Continuing Education Provincial Survey Winter 2012 Connie Phelps Manager, Institutional Research & Planning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Future Trends on Student Involvement in Quality Assurance Agencies
Advertisements

Student Survey Results and Analysis May Overview HEB ISD Students in grades 6 through 12 were invited to respond the Student Survey during May 2010.
1 A Service ONLINE APPAREL - USA ISABEL CAVILL Senior Retail Analyst June 2013 E-commerce Shopper Insights.
Mark Troy – Data and Research Services –
Subjective well-being in the human services: A pathway to sustainable social development John Graham Murray Fraser Professor Faculty of Social work Fuschia.
Summary of Key Results from the 2012/2013 Survey of Visa Applicants Who Used a Licensed Adviser Undertaken by Premium Research Prepared: July 2013.
Looking Good, Teaching Well? Linking Liking, Looks, and Learning Regan A. R. Gurung, Kristin M. Grudzielanek, and Christina J. Tosh Attractiveness is a.
What determines student satisfaction with university subjects? A choice-based approach Twan Huybers, Jordan Louviere and Towhidul Islam Seminar, Institute.
Method IntroductionResults Discussion Effects of Plans and Workloads on Academic Performance Mark C. Schroeder University of Nebraska – Lincoln College.
Writing Program Assessment Report Fall 2002 through Spring 2004 Laurence Musgrove Writing Program Director Department of English and Foreign Languages.
Results from the AVID Program in Chicago Jenny Nagaoka, Jonah Deutsch, Melissa Roderick, and Andy Brake January 29, 2008.
IMPLEMENTATION OF AN E-LEARNING PLATFORM USING CMS
Doing the maths: training needs of numeracy tutors in Ireland: 2013 and beyond Numeracy Conference 13 th June 2013.
AET/515 Instructional Plan Template Talisha Bunkley
E_learning.
Understanding and Applying the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey Department of Institutional Research.
What is the Focus?  Round 2 Analysis observed trends in student perception after first survey.  Allows us to recognize improvements of lower measures.
Assessment Overview Drake CPHS. Overview Overview of IDEA Data Assessing college-wide teaching goal Advising Results Q&A.
Qatar University Exemplary Online Course Award
LSE 2009 Staff Survey – Presentation to Staff Briefings 15 th /16 th March 2010.
Quality Professional Development Programs for Language Teachers: Korean Case Sunhee Choi, Ph.D JeonJu University, Korea.
Summary of Key Results from the 2013/2014 Survey of Visa Applicants Who Used a Licensed Adviser Survey undertaken by: Premium Research Report prepared:
1 School of Health in Social Science 2011 UG Entrants’ Survey Analysis.
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
November 3, 2010 Department of Nutrition Online vs. Face-to-Face: A Course Comparison Jessica Bulova, Ashley Person, Brittan Bibb, Sarah Mammarella, Sarah.
The learning experience and satisfaction of management students in a diverse learning environment: A Cross Campus Study at the University of Toronto Dr.
A Study of the Role of Technology in Modern Education By Fan Jin, James Cong, and Kevin Wong.
1 ACSI American Customer Satisfaction Index TM Citizen Satisfaction with the U.S. Federal Government: A Review of 2011 Results from ACSI Forrest V. Morgeson.
Workforce Profiling Statistics Gender Split Across College 2007/08 The above chart illustrates a fairly even gender split across the College,
Staff Survey Executive Team Presentation (Annex B) Prepared by: GfK NOP September, Agenda item: 17 Paper no: CM/03/12/14B.
Maryland Consortium Findings from the 2006 CCSSE Survey.
>  Slide 1 Coaching Insights Coaching statistics and analysis 2015/16.
Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey of Classroom and Online Students Conducted Spring 2008.
Student Satisfaction Survey Administered to 213 randomly selected lecture & lab courses, including courses from all campuses and all levels (response.
A Preliminary Investigation of Student Perceptions of Online Education Angela M. Clark University of South Alabama Presented at ISECON 2003 San Diego,
Postgraduate Taught Experience Survey (PTES) 2010 Interim Results Dr Pam Wells Adviser, Evidence-Informed Practice.
St. Thomas University ALUMNI SURVEY Executive Summary Undergraduate and Graduate alumni in university database from 2001 to 1991 were mailed a copy of.
Findings from the Perceptions of Success Inventory for Beginning Teachers Northeast Collaborative July 10, 2007 Presented by: Alan Reiman Kristen Corbell.
Attitudes towards E-Learning By Fairouz Farah Sarkis Director Arab Open University - Lebanon.
Online and Hybrid Course Design. Define Terms Traditional course Web Enhanced course Hybrid course Online course.
Faculty Evaluation for Online Learning Institutional Standards and Emerging Practices Ellen Hoffman Eastern Michigan University.
© 2008 Brigham Young University–Idaho Course Evaluations at BYU-Idaho 1.
Outcome Measures of Triple Board Graduates: Marla J. Warren, MD,MPH; David W. Dunn, MD; Jerry L. Rushton, MD,MPH. Section of Child Psychiatry.
Graduating Senior Survey Summary of Results through
0 1 1.Key Performance Indicator Results ( ) KPI Survey Statistics Student Distribution by Year in Program KPI Overall Results Student Satisfaction.
Employee Survey 2005 Results from employee survey run during Feb/March 2005.
Effective Data Sharing Research Project Linking London; Newham Sixth form College.
Slide 1 Customer Satisfaction Monitoring Rolling data 2014/15 –Waves 1-12 (April 14-March 15)
An Assessment of the Readiness of a Tertiary Healthcare Organization in Saudi Arabia, in Adopting Effective Online Staff Development Programs Adnan D.
ISECON (San Antonio, TX) November 1, Student Perceptions of Online Learning: A Comparison of Two Different Populations Kitty Daniels and Susan Feather.
CCHE 680 Denise Zambos. The student’s college choice… After high school, the student must decide if they will go to college and what college they will.
Kehittämistehtävä Students’ perceptions of highly interactive, reflective and process oriented eLearning courses Dr. Matti J. Haverila.
AUTHOR: NADIRAN TANYELI PRESENTER: SAMANTHA INSTRUCTOR: KATE CHEN DATE: MARCH 10, 2010 The Efficiency of Online English Language Instruction on Students’
ALL DATA GATHERED OVER MXIT SOCIAL NETWORK
CAPE ROAD SURGERY Patient Questionnaire 2013 / 2014.
Teaching and Evaluating a Required Course in Career Planning for Psychology Majors b b James H. Thomas b b Cyndi R. McDaniel b b Northern Kentucky University.
Smoking in England Robert West Jamie Brown University College London 1.
The Assessment of Blended Courses: Gathering and Using Faculty and Student Feedback to Maximize Program Effectiveness Orly Calderon, PsyD, Long Island.
Translation Education at Japanese Universities: Questionnaire Results Summary NAGANUMA, Mikako (Do not quote without my permission.)
D. Randall Brandt, Ph.D. Vice President Customer Experience & Loyalty The Customer Experience Trust Factor Do You Know How Well Your Employees Are Delivering.
Office of Measurement Services (OMS) Student Evaluation of Teaching June 2003.
International Students’ Experiences: Examining their Sociocultural Adjustment Kelly Torres, Ph.D.
Summary of VCU Student Satisfaction Fall 2012
Director of Institutional Accreditation and Assessment
Teaching Goal Overview Drake CPHS
Your Institutional Report Step by Step
Indiana University School of Social Work
Public Health Learning Network
2017 Postgraduate Research Experience Survey (PRES) Results
USG Dual Enrollment Data and Trends
Presentation transcript:

Continuing Education Provincial Survey Winter 2012 Connie Phelps Manager, Institutional Research & Planning

Agenda Survey background Results - Conestoga CE students: –Who are they? –Why are they here? –What do they think of Conestoga’s courses?

Background Provincial survey – done every 3 years since 2000 Traditional courses –In-class paper and pencil survey 3,113 registrations with 2,266 returned surveys (72%) –Confidence interval: +/-1.1% Provincial response rate of 64% Distance courses (New) –Online survey 782 invitations with 343 responses (44%) –Confidence interval: +/-4.0% Provincial response rate of 35%

Proportions of In-class and Online Surveys

Conestoga CE Students…… Who are they?

Q24 – My age is: The age of in-class and online students is very similar; although slightly more in- class students are aged and slightly more online students are aged In-Class Since 2005, proportion of CE students aged years has declined, proportion of students aged trending higher

Q25 – I am: In-class CE students are more likely to be female –The gender ratio among in-class learners shows no significant changes since 2005 Among online CE learners, an even higher proportion are female –May be due to response bias of online survey (females are always more likely to participate in online surveys)

Q31 – What is the highest level of education you have completed? In-class CE students tend to have lower levels of education than do the online CE students The proportion of CE students with a university degree has risen since 2005

Q33 – Are you a recent immigrant to Canada (within the last 10 years)? Q36 – What is your first language? Fewer recent immigrants sign up for our online courses Compared to provincial averages, Conestoga CE students are: –Less likely to be recent immigrants –More likely to be native English speakers

Q35 – Is your previous post-secondary education or training in a field related to your current course of study? Recent immigrants are much more likely to take CE courses that are related to their previous post-secondary education Recent immigrants are much more likely have a university degree

Summary - Who are they? 33% are aged years; 45% are aged years –Proportion aged years is trending higher in recent years Six in ten are female In-class CE students tend to have lower levels of education than do online CE students –35% of in-class compared to 19% of online have high school or less –The proportion of in-class CE students with a university degree has risen since 2005

Summary - Who are they? About 12% of our in-class students and 7% of online students are recent immigrants –Half the provincial average Recent immigrants are: –More likely to have a university degree (63% vs. 28%) –Much more likely to be taking CE courses related to the previous post-secondary education (43% vs. 14%)

Conestoga CE Students…… Why are they here?

Q2 - What was your most important reason for choosing to register at Conestoga? In-class selection based mostly on location Online selection based mostly on previous positive experience No significant in- class changes since 2008 or 2005

Q5-What is the main reason you are taking this Continuing Education course? 73% in-class and 83% online are using CE to support career development Results are similar to previous years 2012

Q6 - What are you working toward? 74% in-class and 75% online are using CE to achieve a long term certification goal Since 2005: –Trend towards more credentials and fewer single courses Compared to 2012 provincial results: –More Conestoga CE students are working towards a certificate and fewer towards a diploma 2012

Q29 – Prior to this course, how many CE (online) courses at Conestoga have you taken? Q30 - How many CE (online) courses are you taking in this semester at Conestoga? 27% of in-class and 41% of online students are in their first CE course Most students are taking one course this semester

Q8 – How did you register for your present course? The website is the preferred method for CE registrations - students taking online courses are even more likely to register through the website 2012 Use of website to register for CE courses continues to increase

Q11 – How would you rate Conestoga’s CE website? One-third of in-class students are very satisfied with quality of content, ease of use and usefulness of Conestoga’s CE website 2012 Students in online courses are more likely to be very satisfied with the website

Q20 – If you had to choose just one method, which method would you choose to take a course of this type in the future? In-class students clearly prefer to take courses in the traditional classroom format Not even half of students currently taking an online course prefers this method of delivery 2012

Summary - Why are they here? Only about 4 in 10 students are in their first CE course at Conestoga –Most students are taking one course per semester CE is being used to support career development –73% in-class and 83% online Increasingly, CE is being used to support a long-term certification goal (certificate, diploma, professional designation, graduate certificate, or degree) –74% in-class and 75% online

Conestoga CE Students…… What do they think of Conestoga’s courses?

Q13 – How would you rate this course? Highest satisfaction with: –Instructor subject knowledge –Helpfulness –Opportunity for participation 2012 In-Class Conestoga vs. Province Conestoga is above provincial results for % very satisfied: –Instructor subject knowledge –Helpfulness of instructor –Opportunity for participation –Fairness of evaluation –Overall, the instructor

Q13 – How would you rate this course? Overall, ratings are very high Compared to students taking traditional class- based courses, the proportion of online students who are “very” satisfied is lower Most notable differences include: –Opportunity for participation (30%) –Helpfulness of instructor (24%) –Overall, the instructor (23%) –Instructor subject knowledge (21%) –Instructor’s presentation of materials (21%) 2012 Conestoga In-class vs. Online

Q14 – How useful were the following in learning the course materials? Assignments and learning materials are seen to be more useful than text-books and web-based learning tools Compared to provincial results, Conestoga CE students feel the textbooks and the web- based learning tools (if applicable) were slightly less useful 2012 Conestoga vs. Province 2012 Conestoga In-Class vs. Province

Q14 – How useful were the following in learning the course materials? Textbooks play a much larger role in the learning of online students 2012 Conestoga vs. Province 2012 Conestoga In-class vs. Online

Q15 – How would you rate the following? Results are highest (& above provincial average) for: –Instructor shows courtesy and respect for all students –Instructor starts and finishes classes on time Results are lower (but similar to provincial average) for: –Instructor uses a variety of teaching methods & materials 2012 Conestoga vs. Province

Q15 – How would you rate the following? Online students feel instructors respond within 2 business days: –Always (56%) –Most of the time (31%) Results for clarity of communication and the display of courtesy and respect appear marginally lower among online students 2012 Conestoga vs. Province 2012 Conestoga In-class vs. Online

Factors influencing Q13h: Overall quality of this course (In-class) Regression analysis All teaching and learning items (Q12, Q14, & Q15) –Most influential (in order): Course content Instructor’s presentation of course material Helpfulness of instructor Instructor’s subject knowledge Usefulness of learning materials Instructor uses a variety of teaching methods & materials

Factors influencing Q13i: Overall the instructor (In-class) Regression analysis All teaching and learning items (Q12, Q14, & Q15) –Most influential (in order): Helpfulness of instructor Instructor’s presentation of course material Instructor’s subject knowledge Fairness of evaluation Feedback from instructor about progress Instructor delivers material at a comfortable speed Opportunity for participation

Q19 – Based on your experience in this course, would you recommend this course to a friend with the same interests? In-class students are more likely to recommend the course the others Why is it important for students to be “very” satisfied? Almost a 30 %-point difference in the likelihood to recommend the course if students are “satisfied” versus “very satisfied”

Summary – What do think of us? Around 70% of students are “very” satisfied (figure approaches 95% when combine very satisfied and satisfied): –Instructor’s subject knowledge –Helpfulness of instructor –Opportunity for participation Students taking online courses are less satisfied these than those taking traditional courses

Summary – What do think of us? Assignments and learning materials are seen to be more useful than text-books and web-based learning tools –However, textbooks play a much larger role in the learning of online students Students are highly satisfied (and above the provincial average) with the courtesy and respect shown by Conestoga instructors (78% very satisfied) Less satisfied with the variety of teaching methods & materials used by instructors (33% very satisfied)

Summary – Did you know…? Most important drivers of student’s satisfaction with (in- class) instructors and courses: –Helpfulness of instructor –Instructor’s presentation of course material –Instructor’s subject knowledge –Opportunity for participation Moving students from satisfied to “very” satisfied with regards to these items will improve the likelihood to recommend a particular course by 30 percentage-points