Siena, May 23-26 2004A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /1 Performance of BIL tracking chambers for the ATLAS muon spectrometer A.Baroncelli,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CSC Test Beam Data Analysis Alexander Khodinov and Valeri Tcherniatine.
Advertisements

Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
1 MDT P ERFORMANCE WITH 2012 C OLLISION D ATA C ONTENT OF THE CONF-NOTE Mauro Iodice Muon Week – Muon Performance Meeting, May 15 th, 2013.
ADC Performance and Calibration of MDT Chambers
D. Peterson, “Tracking Detector R&D at Cornell University and Purdue University” LC-TPC-LBL 18-Oct Tracking Detector R&D at Cornell University and.
DOE/NSF Review of ATLAS, 1 Mar 2000, BNL Muon MDT Front End Electronics (WBS 1.5.9) James Shank DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS Detector (with help from:
MDT-ASD PRR C. Posch30-Aug-02 1 Specifications, Design and Performance   Specifications Functional Analog   Architecture Analog channel Programmable.
Christine KOURKOUMELIS University of Athens ATLAS Muon Chamber construction in Greece and alignment studies for H  ZZ  4μ decay Como, 8/10/03.
MICE CM Berkeley 9-12 Feb February 2005 Edda Gschwendtner 1 Control/Monitoring and DAQ for PIDs Edda Gschwendtner.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
Octal ASD Certification Tests at Michigan J. Chapman, Tiesheng Dai, & Tuan Bui August 30, CERN.
D. Peterson, “Tracking Detector R&D at Cornell University and Purdue University” ALCPG SLAC 07-Jan Tracking Detector R&D at Cornell University and.
The Time-of-Flight system of the PAMELA experiment: in-flight performances. Rita Carbone INFN and University of Napoli RICAP ’07, Rome,
PERFORMANCE OF THE MACRO LIMITED STREAMER TUBES IN DRIFT MODE FOR MEASUREMENTS OF MUON ENERGY - Use of the MACRO limited streamer tubes in drift mode -Use.
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
Ivan Vitev & E906 Muon Identifier Status Patrick McGaughey and the muon radiography team E866 Meeting at FNAL June 20-21, 2007 Large Muon Tracker at LANSCE.
Precision Drift Chambers for the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Susanne Mohrdieck Max-Planck-Institut f. Physik, Munich for the ATLAS Muon Collaboration Abstracts:
VC Feb 2010Slide 1 EMR Construction Status o General Design o Electronics o Cosmics test Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Geneva.
PHENIX Drift Chamber operation principles Modified by Victor Riabov Focus meeting 01/06/04 Original by Sergey Butsyk Focus meeting 01/14/03.
Manoj Kumar Jha INFN – Bologna On Behalf of ATLAS Muon Calibration Group 20 th October 2010/CHEP 2010, Taipei ATLAS Muon Calibration Framework.
LNF, 26 gennaio Test Beam 2003 Data Analysis and MonteCarlo Studies M. Barone Software and Analysis Meeting ATLAS/Frascati.
“End station A setup” data analysis Josef Uher. Outline Introduction to setup and analysis Quartz bar start counter MA and MCP PMT in the prototype.
Barrel RPC Chamber consists of 2 double-gaps, each equipped with a common plane of 96 strips read-out by 6 front-end boards. The two double- gaps have.
QGP France sept 2010Sanjoy Pal Performances of the tracking Chambers of the ALICE MUON Spectrometer 1.
Muon-raying the ATLAS Detector
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Calibration of the COSY-TOF STT & pp Elastic Analysis Sedigheh Jowzaee IKP Group Talk 11 July 2013.
M. Bianco On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration
Shashlyk FE-DAQ requirements Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA FE-DAQ workshop, Bodenmais April 2009.
W-DHCAL Analysis Overview José Repond Argonne National Laboratory.
Luca Spogli Università Roma Tre & INFN Roma Tre
26 June 2006Imaging2006, Stockholm, Niels Tuning 1/18 Tracking with the LHCb Spectrometer Detector Performance and Track Reconstruction Niels Tuning (Outer.
Progress on the beam tracking instrumentation Position measurement device Tests performed and their resolution Decision on electronics Summary.
The ATLAS Muon Spectrometer 1 has ~355,000 drift tubes installed into 1200 precision Monitored Drift Tube (MDT) tracking chambers arrayed over a 22 m high,
2/4/2001Ludovico Pontecorvo INFN Roma1 Plans for the H8 system test: 2001/2002 Goals for the 2001/2002 Test beam Beam layout Chamber Supports 2001 Schedule.
Precision Drift Chambers for the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer
Radioactive source and cosmic-ray test for the MWPC Davide Pinci on behalf of the Frascati-Roma1 MWPC group.
PERFORMANCE OF THE PHENIX SOUTH MUON ARM Kenneth F. Read Oak Ridge National Lab & University of Tennessee for the PHENIX Collaboration Quark Matter 2002.
Atlas Muon Spectrometer: installation and commissioning L. Pontecorvo INFN Roma.
2002 LHC days in Split Sandra Horvat 08 – 12 October, Ruđer Bošković Institute, Zagreb Max-Planck-Institute for Physics, Munich Potential is here...
1 A CLUster COUnting Drift Chamber for ILC …and… can we adapt this chamber to SuperB ? F.Grancagnolo, INFN – Lecce, Italy.
To measure 0, mechanical oscillations of the wire to be tested are induced by applying a periodic high voltage (about 900 V) with a frequency of 300 ÷
Single tube detection efficiency BIS-MDT GARFIELD Simulation GARFIELD Simulation Anode wire voltage as a function of the distance from the wire Electric.
29-Feb-16S.Movchan Straw status1 Choose of FEE chip for NA62 straw detector Beam tests results 2007 and 2008 (Straw spatial resolution) Comparison FEE.
( ATLAS was designed for LHC: L=10 34 cm -2 s -1 ) [ Now we expect 7.5 x instantaneous and 10 x integrated luminosity ] PILEUP: from ~30  >200 proton.
Station-4 MuID System: Status Ming X. Liu Los Alamos National Lab 1/7/091E906 Collaboration Meeting.
A Brand new neutrino detector 「 SciBar 」 (2) Y. Takubo (Osaka) - Readout Electronics - Introduction Readout electronics Cosmic ray trigger modules Conclusion.
Plots of RPC performance G. Cattani, University of Rome “Tor Vergata” & INFN Roma 2 on behalf of ATLAS Muon Collaboration.
Update on works with SiPMs at Pisa Matteo Morrocchi.
Outline Description of the experimental setup Aim of this work TDC spectra analysis Tracking method steps Autocalibration Single tube resolution Summary.
14/02/2008 Michele Bianco 1 G.Chiodini & E.Gorini ATLAS RPC certification with cosmic rays Università del Salento Facoltà di Scienze MM.FF.NN.
FEE for Muon System (Range System) Status & Plans G.Alexeev on behalf of Dubna group Turin, 16 June, 2009.
A. Calcaterra, R. de Sangro, G. Felici, G. Finocchiaro, P. Patteri, M. Piccolo INFN LNF XIV SuperB General Meeting DCH-I parallel session LNF, 27 September.
Precision Drift Tube Detectors for High Counting Rates O. Kortner, H. Kroha, F. Legger, R. Richter Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, Munich, Germany A. Engl,
A. Calcaterra, R. de Sangro, G. Felici, G. Finocchiaro, P. Patteri, M. Piccolo INFN LNF XIII SuperB General Meeting DCH-I parallel session Elba, 30 May.
A high rate fast precision tracking trigger with RPCs
Results with the RPC system of OPERA and perspectives
High Energy Physics experiments.
MDT second coordinate readout: status and perspectives
Jinfan Chang Experimental Physics Center , IHEP Feb 18 , 2011
S.Movchan Straw prototype beam test into the NA48 infrastructure
First results from prototype measurements
Tracking results from Au+Au test Beam
The Silicon Drift Detector of the ALICE Experiment
BESIII EMC electronics
Bringing the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer to Life with Cosmic Rays
Univerity of rome “Tor Vergata”
Cosmic ray test of RPC for the ATLAS experiment
Pre-installation Tests of the LHCb Muon Chambers
Resistive Plate Chambers performance with Cosmic Rays
ASD-TDC joint test with MDT-CSM
Presentation transcript:

Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /1 Performance of BIL tracking chambers for the ATLAS muon spectrometer A.Baroncelli, P.Branchini, F.Ceradini, E.Graziani, M.Iodice, D.Orestano, A.Passeri, F.Pastore, F.Petrucci, E.Spiriti, S.Tagliaventi and A.Tonazzo Università Roma Tre and INFN Sez. Roma IIII

Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /2 Outline Description of ATLAS MDT chambers Equipment and tests in Roma Tre Calibration and resolution Effects of varying operational conditions –Temperature –Gas composition Use of charge information to improve the spatial resolution

Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /3 The ATLAS muon system MDT chambers Air-core toroidal spectrometer (4 T/m) with 3 measurement stations  good momentum resolution 6GeV/c-1TeV/c + Dedicated trigger detectors BIL chambers: 2 MultiLayers x 4 Layers x 36 (or 30 or 24) MDTs Length=2.6m

Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /4 MDT (Monitored Drift Tube) Gas mixture: Ar-CO % Absolute pressure 3 bar Gain 2x10 4 (HV=3080 V) Discriminator threshold: 20 primary e start stop Anode wire 50  m W TDC ADC electron drift time signal amplitude Al tube R=15mm 400  m thick Max drift time 700 ns Single point resolution ~80  m

Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /5 MDT chamber equipment and tests StepACTIONMEASUREATLAS LIMIT 1Gas distribution systemLeak rate 2x10 -8 barl/s per tube 1 mbar/day per chamber 2HV distribution and signal readout cards Current 5 nA per tube 0.1  A per ML 3ElectronicsNoise rate 1 kHz per tube 4Cosmics dataPerformance RomaTre total 62 chambers, 32 done

Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /6 Cosmic ray hodoscope Simultaneous test of up to 3 chambers Trigger = 3 planes of RPCs 6 segments along tube CHAMBER 1 CHAMBER 2 CHAMBER 3

Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /7 Data acquisition system VME architecture 3 Chamber Service Modules (CSM0) read the events from front- end level-1 buffer of chamber TDCs and perform single chamber event building Digitization performed on the chamber by mezzanine boards hosting 3 ASD circuits and an Atlas Muon TDC (AMT) integrated circuit, that digitize the drift time and sampled charge The CSM0 also distribute the trigger and the main clock (40 MHz) and initializes the ASD and AMT parameter via a JTAG interface

Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /8 Cosmics data 1.3 M events in 24 h Occupancy distributions: spot dead/hot channels Check response of each tube Chamber RM012: central position

Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /9 Single tube response TDC counts Drift time spectrum T0T0 T max noise Distribution of drift time spectrum fit parameters for all tubes in one chamber

Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /10 Autocalibration: space-time relation Iterative procedure: Straight line tangent to drift circles Evaluate residuals Compute mean value of residuals in each time slice Use it as correction to r-t relation

Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /11 Resolution Select “good” events (single track, n≥8 hits) Cut on  2 (a tight cut selects hard  s, reducing contributions from MS) Compute residuals and extrapolation error for each point with track constructed with n-1 points Width of residuals distribution is  r)=  [Resolution(r)] 2 +[ (r)] 2  r)

Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /12 Temperature effects Variations of r-t relations scale linearly with T Effect of temperature variations: Increase/decrease drift spectrum length Modify r-t relations R-t variations on cosmic samples at different temperatures:  T=1.1°C  T=3.1°C  T=5.1°C  T=2.1°C In ATLAS: measure T and apply corrections to r-t relations Systematic error not included

Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /13 Effects of varying gas composition Effect of gas mixture variations: Increase/decrease drift spectrum length Modify r-t relations r-t variations on cosmic samples with precisely known Ar-CO 2 mixtures: 93-7% and %  CO 2 =-0.3%  T=7.1°C ….  T=0.2°C In ATLAS: Control gas composition stability at % level

Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /14 Charge information 8-bit Wilkinson ADC to measure the charge collected in a given time gate after threshold crossing Charge→ADC conversion is non-linear Spread ~10% Width vs peak Equalize channels

Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /15 Charge information: noise rejection TDC counts ADC counts ADC vs TDC counts cut

Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /16 Charge information Average signal amplitude vs drift time (t) in the 6 trigger zones along the wire Average signal amplitude vs position along the wire Signal attenuation length ~30 m consistent with estimate from impedance value

Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /17 Charge information: slewing corrections Charge information can be used to improve the spatial resolution Estimate  t from track residuals Use local linear correction for  t vs ADC- in each r interval

Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /18 Slewing corrections Improvement on resolution most relevant at small radii Average resolution 90  m 80  m = ATLAS design The method is based solely on the data from the chamber itself ~50  m

Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /19 Summary 32/62 MDT chambers for the ATLAS muon system have been equipped and tested at the Roma Tre site Cosmic ray data is used for calibration and resolution measurement Effects of varying operational conditions have been studied –Temperature –Gas composition A method to improve the spatial resolution using charge information has been developed