Hernando County’s Utilities Infrastructure Opportunity through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the Federal Stimulus Package)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Wakulla County Sewer Project Eutaw Utilities Presentation April 7, 2011.
Advertisements

Calaveras County Water District Capital R&R Program Funding Options March 25,
City of Clinton Fiscal Year 2013 Sewer Rate Recommendations Committee of the Whole April 24, 2012.
March 1, 2007 Review of the Financial Parameters Affecting Policy Decision Making Water and Sewer Enterprise System.
Middletown Water & Sewer Committee Recommendations for Future Financing of Improvements Water & Sewer Committee Members: Jennifer Falcinelli, Chairman.
2 Water and Waste Loans and Grants United States Department of Agriculture??? Rural Development: Mandate to improve the quality of life in Rural America.
“Nucor Road Industrial Corridor – Sanitary Sewer Project” Presented by: Justin Longstreth, P.E. Brian Hannon, P,E, Moore & Bruggink, Inc. October 14 th,
GFOAz May 11, 2007 The ABC’s of Municipal Financing.
Beaver Lake Homeowners Association 2007 Annual Financial Report.
Cuba’s Future Development Needs, Funding Models, and Alternatives. A Perspective of the Operation of a Cuban Water & Sewer Utility. Eduardo Vega-Llort,
Municipal & Financial Services Group Water and Sewer Rate Study Revenue Requirements and Rates Workshop April 18, 2012 King George County Service Authority.
Wastewater Fund. Wastewater Revenue $296,
May 30, Meeting & Outreach efforts  February 27th – Proposed Compensation Plan Distributed to Joint Admin/WWOC  March 5th – Joint Admin/WWOC Meeting.
Water Rates Utility Rates & SDCs Presentation to the West Linn City Council October 5, 2009.
Copyright Rehmann Robson Pennfield Charter Township Water and Sewer Utilities Rate Study.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
Municipal & Financial Services Group Village of Downers Grove Water Rate Study Rate Study Overview and Recommendations September 21, 2010 Presented by:
Lancaster County Replacement Facility Development Strategy Presented by: CGL Capital Solutions May 19, 2011 A World of Solutions.
11 City of Hallandale Beach Water, Wastewater and Stormwater Facilities Plan Public Meeting.
1 Combined Utility System Cost of Service Rate Study Presentation April 6, 2010.
2015 Municipal Budget Overview Borough of Montvale April 14, 2015.
Utility Extension Project
International Center For Environmental Finance. Series B - Course #2 Calculating Annual Debt Service.
Federal, state and local government entities working together to meet the health, welfare and public safety needs of Wyoming’s citizens. January 11, 2011.
Fairview Township, York County May 28, 2015
Denver Water Contract Summary WWBD (What Would a Business Do?) Decision point: – Accept Revised Contract or, – Reject and retain Existing Contract. Key.
2013 City Budget Manhattan ~ Kansas Work Session Two.
2014 Budget Department Presentations Infrastructure Funding Options.
City of Polson April 5, 2010 PUBLIC HEARING Water System Improvements PRESENTATION ON PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT.
1 TOWN OF LOCKPORT FINANCIAL REVIEW Focus on the Sewer Plant and Sewer Collection Service.
2012 – 2016 FINANCIAL PLAN OVERVIEW City of Pitt Meadows DM #94656.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
Water & Waste Disposal Loans and Grants The funding purpose is to construct, enlarge, extend or improve water, wastewater and solid waste systems in rural.
1 World Water Congress and Exhibition - Montréal, Canada WATER AND POWER UTILITY PUBLIC SECTOR FINANCING Presented by: James B. McDaniel, Senior Assistant.
Independent Review of FY 2008 Proposed Rates D.C. Water and Sewer Authority Public Hearing June 13, 2007.
1 Why Budgeting Matters NC Local Government Budget Conference Wilmington, NC July 2007.
Financial Impact of Drought March 5, 2008 Updated 3/17/08.
Cost of Service Based Water and Wastewater Rates City of Lawrence, Kansas February 11, 2004 J. Rowe McKinley Keith D. Barber.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASIBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
Village of Almont WATER, SEWER, AND SSO RATES 2012 – 2013 FISCAL YEAR.
1 Public Hearing User Rate Adjustments April 8, 2008.
Department of the Environment Maryland Water Quality Revolving Loan Fund Financing Stormwater Infrastructure Jag Khuman, Director Maryland Water Quality.
2016 Water and Wastewater Rates Committee of the Whole November 16, 2015 Presenter: Mike Mayes – Director, Financial Services/Treasurer.
Nassau-Amelia Utilities FY 2008 Utility Rate Study Presented by: Andrew J. Burnham July 9, 2007 Nassau-Amelia Utilities.
1 Financial management for water, sewer, and storm water systems Most financial management of water, sewer, and storm water systems takes place in a government.
Town of Yountville B ARTLE W ELLS A SSOCIATES Independent Public Finance Advisors Water and Wastewater Rates Prop. 218 Hearing February 15, 2011.
Water System Master Plan & Rate Study City of DeKalb, Illinois City Council Presentation May 16, 2015.
1 New Territory Municipal Utility Districts Strategic Partnership Agreement Discussions With the City of Sugar Land.
City of Fernley, Nevada – 164 th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Redmond, WA April 18, 2007 Rate Study Findings Water and Sewer Utility Rates.
U TILITIES 2013 BUDGET OVERVIEW Electric Department – Fund 520 Water Department – Fund 525.
What are they and how are they calculated? May 2015.
Global Service Provider Buildings Energy Environment Transportation Water Water and Wastewater Rate Study Village of Villa Park, Illinois Presented to.
Operating Efficiencies Costs to operate and maintain the water and sewer system have not varied significantly during the first 5 years of operation.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA FINANCIAL FORECAST AND CAPITAL FACILITIES FEES ANALYSIS Prepared in Conjunction With the Utility System Revenue.
City of Fernley, Nevada – 164 th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Redmond, WA April 18, 2007 Rate Study Findings Water and Sewer Utility Rates.
Public Infrastructure Funding Request Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Special Assessments.
2015 Annual Financial Report December 31, Total Revenue $13,068,887Total Expenditure $14,006,870 Revenue Budget $14,957,884Expenditure Budget $15,669,564.
Town of Yountville B ARTLE W ELLS A SSOCIATES Independent Public Finance Advisors Water and Wastewater Financing Plan Rate Study 2010 December 14, 2010.
OAK RIDGE NORTH IMPACT FEES. Overview 1.Introduction 2.Schedule/Process 3.Land Use Assumption 4.Capital Improvement Plan Water Wastewater 5.Impact Fees.
Overview Rationale Funding Phased Plan Leak Control Program Other Aspects Next Steps.
City of Petersburg Water and Wastewater Rates
Wastewater Fee Increases
Water & Wastewater Capacity Charge Work Shop
Final Rate Study Findings
City of Sisters, OR 2017 Water & Sewer Rate Study
Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada Leveraging Infrastructure Funds
Water & Sewer Rate Study Presented by: Chris Gonzalez, Project Manager
Idyllwild Water District
FEE INCREASES Public Work Shop June 2, 2018.
Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 24, 2017
Presentation transcript:

Hernando County’s Utilities Infrastructure Opportunity through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the Federal Stimulus Package)

The Glen WWTP ……………….$20,000,000 SR50/US19 FM & LS ………….….…$4,000,000 Northcliffe FM & LS ……...……….…$1,500,000 The Glen Reclaimed Water System ……….$3,000,000 Weeki Wachee FM & LS ……………..…..$2,750,000 Phase 1 SRF Funding

Quality Dr to Airport FM ………………...$5,000,000 Airport WWTP Expansion ………………$45,000,000 County Line Rd FM ………………..$7,000,000 Spring Hill Master Lift Station …………..…….$2,000,000 County Line Rd RCW Main ….………….….$5,000,000 County Line Rd FM, US19- Cobblestone (under const) $3,000,000 Phase 2A SRF Funding

SR50/Kettering LS Bypass & FM ……………………..$1,250,000 Ridge Manor RCW & FM ……………….…….$4,500,000 Ridge Manor WWTP …………………....$24,000,000 US301/Kettering Rd FM ……………………..$2,250,000 Phase 2B SRF Funding

Phase 1 –“Fully Funded” status for $45,000,000 in low interest loans through the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (SRF) Phase 2 –Number 1 Ranking on “Contingency List” for $109,000,000 in Clean Water SRF funding Hernando County’s Current Status

Choices Do Nothing –Doesn’t replace aging infrastructure –Doesn’t solve odor problems at Spring Hill Plant and Berkeley Manor –Doesn’t get key infrastructure out of storm surge zone –Doesn’t expand water re-use capability –Doesn’t meet commitments for expanded capacity –Operation and Maintenance Costs Rise

Choices (cont.) Fund program with reserves –Reserves………..$30,000,000 –Cost estimate…$150,000,000 Obviously, Reserves are not adequate. Do Something #1…

Funding program with reserves and cash requires an immediate and drastic increase in rates to fund construction over a 10 year period. How much?? 91% water 129% sewer Choices (cont.) Do Something #2…

Use combination of reserves and borrowed funds obtained through Revenue Bonds (if even available…) –Revenue Bond Interest rate is about 6.0% –6.0% Interest rate over the life of the bond yields a total interest cost of about $112 M. –Debt Service starts immediately. –Rate Increase required, immediately…. 60% Choices (cont.) Do Something #3…

Choices (cont.) Use Reserves in Combination with SRF funding –$10,000,000* per year “draw down” from SRF –Reserves to fund excess needs in early years, to be replenished as necessary from SRF draw downs in the out-years Requires a rate increase of 21.6% for water (based on NON-emergency rates), and 44.9% for sewer spread over five years Debt Service begins in 2012; total interest cost of $60,510,842 over the life of the borrowing. –* Rules Change proposed to increase annual “Segment Cap” to $15,000,000 (total interest cost reduced to approximately $53,000,000) Do Something #4…

Funding SRF $10M

Funding SRF $15 M

Choice (cont.) The choice is really Do Something” vs “Do Nothing.” The best “Do Something” option is proceeding with the SRF financing alternative, which will has the least rate impact

Utility Rates & Charges Basic Principles Recognition of User Classes –Residential –Commercial/Industrial –Irrigation Each User Class pays its fair share, and doesn’t subsidize the others Capital Cost Recovery –Growth pays for growth –Current Users pay current costs –Future Users pay future costs Impact of Conservation

Paradoxical…. Necessity in this climate, and geography Promotes a reduction in water use, and therefore lower revenues The fixed costs of the utility must still be paid, and therefore conservation imposes upward pressure on rates to make up the lost revenues resulting from lower sales.

Water Rate Comparison

Sewer Rate Comparison

Typical Bill Water

Typical Bill Water & Sewer

Typical Bill Water & Sewer (5,000/10,000)

Residential Tap-In Fee Current Cost (Long Side +Short Side) / 2 = Fee Proposed Cost (Long Side +Short Side) / 4 = Fee Lot 2Lot 3Lot 5 Lot 9Lot 6Lot 10 MM 6” WM MM (Long Side) 1” Tap, 48’-1” pipe, Meter Box, 1” wye branch, 2 Meters (Short Side) 1” Tap, 8’-1” pipe, Meter Box, 1” wye branch, 2 Meters Lot 4 Lot 8Lot 7 Lot 1

Cost Calculation for Tap-In Fee

Information from Developer’s Engineer: Sewer Flow Gallons per day Water Demand Gallons per day ERU Calculation: 2250 / 280 = 8.04 Sewer 2813 / 350 = 8.04 Water ERU Billed To Date: 4.50 for $18,000 ERU, based on Water Use, about ) Floors, 3 Units Each 1 Floor, 6 Units 1” M1..5” Service 1” M 6” Fire Line 1..5” Service