The Evaluator's Role in the SLO Process Module Three Summative Conference Presented by the SCDE Office of Educator Effectiveness.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
Advertisements

 Teacher Evaluation and Effectiveness laws are now in place  Legislature has passed a law that student performance can now be a part of teacher evaluation.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation Module 1: Introduction to Student Growth Measures and SLOs.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 7: Preparing for My Mid-Year Conversation.
Student Learning Targets (SLT) You Can Do This! Getting Ready for the School Year.
STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES (SLOs) 1 Orientation Module.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth (LEPG) Model Module 3: Reflection, Rating, and Planning 1.
RHODE ISLAND MODEL Fall 2013 Evaluation Update. 2 Fall Evaluation Educator Update Agenda 1.RI Model Improvements 2.Support Professionals Overview 3. Questions.
Performance Appraisal System Update
Introduction to Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
GOAL SETTING CONFERENCES BRIDGEPORT, CT SEPTEMBER 2-3,
EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS: 1 An Orientation for Principals and Assistant Principals.
Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (T-PEPG) Model
Putting the Pieces Together…. Understanding SLOs.
WELCOME! Elementary Math Building Leads / Coaches Please complete the ORANGE information sheet. Wednesday, September 26, 2012 Kathleen Wilson - Math Program.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Implementing High Quality Student Learning Objectives: The Promise and the Challenge Maryland Association of Secondary School.
Student/School Learning Objectives
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
Student Growth 2.0 Fall,  Face-to-Face Sessions  Student Growth 2.0  Rater Agreement Practices  TPEP/ Washington State Learning Standards.
Student Growth Goals Pendleton School District Teacher Evaluation System Domain Five Targeting Growth Using Student Growth Goals as a Measure of Educator.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Through the Use of Student Data Overview of the SLO Process April 7,
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
ISLLC Standard #1 ISLLC Standard #1 Planning School Improvement Name: Planning School Improvement that Ensures Student Success Workshop Facilitator.
Creating a Student Learning Objective (SLO). Training Objectives Understand how Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) fit into the APPR System Understand.
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 1: MSFE TEPG Rubric.
An Introduction and Results of a Field Test.  Julie Oxenford O’Brian  Director, Center for Transforming Learning and Teaching  Catalyzing and co-creating.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
STUDENT GROWTH MEASURES Condensed from ODE Teacher Training.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation Using Data to Inform Growth Targets and Submitting Your SLO 1.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS: 1 An Orientation for Teachers.
The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 6: Reflecting and Planning for Next Year December 2013.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T?  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection of evidence  Stage.
Student Learning Objectives. Introductions Training Norms Be present Actively participate in activities Respect time boundaries Use electronics respectfully.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 4: Professional Growth Plan Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Student Learning Objectives 1 SCEE Summit Student Learning Objectives District Professional Development is the Key 2.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 6: Informal Observations Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Teacher Evaluation Process Update March 13, 2015 SCASPA Roundtable.
SLO Check-in December 2015 SLOs in LEAP Midyear Conversations.
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Creating & Implementing Your Plan October 2012.
Educator Effectiveness Process Introduction to the Grant and Guide to the Unit Meeting.
Assessment Literacy and the Common Core Shifts. Why Be Assessment Literate? ED Test and Measurement 101 was a long time ago Assure students are being.
Forum on Evaluating Educator Effectiveness: Critical Considerations for Including Students with Disabilities Lynn Holdheide Vanderbilt University, National.
2015/16 Staff Performance Appraisals Webinar for ANR Supervisors Spring 2016.
Best Practices in CMSD SLO Development A professional learning module for SLO developers and reviewers Copyright © 2015 American Institutes for Research.
The Evaluator's Role in the SLO Process Module Two Mid-Course Conference Presented by the SCDE Office of Educator Effectiveness.
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
Expanded ADEPT Guidance Presentation Office of Educator Effectiveness May 9, 2016.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation Module 4: Scoring an Individual SLO 1.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Doreen Griffeth, Director.
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY
Evaluating the Quality of Student Achievement Objectives
Welcome to the session on Student Growth
Introduction to Student Achievement Objectives
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Student Growth Measures
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

The Evaluator's Role in the SLO Process Module Three Summative Conference Presented by the SCDE Office of Educator Effectiveness

Connector Think about this year. How has supporting the SLO process benefitted the principal? The teachers? Take one minute to process independently Turn and talk to your neighbor to discuss your thoughts Be prepared to share out with the group

Group Norms Be present (physically and mentally) Please use electronic devices responsibly Ask questions when in doubt Honor the time schedule Participate actively

Key Topics Welcome and Introductions SLO Module Review SLO Conference Cycle Coaching Conversations & the Mid-Course Conference Case Study: End of the Year Next Steps: Districts, Evaluators, Teachers

Overarching Objectives Develop an understanding of SLOs and their role in the Expanded ADEPT Support and Evaluation System Become proficient in evaluating SLO components to ensure successful implementation Identify methods to support teachers in the development and monitoring of SLOs Identify resources to facilitate the evaluation of SLOs at the school level

SLO Module Review

SLO Evaluator Modules Approval Conference Mid-Course Conference End of the Year Conference

End of Year Each Student Learning Objective, upon review of the evaluator(s), will be given a rating. The ratings are based on the percentage of students that have met their growth goals based upon the rubric agreed upon at the beginning conference and any mid-course conference adjustments. Teachers self-score the SLO prior to review with the evaluator. SLO Development Preliminary Conference- SLO Approval Mid-Course Conference Final Review and Score Summative Conference and Reflection

Review all available evidence submitted by the teacher, including the summary of results and any supporting documentation. Compare results to original targets set for students. Determine whether or not the data supports the teacher’s SLO rating. Take into account the requirements for rigor and comparability within the district. Review the PG&D plan results and results of action research. Preparing for the Summative Conference

SLO Scoring: Questions to Consider Was the target for this SLO reached? If not, was it close? If so, was the target greatly surpassed? Why or why not?

Operate under the presumption that educators will reach a “proficient” rating. Evidence should be collected to support and determination if performance is above or below that level. Early Implementation Considerations:

Scoring Rubric Example SLO RatingPercentage of Attainment Unsatisfactory50% or fewer students met growth goal. Needs Improvement % of students met growth goal. ProficientAll students met growth goal. ExemplaryAll students met growth goal; 25% of students exceeded goal.

Case Study Scoring Rubric Exemplary In addition to meeting the standard… Proficient Needs ImprovementUnsatisfactory The teacher attains a high level of student achievement with all populations of learners. The work of the teacher results in acceptable, measurable progress based on established standards for a significant number of students. The work of the teacher results in student growth but does not meet the established standard and/or is not achieved with all populations taught by the teacher. The work of the teacher does not achieve acceptable student growth. Almost all students % meet their targeted growth, and many exceed their targets A significant number of students 70%-89% meet or exceed their targets. A less than significant number %of students meet or exceed their targets. Fewer than 50%of students meet or exceed their targets.

Coaching Protocol ValidateClarifyStretch &Apply

COACHING CONVERSATIONS Supporting Development of High Quality SLOs

SLO Summative Conference Video #1) Validate: Affirms strength, or rationale #2) Clarify: Asks for greater detail, probes deeper #3) Stretch: Pushes the educator to think about next steps growth and development Count off 1-3. During the video capture language stems that demonstrate your assigned area of the protocol. Video Link:

SLO Summative Conference Coaching Conversation Video Recap

Key Takeaways Student growth is collected and scored annually. SLO Scoring rubrics are submitted annually with ADEPT plans. For 15-16, assume “proficiency” unless significant data to suggest otherwise. Those that engage in the process (as outlined) report that the scoring of an SLO is not surprising.

Overarching Objectives Develop an understanding of SLOs and their role in the Expanded ADEPT Support and Evaluation System Become proficient in evaluating SLO components to ensure successful implementation Identify methods to support teachers in the development and monitoring of SLOs Identify resources to facilitate the evaluation of SLOs at the school level

Next Steps SLO Evaluator Training (for appropriate staff) – Materials available on SCDE Website SLO Teacher Training – SLO Toolkit – SLO Online Module – District SLO Trainings

Office of Educator Effectiveness Team Kris Joannes Director Joseph Tadlock Team Leader Rinice Sauls Education Associate Tria Grant Education Associate Libby Ortmann Education Associate Dr. Sheila Quinn Deputy Superintendent, Division of Innovation & Effectiveness

Simple Truths