SPEERMINT Architecture - Reinaldo Penno Juniper Networks SPEERMINT, IETF 70 Vancouver, Canada 2 December 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SIP Interconnect Guidelines draft-hancock-sip-interconnect-guidelines-02 David Hancock, Daryl Malas.
Advertisements

1 SIP End-to-End Performance Metrics (draft-ietf-pmol-sip-perf-metrics-00.txt)draft-ietf-pmol-sip-perf-metrics-00.txt 71 st IETF Conference PMOL Daryl.
1 Use Cases & Requirements IETF#78, Maastricht, NL.
© 2006 NEC Corporation - Confidential age 1 November SPEERMINT Security Threats and Suggested Countermeasures draft-ietf-speermint-voipthreats-01.
1 IP Telephony (VoIP) CSI4118 Fall Introduction (1) A recent application of Internet technology – Voice over IP (VoIP): Transmission of voice.
Halifax, 31 Oct – 3 Nov 2011ICT Accessibility For All Wayne Zeuch, ATIS ATIS Cybersecurity Standards Document No: GSC16-GTSC9-10 Source: ATIS Contact:
Omniran TG 1 Cooperation for OmniRAN P802.1CF Max Riegel, NSN (Chair OmniRAN TG)
Recommendations for IPv6 in 3GPP Standards draft-wasserman-3gpp-advice-00.txt IPv6-3GPP Design Team Salt Lake City IETF December 2001.
Problem Statement and Architecture for Information Exchange Between Interconnected Traffic Engineered Networks draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-03.txt.
Voice over IP Fundamentals
August 2005IETF 63 VOIPEER1 Issues in Numbering, Naming and Addressing voipeer BoF IETF 63 – Paris, August 2005 Richard Stastny ÖFEG.
Jacob Boston Josh Pfeifer. Definition of HyperText Transfer Protocol How HTTP works How Websites work GoDaddy.com OSI Model Networking.
 3G is the third generation of tele standards and technology for mobile networking, superseding 2.5G. It is based on the International Telecommunication.
Secure Telephony Enabled Middle-box (STEM) Maggie Nguyen Dr. Mark Stamp SJSU - CS 265 Spring 2003 STEM is proposed as a solution to network vulnerabilities,
1 SIPREC Requirements IETF #80 Authors: K. Rehor, A. Hutton, L. Portman, R. Jain, H. Lam.
MIF API draft-ietf-mif-api-extension-05 Dapeng Liu.
SIP Interconnect Guidelines draft-hancock-sip-interconnect-guidelines-03 David Hancock, Daryl Malas.
IEEE Emergency Services DCN: Title: call flow for Layer 2 support for unauthenticated requests Date.
Copyright © 2006 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidentialwww.juniper.net 1 draft-penno- message-flows-02 Reinaldo Penno, Daryl Malas, Adam Uzelac,
Copyright © 2004 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidentialwww.juniper.net 1 ANCP protocol draft updates draft-ietf-ancp-protocol-00.txt ANCP.
Issues of HIP in an Operators Network Nick Papadoglou Thomas Dietz.
Ernst Langmantel Technical Director, Austrian Regulatory Authority for Broadcasting and Telecommunication (RTR GmbH) The opinions expressed in this presentation.
A Framework for Management and Control of Optical Interfaces supporting G draft-kunze-g management-control-framework-02 March rd IETF.
December 5, 2003FG3 Report FOCUS GROUP 3 Interoperability Report to NRIC VI Council December 5, 2003 Cliff Naughton (Boeing)
ENUM? “ Telephone Number Mapping (ENUM or Enum, from TElephone NUmber Mapping) is a suite of protocols to unify the telephone numbering system E.164 with.
1 NGN Issues - Numbering and Addressing Peter Darling ACIF NGN FOG No. 3.
RIPE64 Enum Working Group DE-CIX NGN Services.
ENUM Update for voipeer BOF Richard Shockey ENUM co-chair IETF 63 Paris.
MGCP Megaco H.248 by Bob Young. MGCP - Megaco - H.248 "It's all one."
1 IPFIX Protocol Specifications IPFIX IETF-59 March 3, 2004 Benoit Claise Mark Fullmer Reinaldo Penno Paul Calato Stewart Bryant Ganesh Sadasivan.
DOCUMENT #: GSC15-GTSC8-06 FOR: Presentation SOURCE: ATIS AGENDA ITEM: GTSC8; 4.2 CONTACT(S): Art Reilly ATIS Cybersecurity.
© 2004 AT&T, All Rights Reserved. The world’s networking company SM VoIP, Portability, and the Evolution of Addressing LNPA & Future of Numbering Working.
Draft-khan-ip-serv-peer-arch-03.txt SPEERMINT Peering Architecture IETF-66, Montreal, Canada Sohel Khan, Ph.D. Technology Strategist.
Draft-rosen-ecrit-emergency- framework-00 Brian Rosen NeuStar CPa
SPEERMINT Terminology Draft th IETF - Chicago Editors: Daryl Malas David Meyer.
1January 2006Richard Stastny Developments around Infrastucture ENUM and their relevance on NGNs Workshop on NGN Interconnection and Numbering TRIS – TISPAN.
Draft-kellil-sam-mtocp-01.txt – CEA, LIST - 78th IETF Meeting, 29July Multiparty Transport Overlay Control Protocol (MTOCP) draft-kellil-sam-mtocp-01.txt.
SIP Performance Benchmarking draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-02 draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-meth-02 July 24, 2010 Prof. Carol Davids, Illinois Inst. of Tech.
Peering Considerations for Directory Assistance and Operator Services - John Haluska Telcordia SPEERMINT, IETF 68 Prague, Czech Republic 20 March 2007.
DNS SRV and NAPTR Use for SPEERMINT - Tom Creighton, Gaurav Khandpur Comcast SPEERMINT Intermin Meeting Philadelphia Sept
The State of VoIP Peering Charles Studt Director of Product Management, VoEX.
7/6/20061 Speermint Use Case for Cable IETF 66 Yiu L. Lee JULY 2006.
DOCUMENT #: GSC15-GTSC8-06 FOR: Presentation SOURCE: ATIS AGENDA ITEM: GTSC8; 4.2 CONTACT(S): Art Reilly ATIS Cybersecurity.
1 SPEERMINT Use Cases for Cable IETF 66 Montreal 11 JULY 2006 Presented by Yiu L. Lee.
Omar A. Abouabdalla Network Research Group (USM) SIP – Functionality and Structure of the Protocol SIP – Functionality and Structure of the Protocol By.
Lucy Yong Young Lee IETF CCAMP WG GMPLS Extension for Reservation and Time based Bandwidth Service.
Peering: A Minimalist Approach Rohan Mahy IETF 66 — Speermint WG.
Requirements for SIP-based VoIP Interconnection (BCP) draft-natale-sip-voip-requirements-00.txt Bob Natale For Consideration by the.
SIP Interconnect Guidelines draft-hancock-sip-interconnect-guidelines-01 David Hancock, Daryl Malas.
IPv6 Site-Local Discussion Bob Hinden & Margaret Wasserman IETF 56 San Francisco March 2003.
1 SIP Performance Benchmarking draft-poretsky-sip-bench-term-04.txt draft-poretsky-bmwg-sip-bench-meth-02.txt BMWG, IETF-70 Vancouver Dec 2007 Davids IIT.
Page 1 IETF Speermint Working Group Speermint Requirements/Guidelines for SIP session peering draft-ietf-speermint-requirements-02 IETF 69 - Monday July.
Session Peering Use Cases for Federations David Schwartz – Kayote Networks Eli Katz - XConnect Jeremy Barkan - Digitalshtick draft-schwartz-speermint-use-cases-federations-00.txt.
SIP-H.323 Interworking Group RRR-1 IETF-48 SIP-H.323 Interworking Requirements draft-agrawal-sip-h323-interworking-reqs-00.txt Hemant.
IETF 67 – SPEERMINT WG Presence Use Cases draft-houri-speermint-usecase-presence-00 Avshalom Houri – IBM Edwin Aoki – AOL LLC Sriram Parameswar - Microsoft.
Omniran CF00 1 IEEE OmniRAN TG Athens NRM Conclusions Max Riegel, Nokia Networks (OmniRAN TG Chair)
March 20th, 2001 SIP WG meeting 50th IETF SIP WG meeting Overlap signalling handling
Page 1 IETF Speermint Working Group Speermint draft-ietf-speermint-requirements-04 IETF 71 - Wednesday March 12, 2008 Jean-François Mulé -
S. Ali, K. Cartwright, D. Guyton, A. Mayrhofer, J-F. Mulé Data for Reachability of Inter/tra-NetworK SIP (drinks) DRINKS WG draft-mule-drinks-proto-02.
Multiple Interfaces (MIF) WG documents status MIF WG IETF 80, Prague Problem statement and current practices documents.
Page 1 IETF DRINKS Working Group Data Model and Protocol Requirements for DRINKS IETF 72 - Thursday July Tom Creighton -
64th IETF Vancouver November 2005 ASON-Compatible Signaling.
IP Telephony (VoIP).
IP-NNI Joint Task Force Status Update
Global Standards Collaboration (GSC) 14
The Domain Policy DDDS Application
Global Standards Collaboration (GSC) GSC-15
S. Gundavelli, J. Korhonen, M. Liebsch, P. Seite, H. Yokota,
IP-NNI Joint Task Force Status Update
Presentation transcript:

SPEERMINT Architecture - Reinaldo Penno Juniper Networks SPEERMINT, IETF 70 Vancouver, Canada 2 December 2007

What the draft is about? The objective of this document is to define a reference peering architecture in the context of Session PEERing for Multimedia INTerconnect (SPEERMINT). In this process, we define the peering reference architecture (reference, for short), it's functional components, and peering interface functions from the perspective of a real-time communications (Voice and Multimedia) IP Service provider network.

Status of the draft Some discussion on the list Review and suggestions done by Daryl, Otmar and few others Stopped updating it as terminology and requirements changed because a lot of churn was happening A new version is in the pipeline

Changes in the Pipeline Major changes –Now that the terminology is settling down, we can change the architecture draft accordingly: SSP, SBE, DBE, etc –Same goes for requirements draft. Some alignment is needed. –Mapping of terminology introduced by use-cases-03 to architecture draft. For example, LS and SM –Remove MUST wording…It is a information draft. “MUST implement TLS” “request MUST contain a valid Identify” “….”

Changes in the Pipeline Section 4 (Reference SPEERMINT Architecture) –Change “The signaling function is located within the Signaling Path Border Element (SBE) “ to “The signaling function is represented by a Signaling Path Border Element (SBE) “ –Other similar changes –Change “The media function is located within the Data Path Border Element (DBE).” to “The media function is represented by a Data Path Border Element (DBE).

Changes in the Pipeline Section (Carrier ENUM lookup) –Change title from Carrier ENUM to infrastructure ENUM Section (Routing Table) –Include text to highlight the indirecte peering option Section (SIP DNS Resolution) –Include text to highlight the fact that the terminating domain might no accept a call

Changes in the Pipeline Section (Publish ENUM records) –Introduce text to highlight the fact that peers might not want to peer by default –Introduce text that suggests how to reject calls (IP Layer and/or SIP Layer)

Changes in the Pipeline Section (Publish SIP DNS records) –This section needs to be reconciled with Requirement #3 which says “the mechanisms recommended for the declaration and advertisement of SBE and SDE entities must allow for peer and media variability.” –Change to allow indirect peering

Changes in the Pipeline Section (Send the SIP request) –Change “Once a TLS connection between the peers is established, the initiating peer sends the request.” to “Once a trust relationship is established..”.. “In the case of TLS”

Changes in the Pipeline Section 6 (Call Control and Media Control Deployment Options) –Protocol between MF and SF is not in scope of SPEERMINT. Today H.248v3 is used in the IMS architecture