Department of Community and Senior Services Jason Stempinski, CIA Compliance Manager COST ALLOCATION PLAN Presented by:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fiscal Guidelines/ Budget and Program Revisions NC Committee on Dropout Prevention Procedures Manual 2010.
Advertisements

FACILITIES AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS (F&A) Understanding Indirect Costs.
Office of Sponsored Projects Administration COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS.
Prepared by Office of Sponsored Programs Spring 2011.
Allowable Costs Division of Financial Services – Sponsored Programs November 2013.
California Department of Food and Agriculture
DIRECT BENEFITS OF AN INDIRECT COST RATE
Regulation Grant Brown Bag Session February 12, 2013.
Rules Governing Sponsored Projects (aka OMB Circulars) Presented by Beverly Blakeney, Diane Cummings and Julie Macy.
OMB Circular A-21 General Overview – F&A OSP Brown Bag Norm Hebert, Director December 8, 2005.
Research Administration 101 Beth Ridenour Office of the Comptroller Facilities & Administrative Cost Rate Proposal.
The University of Texas at Arlington Office of Research and Office of Accounting and Business Services Brown Bag Training Session Two: Indirect Costs.
MARCH 26,2013 PRE-AWARD MATTERS THAT AFFECT POST-AWARD COMPLIANCE MODULE SERIES 3, SESSION III AAPLS (APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES)
Page 1 Discretionary Grant Administration. Page 2  Overview of ED financial policies  Managing budget  Avoiding audit problems  Identifying key resources.
4/28/2015 Presented by David McQuay, Jr., CPA 1 Non-Profit Financial Management Florida Non-profit Housing, Inc. Self-help Housing Conference.
2007 FAMILY PLANNING Project Director’s Conference November 13, 2007 Overview of DSHS Contractor’s Cost Allocation Plan.
INDIRECT COST BASICS Presented by Gene Fornecker, CPA DPI School Finance Auditor.
1.  Office of Management and Budget (OMB) – Circular A-87  US Department of Education ◦ Delegates authority for indirect cost rate determination to.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION OF COST ALLOCATION Presenters: Steven J. Zuraf, Branch Chief for Colleges/Universities, Non-Profits & Hospitals.
Documenting Cash and In-Kind Match Project Director Training & Annual Meeting.
1 CYS COST ALLOCATION WORKSHOP March , 2007 Chicago, Illinois Presented by R. Armstrong.
Presented by Ginger Baker Eileen Campbell. Cost Principles for Educational Institutions found in 2 CFR Part 220  The Federal Government guidelines for.
THE BIGGEST WINNER FISCAL EDITION. Test Your Fiscal Fitness Fiscal Basics Property & Facilities Cost Allocation Nonfederal Share Records & Reports
Indirect Cost Presented by Bonita Brown HMEP Grant Program
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
Staff Timesheets 2014 Project Director Training & Annual Meeting1.
Fiscal Compliance Why it matters… University of Delaware.
GPD Indirect Cost Rate Training OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215) 2 CFR Part 230 Appendix A – General Principles GPD Indirect Cost Rate Agreement Chief,
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES. Presenters: Tanielle Chandler, Financial Management Specialist, U.S. Department of Education, Rehabilitation.
Cost Allocation Plans, Indirect Cost Rates Financial Management 101 and Identification of Fraud Scott R. Koons, AICP, Executive Director Moderator and.
Financial Management For Project Administrators. How Feds View Themselves.
9/25/2013. AGENDA  Introduction & General Overview  F&A Definition and Category Application  Application of F&A Cost Rates  The Distribution Basis.
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES. Presenters: Mary Gougisha, Director of the Indirect Cost Group, Office of the Chief Financial Officer, U.S.
“Grants Boot Camp” Workshop Series January 9, 2014 Creighton University Sponsored Programs Administration 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE  Phone:
Solving the Matching Dilemma Session 32 Tuesday, May 24, 2011 National Extension and Research Officers Administrative Conference Anchorage, Alaska.
KEYS TO SUCCESS NCURA Region IV Spring Meeting April 27 – 30, 2014 © 2014 National Council of University Research Administrators Cost Principles: It Depends!
1 Sponsored Programs AdditionalReviewSteps. 2 Sponsored Program Section Content How to Identify a Sponsored Program Types of Costs Review Budget to Actual.
The Management of Service centers NCURA REGIONS VI and VII CONFERENCE April 7, 2009.
Fishery Management Councils Executive Director Session Grants Rimas T. Liogys Director, Grants Management Division February 25, 2009.
Cost Sharing on Contracts and Grants October 16, 2001.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
FAR Part 31 Contract Cost Principles and Procedures.
 The Facilities and Administrative Rate (F&A Rate) is the mechanism used to reimburse the University for the infrastructure support costs associated.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
Adult Education and Literacy Budget Development and Cost Allocation.
Time with Office of Sponsored Programs May 4, 2010 Topic: Allowability.
Cost Allocation Prepared by: Colleen B. Mendel, Executive Director & Chris Watkins, Management Specialist WKU 2009 FSS Fiscal Conference.
1 SPS Primer SPS Primer Workshop Cost Accounting Considerations When Preparing Budgets for Sponsored Proposals Division of Financial Affairs.
Kuali Financial Systems – Financial Administrator Development Series - October, 2006 Indirect Cost Facilities and Administrative (F&A) Costs.
Eta EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR eta EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR.
Indirect Cost Rates 101 CNCS Uniform Guidance § Indirect Costs.
1 Service Center FY2006 Billing Rate Proposal Preparation.
Cost Allocation/Indirect Costs Cost Allocation/Indirect Costs November 2 nd 2009.
Cost Allocation & Indirect Costs Requirements, Steps & Administrative Costs.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
IUP Research Institute University Square 1179 Grant Street, Suite One Indiana, PA Telephone: (724) Fax: (724)
12/11/20071 Indirect Cost Study Facilities and Administrative (F&A) Costs Indiana University Sally Link Cost Accounting Manager Financial Management Services.
DISTRICT AUDITING UPDATE INDIRECT COST AND TIME DISTRIBUTION Melissa A. Austin, Audits Manager SC State Department of Education Office of Finance District.
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: November 3, 2015 Presented by: Office of Grants.
1 Federal Cost Recoveries Georgia Fiscal Management Council October 3, :30pm – 3:30pm.
Cost Allocation 101 February 12, 2016
Cost Transfers October 21, 2015
FY2007 Billing Rate Proposal Preparation (Part I)
2015 Leadership Conference “All In: Achieving Results Together”
Cost Allocation Annual Mid-Western and Eastern Multi-Regional
Introduction to Indirect Costs
Introduction to Indirect Costs Claiming Your “Fair Share”
Indirect Costs Mark W. Stout, MBA Branch Chief Indirect Cost Services Division (ICSD) Interior Business Center (IBC) U.S. Department of Interior (DOI)
University of Pittsburgh
Introduction to Indirect Costs
Presentation transcript:

Department of Community and Senior Services Jason Stempinski, CIA Compliance Manager COST ALLOCATION PLAN Presented by:

CSS Cost Allocation Plan Requirement Directive CCD Cost allocation…plans will be required as part of the subrecipient’s submission to a CSS Request for Proposal. Failure to submit plans that meet the requirements…will result in a nonresponsive proposal which shall not be considered for funding. Contracts will require:  Annual written confirmation of CAP  Advance notice of revised CAP  Limit of one revised CAP per year  CAP revisions subject to CSS approval

Cost Allocation Plan Definition Cost Allocation Plan (CAP) A contractor’s written policy of the methods used to allocate indirect and/or shared costs.

What is “Cost Allocation”? Cost Allocation is how an organization assigns their “Total Cost” to their “Cost Objectives”.  “Cost Objective” is a particular award, contract, grant, project, service, or other activity of an organization.  “Total Cost” is composed of the sum of the allowable direct costs and allocable indirect costs.

Total Costs = Direct + Indirect + Shared Direct Costs – costs that can be identified specifically to a particular contract. Indirect Costs – costs that have been incurred for common or joint objectives and cannot readily be identified to a particular contract. Joint (Shared) Costs - (i.e., costs that benefit more than one program or activity) which can be distributed in reasonable proportion to the benefits received may also be direct costs.

Direct Costs Typical examples of direct costs for many non-profit organizations may include: Salaries for staff that work on the contract Materials and supplies used specifically for the contract

Indirect Costs Typical examples of indirect costs for many non-profit organizations may include: Depreciation on buildings and equipment Costs of operating and maintaining Administrative facilities General administration/overhead and general expenses, such as the salaries and expenses of executive officers, personnel administration and accounting

Joint (Shared) Costs Typical examples of shared costs for many non-profit organizations may include: Rent Telephone Postage

Cost Allocation Plan Definition Cost Allocation Plan (CAP) A contractor’s written policy of the methods used to allocate indirect and/or shared costs.

Cost Allocation Methods

Allowable Cost Allocation Methods Acceptable Cost Allocation Methods  Simplified Allocation Method  Multiple Allocation Base Method  Direct Allocation Method  Federally Approved Rate  Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate  De Minimis Rate

Unallowable Cost Allocation Methods Unacceptable Cost Allocation Methods  Budgeted Rates  Estimated or Predetermined Rates  Number of Programs  1/12 of the Annual Budget  Projected Revenue

Simplified Allocation Method Simplified Allocation Method is used whenever the major functions of an organization benefit from its indirect costs to approximately the same degree.  Classify total costs as either direct or indirect  Divide the total allowable indirect costs by an equitable distribution base The result is an indirect cost rate which is used to distribute indirect costs to individual awards.

Multiple Allocation Base Method Multiple Allocation Base Method can be used when an organization’s major functions benefit from its indirect costs in varying degrees.  Indirect costs are grouped based on the benefits provided to the major function.  Each group is then allocated individually using the basis most appropriate for the grouping being allocated

Direct Allocation Method Direct Allocation Method can be used when an organization treats all costs as direct costs except general administration and expenses.  Joint costs are prorated individually to each direct activity on a basis appropriate for that type of cost  Remaining costs (general administration and general are allocated using the simplified allocation method.

Federally Approved Rate

Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate can be used when an organization does not have a federally approved indirect cost rate.  This rate is applied to the total approved direct cost base.

De Minimis Rate De Minimis Rate can be used when an organization has never had a negotiated indirect cost rate.

Cost Allocation Methods The allocation base used must be:  Allowable  Reasonable and consistently applied  Supported by accurate and current data  Appropriate to the particular cost being distributed  Equitable amongst benefitting programs

Documentation To Support Allocations Based on the methodology basis used, the contractor must maintain the following documentation to support the allocations:  FTE (Full-Time Equivalent)– Spreadsheet which includes the individuals in the FTE calculation and payroll documents to support the allocation of time for each individual.  Direct Salaries – Allocation Spreadsheets, Payroll Registers and Timecards/Time Reports  Square Footage – Floor plan or spreadsheet indicating how much space is occupied by EACH of the contracts or programs in that location.

Criteria

CSS Directive CCD Detailed requirements Sample allocations Example CAP

Auditor-Controller Handbook Section C.2.4 states the Agency’s Cost Allocation Plan must be approved by management and identify the Contractor’s: General accounting policies Basis of accounting (cash or accrual) Fiscal year Method for allocating indirect costs Indirect cost allocation base Direct and indirect costs (by category) and describe the cost allocation methodology for each category. Signature of Contractor management certifying the accuracy of the plan.

Auditor-Controller Handbook Section C.2 states in accordance with the applicable OMB Circular(s), agencies shall define their allocable expenses as either direct or indirect costs and allocate each cost using the basis most appropriate and feasible. Section C.2 states for Contractors that operate programs or provide services in addition to the services required under contract, the Contractor shall allocate expenditures that benefit programs or funding sources on an EQUITABLE BASIS.

OMB SuperCircular OMB SuperCircular states budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) do not qualify as support for charges to awards for salaries. OMB SuperCircular states any cost allocable to a particular award or other cost objective under these principles MAY NOT BE SHIFTED TO OTHER FEDERAL AWARDS TO OVERCOME FUNDING DEFICIENCIES, or to avoid restrictions imposed by law or by the terms of the award.

Acceptable Cost Allocation Plan Example

What is wrong with this Cost Allocation Plan? Exercise

The Contractor allocates rent and utility expenses to CSS, DPSS and a non-LA County program based on square footage. The Contractor does not have a floor plan, but estimates that the CSS program uses 60% of their facility, DPSS uses 30%, and the non-LA County program uses 10%. IS THIS CORRECT?

Exercise The Contractor purchased office furniture and supplies for a facility that operates both CSS and DPSS contract services. The Contractor bills 100% to CSS contract because the Contractor indicates that the CSS contract has a larger budget and they have already exceeded their DPSS contract budget. IS THIS CORRECT?

Questions or Comments?