Controlled Rocking of Steel Braced Frames

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Codes and Standards Future Work
Advertisements

Design of Steel and Composite-Structures for Seismic Loading – Safety Requirements, Concepts and Methods – Prof. Dr.-Ing. Ekkehard Fehling, University.
Design of Seismic-Resistant Steel Building Structures
Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo.
Chapter 7 Column Design (Part 2). Shearson Lehman/American Express Information Services Center, New York City. (Courtesy of Owen Steel Company, Inc.)
Mechanics Based Modeling of the Dynamic Response of Wood Frame Building By Ricardo Foschi, Frank Lam,Helmut Prion, Carlos Ventura Henry He and Felix Yao.
ETABS Three Dimensional Static and Dynamic Analysis and Design of Buildings.
Elastic Stresses in Unshored Composite Section
CEE Capstone II Structural Engineering
Advanced Flexure Design COMPOSITE BEAM THEORY SLIDES
Structural System Overview
Lecture 33 - Design of Two-Way Floor Slab System
ANALYSIS OF TWO-WAY SLABS WITH BEAMS
Development of Self-Centering Steel Plate Shear Walls (SC-SPSW)
STESSA 2012 Santiago, Chile Design Considerations for Braced Frames With Asymmetrical Friction Connections - AFC By J. Chanchi, G.A. MacRae, J.G. Chase,
Modeling for Analysis CE Design of Multi-Story Structures
Structural Principles and Landscapes Over Structure GSD 6242 Ecologies, Techniques, Technologies IV Spring 2015Niall Kirkwood FASLA Alistair McIntosh FASLA.
ONE-WAY SLAB. ONE-WAY SLAB Introduction A slab is structural element whose thickness is small compared to its own length and width. Slabs are usually.
Two-Span LRFD Design Example
Carl Hubben – Structural Option Ae senior thesis Office Building-G EASTERN UNITED STATES.
Second order effects.
Connections and Bracing Configurations
Yahya C. Kurama University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, Indiana, U.S.A
Patricia M. Clayton University of Washington
Utilizing Steel Plate Shear Walls for Seismic Hazard Mitigation
POTENTIAL ISSUE TEAM STUDIES CONCRETE CODIFICATION OPPORTUNITIES 1. CONCRETE SHEAR WALLS Current Codes provide detailed provisions for the seismic design.
STEEL DESIGN (I) CE 408 ( 2 – 3 – 3 ) Semester 062
C-23 The effective length factor (K) was introduced in page (C-7) for six ideal conditions, these are not encountered in practical field conditions. LRFD.
CM 197 Mechanics of Materials Chap 14: Stresses in Beams
Section 2.1 Overview Types of NL Models Inelastic Model Attributes
Seismic Performance Assessment of Flat Plate Floor Systems John W. Wallace, Ph.D., P.E. Thomas Hyun-Koo Kang, Ph.D. Student Department of Civil and Environmental.
Earthquake Resistant Features in Buildings Dr. K. S. Nanjunda Rao.
SEISMIC ANALYSIS WITH SHEAR WALLS
Composite Beams and Columns
Controlled Rocking of Steel-Framed Buildings with Replaceable Energy Dissipating Fuses MUST-SIM Meeting February 5, 2007 Matt Eatherton, MS SE University.
Greg Deierlein, Paul Cordova, Eric Borchers, Xiang Ma, Sarah
Seismic Performance of Outriggered Tall Buildings
Seismic Design of Concrete Structure.
Static Pushover Analysis
TOPICS COVERED Building Configuration Response of Concrete Buildings
© Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras1 SECTION 7 DESIGN OF COMPRESSION MEMBERS.
Weian Liu 3. Research Interest Soil Structure Interaction Seismic Analysis and Design of Bridge Structures Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics.
CTC 422 Design of Steel Structures
7. APPROXIMATE ANALYSIS OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES
NEESR-SG: Controlled Rocking of Steel- Framed Buildings with Replaceable Energy Dissipating Fuses Greg Deierlein, Paul Cordova, Eric Borchers, Xiang Ma,
Building Fun You will have 30 minutes to build the strongest structures you can with only the materials you are provided with. Explain to the class the.
Robert M. Arnold Building Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. An object with forces acting on it, but with zero net force, is said to be in equilibrium. The Conditions for.
Seismic of Older Concentrically Braced Frames Charles Roeder (PI) Dawn Lehman, Jeffery Berman (co-PI) Stephen Mahin (co-PI Po-Chien Hsiao.
NEESR-SG: Controlled Rocking of Steel- Framed Buildings with Replaceable Energy Dissipating Fuses Greg Deierlein, Paul Cordova, Eric Borchers, Xiang Ma,
NEESR-SG: Controlled Rocking of Steel-Framed Buildings with Replaceable Energy Dissipating Fuses Greg Deierlein, Paul Cordova, Eric Borchers, Xiang Ma,
IN MODULAR CONSTRUCTIONS
Structural Curriculum for Construction Management and Architecture Students 1 Prepared by: Ajay Shanker, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Professor Rinker School.
Greg Deierlein, Paul Cordova, Eric Borchers, Xiang Ma, Alex Pena,
3rd Annual EHKS Retreat March 10, 2007 Allerton Park Controlled Rocking Steel Frames with Replaceable Energy-Dissipating Fuses Matt Eatherton, MS SE University.
CABER Project Update February 22, 2008
Beam Design Beams are designed to safely support the design loads.
Practical Design of PT Buildings
NEESR-SG: Controlled Rocking of Steel-Framed Buildings with Replaceable Energy Dissipating Fuses Gregory G. Deierlein, Sarah Billington, Helmut Krawinkler,
Design of Beam-Column Connections in Steel Moment Frames
Design of Bracing Connections in Concentrically Braced Frames
Base Isolation. Conventional Construction Practice assumes Fixed Base Structures The Dynamic Characteristics of Fixed Base Structures are determined by.
Elasto - plastic behavior of beam-to- column connections with fillets of steel bridge frame piers.
SECTION 7 DESIGN OF COMPRESSION MEMBERS
FRAMING CONECTIONS Session 3.
Slender Columns and Two-way Slabs
GUIDED BY, MS. D. DARLING HELEN LYDIA M.TECH., PRESENTED BY,
1C2 Conceptual Design of Buildings
Anjar substation control building with
Earthquake resistant buildings
Presentation transcript:

Controlled Rocking of Steel Braced Frames April 12-13, 2006 NEESR-SG: Controlled Rocking of Steel-Framed Buildings with Replaceable Energy Dissipating Fuses Greg Deierlein, Sarah Billington, & Helmut Krawinkler Stanford University Jerome Hajjar Mitsumasa Midorikawa Univ. of Illinois Hokkaido University US-Japan Meeting

Schematic Building Systems Controlled Rocking of Steel Braced Frames April 12-13, 2006 Schematic Building Systems Structural Fuse Post-tensioning (PT) Tendons NOTE – we will likely use alternative configuration with chevron bracing and PT running down the center of the braced frames. A B A US-Japan Meeting

Controlled Rocking of Steel Braced Frames April 12-13, 2006 Controlled Rocking Brace Frames Yielding of Structural Fuse Structural Fuse Post-tensioning (PT) Tendons PT Cables & Braces remain elastic Steel Braced Frame A B A Could potentially employ additional fuse at base of column US-Japan Meeting

Structural Fuse Options Controlled Rocking of Steel Braced Frames April 12-13, 2006 Structural Fuse Options US-Japan Meeting

Controlled Rocking of Steel Braced Frames April 12-13, 2006 HPFRCC Panels Butterfly Panels Height to width ratio of links close to 1 – likely a combination of shear and flexure behavior. Could adjust A/B ratio to enforce more flexural yielding. A B Slit Tapered Panels Height to width ratio of links approximately 2-1. Region detailed to carry shear after flexural hinging Offset helps distribute stresses near connection, hopefully postponing splitting. US-Japan Meeting

Steel Shear Wall with Slits Controlled Rocking of Steel Braced Frames April 12-13, 2006 Steel Shear Wall with Slits Bolted connection to steel columns A B A US-Japan Meeting

Reduced Web Section Beams Controlled Rocking of Steel Braced Frames April 12-13, 2006 Reduced Web Section Beams A B Welded to steel plate Bolted to steel column US-Japan Meeting

Controlled Rocking of Steel Braced Frames April 12-13, 2006 Viscous Dampers Structural Fuse Post-tensioning (PT) Tendons PT Cables & Braces remain elastic A B A US-Japan Meeting

Bilinear vs. Pinching Fuse Controlled Rocking of Steel Braced Frames April 12-13, 2006 Bilinear vs. Pinching Fuse Not Restoring Restoring PT Strength = Fuse Strength (2PT*A) / (Vp,fuse (A+B)) = 1.0 The hysteretic behavior of the fuse can impact the way we design the PT to fuse strength ratio. A fuse with pinched behavior requires less restoring force to return back to zero displacement, therefore this allows us to provide a stronger fuse than if elastic perfectly plastic behavior is assumed. US-Japan Meeting

Shake Table Test – PRELIMINARY (OLD) CONCEPT Controlled Rocking of Steel Braced Frames April 12-13, 2006 Shake Table Test – PRELIMINARY (OLD) CONCEPT Large scale validation of full system (incl. floor slabs, restoring frame, connection details, etc.) Proof of concept – construction and seismic performance Validation of simulation tools (e.g., OpenSees) US-Japan Meeting

Shake Table Test – LATEST CONCEPT Controlled Rocking of Steel Braced Frames April 12-13, 2006 Shake Table Test – LATEST CONCEPT Note – it is unlikely we will use a slab. Instead, we will likely use some type of steel beam to provide lateral bracing. US-Japan Meeting

Shake Table Test – LATEST CONCEPT Controlled Rocking of Steel Braced Frames April 12-13, 2006 Shake Table Test – LATEST CONCEPT Discussion Points: Interest in running multiple tests to look at alternative shear fuses, varying post-tensioning force, and perhaps other design variants. We need to think about the implications this has on rapid access to the specimen to make adjustments and replace fuses (perhaps while the table is energized). The lateral bracing and connection to the testbed structure will need to allow for vertical rocking motion of frame and the attached beams. We are thinking to test a 4-story structure since we need sufficient height to accommodate the induced deformations in the post-tensioning tendons. We are interested to see if other Japanese researchers will be interested in collaborating on the rocking tests. Possible collaboration would include: (a) design/testing of alternative fuse types, (b) re-use of our specimen for alternative configurations, (c) other … We would like to explore possibilities to leverage resources with other projects or sponsors to help defray costs of detailing, fabrication, and construction of specimen. US-Japan Meeting