TGDC Pre-Meeting July 20 -21, 2015 NIST Facility - Gaithersburg, Maryland Members : Designated Federal Official Matthew V. Masterson, EAC Commissioner,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE and the Information Society Council of Europe Summit (May 2005), Action Plan on e-democracy: "We will also take initiatives so that.
Advertisements

TGDC Meeting, July 2011 Review of VVSG 1.1 Nelson Hastings, Ph.D. Technical Project Leader for Voting Standards, ITL
© Copyright 2009 TEM Consulting, LP - All Rights Reserved Presentation To Travis County, TX - May 27, 2009Rev 1 – 05/22/09 - HSB US Voting System Conformity.
© Copyright CSAB 2013 Future Directions for the Computing Accreditation Criteria Report from CAC and CSAB Joint Criteria Committee Gayle Yaverbaum Barbara.
United States Election Assistance Commission Pilot Program Testing and Certification Manual & UOCAVA Pilot Program Testing and Certification Manual & UOCAVA.
Voting System Qualification How it happens and why.
United States 1 Election Assistance Commission 1 Inspiring Change & Modernization in Election Administration Seattle, WA June 10, 2015.
12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting TGDC Recommendations Research as requested by the EAC John P. Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology
Improving U.S. Voting Systems The Voters’ Perspective: Next generation guidelines for usability and accessibility Sharon Laskowski NIST Whitney Quesenbery.
TGDC Meeting, July 2011 Overview of July TGDC Meeting Belinda L. Collins, Ph.D. Senior Advisor, Voting Standards, ITL
Election Assistance Commission United States VVSG Technical Guidelines Development Committee (TGDC) NIST July 20, 2015 Gaithersburg,
MAC Committee Update Robert Kondziolka, MAC Chair.
April 11, 2007 Prepared by the North American Energy Standards Board 1 North American Energy Standards Board Standards Development Process.
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 VVSG 2.0 and Beyond: Usability and Accessibility Issues, Gaps, and Performance Tests Sharon Laskowski, PhD National Institute of.
TGDC Meeting, July 2011 UOCAVA Roadmap Update Nelson Hastings, Ph.D. Technical Project Leader for Voting Standards, ITL
TGDC Meeting, July 2011 IEEE P.1622 Update John P. Wack Computer Scientist, Software and Systems Division, ITL
Federal Geographic Data Committee: Coordination Group Meeting Proposal: FGDC Annual Planning Process & Monthly Performance Management Reviews Submitted.
NIST – Who We Are and What We Do 1 NIST is a world class scientific and technical agency uniquely focused on driving innovation and economic competitiveness.
NIST HAVA-Related Work: Status and Plans June 16, 2005 National Institute of Standards and Technology
Making every vote count. United States Election Assistance Commission HAVA 101 TGDC Meeting December 9-10, 2009.
12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting NIST Research on UOCAVA Voting Andrew Regenscheid National Institute of Standards and Technology
Atlanta Board of Education AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” February 14, 2011.
IEEE P1622 Meeting, Feb 2011 Common Data Format (CDF) Update John P. Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology
Improving U.S. Voting Systems Security Breakout Session Improving U.S. Voting Systems Andrew Regenscheid National Institute.
Improving U.S. Voting Systems Interoperability in Election Data and Devices TGDC Meeting July 20 – 21, 2015 Improving U.S. Voting Systems 1 John P. Wack.
Usability and Accessibility Working Group Report Sharon Laskowski, PhD National Institute of Standards and Technology TGDC Meeting,
TGDC Meeting, December Common Data Format Directions John P. Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology
Briefing for NIST Acting Director James Turner regarding visit from EAC Commissioners March 26, 2008 For internal use only 1.
NIST Voting Program Activities Update February 21, 2007 Mark Skall Chief, Software Diagnostics and Conformance Testing Division.
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Auditability Working Group David Flater National Institute of Standards and Technology r4.
ARIP Technical Committee Convener Call 07 April
CTI Technical Committee Convener Call 11 May
ARIP Technical Committee Convener Call 07 April
PROMCODE Technical Committee Convener Call 14 February
Oct 15-17, : Integratability and Data Export Page 1Next VVSG Training Voting devices must speak (produce records) using a commonly understood language,
TGDC Meeting, July 2010 Report of the UOCAVA Working Group John Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology DRAFT.
1 The Evolution of Voting Systems Paul DeGregorio Vice Chairman Donetta Davidson Commissioner The U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
NIST Voting Program Page 1 NIST Voting Program Lynne Rosenthal National Institute of Standards and Technology
TGDC Meeting, December 2011 Overview of December TGDC Meeting Belinda L. Collins, Ph.D. Senior Advisor, Voting Standards
NIST Voting Program Barbara Guttman 12/6/07
TGDC Meeting, July 2011 Voluntary Voting System Guidelines Roadmap Nelson Hastings, Ph.D. Technical Project Leader for Voting Standards, ITL
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Help America Vote Act (HAVA) Roadmap Nelson Hastings National Institute of Standards and Technology
TGDC Meeting, July 2010 Report on Other Resolutions from Dec 2009 TGDC Meeting John Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Common Data Format (CDF) Update John P. Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Review of UOCAVA Roadmap Nelson Hastings National Institute of Standards and Technology
NIST Voting Program Activities Update January 4, 2007 Mark Skall Chief, Software Diagnostics and Conformance Testing Division.
1 DECEMBER 9-10, 2009 Gaithersburg, Maryland TECHNICAL GUIDELINES DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Commissioner Donetta Davidson.
OData Technical Committee Convener Call June 5, 2012.
© Copyright 2002 TEM Consulting, LP - All Rights Reserved Presentation To GTRI Voting Technology WorkshopRev – 05/31/02 - HSB GTRI Future of Voting Technology.
The VVSG Version 1.1 Overview Matthew Masterson Election Assistance Commission
NIST VOTING PROGRAM MARY BRADY, PROGRAM MANAGER TGDC MEETING: FEBRUARY 2016.
TGDC Meeting, July 2010 Overview of NIST Activities and TGDC Meeting Agenda Martin Herman, PhD National Institute of Standards and Technology
Creating Accessibility, Usability and Privacy Requirements for the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG) Whitney Quesenbery TGDC Member Chair, Subcommittee.
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Development of High Level Guidelines for UOCAVA voting systems Andrew Regenscheid National Institute of Standards and Technology.
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Path Forward for FY11 UOCAVA Activities Nelson Hastings National Institute of Standards and Technology
Briefing for the EAC Public Meeting Boston, Massachusetts April 26, 2005 Dr. Hratch Semerjian, Acting Director National Institute of Standards and Technology.
12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting NIST-developed Test Suites David Flater National Institute of Standards and Technology
Update: Revising the VVSG Structure Sharon Laskowski vote.nist.gov April 14, 2016 EAC Standards Board Meeting 1.
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Report from Workshop on UOCAVA Remote Voting Systems Nelson Hastings National Institute of Standards and Technology
Interoperability Voting Public Work Group Jeramy Gray, CIO, LA County John Wack, NIST.
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 VVSG 2.0 and Beyond: Usability and Accessibility Issues, Gaps, and Performance Tests Sharon Laskowski, PhD National Institute of.
More than a Sticker…. Benefits of EAC Certification Presentation to the EAC Standards Board Carlsbad, CA April 14, 2016 Brian Hancock, Director, Testing.
United States 1 Election Assistance Commission 1 Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) Overview Standards Board Meeting Carlsbad, Ca – April.
The VVSG 2005 Revision Overview EAC Standards Board Meeting February 26-27, 2009 John P. Wack NIST Voting Program National Institute.
Updating the Regulation for the JINR Programme Advisory Committees
Chris Albrecht Legal Counsel
Chris Albrecht Legal Counsel
FGFOA Committees Established and evaluated by the FGFOA Board of Directors to utilize talent and resources of the FGFOA membership.
IEEE Task Group G Report to the IEEE WG
Presentation transcript:

TGDC Pre-Meeting July , 2015 NIST Facility - Gaithersburg, Maryland Members : Designated Federal Official Matthew V. Masterson, EAC Commissioner, Chair Dr. Willie E. May, Director, NIST EAC Standards Board Representatives Robert Giles Greg Riddlemoser EAC Board of Advisors Representatives Linda Lamone Helen Purcell Architectural and Transportation Barrier Compliance Board (Access Board) Representatives Marc Guthrie Mat McCollough American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Representatives Scott Cooper Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Representative Jeremy Epstein National Association of State Election Directors (NASED) Representatives Lori Augino Ross Hein Technical Experts McDermot Coutts Diane Golden Jeramy Gray David Wagner

Public Working Groups Pre-Election Election Day Post Election Constituency Groups Cybersecurity Human Factors Interoperability Testing

Public Working Group Progress Created TWiki pages

Process Models – Pre-Election

Process Models – Election Day

Process Models – Post Election

TGDC First Official Meeting February 8 – 9, 2016 U.S. Access Board - Washington, DC Agenda: Presented Process Models Heard from the Constituency Groups Learned about legislative trends related to voting technology Discussed certification and standard setting strategies and recommendations Updated on the state to federal mapping project by the EAC Reviewed the proposed VVSG format Discussed Scope

Next Generation VVSG Principles/Guidelines Standards/Requirements Test Assertions

Presented NASED Principles The purpose of testing and certification of voting systems, including the development of the corresponding requirement to be tested, is as follows: To assess the ability of the election systems to correctly execute secure, usable and accessible elections in the jurisdictions in order to provide assurance to voters that the election is an accurate reflection of the voters’ will. To enable, not obstruct or impede, innovation and needed response to changing statutes, rules, or jurisdictional and voters’ needs. To provide deployable systems and system modifications in a timely manner based on generally recognized elections calendars and schedules. To provide an open and transparent process that allows voters and election jurisdictions to assess the performance and capability of the election systems. To provide a set of testable requirements that jurisdictions can understand and use to procure and evaluate the performance of election systems.

Scope of the VVSG What’s in? Areas where the technology interacts with functions of ballot creation all the way through to tabulation Intersecting technologies if they communicate directly with the tabulation system E-pollbook Electronic ballot delivery tools Accessibility Security Interoperability Functionality

Next Steps Continue to further develop the TWiki pages. Hold public webinars to continue building out the process maps and to put out VVSG drafts for evaluation and feedback. Standards Board members should sign up and participate in these public working groups. Look for a follow up invite in the coming weeks. TGDC will hold half day remote meetings over the summer. Review Charter Bring public feedback to the Committee Continue Scoping Discussion