Orbit Engineering Moonbuggy Wheels James Roland Jacob Lloyd Ian Henry Kevin Beckman.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MIT Rocket Team November 20, 2010 Design and Fabrication.
Advertisements

Fiber Reinforced Plastic beam manufacturing process
An introduction to composites design and manufacturing
SHOTCRETING K.V.SUBBA RAO.
Formula 1 Group Members: Quinn Collett Steve Godlewski Tobiah Halter Jeff Swanson Academic Advisor: Dr. Chien Wern June 4, 2003.
FEA of Vehicle Front Stabilizer Bar & Airfoil Design (Final Project) Name: Antonio Sevilla & Sanh Si Course: ME 272 FEA Professor: Jose Granda Date:
AeroE 423 Composites Travis Brotherson Kevin Howard Mike Nielsen 1.
THE EFFECTS ON THE MANUFACTURING OF COFFINS AND CASKETS.
© 2012 Delmar, Cengage Learning Automotive Hoses Chapter 23.
Rolling Chassis Team Todd Anderson Matt Blackwood David Hovater Josh Smith Jessica Yoho.
Molding and Machining Composites
Optimization of the Oscillating Hydrofoil Propulsion System Sarah Blake, Scott Eaton, Mary Girard and Hassan Mazi Advisor: Michael “Mick” Peterson, Ph.D.
Vertical-Axis Wind Turbine Kang Zheng Aaron Peterson Mohd Ramjis.
M.E. 462 Capstone Design I.U.P.U.I. Spring 2007 Bishop Steering: 1970 Lotus Europa Front Axle Re-design Aaron Emmons Phil Palmer Brad Holtsclaw Adam Spindler.
2012 Formula SAE Outboard Suspension
Liquefied Natural Gas Fuel tank
AMPHIBIOUS VEHICLE. The Team The Project Overview The Design & Prototype The Testing The Conclusion The Acknowledgements.
University of the Pacific 1 Parabolic Food Aid Delivery System Mishari Al-Nahedh Chia Lee Lisa Mak December 5, 2002 Engineering 5 Section 6 University.
Screws, Fasteners, and the Design of Nonpermanent Joints
Welding, Bonding, and the Design of Permanent Joints
Mini-Baja Advisory Presentation April 27, 2007 Quentin Holmes Chris Meyer.
Redesign and Packaging of Adirondack Chair Team #58 Project # F07-58ADRNDKCH Team Members Craig Craddock William Fogerson Jason Hick John Mathews Mike.
BEARING OR CRUSHING Bearing Stresses (Compression Perpendicular to the Grain) Allowable stresses for compression perpendicular to the grain are available.
Bicycle Mechanics and Repair Decal Mechanical Engineering 98/198 Spring 14 Lecture 2.
Finite Element Method Final Project “ Rear Suspension- Double A- Arms” Jaime Taha T.April 29 th 2003.
Marc Crans Chris Henderson Matthew Leroux Deryl Sedran 1.
Compressed Air Piping Systems by Asahi/America
F13-60-BAJA PROPOSAL SAE SALUKI FRAME DESIGN Team Members Austin Lewandowski (ME) (PM) Thang Tran (ME) Preston Mathis (ME) Keegan Lohman (ME) Kyle Koester.
Polyvinyl Acetate Adhesives Forestry 485 Lecture 3-4.
1 COMPOSITE MATERIALS What are composite materials? Two or more materials bound together Example from civil engineering: Concrete reinforced with steel.
NASA moon buggy project
Aer E 423 Project Katarzyna Szemplinska 12/13/2008.
Alternative Terrain Wheelchair Team # 1: Team ARROW Brent Fischer Mitchell Kane Eric Goyette Brennan McVeigh Chris MacKenzie.
Creating a Future for Engineers Formula Student Germany FSAE-CFRP monocoque.
Tires Tires have several characteristics that are important in understanding their design. Red = on unit test.
The A380, Leader on Manufacturing technology FARNBOROUGH 20 th /21 st July 2004 Neil HARRIS Presented by.
Composite Manufacturing using VARTM
Application of Advanced Composites to Helicopter Structures Design for Manufacturing Nothing can replace hands on shop experience as a prerequisite to.
Carbon fiber prepreg tack characterization for automated fiber placement Nicholas J. Albertson 1, Brian W. Grimsley 2 1 NASA LARSS.
Development of the Mechanical Battery Dept of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, TAMUK Faculty Mentor: Dr. Larry D Peel, P.E. Students: Javier A. Lozano,
Substrate-Paddle-Base Peter Cooke. Peter Cooke 28 Feb - 1 March VELO PRR2 Substrate- Paddle-Base Substrate Production Paddle – Base – Feet Component.
Mechanical Engineering Department Advanced Composites Dr. Talal Mandourah 1 Lecture 7 & 8 Comparison of Fibers.
VXD Mechanical R&D at the University of Washington H. Lubatti, C. Daly, W. Kuykendall LCRD in conjunction with Fermilab, SLAC.
Fred Nobrega, Nikolai Andreev 21 September, 2015.
Composite Materials Manufacturing Composite Materials Manufacturing 정분방.
Comparison of strength behavior of unidirectional HMC and HSC composite subjected to biaxial loading J. Krystek, R. Kottner, L. Bek 19 th Conference on.
High Speed Vessel Fendering System Design Presenters: Cameron Clark Dave Maharaj Okason Morrison Jean-Pierre Njante Alexandra Ortiz Advisor: Prof. Sadegh.
Standout Technical Designers MAE 416: ME Senior Design Sponsored by Cooper Hand Tools Brian SearsNate Ouellette Pooria Javidi Nathan Mize Chris EvansJustin.
North Dakota Space Grant Presentation Group Members: Oliver Boeckel Jacob Hanson Paul Johnson Lance Krogh Lindsey Feyder May 5, 2014 NDSU NASA Rover Challenge.
Development of a Mechanical Battery Texas A&M University - Kingsville Luis Muratalla – MEEN Senior Jonathan Boehm – CEEN Sophomore Gary Garcia & Richard.
Adam Karges Leader Alicia Martin Recorder Britta O’Keeffe Project Engineer Chris BattistiProject Engineer Steve Boyd Project Engineer 2011 NASA Great Moonbuggy.
Composites 101 An introduction to composites design and manufacturing.
NASA Great Moonbuggy Race 2012 SpacePokes Design Lesley Young Leader Davis FayRecorder Alisa FrohbieterProject Engineer Ryan WilliamsProject Engineer.
Designing an Automated Wood Briquette Feeding System for a GARN ® Wood Fired Hydronic Furnace Jared Baker Jeff Baumann Michael Leriger Andrew Morrison.
Wheels and Tyres Topics covered in this presentation: Tyres Wheels.
C.K. PITHAWALA COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
Eric McDonald Drew Krutak Jeremy Hanneman. Our objective was to design and fabricate a High-Speed Treadmill that is capable of measuring the horizontal.
Structural Integrity UNDERSTAND STRUCTURAL STRENGTH OF LOAD BEARING COMPONENTS IN MECHANICAL SYSTEM.
Roman Battisti Anthony Garcia Lori Sandberg Liz VanHoosen.
1 IST development status  Seattle  Composite Design.
Wheels and Tyres Topics covered in this presentation: Tyres Wheels.
Reinforced Plastics.
University of Washington, Seattle
Mississippi Space & Technology Center
Protective Technology Services’ Data Destruction Machine
LV3: Open-hardware Carbon Fiber Rocket
Leslie Elwood Erik Nelson Jacob East Joe Shields Brandon Bonner
Next Generation Carbon Fiber Airframe Team
The Pneumatic Airbag Jack
Presentation transcript:

Orbit Engineering Moonbuggy Wheels James Roland Jacob Lloyd Ian Henry Kevin Beckman

Presentation Outline This presentation will cover: Problem Overview Wheel Design Prototype Fabrication Compliance Testing Final Wheel Fabrication Conclusions 2

Problem Overview

Design Goals Win 2013 NASA Great Moonbuggy Race Improve performance over bicycle wheels Increase suspension Increase axial load capability Reduce rolling resistance 4 Figure 1. Tire inflation vs rolling resistance Source:

Initial Design Specifications Radius 13.0 in Maximum width 2.5 in Maximum weight 5.75 lbm Maximum radial force 1,100 lbf Maximum axial force 300 lbf Spring constant 300 lbf/in Project budget $2,000 5 Source: Adam Karges, 2012

Wheel Design Methodology SolidWorks® Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Compare wheel geometries Analyze single spokes Arc angle, thickness, width Analyze entire wheels No. of spokes, rim thickness 6 Figure 2. Wheel being modeled under radial load in SolidWorks®

Final Wheel Design Non-pneumatic composite wheel Kevlar® rim and spokes, aluminum hub, rubber tread SolidWorks® analysis Radius 13.0 in Rim width 2.0 in Spoke width 1.5 in Weight 5.65 lbm Axial force 300 lbf Radial force 1,100 lbf Non-linear spring constant 400 lbf/in at 100 lbf 190 lbf/in at 500 lbf Built test spoke and compared to SolidWorks® model 7 Figure 3. Isometric view of final wheel design modeled in SolidWorks®

Prototype Fabrication Manufacturing tools Spoke mold Rim mandrel 8 Figure 4. Spoke moldFigure 5. Rim mandrel

Hub Fabrication Machining tools Abrasive water jet Lathe Mill 9 Figure 6. Disk brake attachment on lathe Figure 7. Spoke holder after being machined on water jet

Hub Assembly 10 Figure 8. Hub assembly in SolidWorks® Figure 9. Actual hub assembly

Spoke Layup Technique 11 Prepare mold with release agent 12 layers of Kevlar® 13.5 x 30 in strips Resin Fibre Glast 2000 Epoxy Resin 2060 Hardener Hand layup Figure 10. Spoke layup

Spoke Cure Process Vacuum bag technique Peel ply Bleeder cloth Bag Vacuum pump Cure pressure of 5-6 psi for 36 hours Spokes cut with band saw 12 Figure 11. Vacuum bagging

Rim Layup/Cure Technique Kevlar® Plain Weave Tape 50 yard roll, 2 in wide 13 Figure 12. Rim on mandrel after layup

Prototype Wheel Assembly Spoke spacing template Clamps Fibre Glast 1101 Epoxy Paste Bonding Adhesive 14 Figure 13. Spokes clamped to rim after bonding

Compliance Testing Axial strength test Adhesive failure at hub - 95 lbf Radial strength test Instron™ Compression Machine Test 1: Adhesive failure at hub lbf Test 2: Adhesive failure at rim lbf Design changes Longer spokes Stronger adhesive 15 Figure 14. Radial compression test

Compliance Testing Results 16 Figure 15. Force-deflection curve of 2 nd radial compression test

Compliance Testing Results 17 Figure 16. Force-deflection curve of 2 nd radial compression test vs SolidWorks® analysis

Final Production Decision Design specifications not met Axial strength, radial strength Decision made to continue to final production Time and money limitations Design flaws were corrected 18 Figure 17. Failure in first radial test

Final Wheel Fabrication Changes Kevlar® Plain Weave Fabric 5.0 oz/sq yd 12 layers of Kevlar® for back wheels, 14 layers for front in pre-compression Less tension in spokes Decrease rolling resistance without changing spring constant 19

Final Wheel Fabrication Same technique Bicycle tire tread Removed side walls Flexible adhesive Weldwood® Contact Cement Ratchet strap Weight specification Front wheel – 7.90 lbm Rear wheel – 7.20 lbm 9 lbm suspension system 20 Figure 18. Final wheel

Moonbuggy Implementation 21 Figure 19. Wheels installed on moonbuggy Figure 20. Moonbuggy in folded position

Final Design Changes During moonbuggy testing, adhesive failure occurred Axial stress Mechanical joining necessary Epoxy too brittle 3480 psi shear stress Aluminum rivets 310 lbf shear force 22 Figure 21. Wheel after adhesive failure

Final Result 23 Figure 22. Substrate failure Figure 23. Close up view of substrate failure

Project Cost Item DescriptionCost Kevlar ® Twill Weave Fabric, Cut To Length$615 Kevlar ® Tape, 2" - 50 yd roll$780 System 2000 Epoxy Resin$ Epoxy Hardener$135 Epoxy Paste Bonding Adhesive$105 Medium Density Fibreboard, 4ft x 8ft x 3/4in$33 Tee Nuts, 3/8 - 16$8 18 GA Cold Rolled Steel Sheet, 4ft x 4ft$29 Shipping$240 Discounts($170) Total Cost$1, Table 1. Final Bill of Materials Cost per wheel - $450

Conclusions and Recommendations 25 Specifications met Wheel dimensions, spring constant, project cost Specifications not met Wheel weight, maximum radial/axial load capacity Future recommendations Test for actual moonbuggy forces Test maximum load capacity of pneumatic wheel Design better joints Use exact same material for prototype and final wheels

26 Figure 24. Completed moonbuggy and wheels

Questions and Comments Special thank you to Dr. David Walrath, Mr. Scott Morton, and Dr. Dennis Coon for all your help and advice this year Thank you to Dr. Shawna McBride and the NASA Space Grant Consortium for providing the funding to make this project possible Finally, thank you to shop technicians Mr. Vince Dauer and Mr. Mike Schilt for all your guidance during our work in the UW machine shop 27