Team Structure and Function October, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project of the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PBIS-Working smarter not Harder Barbara Kelley PBIS Coordinator 5/26/09.
Advertisements

RTI Implementer Webinar Series: Establishing a Screening Process
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports: New Team Training PBIS Team Day 1.
Implementing School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob Horner, George Sugai and Anne Todd University of Oregon Center on Positive Behavior Interventions.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series IDEA and the Multi-level Prevention System.
Sustained Implementation of School-wide PBIS for All Students George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of.
 Getting Started: Work Smarter, Not Harder Michele Wackman School Psychologist District #623.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Implementation – Teaming Northwest AEA September 7, 2010.
Issues and Challenges in School-wide Prevention Carl Liaupsin University of Arizona pbisaz.org (with support and material from the National Technical Assistance.
Aligning Resource for School Improvement: Getting Everyone on Same Page George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Prioritizing and Integrating Initiatives: Work Smarter Appendix B – Pages 16 – 19, 21.
Coaching for Implementation: Best Practices Perspective George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
Shawnee Mission Schools Outcomes for Today Basic Knowledge of Positive Behavior Supports The Role of the PBS Team PBS Training System and Timeline.
George Sugai & Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS University of CT & OR
CT SWPBS: Coaching George Sugai Brandi Simonsen OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut March 28, 2007
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is RTI?
IU 5 Educational Consultants and SWPBS Facilitators: Annette Eccles Erin Eighmy Mary Flowers Laura Yaeger School-Wide Positive Behavior Support.
Getting Started: Work Smarter, Not Harder. The Challenge Whenever a new initiative is introduced to a school, district/region, or state, the general approach.
General Session School-wide Reform Mary Kealy & George Sugai Loudoun Cty P.S., VA OSEP Center on PBIS July 20,
GRAND RAPIDS PUBLIC SCHOOLS AUGUST Introduction to Coaching.
SWPBS Coaching: More than Reminders Donald H. Eichhorn Middle School Team & Coaches George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education &
Sustained Implementation of School-wide PBIS for All Students George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of.
BoQ Critical Element: PBIS Team. 1. Team has administrative support 2. Team has regular meetings (at least monthly) 3. Team has established a clear mission/
Gary L. Cates, Ph.D. Illinois State University Kathryn Cox Illinois State Board of Education State Personnel Development Grant – Illinois U.S. Department.
Work Smarter… Not Harder Katie Schmitt, S-RIP Adapted from: Rob Horner and Michele Wackman.
Systems Logic for Sustained Large Scale Implementation George Sugai National Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports UConn Center for Behavioral.
Andy Friedman, District 65 PBIS External Coach Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) : District 65 Internal Coaches Meeting.
Coaching for Implementation: Best Practices Perspective George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
SWPBS: Readiness & Commitment George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut June 6,
Introduction to Strong Educator Support System.
Transforming Complexity into Practical Action Rob Horner University of Oregon
PBIS District Leadership Team Overview Administrative Team Meeting August 13, 2008.
Implementing School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob Horner and George Sugai University of Oregon and University of Connecticut OSEP TA Center on Positive.
SWPBS: Establishing District & Community Capacity (Beyond Classroom Management) Carl Cole & George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Essential Component: Schoolwide, Multi-Level Prevention System Katie Klingler Tackett National Center on.
Data Examples Problem Identification—Tier 1 October, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG)
Introduction to the Grant August-September, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project.
Establish and Maintain Leadership Team: Supporting Implementation of Schoolwide PBIS.
Scheduling at Tier 2: How Do We Fit It All In? September 24, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant.
Scheduling at Tier 2: How Do We Fit It All In? September 24, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant.
Effective Meeting Practices November, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project of.
The Missouri—Show Me Outcomes Story. Missouri Integrated Model (2007 SPDG)
Addressing Assumptions, Beliefs, and Controversial Issues Surrounding RtI/MTSS at Tier 3 October, 2014 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network.
Fidelity: Maximizing the Effectiveness of Tier 2 September 24, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development.
Data and Assessment-Using the Right Data to Make Better Decisions September 24, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
Participant Handouts Tier 1 Assessment/Data Systems Tier 1 Grade Level/Department Data Teams For External Coaches The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel.
Dial-in: Passcode: RTI/Multi-Tiered Models of Intervention PLC Movement Between Tiers of Intervention & Implications for Special.
Teaming at Tier 2: Collaborative, Effective, & Efficient Teams September 24, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel.
Data and Assessment-Using the Right Data to Make Better Decisions September 24, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel.
Louisiana State Personnel Development Grant Personnel Development Grant to improve outcomes for SWD Awarded to the LDOE in 2016.
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Getting Started George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut April 6,
New Jersey Tiered System of Supports (NJTSS)
NCDB Webinar Series Early Identification & Referral: Community Programs Wednesday • March 9, 2016 The contents of this PowerPoint presentation were developed.

SAPSI-S PEP Overview I-RtI Network December, 2012
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
ESSA Updates NO new updates at this time
Reaching All Students: RtI & SWPBS
Building Family Engagement into the RTI System
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Sustainability & Scaling & Failure of Friday In-service Day
Professional Learning Communities Kick-off Day
NC Preschool Pyramid Model Leadership Team Summit January 9-10, 2019
Facilitated/Presented by:
2019 OSEP Leadership Conference
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS)
Implementing School-wide Positive Behavior Support
From “Talking the Talk” to “Walking the Walk:” RI’s Engagement Story
Presentation transcript:

Team Structure and Function October, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project of the Illinois State Board of Education. All funding (100%) is from federal sources. The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the U.S. Department of Education, #H325A However, those contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the U.S. Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. (OSEP Project Officer: Grace Zamora Durán) I-RtI Network Insert name(s) here

Types of Teams to Support RtI Implementation 1. District Leadership Team 2. School Improvement Team 3. Grade/ Department/ Interdisciplinary Team with Supports 4. Individual Problem Solving & Special Ed Decision Making Team

Purpose, Membership, Roles and Responsibilities 1. District Leadership Team

Purpose, Membership, Roles and Responsibilities 1. District Leadership Team 2 School Improvement Team

Work Smarter

Initiative, Committee PurposeOutcomeTarget Group Staff Involved SIP/SID/ etc Attendance Committee Increase attendance % of students attending All students Eric, Ellen, Marlee Goal #2 Character Education Improve character Student behavior? All students Marlee, J.S., Ellen Goal #3 Safety Committee Improve safety Dangerous students Has not metGoal #3 School Spirit Committee School spiritAll students Has not met Discipline Committee Improve behavior Improve discipline Bullies, repeat offenders Ellen, Eric, Marlee, Otis Goal #3 DARE Committee Decrease drug use High risk drug users Don?? EBS Work Group Implement 3-tier model Office referrals, Attendance, Grades All students Eric, Ellen, Marlee, Otis, Emma Goal #2 Goal #3 Non-Example Working Smarter Matrix Sugai

Initiative, Project, Committee PurposeOutcome Target Group Staff InvolvedSIP Bring to the Table Working Smarter

Change in Team Membership

Initiative, Project, Committee PurposeOutcome Target Group Staff InvolvedSIP Bring to the Table Working Smarter

Parent involvement in RtI is not limited to when and how to bring individual parents into the discussion about their child. - Sue Hans

Role of the Parent Leader is: To participate in the initial program development of RtI within a district or building by serving on the leadership team. To serve in an advisory capacity to the leadership team on best ways to communicate RtI program plan to parents. To participate in the initial training of administrative and educational staff on RtI. But, role is not for individual students Sue Hans

Resources Parent & Educator Partnerships Parent Training and Information Centers – Family Resource Center on Disabilities (Chicago) – Family Matters (Effingham, IL) Joyce L. Epstein, Mavis G. Sanders, et al (2002). School, Family and Community Partnerships – Your Handbook for Action. Second edition.

Group Discussion Do you have a DLT? Do you address the purposes intended? Does it have the necessary members? Are the necessary roles and responsibilities being addressed? Do you have a BLT/SIP? Do you address the purposes intended? Does it have the necessary members? Are the necessary roles and responsibilities being addressed? If no, what are the barriers that you are currently facing?

Group Discussion Do you have a DLT? Do you have a BLT/SIP? If no, How do you plan to address the purposes intended? How can you ensure you have the necessary members? How can you ensure the intended roles and responsibilities will be addressed?

Application Assignment Read The Building Leadership Team and Choose one area to prioritize and action plan around based on your responses in the group discussion

Work Smarter

Initiative, Committee PurposeOutcomeTarget Group Staff Involved SIP/SID/ etc Attendance Committee Increase attendance % of students attending All students Eric, Ellen, Marlee Goal #2 Character Education Improve character Student behavior? All students Marlee, J.S., Ellen Goal #3 Safety Committee Improve safety Dangerous students Has not metGoal #3 School Spirit Committee School spiritAll students Has not met Discipline Committee Improve behavior Improve discipline Bullies, repeat offenders Ellen, Eric, Marlee, Otis Goal #3 DARE Committee Decrease drug use High risk drug users Don?? EBS Work Group Implement 3-tier model Office referrals, Attendance, Grades All students Eric, Ellen, Marlee, Otis, Emma Goal #2 Goal #3 Non-Example Working Smarter Matrix Sugai

Initiative, Project, Committee PurposeOutcomeTarget GroupStaff InvolvedSIP Working Smarter

Stages of Team Development FormingStormingNormingPerformingAdjourning Bruce Tuckman

Table Talk Reflect on your team...what stage are they in currently? As a Coach, how is knowing the stages of team development useful to support RtI implementation? How would you respond as a Coach to a team in the: – Forming Stage? – Storming Stage? – Norming Stage? – Performing Stage? – Adjourning Stage? If needed, what steps could you take to help them move to the next stage?