Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Lancaster County Replacement Facility Development Strategy Presented by: CGL Capital Solutions May 19, 2011 A World of Solutions.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Lancaster County Replacement Facility Development Strategy Presented by: CGL Capital Solutions May 19, 2011 A World of Solutions."— Presentation transcript:

1 Lancaster County Replacement Facility Development Strategy Presented by: CGL Capital Solutions May 19, 2011 A World of Solutions

2  Overview of CGL Capital Solutions  Discussion of project alternatives benefits and limitations  Description of financing solutions  Detail the procurement process  Description of the menu of services for the Request for Proposals Agenda

3 CGL Capital Solutions A World of Solutions Developer and financer of mission critical public infrastructure for the Corrections, Justice and Public Safety Markets We are truly PARTNERS Development includes ALL aspects of a project including: site acquisition, entitlement, permitting, financing, funding, planning, sustainable design, procurement, construction management, commissioning, training, warranty, facility maintenance, life-cycle management, facility closures, and excess property reuse planning. Financing includes sourcing the initial capital outlay, ongoing capital expenditures and budgeting operational cost such as staffing, maintenance and utilities.

4 1.Status quo 2.Renovate existing jail and build a smaller re-entry facility 3.Renovate existing jail and build Phase 1 of full replacement 4.Build full replacement facility Options A World of Solutions

5  No new capital expenditures Option 1: Status Quo A World of Solutions PROSCONS  Safety and security issues from overcrowding  Excess labor costs  Excess utility costs  On-going maintenance and equipment replacement  No increased capacity

6 Option 2: Renovate & Build CCRE A World of Solutions PROS  Lower capital commitment  Beginning to address the overcrowding issues  All the benefits of re-entry programming CONS  Operations of two facilities  Excess labor costs  Excess utility costs  On-going maintenance and equipment replacement  No additional high custody beds

7 Option 3: Renovate & Build Phase I A World of Solutions PROS  Completely solves overcrowding issue  Defers capital expenses CONS  Most expensive operational model for staffing, utilities, maintenance  Paying for both the existing facility renovations and the full build-out support structure  Most expensive per inmate capital outlay  On-going maintenance and equipment replacement

8 Option 4: Full Replacement A World of Solutions PROS  Most efficient operational model for staffing, utilities, maintenance  Safest and most secure  Additional capacity for all security levels CONS  Largest capital outlay

9 Option Comparison 1: Status Quo 2: Renovate & Build CCRE 3: Renovate & Build Phase I 4: Full Replacement Capital 1234 Staffing 2431 Utilities/ Maintenance 4321 Impact on: Budget/ Cash Flow 1342 Programming & Recidivism 42 or 3 1 Security & Safety 42 or 3 1 Inmates 42 or 3 1 Employees 42 or 3 1 Community 42 or 3 1

10 2009 Budget 384-bed Community Re-entry Center$25M$66,400/bed 1,262-bed Phase 1 Build Out with Renovation of Existing Jail $115M$91,200/bed 2,158-bed Full Build Out$169M$78,100/bed A World of Solutions

11 Cost Reduction Items A World of Solutions Number of Beds Most recent 2025 projection at 1,760 beds 13% less than 2009 Construction Costs 2011 vs. 2009 Material cost and subcontractor margin reductions have lowered cost by 10% or more This is expected to hold true through at least the 1 st quarter 2012. Beyond that expect the supply/demand curve to dramatically change.

12 Cost Reduction Items A World of Solutions Private Finance Model Conservatively saves 12% from public procurement process through: 1.Economies of scale 2.Schedule savings 3.Constructability knowledge and expertise

13 Private Finance Model for 1,760- Bed Full Build Out A World of Solutions 1,760 beds multiplied by $78K/bed 10% cost reduction due to current market conditions Current cost estimate under public procurement process 12% expected savings with private development and finance models $137,280,000 ($13,728,000) $123,552,000 ($14,826,240) $108,725,760 $62K / bed

14 Issue Tax-Free Municipal Bonds  Uses County’s borrowing capacity  General extra soft cost  Usually lowest rate, but not always the least expensive Municipal Lease Models  Uses County’s borrowing capacity  Little flexibility True Lease Model  Can be accomplished off balance sheet  Paid for through the annual DOC operating budget  Very flexible Finance Options A World of Solutions

15 Design builder is also responsible for operating and life-cycle costs Fix the repair and maintenance at a designated amount per year at inception of contract Set schedule for replacement of all major systems at inception and include in initial contract Total Cost of Ownership A World of Solutions Examples:  Security Electronics  Plumbing  Electrical  Locking Controls  Roofs  HVAC

16 1)Move quickly to capitalize on all time historic low construction cost 2)Utilize the development, finance, design, and construction markets to analyze the problems Conclusions A World of Solutions RFQ/RFP should include:  Design & construction costs  Impact on repair and maintenance and asset life cycle management  Impact on staffing  Impact on utilities  Reuse of existing jail property  Finance options

17 Questions Comments Next Steps A World of Solutions Buddy Johns, President 6401 E Thomas Rd, Suite 106 Scottsdale, AZ 85251 (724) 601-4918 bjohn@cartergoblelee.com www.cartergoblelee.com


Download ppt "Lancaster County Replacement Facility Development Strategy Presented by: CGL Capital Solutions May 19, 2011 A World of Solutions."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google