Estimates of required MPS reaction time In the merger (at the centers of respective 20deg dipoles and in between 2 lenses) rms R=250 um In the

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Y. R. Roblin, G2P review, 1/17/ HALLA G2P readiness review Yves Roblin, CASA.
Advertisements

February 17-18, 2010 R&D ERL Dmitry Kayran R&D: G5 test and Commissioning Plan Eduard Pozdeyev, Dmitry Kayran BNL R&D ERL Review February 17-18, 2010 R&D.
Diagnostics and commissioning on ERLP Yuri Saveliev ASTeC CONFORM Project: EMMA Design Review Workshop February 2007, Daresbury Laboratory.
Experience with Bunch Shape Monitors at SNS A. Aleksandrov Spallation Neutron Source, Oak Ridge, USA.
Chris Tennant Jefferson Laboratory March 15, 2013 “Workshop to Explore Physics Opportunities with Intense, Polarized Electron Beams up to 300 MeV”
Commissioning August & September. 2 Agenda 11:20 Coffee 11:30 Introduction Sue S 11:35 Controls (an overview) Brian M 10:55 Controls & Data Acquisition.
TUPD02 BEAM DIAGNOSTICS FOR THE ESS BLM BPM Trans Profile Bunch Shape BCM Preliminary System Count A. Jansson, L. Tchelidze, ESS AB, Lund, Sweden Hybrid.
Paul Emma LCLS FAC April 16, Initial Experience with Injector Commissioning P. Emma, et al. Facilities Advisory Committee.
Beam current4 A Beam pulse length1.5 ms Power input/structure 35 MW Ohmic losses (beam on)1.6 MW RF power to load (beam on) 0.4 MW RF-to-beam efficiency.
Beam Loss Analysis Tool for the CTF3 PETS Tank M. Velasco, T. Lefevre, R. Scheidegger, M. Wood, J. Hebden, G. Simpson Northwestern University, Evanston,
1 Low-energy RHIC electron Cooler (LEReC) Update November 17, 2014.
The 2nd Tevatron Electron Lens and tests of a new electron gun in the framework of Beam-Beam Compensation project Yu. Alexahin, V. Kamerdzhiev, G. Kuznetsov,
F Specifications for the dark current kicker for the NML test facility at Fermilab S. Nagaitsev, M. Church, P. Piot, C.Y. Tan, J. Steimel Fermilab May.
Low Energy RHIC e - Cooling Meeting Notes 1 –LF Solenoids & HF (Matching) Solenoids: Out for bid??? –20 o Dipole  Magnet gap is 4 inches/transport lines.
Project X RD&D Plan Instrumentation Manfred Wendt AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
Beam Instrumentations: Requirements for Proton and Electron Beams C. Bracco, E. Gschwendtner, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi, A. Petrenko, F. Velotti Acknowledgements:
ESS DTL beam commissioning
Beam Instrumentation for Orbit Stability I. Pinayev.
1 Plans for KEK/ATF 1. Introduction 2. Related Instrumentations at ATF 3. Experimental Plans for Fast Kicker R&D at ATF Junji Urakawa (KEK) at ILC Damping.
1 Low-energy RHIC electron Cooler (LEReC) cost estimate December 2, 2014.
Beam diagnostics control for J-PARC LINAC Guobao SHEN J-PARC Center Japan Atomic Energy Agency Mar
Photocathode 1.5 (1, 3.5) cell superconducting RF gun with electric and magnetic RF focusing Transversal normalized rms emittance (no thermal emittance)
The Overview of the ILC RTML Bunch Compressor Design Sergei Seletskiy LCWS 13 November, 2012.
Xiao-Yan Zhao Beam Instrumentation Group Accelerator Center, IHEP BEPCII Background Issues: Beam Loss Measurement.
05/05/2004Cyrille Thomas DIAMOND Storage Ring Optical and X-ray Diagnostics.
MP Questions for LE eCooling. Why talk about this now? Is there additional equipment needed, not yet considered? (nor costed) Interfaces to systems that.
Electron Source Configuration Axel Brachmann - SLAC - Jan , KEK GDE meeting International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
1 Plan and Opportunities for Migration and Integration of the Photoinjector into New Muon Lab Mike Church AAC Review - 12/5/06.
Overview of Electron Cooling Activities at FNAL Thomas Kroc Fermilab – Electron Cooling EIC 2004 March 15-17, 2004 Jefferson Lab.
Machine Protection at the 1MW CEBAF Electron Accelerator and Free Electron Laser Facility Kelly Mahoney Presented at the Workshop for.
02/18/09 Dump line beam steering and beam losses (Sept 26, 2008 studies) Xiaowei Dong & John Carwardine (Argonne) TTF/FLASH 9mA meeting, 23 February 2009.
CLIC Decelerator Instrumentation - Ideas and outlooks – non exhaustive - Erik Adli, July 9, 2008.
G5 Design Review, April 24, 2009 Gun to 5cell Cavity Test: Overview Dmitry Kayran G5 test Design Review April,
NSLS-II Transfer Lines BUDKER INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS NOVOSIBIRSK.
PROBLEM 1 Show that the (beam size ^2) varies quadratically with distance in a drift section with no quadrupoles.
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
Parameter [units]Tune-up beam"low" chargehigh currenthigh charge Kin. injection energy [MeV]2.0 – Maximum beam energy [MeV]16 –
An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron radiation. I.Meshkov, T. Mamedov, E. Syresin, An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron.
Eduardo Nebot del Busto (1) CERN, Geneva, Switzerland (2) The University of Liverpool, Department of physics, Liverpool, U. K (3) The Cockcroft Institute,
Issues Concerning Different Beam Lines Integration C. Bracco, E. Gschwendtner, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi, A. Petrenko, F. Velotti Acknowledgements: WP3 and.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility 1 Alex Bogacz UITF Beam-line Modeling (2) UITF Mtg. JLAB,
Future Circular Collider Study Kickoff Meeting CERN ERL TEST FACILITY STAGES AND OPTICS 12–15 February 2014, University of Geneva Alessandra Valloni.
SNS Beam Diagnostics A. Aleksandrov Spallation Neutron Source, Oak Ridge, USA.
Beam on Target Diagnostics Beam on Target Meeting 2013 March Tom Shea.
Construction, Commissioning, and Operation of Injector Test Facility (ITF) for the PAL-XFEL November 12, 2013 S. J. Park, J. H. Hong, C. K. Min, I. Y.
Notes from Tom’s visit 1. Controls is under-staffed 2. Common Diagnostics platforms (BPM, FCT, DCCT, BLM,…) 3. Where possible, ‘Smart’ Diagnostics, running.
Experience with Novosibirsk FEL Getmanov Yaroslav Budker INP, Russia Dec. 2012, Berlin, Germany Unwanted Beam Workshop.
Low-Energy RHIC electron Cooling (LEReC) MPS meeting MPS Meeting April 21, 2016.
ISG – Damping Ring Physics and Design Group ATF – 2003// focus on the TRC challenge Marc Ross – 1.Instability about which little is known: Fast ion,
Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen PSI, March 2013 Paul Scherrer Institut PSI / DESY / KIT Mini-Workshop on Longitudinal Diagnostics for FELs.
Machine Protection Systems (MPS) Arden Warner, and Jim Steimel Project X Machine Advisory Committee March 18-19, 2013.
Beam Instrumentation of CEPC Yue Junhui (岳军会) for the BI Group Accelerator Center, IHEP HF2014.
MAX IV linac overview and scope of automation Sara Thorin.
HB2008 – WG F: 27 Aug. S. Childress – Diagnostics_2MW 1 NuMI Beam Diagnostics and Control Steps to 2 MW S. Childress Fermilab.
Failure Analysis Tools at DESY. M. Bieler, T. Lensch, M. Werner, DESY ARW 2013, Melbourne,
PAL-XFEL Commissioning Plan ver. 1.1, August 2015 PAL-XFEL Beam Dynamics Group.
The Preparation for CSNS Accelerator Commissioning Sheng Wang June 8, 2015, Dongguan.
Beam Commissioning Adam Bartnik.
Options and Recommendations for TL and Dumps
XFEL Beam Physics 10/30/2015 Tor Raubenheimer.
Longitudinal Diagnostics for start-up
Operational Experience with the Cornell ERL Injector SRF Cavities
eRHIC with Self-Polarizing Electron Ring
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Studies of Emittance & Lifetime
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
Considerations on Beam Diagnostics Physics
Thursday
小型X線源の性能確認実験計画 高輝度・RF電子銃研究会 広島大学 高エネルギー加速器研究機構 浦川順治
Hall A Beam Parameters Table
Presentation transcript:

Estimates of required MPS reaction time In the merger (at the centers of respective 20deg dipoles and in between 2 lenses) rms R=250 um In the normal incident angle full power beam melts 1.5 mm thick vacuum chamber in 30 us Typical beam rms R > 1 mm throughout the whole LEReC beamline. For rms R=1 normal incident angle full power beam melts 1.5 mm thick vacuum chamber in 0.5 ms. RF phase jump can happen in few us. Magnet fields change in many milliseconds. 0.5 ms 30 us 1.5 ms 90 us

Machine protection diagnostics Beam Loss Monitor (BLM): – used at every facility similar to LEReC; – reaction time (~ 10 us); – sensitive to beam losses (according to Bruce Dunham it doesn't even matter where you place BLM, as soon as there is a small uA level loss somewhere along the beamline the BLM is tripped off); – will it see signal from e-beam loss in RHIC tunnel background? Differential signal from Fast Current Transformers (FCTs) at the beginning and at the end of the beamline: – fast reaction time (~ 1 us); – is it accurate enough at nominal current (35 mA) ops? BPM with predefined beam position envelope (closes laser if beam trajectory deviates from BPM center by more than allowed): – Reaction time (~ 12 us); – Works in the whole range of machine parameters.

Commissioning, operation and machine protection Mode of operation GoalsParametersMPS Pencil beam ( , E=400 keV) (2018, E= MeV) Roughly get beam energy and trajectory through the whole machine; find any rough errors in RF or magnets. BPM precision 100 um. 1 macro-pulse of 30 bunches per 1 second; each bunch is 30 pC. dE/shot=2.8 mJ; P=2.8 mW; I= 0.9 nA; Worst rms R=250 um; Worst case dT=1.2 K/sec. none Optics studies ( , E=400 keV) (2018, E= MeV) Set the optics for the full charge bunches; measure beam emittance; measure beam envelope throughout the CS. BPM precision 100 um. 1 macro-pulse of 9 bunches per 1 second; each bunch is 130 pC. dE/shot=3.6 mJ; P=3.6 mW; I= 1.2 nA; Worst rms R=250 um; Worst case dT=1.5 K/sec. none High current studies ( , E=400 keV) Explore possible gun trips at up to 10 mA current; set clearing electrodes. 9 MHz trains of macro-pulses (10 bunches 130 pC/bunch) per second. P=11 kW; I= 12 mA; Worst rms R=1 mm; Worst case dT=1450 K / 5 msec. BPMs

Commissioning, operation and machine protection (continued) Mode of operation GoalsParameters (beam energy is 2.6 MeV) MPS RF studies (2018, E= MeV) Fine tuning of RF system; measure energy spread. 250 us trains of macro-pulses (30 bunches 130 pC/bunch) per second. E/shot=27.6 J; P=27.6 W; I= 9 uA; Worst rms R=1 mm; Worst case dT=735 K / 250 usec. BPMs; Interlock 20deg merger bend High current studies (2018, E= MeV) Explore gun trips at up to 10 mA current; set clearing electrodes. 9 MHz trains of macro-pulses (10 bunches 130 pC/bunch) per second. P=37 kW; I= 12 mA; Worst rms R=250 um; Worst case dT=1450 K / 90 usec. BPMs; BLMs; differential FCT signal Operation (2018, E= MeV) Electron cooling9 MHz trains of macro-pulses (30 bunches 130 pC/bunch). P=110 kW; I= 35 mA; Worst rms R=250 um; Worst case dT=1450 K / 30 usec. BLMs; differential FCT signal

By combining fast detector and BPMs with beam position envelope one can relax the requirements to fast detector accuracy: Required accuracy of fast detectors Assume that stainless steel chamber and ambient air can dissipate 5 K/s 3.5 mA beam melts merger vacuum chamber in 300 us FCT1-FCT2 > 3.5 nA Close Laser ~1 us FCT1-FCT2 > 3.5 mA BPMs ~1 us ~12 us Close Laser Both the large losses (> 10 % of the full current) and the small losses will be detected and the laser will be closed in timely fashion.

Conceptual design of fast MPS BLM FCT1 FCT2 FCT3 I Gun PS Laser mode Calculate power P>P threshold FCT1-FCT2>ΔI threshold FCT1-FCT3>ΔI threshold BLM(x8)>Losses threshold BPM(x all)>trajectory envelope Close laser