Essential Question: In what ways might economic factors influence agricultural practices?

Primarily for direct consumption by a local population, usually small scale and low tech Subsistence Agriculture Primarily for purpose of selling products for money, often monocultures for economies of scale Commercial Agriculture Agriculture & Rural Land Use – Key Topics

Large-area farms or ranches Low inputs of labor & low output per acre Extensive Land Use Small-area farms or ranches High inputs of labor & high output per acre Intensive Land Use Rice paddies, southeast China Cattle ranch, northeast Colorado

Large amount of human work is applied per unit of output Labor-Intensive Agriculture Large amount of capital (equipment and buildings used to produce other goods) is applied per unit of output Capital-Intensive Agriculture Top picture – Labor-intensive corn raising in central Mexico. Bottom picture – Corn exported from capital- intensive U.S. farms to the Mexican market

Subsistence – predominantly low-income regions Intensive subsistence – subtropical monsoon areas Shifting cultivation – tropical forests & savannas Nomadic herding – semiarid and arid lands Commercial – predominantly high-income regions Crop farming – more humid climates Livestock ranching - drylands

Probable culture-hearths of agriculture shift from hunter-gatherer to agricultural societies Invention of farming & domestication of livestock (8,000– 14,000 years ago) + diffusion from several source regions = shift from hunter-gatherer to agricultural societies First Agricultural Revolution

Second Agricultural Revolution Technological changes (starting 1600s in Western Europe; spread by 1800s to North America) Began with new methods: crop rotation, better horse collars Later innovations: replace human labor with machines, supplement natural fertilizers & pesticides with chemical Beginnings of commercialization of agriculture (production of surplus for trade); enabled widespread urbanization

Third Agricultural Revolution Since 1960s - hybridized grains for better yields (“Green Revolution”) - greater reliance on synthetic fertilizers - genetically engineered crops - vertical integration of ownership (e.g., Cargill, ConAgra, ADM) - globalization of production A partial list of ConAgra’s brands Swiss MissHunt’s Van Camp’sMarie Callender’s WessonHebrew National Slim JimEgg Beaters RosaritaChef Boyardee ReddiWipPam Peter PanOrville Redenbacher’s Healthy ChoiceBanquet

“Green Revolution” – 1960s -1980s Rice plant Rice - staple food for 2.5 billion Asians - provides 2/3 of calories for Asians with rice-based diets Green Rev – Raised yields * Improved rice strains * Greater use of fertilizer * Increase use of irrigation Asia’s rice production grew at annual rates of 3.0% until 1980s Yield growth rate exceeded high pop. growth rates of the time Sources: FAO, IRRI (research organization devoted to rice) – part of global CGIAR effort at improving yields of staple crops worldwide

Green Revolution Take notes… 1X4 1X4

Third Agricultural Revolution Benefits Reduced uncertainties in agriculture Greater global exchange of ag products Increased yields Costs Increased dependence on fossil fuels Reliance on chemical inputs Less global diversity of food products Concentration of pollutants

Primary Secondary Tertiary Quaternary Sectors of the Economy Figure 6.1 (p. 138) Figure 6.11 (p. 150)

Harvest of Fear

“Post-Green Revolution” (since 1980s) Green Revolution Plusses: Countries self-sufficient in rice or even exporters (Thai, Viet). Poor people benefited as yield increases caused real price of rice to drop. Problems Successes led to less concern about food security, and less investment in irrigation, agric research, and rural infrastructure. Growth rate in rice production declined during due to drop in growth rate of rice yields. In most places, despite increasing use of fertilizers, further increases in yields became harder to achieve and more costly. Mobilising science for global food security

Globalization of the Cut-Flower Industry Kenya has become the European Union's biggest source of flower imports and overtaken Israel as market leader. It has a 25% market share, beating Colombia and Israel, which each have about 16%. Two thirds of these blooms go to the Netherlands, which dominates the trade in cut flowers worldwide through its auction halls where Dutch wholesalers buy flowers for re-export to markets as far away as the United States and Japan. Valentine's Day is a big date for Kenyan growers, thanks to the country's perfect match of high altitudes and equatorial sunshine. Roses make up 74% of Kenya's flower exports, followed by carnations which are the most popular flower in Britain at less romantic times because they last longest. Source – Flower industry workers in Kenya (left) and Colombia (right)

The Von Thunen Model AP Human Geography

Discussion Questions to Ponder: Von Thünen developed his model in Is it still relevant today? Are transportation costs still an important factor in where certain products are raised today? How has the use of technology in agriculture impacted vonThunen’s model and observations?

Climate and natural environment Culture Economic factors Simplified von Thünen model of agricultural land use (1826) Factors influencing location of agriculture Medium transportation cost items (corn, soybeans, mixed farming) More extensive land use – medium rent Urban market High transportation cost items (vegetables, eggs, dairy, flowers) Intensive land use – high land rent Lowest transportation cost items (forestry, wheat, livestock ranching) Most extensive land use – lowest land rent

Review: What is a model? Models are examples that help us better understand a major concept or idea. Models are NOT exact and are flexible. Models are NOT perfect. Models might look different in reality than the do in theory.

The Model, again.

Historical Background “A Portion of Each Crop is Eaten By the Wheels!”- von Thunen. Germany, 1820’s. Developed by Johann Heinrich von Thunen in the early 1800’s (19 th century) Based on the layout of Rostock, Germany Noticed a pattern of 4 rings developed around the central city. – Each ring was a different type of agriculture. Created before highways, railroads, factories, etc.

The Big Idea! Farmers grow certain crops closer to the market (aka central city) while others are grown farther away. Why? It’s all about the Benjamin$, baby! Decision to grow certain crops in certain places is based on profit. Von Thünen’s model helps explain the contemporary distribution of agricultural regions (e.g. dairy, horticulture, wheat).

The Formula Profit = Market Price – Production Costs Production costs include cost of labor, equipment, and TRANSPORTATION! Factor 1: The bulkier the product, the more it costs to transport. Factor 2: The more perishable a product, the closer to the market it has to be. Factor 3: The more land a product needs, the farther from the central city it should be (land closer to city is more expensive) All of these must be considered when deciding what to grow where!

Bid-Rent Curve As distance from city center increases, cost of land goes down.

The Rings Ring 1: Dairy/ Commercial Gardening –Easily perishable goods –Located too far, goods go bad, no profit Ring 2: Forest (building material/ fuel) –Not perishable but very heavy! Ring 3: Extensive Crops (grains) –Not as heavy as wood, can be stored for longer periods of time. Ring 4: Livestock –Needs a lot of land –Perishable once slaughtered, but animals can transport themselves! Beyond the rings: Wilderness –Too far from city, to expensive to transport anything.

Ring Clip dQw4w9WgXcQwww.youtube.com/watch?v= dQw4w9WgXcQ

Specialty Regions Criticisms: Regions of specialty farming (e.g., South Florida, California’s Central Valley) do not always conform to von Thünen’s concentric rings.