A.Saini, K.Ranjan, N.Solyak, S.Mishra, V.Yakovlev on the behalf of our team Feb. 8, 2011 Study of failure effects of elements in beam transport line &

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MEBT Design Considerations The beam energy in the MEBT is sufficiently low for the space charge forces to have a considerable impact on the beam dynamics.
Advertisements

1 MICE Beamline: Plans for initial commissioning. Kevin Tilley, 16 th November. - 75days until commissioning Target, detectors, particle production Upstream.
R. Miyamoto, Beam Physics Design of MEBT, ESS AD Retreat 1 Beam Physics Design of MEBT Ryoichi Miyamoto (ESS) November 29th, 2012 ESS AD Retreat On behalf.
ESS End-to-End Optics and Layout Integration Håkan Danared European Spallation Source Catania, 6 July 2011.
Cryomodule Quad Doublet Solutions – M Church 9/12/07 1 NML Cryomodule Quad Doublet Lattice Solutions  Question  Are quadrupoles required as part of the.
Mark Rayner, Analysis workshop 4 September ‘08: Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing, slide 1 Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing Analysis.
ESS DTL beam commissioning
Beam tolerance to RF faults & consequences on RF specifications Frédéric Bouly MAX 1 st Design Review WP1 - Task 1.2 Bruxelles, Belgium Monday, 12 th November.
1 Tracking code development for FFAGs S. Machida ASTeC/RAL 21 October, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
FFAG-ERIT R&D 06/11/06 Kota Okabe (Kyoto Univ.) for FFAG-DDS group.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
J. Rodnizki SARAF, Soreq NRC HB2008, August, 2008 Nashville TN Lattice Beam dynamics study and loss estimation for SARAF/ EURISOL driver 40/60 MeV 4mA.
2002/7/02 College, London Muon Phase Rotation at PRISM FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
2002/7/04 College, London Beam Dynamics Studies of FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
Particle dynamics in electron FFAG Shinji Machida KEK FFAG04, October 13-16, 2004.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
DTL: Basic Considerations M. Comunian & F. Grespan Thanks to J. Stovall, for the help!
S2E optics design and particles tracking for the ILC undulator based e+ source Feng Zhou SLAC ILC e+ source meeting, Beijing, Jan. 31 – Feb. 2, 2007.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Overview of ERL MEIC Cooler Design Studies S.V. Benson, Y. Derbenev, D.R. Douglas, F. Hannon, F. Marhauser, R. A Rimmer, C.D. Tennant, H. Zhang, H. Wang,
Muon cooling with Li lenses and high field solenoids V. Balbekov, MAP Winter Meeting 02/28-03/04, 2011 OUTLINE  Introduction: why the combination of Li.
LINAC4 COMMISSIONING A.Lombardi BCC 8-19 Nov 09 Linac4 BCC Nov 2009Alessandra Lombardi.
Electron Model for a 3-10 GeV, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
PROTON LINAC FOR INDIAN SNS Vinod Bharadwaj, SLAC (reporting for the Indian SNS Design Team)
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Extended ALICE Injector J.W. McKenzie, B.D. Muratori, Y.M. Saveliev STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
Beam Dynamics and Linac Simulation Petr Ostroumov Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee May 10 th – 12 th, 2006.
FNAL 8 GeV SC linac / HINS Beam Dynamics Jean-Paul Carneiro FNAL Accelerator Physics Center Peter N. Ostroumov, Brahim Mustapha ANL March 13 th, 2009.
ICFA-HB 2004 Commissioning Experience for the SNS Linac A. Aleksandrov, S. Assadi, I. Campisi, P. Chu, S. Cousineau, V. Danilov, G. Dodson, J. Galambos,
Beam breakup and emittance growth in CLIC drive beam TW buncher Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, IPM.
Module 5 A quick overview of beam dynamics in linear accelerators
Polarization in ELIC Yaroslav Derbenev Center for Advanced Study of Accelerators Jefferson Laboratory EIC Collaboiration Meeting, January 10-12, 2010 Stony.
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
R. Tiede, Institute for Applied Physics (IAP), Goethe-University Frankfurt 1 42nd ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop on High-Intensity, High-Brightness.
Status of RTML design in TDR configuration A.Vivoli, N. Solyak, V. Kapin Fermilab.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Jorg Kewisch, Dmitri Kayran Electron Beam Transport and System specifications.
D. Raparia2005/01/27-28 MAC Review EBIS Injector Linac Optics I I D.Raparia EBIS Review 2005/01/27-28 HEBT Booster Injection.
Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,
Warm linac simulations (DTL) and errors analysis M. Comunian F. Grespan.
Transverse kick of HWR and SSR2 Paolo Berrutti, Vyacheslav Yakovlev.
1 Error study of non-scaling FFAG 10 to 20 GeV muon ring Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 26 July, ffag/machida_ ppt.
Linac4 DTL Beam Dynamics 1Jean-Baptiste Lallement – Mini-workshop on DTL design - 13/09/2011 Mini-workshop on DTL design – 13 September 2011 JB Lallement,
1 Project X Workshop November 21-22, 2008 Richard York Chris Compton Walter Hartung Xiaoyu Wu Michigan State University.
Linac Design: Single-Spoke Cavities.
Dark Current in ILC Main Linac N.Solyak, A.Sukhanov, I.Tropin ALCW2015, Apr.23, 2015, KEK LCWS'15, Tsukuba, 04/2015Nikolay Solyak1.
CW Linac Lattice August, 29 N.Solyak, B.Shteynas.
Choppers Comparison of three schemes of choppers is made 2.5 MeV and 2.1 MeV beam energies are considered Presented by Boris Shteynas May,
1 Superconducting linac design & associated MEBT Jean-Luc BIARROTTE CNRS-IN2P3 / IPN Orsay, France J-Luc Biarrotte, 1st Myrrha design review, Brussels,
DTL: Basic Considerations M. Comunian & F. Grespan Thanks to J. Stovall, for the help!
CW Linac: Optics with Quads or Doublets. N. Perunov and N.Solyak Nov.6, 2009.
HWR, SSR1 and SSR2 transverse kick summary Paolo Berrutti, Vyacheslav Yakovlev.
Review of Alignment Tolerances for LCLS-II SC Linac Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermilab 27 th April 2016, LCLS-II Accelerator Physics Meeting.
CLIC Frequency Multiplication System aka Combiner Rings Piotr Skowronski Caterina Biscari Javier Barranco 21 Oct IWLC 2010.
Preservation of Magnetized Beam Quality in a Non-Isochronous Bend
A. Aksoy Beam Dynamics Studies for the CLIC Drive Beam Accelerator A. AKSOY CONTENS ● Basic Lattice Sketches ● Accelerating structure ● Short and long.
General Design of C-ADS Accelerator Physics
Physics design on the main linac
Acceleration of RIB using linacs
Emanuele (ESS), Alessandro (CERN), Mikel (Tekniker), Hayley (ISIS)
Challenges and Perspectives of Accelerator Driven Systems (ADS)
Beam dynamics of RAON accelerator system
SuperB e+/e- main linac and diagnostics studies
Superconducting High Brightness RF Photoinjector Design
SC ISOL Linac of KoRIA Tae-Sun Park (SKKU).
Test of Booster at UITF Reza Kazimi (12/12/18)
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Physics Design on Injector I
Studies on orbit corrections
DTL M. Comunian M. Eshraqi.
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov (SLAC), M-H. Wang
Presentation transcript:

A.Saini, K.Ranjan, N.Solyak, S.Mishra, V.Yakovlev on the behalf of our team Feb. 8, 2011 Study of failure effects of elements in beam transport line & its compensation. 6/9/2016 1

Outline Layout of SC CW lattice Study and compensation of effects of RF element’ s failure :- Failure of first cavity in SSR0 section. Failure of last cavity in SSR0 section. Failure of last cavity in SSR2 section. Study and compensation of effects of focusing element’s failure:- Failure of first solenoid in SSR0 section. Failure of first solenoid in SSR1 section. 6/9/2016 2

Goals of work Study the effects of failure of focusing & accelerating elements in beam transport line. Retuning of the lattice to compensate the effects of failed elements. To minimize beam losses (below 1W/m) & achieving smooth beam propagation through linac ( Beam envelope, emittance growth, halo growth are calculated & compared for each case ). Lattice version is used for all calculations. \\tdserver1.fnal.gov\project\TD_SCRF\ProjectX\CW \650 MHz\Alex\v /9/2016 3

Initial Parameters Ensuring the surface field limit during retuning of amplitudes of rf cavities. - Maximum allowable surface magnetic field is 60 mT for spoke resonators (soft limitation in SSR sections). and 70 mT for elliptical cavities. Maximum field gradient ~ 10 T/ m in quad and <6 T/m in solenoids. 6/9/ Limitations & constraints Longitudinal emittance :  ∙mm mrad (changed to 0.275) Transverse emittance : 0.25 pi mm mrad. Initial Energy : 2.5 MeV * Tracewin code is used for all calculations ( )

Layout of Lattice 6/9/2016 5

Beam Envelope for ideal Lattice : No errors & failures  Calculation is performed with 10k macro-particles.  3 sigma Gaussian beam 6/9/2016 6

Emittance 6/9/ tt zz

Synchronous Phase Halo parameters 6/9/ HzHz HzHz HzHz

9 Case 1: Failure of First cavity in SSR0 section SSR0 period MEBT elements available for re-tuning  Field amplitude and phases are re-adjusted in RF Cavity.  Magnetic field gradients are changed in solenoids and quads …

Failure of First cavity in SSR0 section Failed cavity 6/9/ m 1.655m Gap between two successive RF element after failure of first cavity Gap between two successive RF elements

Beam Envelope 6/9/ Losses of Particles happen at these location

Emittance 6/9/

Compensation of Failed elements Solenoid Triplet RF Gaps SSR0 Cavity 6/9/  Matching section in MEBT & 3 following period in SSR0 section are used

Beam Envelope after retuning 6/9/

Emittance Before compensation After Compensation 6/9/

Halo Parameters Before compensation After Compensation 6/9/

Summary 6/9/ ParametersNo failure Failure of first Cavity SSR0 No Compensation Compensa tion At the end of Linac zz  ∙ mm mrad tt  ∙ mm mrad Final Energy MeV Losses (%)

6/9/ Case 2: Failure of Last cavity in SSR0 section

Failure of Last cavity in SSR0 section 6/9/ Failed cavity 1.135m Note: Failed cavity is used for matching between sections

Beam Envelope 6/9/ Losses of Particles happen at these locations

Compensation of last cavity in SSR0 section 6/9/ Failed cavity Gap between two successive RF element after failure of last cavity 1.745m

Beam Envelope after compensation 6/9/

Emittance Before compensation After Compensation 6/9/

Halo Parameters Before compensation After Compensation 6/9/

Summary 6/9/ ParametersNo failure Failure of last Cavity SSR0 No CompensationCompensation At the end of Linac  z (  ∙ mm mrad)  t (  ∙ mm mrad) Final Energy (MeV) Losses (%)

6/9/ Case 3: Failure of Last cavity in SSR2 section

Beam Envelope Failure of last cavity in SSR2 section 6/9/ Failed cavity

Beam Envelope 6/9/

Compensation of failure of last cavity in SSR2 section 6/9/

Beam Envelope 6/9/

Emittance Before compensation After Compensation 6/9/

Summary 6/9/ ParametersNo failure Failure of last Cavity SSR2 No CompensationCompensation At the end of Linac  z (  mm mrad)  t (  mm mrad) Final Energy, MeV Losses, % ---

6/9/ Case 4: Failure of first solenoid in SSR0 section

Beam Envelope Failure of first solenoid in SSR0 section 6/9/

Beam envelopes 6/9/

Compensation of Failure of first solenoid in SSR0 section 6/9/

Beam envelope 6/9/

Halo Parameters Before compensation After Compensation 6/9/

Beam Losses Before compensation After Compensation 6/9/

Emittance Before compensation After Compensation 6/9/

Summary 6/9/ ParametersNo failure Failure of first solenoid SSR0 No CompensationCompensation At the end of Linac  z (  mm mrad)  t (  mm mrad) Final Energy, MeV Losses %-

6/9/ Case 5: Failure of first solenoid in SSR1 section

Beam Envelope 6/9/

Beam Envelope before compensation 6/9/

Compensation of failure of first solenoid in SSR1 section 6/9/ Two solenoids - one upstream and one downstream are used for compensation

Beam Envelope after re-tuning 6/9/

Emittance Before compensation After Compensation 6/9/

Summary 6/9/ ParametersNo failure Failure of first solenoid SSR1 No Compensation Compensation At the end of Linac  z (pi mm mrad)  t (pi mm mrad) Final Energy, MeV Losses % ---

Conclusion Different scenario of failure of beamline elements are studied. In analysis the critical locations of failed elements are chosen to demonstrate strategy of tuning. It is possible to compensate the effects of failed elements by retuning neighboring elements ( RF cavity and Solenoids/Quads). 6/9/

Thank you 6/9/

SSR0 1 st cavity ViVfSynch Phase Initial Synch Phase Final elements Gap Gap SSR0_ SSR0_3 GradiGrad felements Quad Quad Quad Sol sol sol sol Sol5 6/9/

6/9/