particles are electrons, protons, and.
P. Bobik, G. Boella, M. J. Boschini, M. Gervasi, D. Grandi, K. Kudela, S. Pensotti, P.G. Rancoita 2D Stochastic Monte Carlo to evaluate the modulation.
1 PEBS Prototype PERDaix was launched in October 2010 from Kiruna, Sweden.
Chapter 8 Charges in Magnetic Fields. Introduction In the previous chapter it was observed that a current carrying wire observed a force when in a magnetic.
Aa GLAST Particle Astrophysics Collaboration Instrument Managed and Integrated at SLAC/Stanford University The Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope (GLAST)
Trapped positrons and electrons observed by PAMELA Vladimir Mikhailov NRNU MEPHI, Moscow, Russia For PAMELA collaboration ICPPA 2015, PAMELA workshop,
Cosmic Rays2 The Origin of Cosmic Rays and Geomagnetic Effects.
H, He, Li and Be Isotopes in the PAMELA-Experiment Wolfgang Menn University of Siegen On behalf of the PAMELA collaboration International Conference on.
GLAST The GLAST Balloon Flight experiment was performed with the collaboration of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center,
16-20 Oct 2005SSPVSE Conference1 Galactic Cosmic Ray Composition, Spectra, and Time Variations Mark E. Wiedenbeck Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California.
February 7, Long Term Decline of South Pole Neutron Monitor Counting Rate – A Possible Magnetospheric Interpretation Paul Evenson, John Bieber,
Direct measurements of cosmic rays in space ROBERTA SPARVOLI ROME “TOR VERGATA” UNIVERSITY AND INFN, ITALY Vulcano Workshop 2014 Vulcano Island (Italy),
Charge Sign Dependence in Cosmic Ray Solar Modulation John Clem and Paul Evenson Bartol Research Institute, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University.
MP BACH MultiPixel Balloon-borne Air CHerenkov Detection of Iron Cosmic Rays Using Direct Cherenkov Radiation Imaged with a High Resolution Camera 1.
The heliospheric magnetic flux density through several solar cycles Géza Erdős (1) and André Balogh (2) (1) MTA Wigner FK RMI, Budapest, Hungary (2) Imperial.
The Hall Effect AP Physics Montwood High School R.Casao.
Periodic Variations in Muon Flux at Project GRAND Thomas A. Catanach, John Poirier ICRC August 2011.
E. W. Grashorn, for the MINOS Collaboration Observation of Shadowing in the Underground Muon Flux in MINOS This poster was supported directly by the U.S.
Solar Magnetic Fields. Capacitors in Circuits Charge takes time to move through wire  V is felt at the speed of light, however Change in potential across.
1 A. Zech, Instrumentation in High Energy Astrophysics Chapter 6.2: space based cosmic ray experiments.
GROUND-LEVEL EVENT (GLE)
Solar modulation of cosmic ray positrons in a quiet heliosphere
CHARGE SIGN DEPENDENCE OF LONG TERM COSMIC RAY MODULATION
INFN e Università di Roma Tor Vergata
Solar Modulation Davide Grandi AMS Group-INFN Milano-Bicocca.
Cosmic-Ray Lithium and Beryllium Isotopes in the PAMELA-Experiment
Measurements of Cosmic-Ray Lithium and Beryllium Isotopes
Hall C KPP Demonstration March 10, 2017.
Cosmic Ray Electron Spectrum in 2009
Rick Leske, A. C. Cummings, R. A. Mewaldt, and E. C. Stone
Ulysses COSPIN High Energy Telescope observations of cosmic ray and solar energetic particles intensities since its distant Jupiter flyby in 2004 R.B.
by W. R. Binns, M. H. Israel, E. R. Christian, A. C. Cummings, G. A
by W. R. Binns, M. H. Israel, E. R. Christian, A. C. Cummings, G. A
Presentation transcript:

Cosmic Ray Positron Fraction Observations during the A- Magnetic Solar Minimum John Clem and Paul Evenson* * Presenter AESOP Departing Esrange, Sweden

The combination of the outward flowing solar wind and the solar rotation produces the spiral geometry of solar magnetic field lines as shown above. A+ symbol represents the case when the dipole axis projection rotation axis is positive and A- the projection is negative Reversals of the solar magnetic field occurs every 11 years. q>0 q<0 q>0 Drift Directions As the particle moves along a curved magnetic field line it experiences a centrifugal force due to the field curvature, and therefore the particle trajectory drifts perpendicular to both the centrifugal force and B. In this case, it is either toward or away from neutral current sheet depending on the charge sign and polarity. Gradients in the HCS will also cause drifts. It is important to note the resulting drift direction is charged sign dependent. 19

Illustrates how the response of electrons and nuclei to changing conditions in interplanetary space is qualitatively similar but quantitatively different. Fluxes are low when the sun is active and high when the sun is inactive, however particles with opposite sign to the polarity state reveal a narrower time profile than those with like charge-sign. The electron profile in the 1990s seems to be broader than the helium spike profile observed in the 1980s possibly due to positron component in the electron observations. 1.2GV Electrons 1.2GV Helium Time Profile of Helium and Electron observations at a rigidity of ~1.2 GV Filled Symbols Open Symbols Magnetic Polarity

AESOP instrument Schematic Drawings of the instruments. Briefly, AESOP detects electrons with plastic scintillators T1, T3 and G (anticoincidence) and the gas Cherenkov detector T2. It measures the electron energy in a leadglass (T5) calorimeter. Scintillator cup T6 also assists in particle identification and energy determination by counting the number of particles that escape the calorimeter. A permanent magnet and a spark chamber SC1,2,3 hodoscope determine the charge sign and momentum of the electron. 25

Vertical axis: Energy measured in the Pb-Glass calorimeter Horizontal: the trajectory deflection in the magnet in units of inverse rigidity. Curve represents the ideal instrument response for positrons (positive side) and electrons (negative side). The red symbols represents those events tagged as high energy protons (E>20GeV to trigger gas CK) as determined by the T3 scintillator detector. The particle ID and energy of each event is assign using a likelyhood analysis 27 AESOP 2006 flight trajectory

Solid line is the modulated (charge sign independent, i.e. no drifts) abundance as calculated by Protheroe (1982). Dashed lines are from Clem et al. (1996) for A+ (top line) and A- (bottom line). Solid symbols show data taken in the A+ state, while the open symbols represent data taken in the A- state. The world summary of observations. Compiled AESOP balloon instrument measurements and calculations of the positron abundance including the 2006 preliminary results.

Shaded rectangles represent periods of well defined magnetic polarity. The black line is a positron abundance prediction based on the analysis of Clem et al. (1996). The red line is an antiproton/proton ratio drift (steady- state) model (Bieber et al. 1999) interpolated to 1.3GV. The current sheet tilt angles used in the drift model were acquired from the Wilcox Solar Observatory database. Dashed lines represent the predicted results for future observations. The anti-protons were measured by the series of BESS flights (Asaoka et al. 2002). Time profile of positron abundance (black) and anti-proton ratio (red) at a rigidity of roughly 1.3GV.