Using SEER-Medicare Data to Enhance Registry Data to Assess Quality of Care Joan Warren Applied Research Program National Cancer Institute NAACCR June.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Connie N. Hess, MD, Bimal R. Shah, MD, MBA, S. Andrew Peng, MS, Laine Thomas, PhD, Matthew T. Roe, MD, MHS, Eric D. Peterson, MD, MPH Relationship of Early.
Advertisements

Informing Medicaid Policy With Cancer-related Health Services Research Siran M. Koroukian, Ph.D. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Case Western.
Coding for Medical Necessity
Liver Transplantation and Subsequent Risk of Cancer: Findings from a Canadian Cohort Study By Scott, Berkeley and Rob Music by Black Sabbath.
March 2002 Outcomes in thyroid cancer: what factors are important? Information Projects Team Outcomes in thyroid cancer: what factors are important? NYCRIS.
Racial Disparities and Socioeconomic Status in Association with Survival in Older Men with Local/Regional Stage Prostate Cancer Xianglin L. Du, M.D., Ph.D.
4.6 Assessment of Evaluation and Treatment 2013 Analytic Lung Cancer.
Urologic Diseases in America Available Datasets. Urologic Diseases in America Mission: 1. Define the burden of illness posed on the nation by the major.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence January–February 2011.
RACIAL DISPARITIES IN PRESCRIPTION DRUG UTILIZATION AN ANALYSIS OF BETA-BLOCKER AND STATIN USE FOLLOWING HOSPITALIZATION FOR ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION.
April 6, o What is cancer? o Cancer statistics o Cancer prevention and early detection o Cancer disparities o Cancer survivorship o Cancer research.
SEER PATTERNS OF CARE Kimberly Kimbler, MS, CCRP, CTR Kentucky Cancer Registry
Giving Induction Radiation in Addition to Chemotherapy Is Not Associated with Improved Survival of NSCLC Patients with Operable Mediastinal Nodal Disease.
Cancer and Minorities Norma Kanarek, MPH, PhD Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Department of.
Impact of Cancer Diagnosis and Chemotherapy on Mammography Use Xinhua Yu, M.B., Ph.D. A. Marshall McBean, M.D., M.Sc. Beth A. Virnig, Ph.D., M.P.H Division.
Prognostic factors for breast cancer survival in affluent and deprived areas Jasmina Stefoski-Mikeljevic.
Quality Cancer Data The Vital Role of Cancer Registrars in the Fight against Cancer Saves Lives.
As noted by Gary H. Lyman (JCO, 2012) “CER is an important framework for systematically identifying and summarizing the totality of evidence on the effectiveness,
Breast Cancer Detection, Treatment, and Survival in Medicare and Medicaid Insured Patients Cathy J. Bradley, Ph.D. Professor of Health Administration Co-leader,
Overview of the SEER-Medicare Data Rachel Ballard-Barbash, MD, MPH Martin Brown, Ph.D. Joan Warren, Ph.D. Applied Research Program DCCPS BSA Meeting November.
The Maturation of a Specialty: Workforce Projections for Endocrine Surgery Julie Ann Sosa, MA, MD, FACS Associate Professor of Surgery Sections of Oncologic.
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Incidence, Survival and Treatment Linda C. Harlan, PhD, MPH National Cancer Institute Division of Cancer Control and.
Disparities in Cancer September 22, Introduction Despite notable advances in cancer prevention, screening, and treatment, a disproportionate number.
The influence of Breast Cancer Pay for Performance Initiatives on breast cancer survival and performance measures: a pilot study in Taiwan Raymond NC Kuo,
1 Lecture 20: Non-experimental studies of interventions Describe the levels of evaluation (structure, process, outcome) and give examples of measures of.
Use of Large Databases for Cancer Prevention and Control Research Gregory S. Cooper, MD Case Western Reserve University.
Preventive Health Care Use in Elderly Uterine Cancer Survivors Division of Health Policy and Management School of Public Health University of Minnesota.
Ethnic Disparities in Early Breast Cancer Management among Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders Rebecca P. Gelber, MD, MPH Department of Medicine, University.
Outcomes of screening mammography among women aged 40 to 43 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences Toronto, Canada (2006)
The Relationship of Surgeon and Hospital Volume with Long-Term Survival For Women with Breast Cancer Patrick J. Roohan New York State Department of Health.
The effect of surgeon volume on procedure selection in non-small cell lung cancer surgeries Dr. Christian Finley MD MPH FRCSC McMaster University.
INCIDENCE AND SURVIVAL TRENDS OF COLORECTAL CANCER FROM 2002 TO 2011 BE Ansa; E Alema-Mensah; MD Claridy; JQ Sheats; B Fontenot, and SA Smith Georgia Regents.
Breast Cancer Care of Mexican American Women in High Poverty California Neighborhoods: Protective Effects of Social and Financial Capital, Including Health.
Statistics about unknown primary tumors Riccardo Capocaccia National Centre for Epidemiology, Surveillance and Health Promotion Istituto Superiore di Sanità,
Unequal Utilization of New Technologies by Race The Use of New Prostate Surgeries (TUNA and TUMT) among Medicare Elderly Beneficiaries Xinhua Yu, PhD,
“The African American Prostate Cancer Crisis in Numbers”
A Glimpse of the Science Behind the American Cancer Society Access to Care Campaign Impact of Being Uninsured or Underinsured on Individuals with Cancer.
Prostate Cancer Screening in African American Men Mark H. Kawachi, MD FACS Director, Prostate Cancer Center City of Hope, National Medical Ctr.
SEER Provided Data Mohammad Afnan Baqai 12/3/2009.
Barb Supanich, RSM, MD, FAAHPM Holy Cross IP Palliative Care Team November 11, 2010.
Measuring the Occurrence of Disease 1 Sue Lindsay, Ph.D., MSW, MPH Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Institute for Public Health San Diego State.
Data Sources-Cancer Betsy A. Kohler, MPH, CTR Director, Cancer Epidemiology Services New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services.
THE URBAN INSTITUTE Examining Long-Term Care Episodes and Care History for Medicare Beneficiaries: A Longitudinal Analysis of Elderly Individuals with.
How Much Do Patients’ Preferences Contribute To Resource Use? Anthony D L, Herndon M B, et al. Health Affairs, 28, no. 3 (2009):
Tools to Access the Latest Cancer Statistics Paul Miller Washington Reporting Fellowships program presentation April 15, 2013.
Aubert RE et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract CRA508. (Oral Presentation)
Evidence for a Survival Benefit Conferred by Adjuvant Radiotherapy in a Cohort of 608 Women with Early-stage Endometrial Cancer O. Kenneth Macdonald 1,
The Usual Source of Care and Delivery of Preventive Services to Medicare Beneficiaries Academy Health, June 2005 Hoangmai Pham, MD, MPH Deborah Schrag,
Urban/Rural Differences in Survival Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Breast Cancer Melony E.S. Sorbero, Ph.D. RAND Corporation Funded by Health Resources.
SEER Data Cancer Project Brett Langsjoen. SEER Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Purpose: Collect.
Treatment Patterns in the Management of Prostate Cancer: Lessons Learned from the Florida Cancer Data System Vonetta L. Williams, PhD, MPH, CTR June 23,
National Cancer Intelligence Network Outcome and the effect of age in 1318 patients with synovial sarcoma: Report from the National Cancer Intelligence.
Carina Signori, DO Journal Club August 2010 Macdonald, M. et al. Diabetes Care; Jun 2010; 33,
Linking Electronic Health Records Across Institutions to Understand Why Women Seek Care at Multiple Sites for Breast Cancer Caroline A. Thompson, PhD,
Trends in Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rates by Race, Age and Indices of Access to Medical Care in the U.S., Yongping Hao, PhD 1 Ahmedin Jemal,
Premature deaths due to Prostate Cancer: The Role of Diagnosis and Treatment Appathurai Balamurugan MD, MPH S William Ross MD Chris Fisher, BS Jim Files,
Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the Elderly: A Population-Based Study in Ontario, Canada JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, VOLUME 30.
1 Overview of presentation 1.Context 2.Objectives 3.Methods 4.What has been achieved 5.What has to be done NCSI-CYP – Risk Stratification Investigation.
Cervical cancer among Asian subgroups in California, Janet Bates, MD MPH California Cancer Registry NAACCR Annual Meeting Denver, Colorado June.
Variation in place of death from cancer: studies in South East England Elizabeth Davies, Peter Madden, Victoria Coupland, Karen Linklater, Henrik Møller.
What does the data tell us? Colorectal CANCER IN NEVADA
PCI related in-hospital mortality based on race and gender in the USA
ELDERLY PATIENTS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR OVARIAN CANCER: PERI-OPERATIVE ASSESSMENT AND SURGICAL CHOICES Dina Kurdiani M.D.
Physical Activity and Endometrial Cancer Survival
M Javanbakht, S Guerry, LV Smith, P Kerndt
The Research Question 1) What is the contemporary prevalence of Active Surveillance (AS) adoption among men newly diagnosed with low-risk localized prostate.
Megan Eguchi, MPh Sana karam, md, phd
Arti Parikh-Patel, PhD MPH Cyllene Morris, DVM MPVM
Colorectal cancer survival disparities in California
Presentation transcript:

Using SEER-Medicare Data to Enhance Registry Data to Assess Quality of Care Joan Warren Applied Research Program National Cancer Institute NAACCR June 6, 2007

What are the SEER - Medicare data? The SEER-Medicare data are the result of the linkage of two large population-based sources of data: cancer registry data from NCI’s sponsored cancer registries (SEER program) and Medicare claims from CMS The SEER registries collect detailed clinical, demographic and cause of death information for persons with cancer Medicare data are longitudinal, with claims for all covered fee-for-service health care from the time of eligibility to death There are currently over 1.8 million cases in the data

Why link the SEER-Medicare Data? The linked data can be used for a number of analyses that span the course of cancer control activities Diagnosis/ Tx  Survivorship  Second Occurrence  Terminal Care Patterns of care Peri-operative complications Volume outcomes studies Extent of staging Comorbidities Late effects of treatment Post-diagnostic surveillance Treatment of prevalent cancers Survival Rates of second primaries Relationship of second events to initial treatment and ongoing surveillance Use of hospice services Patterns of care during the last year of life Quality of care, h ealth disparities, and cost of treatment

Persons included in the SEER-Medicare Data 100% of patients in the SEER data who are found to be Medicare eligible 5% random sample of persons residing in the SEER areas who have not been diagnosed with cancer These people can be used to create comparison groups as well as to create estimates of diagnostic testing and treatment practices in the entire population Medicare files available for the non-cancer cases are the same as for the cancer cases

What is included in the SEER-Medicare Data SEER Data including Incidence, site, stage, initial tx, demographics and vital status Medicare claims for: Short stay hospitals Physician and lab services Hospital outpatient claims Home health and hospice bills

Other variables available in the SEER-Medicare data 1990 and 2000 Census data at the census tract and zip code level for ecological SES measures Health Care Service Area from Area Resource File Hospital and physician characteristics- ex. bedsize, hospital ownership, physician specialty

Years of SEER-Medicare Data Available SEER data are available for the entire time a registry has participated in the SEER program; some registries go back to 1973 Medicare claims are available from , except for hospital data that are available back to 1986 Cases reported through 2002 Update of the linkage is underway. It will include cases through 2005 with Medicare claims through 2006.

Limitations of the SEER-Medicare Data Observational data- pts are not randomly assigned to treatment Non-covered services excluded: prescription drugs, long- term care, free screenings Reasons for tests are not known; this raises challenges w/measuring screening Results of tests not available Does not include claims for care provided to persons in HMOs (about 22% in SEER areas) Under 65 population includes only the disabled/ESRD

Using the SEER-Medicare Data to Assess Quality of Cancer Care The SEER-Medicare data are a good resource to measure quality of cancer care: Data are longitudinal Can look at claims prior to diagnosis to adjust for pre- existing conditions Cross most components of the health care system Challenges of using these data to assess quality of care Secondary data do not capture factors that may influence treatment choices; especially an issue in the elderly There are a limited number of treatments for which there is consensus regarding treatment

Examples of Quality of Care Studies Using SEER-Medicare Data Investigators have used SEER-Medicare data to: Assess if patients received routinely provided care- Surgery Adjuvant therapy (RT/Chemo) Post-diagnostic surveillance Examine health system factors related to outcomes Hospital and physician characteristics Volume outcomes

Are All Medicare Beneficiaries with Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Potentially Curative Surgery? Black persons with early stage non-small cell lung cancer have poorer survival than do comparable white persons Early-stage non-small cell lung cancer is potentially curable by surgical resection Investigators used SEER-Medicare data to estimate the rates of surgical treatment between blacks and whites and to determine if disparities in survival could be explained by differences in use of surgery

Survival of Medicare beneficiaries aged 65+ with Stage I/II non-small cell lung cancer, by treatment and race,

CONCLUSIONS The lower survival rate among black patients with early-stage, non-small-cell lung cancer, as compared with white patients, is largely explained by the lower rate of surgical treatment among blacks.

Use of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Medicare Beneficiaries with Stage III Colon Cancer Use of adjuvant chemotherapy following a diagnosis of Stage III colon cancer has been guideline treatment for many years There are concerns that some patients are not receiving adjuvant treatment because of their age or race Investigators have used the SEER-Medicare data to assess use of adjuvant chemo in Medicare beneficiaries with Stage III colon cancer

Schrag et al, JNCI 2001 Receipt of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Medicare Beneficiaries with Stage III Colon Cancer by Age Group

Referral to Medical Oncologist and Receipt of Chemotherapy Among Those Who Saw an Oncologist Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Stage III Colon Cancer Baldwin LM, et al. JNCI Aug Saw a Medical Oncologist Received Chemotherapy Percent

Assessment of Post-diagnostic Surveillance SEER-Medicare data have been used to evaluate whether patients are receiving the recommended surveillance following a cancer diagnosis: Persons with superficial bladder cancer who have not undergone total cystectomy should undergo bladder surveillance with cystoscopy every 3-6 months Men with prostate cancer who opt for expectant management should have a PSA test every 6 months

Surveillance among Medicare Eligible Patients with Superficial Bladder Cancer over a 30-month interval following diagnosis, by Age Group Source: Schrag D et al. J Natl Cancer Inst Apr 16.

Receipt of PSA Testing 7-24 Months Following a Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer for Men Choosing Expectant Management Shavers, et al., Medical Care 2004

Conclusions Bladder surveillance: Only 40% of the cohort received the recommended surveillance PSA tests: African Americans and Hispanics were significantly less likely to receive a PSA test. Black men are more likely to be treated with expectant management.

Does Provider Specialty or Provider Volume Impact on Patient Outcomes? Earlier studies have suggested that provider specialty and/or volume may improve patient outcomes Investigators used the SEER-Medicare data to compare outcomes for women following surgery for ovarian cancer Two studies were done: Does the specialty of the physician performing the surgeon impact on overall survival ? Is there a volume-outcome effect?

Adjusted Cox proportional hazards model for death from any cause for Medicare women with ovarian cancer Adjusted Hazards Ratio General Surgeon Gynecologic oncologist * General gynecologist 0.86* * P < 0.05 Earle CC et al. JNCI Feb

Percent of Patients with Stage III/IV Ovarian Cancer Surviving 48 Months After Surgery by Hospital and Surgeon Volume Schrag D. et al. J Natl Cancer Inst Feb 1.

Conclusions About Ovarian Cancer Treatment These data show that the volume of procedures is not a significant factor in patient survival It appears that physician training is associated with improved outcomes

Final Thoughts About Using SEER-Medicare Data to Assess Quality of Care Secondary data sources such as SEER-Medicare can be a powerful source of information because of their size and breadth However, these types of data do not offer definitive information about quality- why was treatment not given, what other factors influenced outcomes These data should be used to determine where more in-depth research should be focused.

More Details on the SEER-Medicare data SEER-Medicare WEB site