District PLC Leadership Team Meeting July 31, 2012 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vs. Attending a Different Training as a Site Team.
Advertisements

Vs. Attending a Different Training as a Site Team.
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
PORTFOLIO.
Presented by: The Eclectic Elective Department Chapter 9.
Parents as Partners in Education
Using Data Effectively or Why Weigh the Hog If You Aren’t Going To Feed It? Presented by Ronni Ephraim, Chief Instructional Officer Los Angeles Unified.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Office of School Improvement Differentiated Webinar Series Leadership #1 February 1, 2012 Presenters: Judy Johnston Vonnie Kunkel 1.
Implementing the CCSS Through Coaching Atomic Conference December 2, 2014.
RAPID CITY AREA SCHOOLS MARCH 7, 2011 Collaborative Goal Setting Task Force Meeting.
“From the Phonograph to the iPod”. 1. The Factory Model  Management identified the “best way,” trained workers accordingly, and provided supervision.
CTE PLC Meeting September 27,   Review some basic PLC information  Goal Setting  CTE PLC Teams  Changes  Focus of goals  New Forms and Procedures.
Structuring Retreats to Share Findings and Discuss Recommendations Paul Cobb and the MIST Team.
Leading the Learning The Role of the Instructional Leadership Team ESC, West Instructional Directors July 30, 2014.
Professional Learning Communities OKGEAR UP Public Schools April 2, 2015.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
This slide show presentation is located on the APEL website: Click on the link: “2015 Summer Leadership Conference.
Professional Learning in the Learning Profession Effective Practice  Increased Student Learning Frederick Brown Director of Strategy.
MSTP PLC Facilitator’s Training Linda Harvieux Cristy Bloch.
Teacher Development and Evaluation Model October 22, 2012.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
Competency Area A: Communicating with Paraprofessionals.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
“Just can’t live that negative way… Make way for the positive day.” -Bob Marley Positive Vibration.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
AWCPA PLC Facilitator’s Training AWCPA Leadership Team.
Dr. Timothy Mitchell Rapid City Area Schools
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
D62 Response to Intervention
System Implementation and Monitoring Regional Session Spring, 2014 Resources are available at sim.abel.yorku.ca.
June 4,  Why are we spending time discussing elements of effective group work ?  Effective and collaborative group work requires an intentional.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
1 Principals’ Student Achievement Meeting April 15, 2009 Leadership for Assessment Literacy From Paper to Practice.
Medicine Hat School District #76 PLC’s Building Capability Through Collaborative Learning Developing tomorrow’s citizens through improved learning, living.
Instructional Leadership Team April 28, Guiding Theme for
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Cultural Shifts: Rethinking what we do and why we do it Together, we can make a difference.
The Facts About Schoolsite Councils The Roles and Responsibilities of a Schoolsite Council.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
“Making the Case for Professional Learning Communities” Placer County Office of Education Renee Regacho-Anaclerio- Assistant Superintendent Educational.
Building Professional Learning Communities: An Overview Halifax County Schools August 10, 2012 Presenter: LaWanna McClease.
Professional Learning Teams Cascade High School September 18, 2015.
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Together, we can make a difference.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
When dealing with colleagues in PLC’s…. Welcome Professional Learning Communities Presenters: Pam Hughes & Kristin Magee
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
PLCS & THE CONNECTION TO RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Essentials for Administrators Sept. 27, 2012.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Proposed Areas of Focus & District Priority Board Meeting April 22, 2014 Kevin. L. O’Gorman, Chief Academic Officer Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
Dr. Timothy Mitchell Rapid City Area Schools Administrative Advance
Loudon County Schools External Review Exit Report February 19-21, 2013.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Principal Student Achievement Meeting PLC Visioning and Beyond.
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning DeeDee Washington, Associate Superintendent of Academics Elementary.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLANNING MARCH 3, 2016.
OEA Leadership Academy 2011 Michele Winship, Ph.D.
Professional Learning Communities Creating powerful and effective learning for teachers and students.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
February 8, 2017.
Step 0: Building a Collaborative Culture
Jeff McCoy, Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology
DAVIS COLLABORATIVE LEARNING TEAMS
Presentation transcript:

District PLC Leadership Team Meeting July 31,

Opening “There is an assumption in more traditional districts and schools that only bottom-up initiatives will be successful or should be undertaken. But the complex journey of district reculturing is not likely to simply bubble up from the bottom. In every district with which we work, we emphasize the need to provide high-quality, top-down leadership, direction, and support, especially in the beginning of the PLC journey.” Robert Eaker & Janel Keating, 2012 Discuss your thoughts regarding the quote above. 2

Effective and collaborative group work Agenda Preview Effective and collaborative group work requires an intentional effort and typically does not happen by accident. Reconnecting: Developing collaborative groups: Key elements that contribute to effective and collaborative group work Highlights… 3

The group’s tasks The District PLC Leadership Team’s Tasks: To make PLC decisions ◦ To clarify numerous aspects of the PLC work ◦ To articulate expectations, accountability, consistency, non-negotiables, and role clarification = “The Tight” To work collaboratively to address and problem solve PLC implementation issues To develop a plan to assess PLC progress in RCAS 4

Participation and Commitments (Roles and Responsibilities) Provide leadership at the district level to move the PLC process forward Provide leadership to make PLC decisions and to problem solve PLC implementation issues Play a district-level leadership role to build a collaborative culture focused on student learning To develop a plan to assess PLC progress Communicate with colleagues and other stakeholders regarding PLC decisions Meet twice a month for 2-3 hours (at least initially) 5

Working Agreements (Norms) Working agreements/norms represent protocols and commitments developed by a team to guide members in working together. They help team members clarify expectations regarding how they will work together to achieve their shared goals. Group Working Agreements/Norms ·Respect others’ ideas, opinions, and time ·Participate and listen actively ·Be here now: Minimize side bar discussions and use technology to contribute to the group Addressing Norm Violations Surface your own norm violations when appropriate The group will monitor norm violations in a subtle, humorous, sensitive way 6

Launching District-Wide PLCs Fundamental Assumptions: Building Shared Background and Knowledge Input from Administrators and Teachers ◦ Data source from February 1, 2012 ◦ Other PLC Research and Literature ◦ Leaders of Learning – District’s role in the PLC process:  Communicate priorities and nondiscretionary goals  Establish specific PLC practices/expectations for every school  Clarify the steps schools must take  Clarify the evidence/indicators that will be used to monitor progress  Vigilantly monitor the degree to which the priorities are monitored and acted on  Clarify expectations for principals and provide them with ongoing training and support  Monitor the implementation process by requiring principals to explain and submit evidence in a public forum to colleagues and central office ◦ Consistency of the Literature ◦ Intensity of the PLC Literature Language 7

Launching District-Wide PLCs: An Implementation Guide for All Staff Intent Key Features:  4 Priorities/Non-Negotiables  Aligned with BOE Goals – Approved 6/7/12  Each priorities has:  Learning Target  Content provided for everyone to learn – Building shared background  Framework includes why, how, who, when, what  Accountability and Indicator of Progress (building level and classroom level)  Monitoring Process  Glossary  References and Additional Resources Q & A, Feedback, Input 8

Leadership for Launching District-Wide PLCs: An Implementation Guide for Administrators Intent Key Features:  Specify learning targets (for principals)  Clarify “the tight”  Offer “how to” strategy ideas based on the PLC literature  Provide opportunities to collaborate, share, and learn from each other  Provide timelines for implementation  Accountability and Indicator of Progress (building level and classroom level)  Monitoring Process  Q & A, Feedback, Input 9

Today’s Specific Tasks To make a consensual decision regarding these PLC issues: Issue #1:How will the Wednesday afternoon time be utilized? (Acceptable and unacceptable staff practices) DECISION MADE - WHAT CLARIFICATION OR ELABORATION IS NEEDED? Issue #2:In what ways will the district practice accountability – at both the building and the classroom levels? FURTHER DEVELOP RESPONSES REGARDING PRIORITIES #1 AND #2 Issue #3:How will we manage situations in which teachers teach more than one content area? DECISION MADE Issue #4: How will we accommodate district-level needs (examples: ELA leadership team work, technology PD), and what will be the expectation for those teachers not involved in district-level work? DECISION NEEDED 10

Debrief Set up meeting times Did we honor our Working Agreements? Reconnect with Learning Targets and Criteria for Success “A district cannot experience the benefits of defined autonomy (loose-tight leadership) when confusion reigns regarding nondiscretionary priorities (the tight).” DuFour & Marzano, 2011 Thank you! 11