Coordinated Resource Management Planning (CRMP) Who, What, Where, Why, When ?? So What ??

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Kentuckys Public Safety Awareness Initiative Program Coordination and Partnerships August 23, 2005.
Advertisements

Facilitated by Joanne Fraser RiverSystems
1.05 Characteristics of Effective Teams
On The Right Track Multiple Response System (MRS) and System of Care (SOC) North Carolina’s Child Welfare Reform Model 1, 2008.
Twelve Cs for Team Building
Why Do People Join Groups?
LEADERSHIP IN TEAMS AND DECISION GROUPS- CHAPTER 10 BUA 200- Organizational Leadership.
Watershed Approaches and Community Based Planning
Sustainable Regional Water Resource Management By: Tucson Regional Water Coalition and Southern Arizona Leadership Council.
1.05 Characteristics of Effective Teams
Session 2.3: Skills for Supportive Supervision
Public Engagement in a Multi-Stakeholder World Don Lenihan June 2008.
Serving citizens of the region through member governments… Watershed Technical Team Kick-off Meeting - July 17, 2008.
A Module of Purdue University’s LeadingEdge Program
Welcome!. What is a Collaborative Team? A group of diverse members who work together to share their expertise to address issues, solve problems or give.
CoP: Getting Started 2. What are Communities of Practice? A way of working Involving those who do shared work Involving those that share issues Always.
Joint Staff School Committee Training. Why do we need a JSSC? Provide orderly and professional means of improving educational programs, conditions within.
GROUP SKILLS GXEX1406 Thinking and Communication Skills.
 The source for guidance on the roles, qualities, and practice of leadership in NA comes from our and practice of leadership in NA comes from our Steps,
Runway Safety Teams (RSTs) Description and Processes Session 5 Presentation 1.
Community-based Education K-12 students serving as a resource for meeting community needs.
RST processes Session 6 Presentation 3. A framework for RST processes Establishing an RST Membership Terms of reference Work programme (schedule, agenda,
2005 Talent Development High Schools Polytechnic High School, Sun Valley, Ca Building & Sustaining Teams Tara Madden TDHS Regional Manager Former Ninth.
WATERSHED PLANNING A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROCESS University of Missouri Water Quality Program Staff: Bob Broz, Dan Downing, John Tharp.
Parents Working Together to Shape Education in Elk Island Public Schools (EIPS) ASCA School Councils Connection Conference 08 Saturday, April 26, 2008.
Conservation Districts in New York Training Module 1.
Locally Led Conservation Colorado State Conservation Board.
The Power of Water A Regional Perspective on Water Resource Challenges and Opportunities Lester S. Dixon Director of Programs, South Atlantic Division.
St. Croix Valley Restorative Justice Program Volunteer Information.
Human Services Integration Building More Effective Responses to Peoples’ Needs.
Advancing Cooperative Conservation. 4C’s Team An interagency effort established in early 2003 by Department of the Interior Secretary Gale Norton Advance.
Integrated Regional Watershed Management Plan Presentation – November 21, 2013 HLVRCD.
The total number of immigrant seniors in Peel is 70,480. Approximately 70% of seniors in Peel are immigrants. Approximately 35% of Peel’s seniors are.
Elements of Effective Behavior Based Safety Programs
Community Board Orientation 6- Community Board Orientation 6-1.
Prepared by: Omar almegbel. ahmad ayasrah Ammar alirr. Ahmad aljarrah. Amjad aljarrah..
© 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Serving as Designated Leader © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. C.
9. EAFM START UP B Essential EAFM Date Place 9. EAFM Startup B: Engage Stakeholders Version 1.
Working in Teams, Unit 4 Individual Roles and Team Mission Working in Teams/Unit 41 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010.
Bear Creek OR 1976 Bear Creek OR Burro Creek AZ 1981 Burro Creek AZ 2000.
RIPARIAN PROPER FUNCTIONING CONDITION A Tool for Integrating the Fundamental Sciences into Collaborative Decision-Making.
CREEKS & COMMUNITIES Laura Van Riper – Social Scientist National Riparian Service Team.
FINAL PRESENTATION OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOUR AND ANALYSIS Prepared for : Dr. S. Kumar Group : Dollar 2 A. R. S. BANDARA - PGIA / 06 / 6317 B. A. G. K.
COMMUNITY COALITION BUILDING. Workshop Objectives  Describe effective community coalition building  What?  Why?  How?  Key challenges and success.
SPED 618: Lifelong Integration Definitions and Dimensions of the Interactive Team.
Rebuilding the System Reducing the Risk California Water Plan Plenary Session October 22-23, 2007.
Chapter 9* Managing Meetings. Chapter 10/Managing Meetings Hilgert & Leonard © Explain why meetings, committees, and being able to lead meetings.
© BLR ® —Business & Legal Resources 1408 Teambuilding for All Employees.
21 st Century Principals Institute Copy March 2009.
Kettle River Watershed Management Plan Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting #3 – July 19, 2012.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. School, Family, and Community Collaboration Chapter 3.
MEKONG RIVER COMMISSION PROGRAMMES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT.
Common Core Parenting: Best Practice Strategies to Support Student Success Core Components: Successful Models Patty Bunker National Director Parenting.
Community Wildfire Protection Planning: HFRA and Beyond.
Leadership Skills. Team Meetings Set the agenda by defining goals and desired outcomes Set the agenda by defining goals and desired outcomes Keep the.
Community-Based Deer Management Collaborative Deer Management Outreach Initiative.
SO – What is CRM ? Stakeholder consensus decision-making process. Stakeholders are any interest with a stake in the consequences of the decision. The.
Advancing learning through service Tamara Thorpe Trainer | Coach | Consultant Region 2 NAFSA Albuquerque, NM.
Managing the Human Footprint. Planning, Policy, and Management  Key elements in the process of identifying problems and their possible solutions  Essential.
Introduction to the Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP) June 10, 2016 Carol Rivera– Program Manager An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer.
 In Ned law are a company that provides strategic consulting and management, composed of a team of high academic and social esteem, focused on optimization,
Bill Hubbard Southern Regional Extension Forester taking the urban forest to the next level.
Channeling Change: Making Collective Impact Work
Conservation Districts
Operation Shop Supervisor
A Focus on Team Meetings
Cooperative Learning Students work together in small groups and learn through interaction with each other while the teacher coaches the process.
Effective Meeting.
Unit 14 Emergency Planning IS 235
Presentation transcript:

Coordinated Resource Management Planning (CRMP) Who, What, Where, Why, When ?? So What ??

The Role of a Coordinated Resource Management Plan Coordinated Resource Management and Planning (CRMP) is a resource planning, problem solving, and management (decision making) process that allows for direct participation of everyone (stakeholders) concerned with resource management in a given planning area. minimizes conflict among land users The concept underlying CRMP is that coordinating resource uses results in improved resource management and minimizes conflict among land users, landowners, government agencies, and interest groups. resource boundaries Resource problems are addressed and solved based on resource boundaries; they are not constrained by individual, agency, or political boundary. local level those who live, work, and recreate on a given piece of land are the people most interested The CRMP process operates on the local level with the underlying philosophy being that those who live, work, and recreate on a given piece of land are the people most interested in and capable of developing plans for its use. voluntarily meet together as a planning team will find common ground as they interact with one another Inevitable conflicts in resource use that arise from diverse interest and goals are best solved by face- to-face communication among all interested groups and individuals. Experience has shown that people with diverse viewpoints who voluntarily meet together as a planning team will find common ground as they interact with one another and have a chance to observe resource problems first hand. Through discussion, landowners, users, and resource managers begin to understand and respect each other's viewpoints. The end result is constructive problem solving through cooperative resource planning. community support essential The local focus of the CRMP process makes community support essential. Community awareness of the constructive, problem solving nature of the plan strengthens the commitment of those involved in the planning group to make the plan work. In addition, news of the successful implementation of the CRMP process in an area can stimulate surrounding areas to follow suit, reducing resource conflicts throughout a region.

Goals: Example Develop and Implement a coordinated resource management plan for the recovery of the fisheries and economies of the South Fork Trinity River Basin. Promote equality, cooperation and voluntary participation among all members of the CRMP process. Build trust. Objectives: Provide the leadership necessary to bring diverse interest groups to agreement on resource management opportunities. Perform upland watershed analysis and inventory. Determine risk potential for sediment yield from private and public land. Assess water quality and quantity improvement opportunity. Strive to prevent listing of species under the Endangered Species Act through habitat improvement and population recovery. Increase forest productivity through soil conservation. Provide access to, and facilitate transfer of, technical information and expertise. Serve as a liaison between the agencies, industries and local grass roots groups.

CRMP FLOW CHART CRMP Request from private or public entity. Private and public landowners and managers, resources managers and others in the general planning area invited to initial meeting. Define specific planning area; list issues, problems and concerns; list objectives. Determine information available and needed, including maps and resource data. List all problems on one sheet and all objectives on a separate sheet. Use checklist to make sure all resources have been considered. List each objective on a separate sheet. List all actions needed to accomplish it. Use checklist to make sure all resources have been considered. For each action, list the who, what, when and how long information; organize it into a logical sequence to meet the objective. Make CRM decision. Reevaluate the plan to determine if it will really solve the problems listed. Set up a system to maintain actions. Implement the plan Schedule annual reviews of progress, accomplishments, problems, new objectives and lay out the coming year’s work.

FOUR STEPS IMPORTANT TO A SUCESSFUL CRM 1. The local private landowners must recognize that there is a need and have the desire to fix that need. The private landowner must be willing to commit the time, and resources to arrive at solution to fix that need and be willing to work with the other land managers in implementing practices identified by group consensus.

FOUR STEPS CONTINUED 2. Everyone seated at the table must be a manager of the resource and must be able to make decisions for the agency or land owner they represent. It is the duty of the facilitator to make sure that only resource managers are seated at the table. Interested groups may attend the meetings and may voice opinions at the appropriate place when questioned or during public comment periods.

FOUR STEPS CONTINUED 2. (continued) The facilitator must also make sure that there is only one voice for each resource management group. Some agencies will send more than one person to the meetings, but only one may sit at the table as a representative of that agency. 3. It is important to remember that special interest groups (Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, Mule Deer Foundation, and others…..) are not decision makers unless they own land with the boundaries of the CRM

FOUR STEPS CONTINUED 3. (continued) It is important to give special interest groups a chance to comment and to feel that their opinions are respected because often they can and do help with financing the resource improvements. 4. It is important that the facilitator makes the agenda and that there is a time limit on each item. Often position gets in the way of need and consensus cannot be reached at this meeting.