ATLAS The ConditionDB is accessed by the offline reconstruction framework (ATHENA). COOLCOnditions Objects for LHC The interface is provided by COOL (COnditions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
E.K.Stefanides March 07, The Muon Spectrometer of the ATLAS detector: progress report on construction and physics studies at the University of Athens.
Advertisements

Clara Gaspar on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration, “Physics at the LHC and Beyond”, Quy Nhon, Vietnam, August 2014 Challenges and lessons learnt LHCb Operations.
GNAM and OHP: Monitoring Tools for the ATLAS Experiment at LHC GNAM and OHP: Monitoring Tools for the ATLAS Experiment at LHC M. Della Pietra, P. Adragna,
1 Alignment using high Pt tracks 1.Small w.r.t. large barrel chambers 2.BEE w.r.t. EC chambers 3.Endcap – Barrel 4.BIS8 w.r.t. BIS7 5.Inner tracker – Muon.
Inefficiencies in the feet region 40 GeV muons selection efficiency   Barrel – End Cap transition 10th International Conference on Advanced Technology.
1 Databases in ALICE L.Betev LCG Database Deployment and Persistency Workshop Geneva, October 17, 2005.
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS First-Level Trigger Groups International Europhysics Conference on High.
Information Systems and Data Acquisition for ATLAS What was achievedWhat is proposedTasks Database Access DCS TDAQ Athena ConditionsDB Time varying data.
HLT & Calibration.
ATLAS Muon test beam, E. Etzion, NSS System Test of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer in the H8 Beam at the CERN SPS Erez Etzion (Tel Aviv University),
The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.
Online Measurement of LHC Beam Parameters with the ATLAS High Level Trigger David W. Miller on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration 27 May th Real-Time.
March 2003 CHEP Online Monitoring Software Framework in the ATLAS Experiment Serguei Kolos CERN/PNPI On behalf of the ATLAS Trigger/DAQ Online Software.
First year experience with the ATLAS online monitoring framework Alina Corso-Radu University of California Irvine on behalf of ATLAS TDAQ Collaboration.
1 Raw Event : ByteStream implementation Muon Workshop, April 2002 A. Nisati, for the Muon Trigger group.
August 98 1 Jürgen Knobloch ATLAS Software Workshop Ann Arbor ATLAS Computing Planning ATLAS Software Workshop August 1998 Jürgen Knobloch Slides also.
DAQ System at the 2002 ATLAS Muon Test Beam G. Avolio – Univ. della Calabria E. Pasqualucci - INFN Roma.
The Muon Conditions Data Management: Database Architecture and Software Infrastructure Monica Verducci University of Wuerzburg & CERN 5-9 October 2009.
Precision Drift Chambers for the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Susanne Mohrdieck Max-Planck-Institut f. Physik, Munich for the ATLAS Muon Collaboration Abstracts:
Alignment Strategy for ATLAS: Detector Description and Database Issues
LHC: ATLAS Experiment meeting “Conditions” data challenge Elizabeth Gallas - Oxford - August 29, 2009 XLDB3.
Software Solutions for Variable ATLAS Detector Description J. Boudreau, V. Tsulaia University of Pittsburgh R. Hawkings, A. Valassi CERN A. Schaffer LAL,
Manoj Kumar Jha INFN – Bologna On Behalf of ATLAS Muon Calibration Group 20 th October 2010/CHEP 2010, Taipei ATLAS Muon Calibration Framework.
André Augustinus 10 September 2001 DCS Architecture Issues Food for thoughts and discussion.
CHEP 2006, Mumbai13-Feb-2006 LCG Conditions Database Project COOL Development and Deployment: Status and Plans Andrea Valassi On behalf of the COOL.
2nd September Richard Hawkings / Paul Laycock Conditions data handling in FDR2c  Tag hierarchies set up (largely by Paul) and communicated in advance.
Databases E. Leonardi, P. Valente. Conditions DB Conditions=Dynamic parameters non-event time-varying Conditions database (CondDB) General definition:
Web application for detailed real-time database transaction monitoring for CMS condition data ICCMSE 2009 The 7th International Conference of Computational.
Gnam Monitoring Overview M. Della Pietra, D. della Volpe (Napoli), A. Di Girolamo (Roma1), R. Ferrari, G. Gaudio, W. Vandelli (Pavia) D. Salvatore, P.
Detector Diagnostics Calibration Analysis Ped/LED/Laser RadDam Analysis Detector Optimization Lumi Detector Performance Monitoring DQM On/Offline Prompt.
Computing in High Energy Physics – Interlaken - September 2004 Ada Farilla Offline Software for the ATLAS Combined Test Beam Ada Farilla – I.N.F.N. Roma3.
24/06/03 ATLAS WeekAlexandre Solodkov1 Status of TileCal software.
Clara Gaspar, March 2005 LHCb Online & the Conditions DB.
Introduction CMS database workshop 23 rd to 25 th of February 2004 Frank Glege.
3rd November Richard Hawkings Luminosity, detector status and trigger - conditions database and meta-data issues  How we might apply the conditions.
TRT Offline Software DOE Visit, August 21 st 2008 Outline: oTRT Commissioning oTRT Offline Software Activities oTRT Alignment oTRT Efficiency and Noise.
The Status of the ATLAS Experiment Dr Alan Watson University of Birmingham on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
September 2007CHEP 07 Conference 1 A software framework for Data Quality Monitoring in ATLAS S.Kolos, A.Corso-Radu University of California, Irvine, M.Hauschild.
Luca Spogli Università Roma Tre & INFN Roma Tre
Artemis School On Calibration and Performance of ATLAS Detectors Jörg Stelzer / David Berge.
Muon Reconstruction with Moore and MuonIdentification The Moore/MUID group Atlas Physics Workshop Athens, May 2003.
Online (GNAM) and offline (Express Stream and Tier0) monitoring produced results during cosmic/collision runs (Oct-Dec 2009) Shifter and expert level monitoring.
Michele de Gruttola 2008 Report: Online to Offline tool for non event data data transferring using database.
1 The ATLAS SemiConductor Tracker commissioning at SR1 APS and JPS joint conference October 30, 2006 Ryuichi Takashima ( Kyoto Univ. of Education ) For.
DQM for the RPC subdetector M. Maggi and P. Paolucci.
S t a t u s a n d u pd a t e s Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) & the group Moore … in the H8 test-beam … in the HLT(Pesa environment) … work in progress.
Software for the CMS Cosmic Challenge Giacomo BRUNO UCL, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium On behalf of the CMS Collaboration CHEP06, Mumbay, India February 16,
11th November Richard Hawkings Richard Hawkings (CERN) ATLAS reconstruction jobs & conditions DB access  Conditions database basic concepts  Types.
Summary of User Requirements for Calibration and Alignment Database Magali Gruwé CERN PH/AIP ALICE Offline Week Alignment and Calibration Workshop February.
DQM for the RPC subdetector M. Maggi and P. Paolucci.
The DCS Databases Peter Chochula. 31/05/2005Peter Chochula 2 Outline PVSS basics (boring topic but useful if one wants to understand the DCS data flow)
Maria del Carmen Barandela Pazos CERN CHEP 2-7 Sep 2007 Victoria LHCb Online Interface to the Conditions Database.
14/02/2008 Michele Bianco 1 G.Chiodini & E.Gorini ATLAS RPC certification with cosmic rays Università del Salento Facoltà di Scienze MM.FF.NN.
The ATLAS detector … … is composed of cylindrical layers: Tracking detector: Pixel, SCT, TRT (Solenoid magnetic field) Calorimeter: Liquid Argon, Tile.
ATLAS Detector Resources & Lumi Blocks Enrico & Nicoletta.
Real data in the Muon Spectrometer Bernardo RESENDE and a lot of other people not named here NIKHEF Jamboree, December 2008.
L1Calo Databases ● Overview ● Trigger Configuration DB ● L1Calo OKS Database ● L1Calo COOL Database ● ACE Murrough Landon 16 June 2008.
EPS HEP 2007 Manchester -- Thilo Pauly July The ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Overview and Status Report including Cosmic-Ray Commissioning Thilo.
Operation, performance and upgrade of the CMS Resistive Plate Chamber system at LHC Marcello Abbrescia Physics Department - University of Bari & INFN,
Measuring the B+→J/ψ (μμ) K+ Channel with the first LHC data in Atlas
Database Replication and Monitoring
ATLAS MDT HV – LV Detector Control System (DCS)
Commissioning of the ALICE HLT, TPC and PHOS systems
HLT & Calibration.
The Compact Muon Solenoid Detector
Barrel RPC Conditions Database
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS
Bringing the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer to Life with Cosmic Rays
DQM for the RPC subdetector
Pierluigi Paolucci & Giovanni Polese
Presentation transcript:

ATLAS The ConditionDB is accessed by the offline reconstruction framework (ATHENA). COOLCOnditions Objects for LHC The interface is provided by COOL (COnditions Objects for LHC), implemented using CORAL: LCG RelationalAccessLayer software which allows database applications to be written independently of the underlying database technology. COOL databases can be stored in Oracle, in MySQL or in SQLite. Database schema optimized for IOV retrieval & look-up COOL implements an interval of validity database. Objects stored or referenced in COOL have an associated start and end time between which they are valid. COOL data are stored in folders (tables), within each folder, several objects of the same type are stored, each with their own interval of validity range. The data are stored in the PAYLOAD, associated with a channelId number. The Reconstruction job, inside ATHENA, read it back using the IoVService and, if necessary, unpacks them via tool-algorithms, storing all in the TDS Containers. Since (Time) Until (Time) ChannelId (Integer) Payload (Data) Tag (String) CONDITION DATABASE Solenoid Endcap Toroid EM Calorimeter Muon Spectrometer Inner Detector Barrel Toroid Forward Calorimeters Tile Calorimeter Manual Input TCord db ROD HLT/ DAQ DCS System Online Calib. farm ROD HLT/ DAQ DCS System Monitor queries Reco. farms Offline analysis Geom. Setup Calib CONFIGURATION DB Geom. Setup Calib CONDITION DB Monitor data DCS ATLAS Detector DCS Detector Con. Sys. HV, LV Temperature Allingment Front- End Event Filter Level2 Trigger ROSs Level1 Trigger VME Crate RODs ATHENA code Configuration Database Conditions Database ByteStream Files THE ATLAS MUON CONDITIONS DATABASE THE ATLAS MUON CONDITIONS DATABASE MUON SYSTEM RPC & TGC: Trigger the detector and measure the muons in the xy and Rz planes with an accuracy of several mm. CSC: Measure the muons in Rz with ~80 μ m accuracy and in xy with several mm. Cover 2<| η |<2.7 MDT: Measure the muons in Rz with ~80 μ m accuracy Cover | η |<2 Cathode-Strip Chambers (CSC) : 32 chambers, 31k channels Monitored Drift Tube (MDT): 1108 chambers, 339k channels Thin Gap Chambers (TGC): 3588 chambers, 359k channels Resistive Plate Chambers (RPC): 560 chambers, 359k channels RECONSTRUCTION CHALLENGE: good resolution in the timing, p T and position measure to achieve the physics goals. Detailed monitoring of each sub-detector parts. Need to storage a huge amount of data:  Calibration parameters  Alignment constants from sensors and from tracks  Data Quality Monitoring Flags  Data Quality final flags (R,G,Y)  Temperature map and B field map  DCS information  DAQ run information  Sub-Detector Configuration parameters REQUIREMENTSSTORAGE ISSUES Most of these non event-data are stored in dedicated ATLAS databases following the ATLAS DataBase Model. ORACLE DBs: Reference DB designed by the detector experts, used to store a fine granularity information ( i.e. Calibration and alignment DB, Configuration DB, Trigger and DAQ DB) COOL DB: Conditions Databases defined and organized centrally by ATLAS DB Management. Extensively used in each reconstruction job within the ATHENA framework. Subset of the information contained in the ORACLE DBs. M.Verducci (University of Wurzburg) on behalf of the ATLAS Muon Collaboration