San Diego Gas & Electric February 24 th, 2016 Energy Matinee Pricing Tariff Proposal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SmartPOWER Critical Peak Pricing (CPP) June 3, 2008.
Advertisements

Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
Time-of-Use and Critical Peak Pricing
1 The Potential For Implementing Demand Response Programs In Illinois Rick Voytas Manager, Corporate Analysis Ameren Services May 12, 2006.
Demand Response in Connecticut Presented by: Bob Laurita ISO New England December 2, 2004.
Automated Demand Response Pilot 2005/2004 Load Impact Results and Recommendations Final Report © 2005 Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI) Research & Consulting.
Cost of Services Pricing Enables a Net Zero Energy World © 2011San Diego Gas & Electric Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved. 1.
2015/16 changes to the winter time-of-use peak periods and tariff charge name changes.
CPUC Submetering Pilot Adam Langton CPUC Energy Division May 2014.
Critical Peak Pricing Gulf Power’s Experience Dan Merilatt, V.P. Marketing Services GoodCents Solutions, Inc. Stone Mountain, GA September 9, 2002.
Energy Storage Definitions/Definitions ETWG 18 Feb 2013.
The California Energy Crisis Continuing Update Lon W. House, Ph.D ACWA Energy Advisor.
The ESKOM Pilot Testing and Findings of the Residential Time-of-Use Tariff (Homeflex) Project by Vashna Singh and Marcus Dekenah 17 October 2006.
Energy Efficiency and Demand Response: Separate Efforts or Two Ends of a Continuum? A Presentation to: Association of Edison Illuminating Companies Reno,
Enhancing Interruptible Rates Through MISO Demand Response: WIEG Annual Meeting June 19, 2008 Presented by: Kavita Maini, Principal KM Energy Consulting,
Electrical Billing and Rates MAE406 Energy Conservation in Industry Stephen Terry.
Utility Rates Electric, Natural Gas, and Water. Electric Utility Different Utility Business Models – “IOU” – Investor Owned Utility Ultimately responsible.
TIME OF USE RATES AT THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY Presented at: Connecticut’s Energy Future December 2, 2004 James D. Lundrigan Pricing Manager The.
PG&E’s General Market Virtual Net Metering Schedule NEMV
WAL-MART STORES, INC. ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND DEMAND RESPONSE.
Power Utilities in the Telecom Business in the USA: Past Failures and Future Trends Mike Oldak Vice President & General Counsel Utilities Telecom Council.
1 Demand Response Update April, Strategic Perspective Demand Response  Aligns with PGE’s Strategic Direction; helping to provide exceptional.
THE RESPONSE OF INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS TO ELECTRIC RATES BASED UPON DYNAMIC MARGINAL COSTS BY Joseph A. Herriges, S. Mostafa Baladi, Douglas W. Caves and.
Overview of Residential Pricing/Advanced Metering Pilots Charles Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory SMPPI Board Meeting August 3, 2005.
Measurement, Verification, and Forecasting Protocols for Demand Response Resources: Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
What’s Coming Down with Energy in California Lon W. House, Ph.D ACWA Fall Conference 2003 San Diego, CA.
Highlights of Commission Activities Little Rock ASHRAE Monthly Meeting October 12, 2011 Presented By: John P. Bethel.
Vehicle-Grid Integration (VGI) © 2011San Diego Gas & Electric Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved.
Innovative approach to DSM through Open Access Jayant Deo MD & CEO, Indian Energy Exchange
Presentation to the: Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Demand-Side Response Working Group December 8, 2006 Gas Utility Decoupling in New Jersey A.
© 2006 San Diego Gas & Electric Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved. SDG&E’s Sustainable Communities Program and Support for our Solar.
Why is WPL filing a rate case?  Last Base Case Rates were set January, 2007  Cost of our utility investments must be reflected in prices our customers.
Page 1 Schedule Experimental Energy Reduction (EER) updated 2005 Note: This program is available to qualified participants within the EntergyArkansas,
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION. California Perspective on Real Time Pricing Michael R. Jaske, Ph.D. California Energy Commission Committee on Regional Electric.
The Secrets to Successful AMI Deployment – The Ontario Experience Paul Murphy, President & CEO Independent Electricity System Operator February 19, 2007.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.
New Jersey Community RE / Solar Programs* New Jersey Board of Public Utilities Net Metering & Interconnection Rules Stakeholder Meeting July 23, 2008 *FOR.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 and Its Revisions to PURPA November 11, 2005 Grace D. Soderberg Assistant General Counsel National Association of Regulatory.
CEC 08-DR-1 Efficiency Committee Workshop 3/3/08.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
Idaho Power Company Demand Response & Dynamic Pricing Programs PNDRP December 5, 2008 Darlene Nemnich Pete Pengilly.
Commercial & Industrial Customer Implications of Smart Metering Allan Boucher Capgemini Canada.
1 Demand Response A 28 Year History of Demand Response Programs for the Electric Cooperatives of Arkansas by Forest Kessinger Manager, Rates and Forecasting.
SDG&E’s Proposal to Implement AB 920 July 9, 2010.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
© 2004 San Diego Gas and Electric. All copyright and trademark rights reserved Demand Response Programs Backup Material.
An Overview of Demand Response in California July 2011.
Overview of Governing Document for Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Stakeholder Workshop Mark Patterson, ERCOT Staff March 1, 2013.
More Than Smart – A Distribution System Vision © 2011San Diego Gas & Electric Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved. Dave Geier – VP Electric.
CEC Load Management Standards Workshop March 3, Update on the CPUC’s Demand Response and Advanced Metering Proceedings Bruce Kaneshiro Energy Division.
Multi-Use Application Use Case #3: Optimized Pricing and Resource Allocation (OPRA) Project. May 3, 2016.
DRMEC Spring 2016 Load Impacts Evaluation Workshop San Francisco, California May 10, SDG&E Summer Saver Load Impact Evaluation.
Communicating Thermostats for Residential Time-of-Use Rates: They Do Make a Difference Presented at ACEEE Summer Study 2008.
Matinee Pricing Opt-in Pilot Rate Proposal (R ) Commission Workshop February 24, 2016 Manager, Pricing Design.
Hawai’i Over 77,000 PV systems interconnected or approved statewide. 17% of customers 500+ MW of PV installed Oahu: 32% of single family homes have.
City of East Point Electric Vehicle Rate Chau Nguyen, ECG
CLECA Proposal on Matinee Pricing Barbara R. Barkovich, Barkovich & Yap., Inc. For California Large Energy Consumers Association Matinee Pricing Workshop.
May 9 th, 2016 California Public Utilities Commission Power Charge Indifference Adjustment (PCIA) Workshop.
Advanced Meter School August 18-20,2015 Time of Use and Load Profile Jeremiah Swann.
BLACK HILLS ENERGY 2016 Energy Efficiency Portfolio Annual Results Overview December 8, :00am – 12:00pm MST Mark James – Energy Efficiency Program.
Kaysville City, UT Electric Rate Study Results
California Product Offerings
System Control based Renewable Energy Resources in Smart Grid Consumer
Resource Adequacy Demand Forecast Coincidence Adjustments
Medium & Heavy Duty Electric Transportation Rate Designs at SCE
The Seller’s Webinar will begin promptly at 1:03
Presentation transcript:

San Diego Gas & Electric February 24 th, 2016 Energy Matinee Pricing Tariff Proposal

Proposal Overview Pilot Objective: evaluate customers’ abilities to respond to hourly dynamic pricing signals, for the purpose of promoting water-energy nexus – Evaluate the effect of this tariff design to allow for water pumping customers with demand response control technologies to shift their energy use to non-off- peak hours Proposal: optional hourly dynamic commodity rate for agricultural and water pumping customers – Includes (1) prices that vary hourly; (2) a dynamic rate component; and (3) net surplus energy credits

Benefits of Hourly Dynamic Pricing Better reflects “real time” variation in pricing Able to adapt to future system conditions Provides customers with more low-cost hours than traditional TOU pricing Includes both SDG&E and CAISO price signals, to address ramping, overgeneration, and increased frequency response

Applicability Optionally available to existing PA-T-1 customers – Typically agricultural and water pumping customers, maximum monthly demand >500kW 1 – As of December 2015, 233 customers on this rate – Recruitment through SDG&E’s account executives Not available to Direct Access or Community Choice Aggregation customers (Commodity offering only) 1 Schedule PA-T-1 Applicability: Available to agricultural and water pumping customers whose Maximum Monthly Demand is expected to be above 500 kw and who are classified with one or more of the following North American Industry Classification (NAICS) Codes , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 11212, 11221, , 11239, , 11291, 11299, , , , 22131, or This schedule is also available to those agricultural and water pumping customers whose maximum demand is less than 500 kw who are installing or have installed facilities or procedures to reduce their annual on-peak energy consumption by 1,500 kwhrs and are also classified by the above NAICS Codes. Service under this schedule is subject to meter availability. PA-T-1 Accounts as of 2/20/16 Accounts% Accounts Agriculture*14929% Water**27454% Other8617% Total509

Rate Design Standard Pricing Two-Period Hourly Commodity Base Rate Lower Commodity rate during super off-peak period (excludes generation capacity costs) Higher Commodity rate in all other hours (includes some generation capacity costs) CAISO Hourly Commodity Rate Applied day-ahead (in all hours) Event Day Pricing Dynamic Critical Peak Pricing hourly adder Applied to top 150 system peak hours Recovers most generation capacity costs Day-ahead notification Surplus Energy Credit Applied on days with high renewable supply (“duck belly” days) Day-of (hour-ahead) notification

TOU Periods Time PeriodSchedule – Optional Tariff Super Off-Peak12:00 a.m. – 6:00 a.m. weekdays, excluding weekends 12:00 a.m. – 2:00 p.m. weekends, holidays OtherAll Other Hours Dynamic SignalsIn response to high system load or abundance of renewable energy Time PeriodSchedule – Otherwise Applicable Tariff SummerWinter On-Peak11:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m. weekdays5:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. weekdays Semi-Peak6:00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. – 10:00 p.m. weekdays 6:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. – 10:00 p.m. weekdays Off-Peak10:00 p.m. – 6:00 a.m. weekdays, and All Hours weekends and holidays

Rate Application Non-Event Hours Commodity Base Rate + CAISO Hourly Commodity Rate System Peak Event Hours Commodity Base Rate + CAISO Hourly Commodity Rate + Dynamic Commodity Adder Surplus Energy Hours Commodity Base Rate + CAISO Hourly Commodity Rate - Surplus Energy Credit (CAISO Day Ahead – CAISO Day Of)

Implementation and Timeline Price signals sent through open communication protocol to customer owned control systems – Alternative method may be utilized if needed Begin no sooner than Q year pilot length

Pilot Evaluation EM&V Plan based on Demand Response Load Impact Protocols Requires two years of participation data Load Impact Evaluation will require a third party consultant – Consultant to be selected through a Request for Proposal (“RFP”)

Budget and Cost Recovery Total Budget Estimated total costs, $1 million - $1.75 million $250,000 to fund load impact study Remainder for IT system changes Additional budget required for IT changes if implementation is required prior to the completion of other expected billing system changes Cost Recovery SDG&E Requests a memorandum account to track costs Will record verifiable incremental expenses associated with set-up of pilot EM&V studies marketing, education and outreach other reasonable expenditures