Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.

Advertisements

Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.

Idaho Tiered Teacher Licensure May 13, Vision for Tiered Teacher Licensure Attract and retain great teachers in Idaho Identify struggling teachers.

Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.

OVERVIEW OF CHANGES TO EDUCATORS’ EVALUATION IN THE COMMONWEALTH Compiled by the MOU Evaluation Subcommittee September, 2011 The DESE oversees the educators’

Alaska Educator Evaluation Overview Yukon Koyukuk School District.

ESSB 5895: Language In New Evaluation Bill

Evidence: First… 1. Assemble your district team to include teachers, administrators, association representatives 2. Research and select an instructional.

TPEP Teacher and Principal Evaluation Process Bellevue Chamber of Commerce Presentation January 15, 2015 Presented by: Dr. Patty Siegwarth: Bellevue School.

August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.

Professional Development and Appraisal System

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 4 Component Five – Student Improvement.

ComprehensiveFocused  Evidence needs to be collected for all 27 components found in all 8 Criteria  Evidence needs to be collected in one of the 8 Criteria.

How do we document evidence of student growth in Healthful Living?

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.

Differentiated Supervision

© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. TEACHER PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND EFFECTIVENESS SYSTEM What the year holds.

M EASURING T EACHER E FFECTIVENESS (MTE). H OW DID WE GET HERE ? Video from the Arizona School Administrators PUSD Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Committee.

Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.

© 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.

Session Materials  Wiki

Session Materials Wireless Wiki

Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.

Teacher/Principal Evaluation Overview (Digging a bit deeper) April 19, 2011 Dana Anderson, ESD 113 Teaching and Learning.

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Combining Multiple Measures Into a Summative Rating 1 Updated April 2014.

Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements 9/9/2015PBevan, D.ED.

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.

1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.

LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.

Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Gathering Evidence 1 June 2013.

Introduction to Working Portfolios Educator Effectiveness System Training.

Welcome: BISD Teacher Evaluation System 8/21/14 "A commitment to professional learning is important, not because teaching is of poor quality and must be.

TEACHER DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND PEER SUPPORT Overview Session for MPS Staff March 10, 2014.

Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.

Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.

Idaho Principal Evaluation Process & Principal Observation Lisa Colón, Idaho State Department of Education Matt Clifford, Ph.D., American Institutes for.

Working Portfolios For Non Classroom Teachers. Agenda Determine Working Portfolio rubric Understand the performance levels and scoring Brainstorm possible.

Certified Evaluation Plan Training Module Products of Practice, Student Voice Surveys December 2014.

Teacher and Principal Evaluation A new frontier….

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.

Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.

Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Introduction to Teacher Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.

TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.

Sumner’s TPEP Journey: Artifacts and Student Growth

 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.

ENHANCING PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE Framework for Teaching Aug. 27 th Title II Day.

What you need to know about changes in state requirements for Teval plans.

Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Introduction to Peer Observations.

EVAL Self Assessment (Adapted from LaConner School Improvement Presentation) Your Name Your District Your Date.

BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,

Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.

BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Teacher Evaluation Committee November 29,

Materials  Wiki 

CFN 609 Principals’ Meeting December 6, 2012 Providing Effective Feedback Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Component 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction.

Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,

Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.

Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.

DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.

1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.

Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D

Expanded ADEPT Guidance Presentation Office of Educator Effectiveness May 9, 2016.

Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.

Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.

An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation

Evaluation Updates.

Student Centered Coaching Benchmark 2.1.E

Presentation transcript:

Focused Evaluation

Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished

How Long?  General Rule  3 Years  Maintain proficient or distinguished rating  Four year cycle instead of five  Comprehensive  Focus 1  Focus 2  Focus 3  Comprehensive

Overview  Choose ONE of the eight criterion from TPEP  Focus on that criterion and the corresponding Danielson components  Example  Criterion #4- Providing clear and intentional focus on subject matter content and curriculum  Danielson  Domain 1- Plannning and Preparation  1a  1c  1d  1e

How do you select your Focus area?  Comprehensive cycle feedback  Self evaluation in eVAL  Conversation and collaboartion with your evaluator

Student Growth?  Focused evaluations must also have a student growth component  Focus: Criterion 3, 6, or 8  Default to the corresponding student growth goals  Example  Teacher chooses Criterion 3  Teacher then completes student growth in Criterion 3

Student Growth  Focus on Criterion 1, 2, 4, 5, or 7  Choose student growth goals in either 3 OR 6  Student growth goal 8.1 is only a choice if Criterion 8 is the area selected for the focused cycle  Example  Teacher chooses Criterion 2  Can choose growth goals in either 3 OR 6

Observations  Minimum of two observations  Not less than 60 minutes  Feedback  Specific to Focus Criterion  Can include other observations  Setting  Classroom  PLC  IEP Meeting

Evidence Collection  Similar to the Comprehensive cycle  Upload into eVAL or other agreed upon format  Only need artifacts and evidence specific to the Criterion you and your evaluator chose to focus on

Resources  Danielson- 2011/2013 Instructional Framework for Teaching  TPEP Website   District Website District Website  Staff Resources  Certificated Resources  Under Construction  Handouts from today  Contract  Page 48

Summative Conference  Discussion will center on your Focus area  Teacher presents student growth data  Teacher and principal review evidence and artifacts  Rating is determined  4- Distinguished  3- Proficient  2- Basic  1- Unsatisfactory

Reflection and Processing  What is clear about the responsibilities of the principal and teacher in the Focused cycle?  What is unclear about the responsibilities of the principal and teacher in the Focused cycle?  What is your next step after today?