Mixture Models with Adaptive Spatial Priors Will Penny Karl Friston Acknowledgments: Stefan Kiebel and John Ashburner The Wellcome Department of Imaging.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The General Linear Model (GLM)
Advertisements

Bayesian fMRI models with Spatial Priors Will Penny (1), Nelson Trujillo-Barreto (2) Guillaume Flandin (1) Stefan Kiebel(1), Karl Friston (1) (1) Wellcome.
Bayesian inference Lee Harrison York Neuroimaging Centre 01 / 05 / 2009.
SPM – introduction & orientation introduction to the SPM software and resources introduction to the SPM software and resources.
Hierarchical Models and
Overview of SPM p <0.05 Statistical parametric map (SPM)
SPM 2002 Experimental Design Daniel Glaser Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, UCL Slides from: Rik Henson, Christian Buchel, Karl Friston, Chris Frith,
SPM Software & Resources Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM Course London, May 2011.
SPM Software & Resources Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM Course London, October 2008.
Wellcome Centre for Neuroimaging at UCL
Experimental design of fMRI studies SPM Course 2014 Sandra Iglesias Translational Neuromodeling Unit University of Zurich & ETH Zurich With many thanks.
Experimental design of fMRI studies Methods & models for fMRI data analysis in neuroeconomics April 2010 Klaas Enno Stephan Laboratory for Social and Neural.
Bayesian models for fMRI data
Experimental design of fMRI studies SPM Course 2012 Sandra Iglesias Translational Neuromodeling Unit University of Zurich & ETH Zurich With many thanks.
Group analyses of fMRI data Methods & models for fMRI data analysis in neuroeconomics November 2010 Klaas Enno Stephan Laboratory for Social and Neural.
OverviewOverview Motion correction Smoothing kernel Spatial normalisation Standard template fMRI time-series Statistical Parametric Map General Linear.
Multiple testing Justin Chumbley Laboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research Institute for Empirical Research in Economics University of Zurich With.
Bayesian models for fMRI data
Bayesian models for fMRI data Methods & models for fMRI data analysis 06 May 2009 Klaas Enno Stephan Laboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research.
The General Linear Model (GLM)
J. Daunizeau Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, London, UK Institute of Empirical Research in Economics, Zurich, Switzerland Bayesian inference.
Group analyses of fMRI data Methods & models for fMRI data analysis 28 April 2009 Klaas Enno Stephan Laboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research.
Multiple comparison correction Methods & models for fMRI data analysis 29 October 2008 Klaas Enno Stephan Branco Weiss Laboratory (BWL) Institute for Empirical.
Group analyses of fMRI data Methods & models for fMRI data analysis 26 November 2008 Klaas Enno Stephan Laboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research.
Preprocessing II: Between Subjects John Ashburner Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, 12 Queen Square, London, UK.
Variational Bayesian Inference for fMRI time series Will Penny, Stefan Kiebel and Karl Friston Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, University.
With many thanks for slides & images to: FIL Methods group, Virginia Flanagin and Klaas Enno Stephan Dr. Frederike Petzschner Translational Neuromodeling.
SPM Course Zurich, February 2015 Group Analyses Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to.
Group analyses of fMRI data Methods & models for fMRI data analysis November 2012 With many thanks for slides & images to: FIL Methods group, particularly.
Bayesian Inference and Posterior Probability Maps Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, University College London, UK SPM Course,
Bayesian models for fMRI data Methods & models for fMRI data analysis November 2011 With many thanks for slides & images to: FIL Methods group, particularly.
Ch. 5 Bayesian Treatment of Neuroimaging Data Will Penny and Karl Friston Ch. 5 Bayesian Treatment of Neuroimaging Data Will Penny and Karl Friston 18.
The General Linear Model Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM fMRI Course London, May 2012.
Multimodal Brain Imaging Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College, London Guillaume Flandin, CEA, Paris Nelson Trujillo-Barreto, CNC,
Bayesian Methods Will Penny and Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, University College London, UK SPM Course, London, May 12.
Bayesian inference Lee Harrison York Neuroimaging Centre 23 / 10 / 2009.
Variance components Wellcome Dept. of Imaging Neuroscience Institute of Neurology, UCL, London Stefan Kiebel.
Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM Course Zurich, February 2008 Bayesian Inference.
Bayesian Inference in SPM2 Will Penny K. Friston, J. Ashburner, J.-B. Poline, R. Henson, S. Kiebel, D. Glaser Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience,
The General Linear Model Christophe Phillips SPM Short Course London, May 2013.
The General Linear Model Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM fMRI Course London, October 2012.
Group Analyses Guillaume Flandin SPM Course London, October 2016
Variational Bayesian Inference for fMRI time series
The general linear model and Statistical Parametric Mapping
The General Linear Model
Bayesian Inference Will Penny
Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London
Neuroscience Research Institute University of Manchester
Keith Worsley Keith Worsley
The General Linear Model (GLM)
Spatio-Temporal Clustering
Wellcome Dept. of Imaging Neuroscience University College London
The General Linear Model
Statistical Parametric Mapping
The general linear model and Statistical Parametric Mapping
SPM2: Modelling and Inference
Bayesian Methods in Brain Imaging
The General Linear Model
Hierarchical Models and
The General Linear Model (GLM)
Wellcome Dept. of Imaging Neuroscience University College London
Bayesian inference J. Daunizeau
Wellcome Centre for Neuroimaging at UCL
Bayesian Inference in SPM2
Wellcome Centre for Neuroimaging, UCL, UK.
The General Linear Model
Mixture Models with Adaptive Spatial Priors
Probabilistic Modelling of Brain Imaging Data
The General Linear Model
The General Linear Model
Presentation transcript:

Mixture Models with Adaptive Spatial Priors Will Penny Karl Friston Acknowledgments: Stefan Kiebel and John Ashburner The Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, UCL http//:

Data transformations RealignmentSmoothing Normalisation General linear model Statistical parametric map (SPM) Image time-series Parameter estimates Design matrix Template Kernel Gaussian field theory p <0.05 Statisticalinference

Data transformations Realignment Normalisation General linear model Statistical parametric map (SPM) Image time-series Parameter estimates Design matrix Template Gaussian field theory p <0.05 Statisticalinference

Data transformations Realignment Normalisation Mixtures of Mixtures of General linear models Statistical parametric map (SPM) Image time-series Size, Position and Shape Design matrix/matrices Template Gaussian field theory p <0.05 Statisticalinference

Data transformations Realignment Normalisation Mixtures of Mixtures of General linear models Posterior Probability Map (PPM) Map (PPM) Image time-series Size, Position and Shape Design matrix/matrices Template

OverviewOverview Overall Framework - Generative model Overall Framework - Generative model Parameter estimation - EM algorithmParameter estimation - EM algorithm Inference - Posterior Probability Maps (PPMs) Inference - Posterior Probability Maps (PPMs) Model order selection - How many clusters ? Model order selection - How many clusters ? Auditory and face processing data Auditory and face processing data

Cluster-Level Analysis The fundamental quantities of interest are the properties of spatial clusters of activation

Generative Model We have ACTIVE components which describe spatially localised clusters of activity with a temporal signature correlated with the activation paradigm.We have ACTIVE components which describe spatially localised clusters of activity with a temporal signature correlated with the activation paradigm. We have NULL components which describe spatially distributed background activity temporally uncorrelated with the paradigm.We have NULL components which describe spatially distributed background activity temporally uncorrelated with the paradigm. At each voxel and time point fMRI data is a mixture of ACTIVE and NULL components.At each voxel and time point fMRI data is a mixture of ACTIVE and NULL components. We have ACTIVE components which describe spatially localised clusters of activity with a temporal signature correlated with the activation paradigm.We have ACTIVE components which describe spatially localised clusters of activity with a temporal signature correlated with the activation paradigm. We have NULL components which describe spatially distributed background activity temporally uncorrelated with the paradigm.We have NULL components which describe spatially distributed background activity temporally uncorrelated with the paradigm. At each voxel and time point fMRI data is a mixture of ACTIVE and NULL components.At each voxel and time point fMRI data is a mixture of ACTIVE and NULL components.

Generative Model m1m1 m2m2 11 22 r0r0 r1r1 r2r2

At each voxel i and time point t 1. Select component k with probability

Generative Model At each voxel i and time point t 1. Select component k with probability Spatial Prior

Generative Model At each voxel i and time point t 1. Select component k with probability 2. Draw a sample from component k’s temporal model Spatial Prior

Generative Model At each voxel i and time point t 1. Select component k with probability 2. Draw a sample from component k’s temporal model Spatial Prior General Linear Model

Generative Model At each voxel i and time point t 1. Select component k with probability 2. Draw a sample from component k’s temporal model Spatial Prior General Linear Model

Generative Model Scan 3

Generative Model Scan 4

Generative Model Scan 8

Generative Model Scan 9

Parameter Estimation Expectation-Maximisation (EM) algorithm

Parameter Estimation Expectation-Maximisation (EM) algorithm E-Step

Parameter Estimation Expectation-Maximisation (EM) algorithm E-Step

Parameter Estimation Expectation-Maximisation (EM) algorithm E-Step Posterior Temporal Spatial Normalizer

Parameter Estimation Expectation-Maximisation (EM) algorithm M-Step Prototype time series for component k A semi-supervised estimate of activity in clusrer k

Parameter Estimation Expectation-Maximisation (EM) algorithm M-Step Prototype time series for component k Variant of Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares

Parameter Estimation Expectation-Maximisation (EM) algorithm M-Step m k and  k updated using line search Prototype time series for component k Variant of Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares

Auditory Data SPMMGLM (K=1)

Auditory Data SPMMGLM (K=2)

Auditory Data SPMMGLM (K=3)

Auditory Data SPMMGLM (K=4)

How many components ? Integrate out dependence on model parameters,  This can be approximated using the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) Then use Baye’s rule to pick optimal model order

How many components ? KK P(D|K) BIC Log L

Auditory Data MGLM (K=2) t=15 Diffuse Activation

Auditory Data MGLM (K=3) Focal Activations t=20 t=14

Face Data This is an event-related study 60 secs Face Events BOLD Signal

Face Data SPMMGLM (K=2)

Face Data Prototype time series for cluster 60 secs GLM Estimate (solid line) (dotted line)

Smoothing can remove signal Spatial priors adapt to shape Smoothing will remove signal here

ConclusionsConclusions SPM is a special case of our modelSPM is a special case of our model We don’t need to smooth the data and risk losing signalWe don’t need to smooth the data and risk losing signal Principled method for pooling dataPrincipled method for pooling data Effective connectivityEffective connectivity Spatio-temporal clusteringSpatio-temporal clustering Spatial hypothesis testing (eg. stroke)Spatial hypothesis testing (eg. stroke) Extension to multiple subjectsExtension to multiple subjects SPM is a special case of our modelSPM is a special case of our model We don’t need to smooth the data and risk losing signalWe don’t need to smooth the data and risk losing signal Principled method for pooling dataPrincipled method for pooling data Effective connectivityEffective connectivity Spatio-temporal clusteringSpatio-temporal clustering Spatial hypothesis testing (eg. stroke)Spatial hypothesis testing (eg. stroke) Extension to multiple subjectsExtension to multiple subjects