© 2008 CRC, All Rights Reserved 426 South Yellowstone Drive, Suite 250 Madison, WI 53719 Phone (608) 831-1180 www.nccd-crc.org The Children’s Research.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Moving Toward More Comprehensive Assessments American Humanes 2007 Conference on Differential Response Patricia Schene, Ph.D.
Advertisements

Desired Results Developmental Profile - school readiness© A Project of the California department of education, child development division.
Parents as Partners in Education
1 Definitions and Examples of Practices vs. Services in Child Welfare The Service Array Process The National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational.
Heather Woltman, Renée Nossal, Nathalie Gougeon, & Dr. Lise Bisnaire 7 th Annual CANS Conference Baltimore, Maryland May Evaluation of the Connections.
© 2010 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved 426 South Yellowstone Drive, Suite 250, Madison, WI Phone (608) / Fax (608)
1 North Dakota Children and Family Services Review Paul Ronningen, Division Director Don Snyder, Permanency Unit Manager.
QSR/Practice Overview © Human Systems & Outcomes, Inc., 2010 Reviewing & Refining Our Practice: Applying Disciplined Inquiry to Case Practice to Improve.
Information for Effective Decision-Making: A Multi-Level Approach Nate Israel, PhD
A New Practice Model for Child Welfare
C4K – Building an efficient and effective delivery system to impact critical outcomes for kids Our initial focus as we build this system is early literacy.
Caregiver Support. Child Intervention Intake Statistics  Calgary and Area 2013:  The Region received 14,100 reports about a child or youth who may be.
Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.
Transforming Children’s Needs to Outcomes John Polakowski August 2010 © Copyright 2010 Cúram Software Limited. Company Confidential – For Internal Use.
1 Child and Family Services Review Program Improvement Plan Kick-Off Division/Staff Name Date (7/30/07)
Strategic Thinking to Align Initiatives and Integrate Management, Supervision, and Practice Heidi D. McIntosh, MSW Deputy Commissioner Fernando J. Muñiz,
JUVENILE COURT: CONTEXT AND OVERVIEW Janet Mason March 8, 2006 Institute of Government UNC at Chapel Hill.
An overview of Florida’s Practice Model Florida Department of Children and Families Copyright 2013 Florida Department of Children & Families.
Signs of Safety Toni Morkin, Senior Manager
Child Protection Transformation Overview October 18, 2012.
AMY FRIEZ NOVEMBER 7, 2012 UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA Response to Intervention and School Counseling:
School’s Cool in Childcare Settings
Signs of Safety Barb Lacroix Child Intervention Practice Specialist
Common Core 3.0 Content Overview Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.
Common Core 3.0 Executive Summary Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.
Overview of the Safety Assessment and Management Process Bryle Zickler, Human Services Program Specialist – OCYF Jana Hitchcock, Curriculum & Instructional.
10/ Introduction to the MA Department of Children and Families’ Integrated Casework Practice Model (ICPM) Fall 2009.
Assessment Skills Lab Structured Decision Making (SDM) Version 1.0 | 2014.
The Healthy Mothers, Healthy Babies Plan: An assessment of South Carolina’s efforts to reduce infant mortality and improve maternal and child health outcomes.
Strengthening Service Quality © The Quality Service Review Institute, a Division of the Child Welfare Policy & Practice Group, 2014.
that keep families strong
School’s Cool in Kindergarten for the Kindergarten Teacher School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
1 Adopting and Implementing a Shared Core Practice Framework A Briefing/Discussion Objectives: Provide a brief overview and context for: Practice Models.
A New Narrative for Child Welfare February 16, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on Children, Youth & Families.
AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION The nation’s voice for the protection of children & animals THE CHILD WELFARE RESPONSE CONTINUUM CHRONIC ISSUES THAT HAVE PLAGUED.
Mark Miller, Director of Training Maryam Fatemi; Regional Administrator Tedji Dessalegn Regional Administrator A Los Angeles “Regional Update” Fairness.
Structured Decision Making Child Welfare and the Law Spring 2006.
MOVING FORWARD: STATEWIDE PROGRESS OF MOFAS GRANTEES.
Children’s Mental Health Reform Overview: North Sound Mental Health Administration Prepared by Julie de Losada, M.S./CMHS
Managing Organizational Change A Framework to Implement and Sustain Initiatives in a Public Agency Lisa Molinar M.A.
Practice Model Elements Theoretical framework Values and principles Casework components Practice elements Practice behaviors.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
Assessing Child Vulnerabilities 1. Introductions Name Agency and Position What you’d like to learn today 2.
Overview of Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) and Quality Service Review (QSR) Process.
Welcome to the … CAPMIS Refresher 1. Name Agency, unit, and primary job function or title, time “on the job” One thing you find helpful about CAPMIS Introductions.
Overview of Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI).
Child Safety Framework: Analyzing and Planning for Child Safety.
Code of Conduct and Ethics Scope of Practice Eileen Quinn
Violence in families: Strengthening our practice.
PowerPoint Presentation for Family Finding: Evaluation.
Common Core 3.0 Online Learning Classroom Skill Building Field Activities.
Thursday, January 07, 2016 Charting the Course towards Permanency for Children in Pennsylvania Module 5: Risk Assessment.
Evaluation: from Objectives to Outcomes Janet Myers, PhD MPH AIDS Education and Training Centers National Evaluation Center
Family Assessment Response. Welcome & Introduction Introduce yourself to the group: 1.Name 2.Work location 3.Work title 4.What is it about FAR that brought.
Sandwell Safeguarding Children Board Annual Report 2015 Presentation to Council January 12 th 2016 John Harris – Independent Chair.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
1 Coaching the Integration of SOS/SDM UC Davis Webinar September 14, 2012 Heather Meitner, LCSW
Signs of Safety Webinar Series UC Davis Extension Center for Human Services Northern Training Academy Overview of Signs of Safety Implementation.
Section 6 The Three Global Outcomes. Key Principles for Early Intervention Service Provision 1.Infants and toddlers learn best through every day experiences.
7/6/09Office of Training and Professional Development1 Unit 3D: Safety Assessment Safety Permanency Well-being.
Clinical Supervision in CPS and FVS Safety Risk Critical Thinking.
Signs of Safety Toni Morkin, Senior Manager
Office of Children's Services
Family Preservation Services
Florida’s Safety Methodology
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
Case Management Pre-Service Curriculum Specialty Track
Children and Adolescents
Comprehensive Youth Services
The Family Functioning Assessment: Investigation and Safety Planning
Presentation transcript:

© 2008 CRC, All Rights Reserved 426 South Yellowstone Drive, Suite 250 Madison, WI Phone (608) The Children’s Research Center is a nonprofit social research organization and division of the National Council on Crime and Delinquency The Structured Decision Making Approach Focus on Case Planning

© 2008 CRC, All Rights Reserved Contribution of assessment Effective assessment Translation of assessment to plan Use of plan

© 2008 CRC, All Rights Reserved Overview of the SDM ® System Comprehensive assessment and decision-making model Different tools used at different decision points Structures the critical decisions through standardised assessments and decision protocols Research-based and/or evidence-based Reduces harm and expedites permanency

© 2008 CRC, All Rights Reserved Response priority assessment Safety assessment Risk assessment Family strengths and needs assessments Screening assessment Risk reassessment Reunification assessment Family strengths and needs reassessments Helpline CSC Is the child safe? Is it child abuse/neglect (CA/N)? How quickly do we need to respond? What is the likelihood of future maltreatment? What services does the family need? Ongoing Should the case remain open or be closed? Key Decision Points

© 2008 CRC, All Rights Reserved Distinct assessments Safety Imminent danger of serious harm Safe Safe with plan Unsafe Risk Probability of future harm Ongoing services? Service intensity S&N Underlying dynamics Focus of case plan

© 2008 CRC, All Rights Reserved Desirable qualities of assessment tools ReliabilityValidityEquity UtilityEffectiveness

© 2008 CRC, All Rights Reserved How much information is needed? All information Information learned Information needed for decision at hand

© 2008 CRC, All Rights Reserved Common, but unhelpful assessments Assessment by crisis Perpetual assessment The dog chasing the car

© 2008 CRC, All Rights Reserved Laying the foundation: Comprehensive assessment Adults »About 9 key domains Children »About 9 key domains

© 2008 CRC, All Rights Reserved Laying the foundation: Comprehensive assessment Each domain on similar scale »Above average strength »Strength »Some need »Major need Each item with operational definition Each item with a specific weight

© 2008 CRC, All Rights Reserved Laying the foundation: Comprehensive assessment Results: »Rank order of needs »Rank order of strengths Case plan should FOCUS on up to 3 areas of need for adults and assure that all child needs are addressed.

© 2008 CRC, All Rights Reserved Clarifying myths Just a checklist Requires skilled interviewing Requires knowledge of key dynamics Doesn’t involve family Family is primary SOURCE of information Family is partner in planning Isn’t clinical ENOUGH Purpose is high level focus Must fit with realities of casework Can partner with “nested” detailed assessments

© 2008 CRC, All Rights Reserved Translating assessment to plan Identify goals: what will it look like when it’s better Identify actions and/or services to achieve those goals Serve as yardstick against which to measure progress

© 2008 CRC, All Rights Reserved Unhelpful, but sadly common case plan types Kitchen sink If we’ve got it, you’re gonna get it One size fits all My last work shop

© 2008 CRC, All Rights Reserved Unhelpful but sadly common uses of case plans Compliance Never-ending plans…. Forgotten

© 2008 CRC, All Rights Reserved Issues in implementation Lack of transition from FSNA results to case plan Case plan formats not linked to FSNA Unilateral case plan development Goals expressed as service compliance vs. outcomes Lack of continuous tracking of progress Lack of direct link from progress to reassessment decision