September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 3: Observation and Feedback.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines. The single most influential component of an effective school is the individual teachers within that school.
Advertisements

Welcome to: The Power of Assessment in Guiding Student Learning Warm up: In groups of 3 or 4, please use the blank chart paper to brainstorm these questions:
Strand C – In Depth. Competencies 8 and 9: The teacher demonstrates a willingness to examine and implement change, as appropriate. The teacher works productively.
Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (T-PEPG) Model
Explicit Instruction: when, where, and how?
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 7: Preparing for My Mid-Year Conversation.
The Blueprint Your SIP (School Improvement Plan) A living, breathing, document.
Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (T-PEPG) Model Module 5: Reflecting and Adjusting.
Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth (LEPG) Model
Copyright © 2013 November 2013 The Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 1: Principal Observation Process.
Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth (LEPG) Module 1: System Overview, Expectations, and Goal Setting.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth (LEPG) Model Module 3: Reflection, Rating, and Planning 1.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
TCRP TEACHER ADVISORY PANEL MEETING October 2011 Derrick Chau, VP Instruction Diane Fiello, TCRP Coach
PUT TITLE HERE Student Success 2011 Summer Program NAME OF YOUR MODULE HERE DAY 2 Student Success 2011 Summer Program Facilitating Learning Teams using.
Observation Process and Teacher Feedback
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
“Charting the Course Together” Implementing the Common Core State Standards -Mathematics- Middle School Leadership Teams February 6, 2014.
Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (T-PEPG) Model
LPS Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth System Core Propositions 4 and 5 Documenting Practice Through Artifacts October 10, 2012.
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 3: Observation and Feedback January 8 th, 2014.
Rhode Island Model Academy for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Day One Professional Practice.
EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, November 2013 NTI.
Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (T-PEPG) Model Module 1: Model Overview 1.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 5: Engaging Students in Rigorous Learning Winter, 2014.
Evaluator Workshop for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Rhode Island Model The contents of this training were developed under a Race to the Top grant from.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 1: MSFE TEPG Rubric.
Engaging Present and Future Members The Taskforce for Reimagining the Episcopal Church Contents of “TREC Engagement Kit” 1.Contents 2.Design Principles.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
Working Portfolios For Non Classroom Teachers. Agenda Determine Working Portfolio rubric Understand the performance levels and scoring Brainstorm possible.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
M ULTIPLE R ESPONSE S TRATEGIES By Euranie Patin Campus Instructional Coach Martin Weiss Elementary School An Approach To Student Engagement.
Agenda Identify and define the key elements of formative assessment. Determine the relationship between the key elements of formative assessment and student.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 6: Reflecting and Planning for Next Year December 2013.
EngageNY.org Supporting Module Implementation: Feedback.
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
Idaho Principal Evaluation Process Tyson Carter Educator Effectiveness Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education
Coastal Plains RESA Assessment Literacy: Leading Formative Instructional Practices January 28 and February 25 Session One: Modules 1, 2, 3 Session Two:
Th e Heart of TPEP: Learning Centered Conferencing Michelle Lewis John Hellwich TPEP.
Candidate Assessment of Performance Conducting Observations and Providing Meaningful Feedback Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation AARPE Session 5 Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement.
Instructional Leadership Planning with Indicators of Quality Instruction.
EngageNY.org Module Assessments and Data Cycles. EngageNY.org2 Good Morning! Please Mix It Up… Sit with principals, teachers, and coaches from different.
Module 1 Peer Coaching on Paper Peer Coach Training.
CM220 College Composition II Friday, January 29, Unit 1: Introduction to Effective Academic and Professional Writing Unit 1 Lori Martindale, Instructor.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Instructional Leadership: Planning for Improvement.
Instructional Leadership: Applying Concern & Use Name Workshop Facilitator.
AVID Leading College & Career Readiness Districtwide - Transforming Student Outcomes AVID's mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students.
Instructional Leadership: Monitoring Insights, Patterns, & Trends.
PLCs in Mount Airy City Schools Purpose of PLCs Collaborative meetings of educators in which data-driven decisions are made to improve teacher’s instruction.
Calibrating Feedback A Model for Establishing Consistent Expectations of Educator Practice Adapted from the MA Candidate Assessment of Performance.
Mid-year Professional Conversations 1. JESA Preparation Process 2 Learn—Engage with the content as a participant and surface questions/hot spots. Internalize—Identify.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
The Evaluator's Role in the SLO Process Module Two Mid-Course Conference Presented by the SCDE Office of Educator Effectiveness.
Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D
Welcome TDEC Professional Learning December 22,
1 Instructional Framework & Teacher Evaluation. 2 Welcome Name School, Assignment, Years in Education One thing you are hoping to get out of today!
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 3: Observation and Feedback

 Module 1: MSFE TEPG Rubric  Module 2: Student Learning Objectives  Module 3: Observation and Feedback Participants learn expectations for observations (both inside and outside classrooms), the collection and organization of observation evidence, and the sharing of timely, constructive feedback. All teachers will participate in peer observation, and this module provides information about how to make the process meaningful, collaborative, and constructive.  Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting  Module 5: Learner Perception  Module 6: Reflecting and Planning for Next Year 2

Agenda  Welcome (5 minutes) Intended outcomes Overview of module structures and norms  Connecting (20 minutes) Problem Pose/Problem Solve Protocol  Learning (45 minutes) Guidelines and structures for collecting evidence Overview of the Peer Observation Protocol and process Best practices for providing feedback  Implementing (1 hour, 25 minutes) Giving feedback to a peer  Reflecting (20 minutes) Hopes and Fears Protocol 3

Connecting 20 minutes 4

Intended Outcomes  At the end of this session, participants will know/be able to Effectively collect evidence for their standard indicators of focus Understand the peer observation process and explain their role in it Develop effective communication strategies for providing meaningful, constructive feedback to peers 5

The Four-Step Evaluation Cycle in Action 6

Core Propositions and Standard Indicators  Core Proposition 4: Teachers think systematically about their practices and learn from their experience. 4-b—Continuous Professional Growth: The teacher uses educational research and feedback from others to identify and pursue professional development opportunities that facilitate relevant and appropriate professional growth.  Core Proposition 5: Teachers are members of learning communities. 5-a—Professional Collaboration and Leadership: Teacher contributes to school effectiveness by collaborating with other professionals on activities related to the strategic priorities of the school and district. 7

Connecting: Problem Pose/Problem Solve Objectives To share a challenge with colleagues, who will take turns brainstorming solutions. For today, please choose a challenge related to your implementation of S.M.A.R.T. goals or SLOs. Directions Form groups of three. Using Handout 1, write a challenge in the middle box and in the top left corner, share a few things you’ve tried to conquer the challenge. Pass your paper to the left to Colleague 1, who will write some suggested solutions for this problem, starting in the top right box. Pass the paper again to the left to Colleague 2, who will write additional suggested solutions in the lower left corner. Pass the paper back to the original author, who will star ideas he or she plans to try out and write any other thoughts in the last box. 8

Learning Teacher-Collected Evidence Observational Evidence 45 minutes 9

 Use Form 3, TEPG Teacher-Led Evidence Collection  Choose evidence that aligns to your standard indicator(s) of focus for the year.  Evidence collection should be ongoing. Option 1: Create a dedicated folder or binder to store potential items throughout the year. Option 2: Keep items wherever you would normally store them, but track them periodically using Form 3.  Evidence is tracked in the table on Form 3: Title, standard indicator(s), rationale for submission  Collect 5–8 pieces of evidence. Quality over quantity Guidelines and Structures for Collecting Evidence 10

Guidelines and Structures for Collecting Evidence 11 Title of DocumentStandard Indicator(s) Alignment Evidence of Practice and Rationale for Submission Reading Group Assignment Chart (2013–14) 3-b, 3-dThis chart shows how I have grouped students for guided reading over time. The white columns show students’ benchmark scores at various intervals (usually monthly) and the gray column shows which reading groups students were assigned to. The reading group assignments change over time to reflect my students’ instructional needs. Graphic Organizers for Unit on European Imperialism 2-b, 2-c, 3-a, 3-d The graphic organizers were distributed throughout the unit, which culminated in students writing an evidence-based argument. The documents show how I used a gradual release model to allow students to demonstrate their learning over time.

Collecting Observational Evidence 12 Image property of Microsoft Corporation. Used by permission of Microsoft.

Verbatim: Teacher: Group 5, please get started on your assignment. Numeric: 23 out of 30 students were reading silently. Factual summaries: Mrs. T stood by the door to greet students. Observed: Classroom rules were posted. Gathering Evidence: Types of Evidence 13

 With an elbow partner, determine whether the provided statements are evidence or opinion.  If evidence, determine which type of evidence.  If opinion, rewrite the statement as evidence and determine the type.  Be prepared to share with the whole group. Gathering Evidence: Evidence Versus Opinion 14

Implementing TEPG Observation Protocols Effective Peer Observation 1 hour, 25 minutes 15

 Types of Observations Observations conducted by administrators – Can be announced or not. – Should always result in feedback. Peer Observations – Feedback is always purely formative.  Observation Protocols Form 4: Preobservation Form 5: Observation Form 6: Postobservation Form 7: Peer Observation Observations: An Overview 16

Purpose The preobservation is an opportunity to discuss the observation process and for a teacher to share evidence of lesson and unit planning and how student data is used to inform lesson design. Review a Sample Look at the sample with a partner. Discuss: – Does it seem like this teacher had a productive preobservation conversation? Why or why not? – What do you think is the most important outcome of a preobservation conversation? – How can you set yourself up for success? Form 4: Preobservation 17

 Watch 5 minutes of video. Mrs. Smith: operationshttp://insidemathematics.org/index.php/classroom-video-visits/public-lesson-number- operations Mr. Smith: – Username: TEPG Facilitator – Password: mainetif4  Use Form 7 to practice writing down what you see and hear from the teacher and the students.  As a whole group, we will share ideas for taking good notes and practice cross-referencing the rubric to note which standard indicators we observed.  Tips: Write/type quickly and think of a few shortcuts (T = teacher, S = student, etc.). Don’t be neat (not yet). Note what the teacher and the students are doing and saying. Capture all four types of evidence. Practice Peer Observation 18

Purpose The postobservation is an opportunity for the observer and teacher to have an evidence-based conversation about the observation and for the teacher to receive actionable feedback. By the end of the conference, the teacher will have specific next steps to integrate into his or her practice. Review a Sample Look at the sample with a partner. Discuss: – Does it seem like this teacher had a productive postobservation conversation? Why or why not? – What do you think is the most important outcome of a postobservation conversation? – How can you set yourself up for success? Form 6: Postobservation 19

 What are the unique benefits of peer observation?  What are the unique challenges of peer observation? Why Do Peer Observation? 20

 All teachers will be participating in peer observation in both observer and observed teacher roles.  Peer observation data will not be used in overall evaluations but is instead intended to offer teachers the chance to get targeted feedback from peers.  Goal: meaningful, collaborative, and constructive feedback  Form 7: Peer Observation Guidelines and Structures for Collecting Evidence in an Observation 21

Peer Coaching Stems 22 ParaphrasingClarifyingReviewingPraisingMaking Suggestions So… In other words… I heard you say… Can you give me an example… What do you mean by… I noticed… When you did X, I saw students do Y… This worked well because… Sometimes it’s helpful to… In my classroom, I… I wonder what would happen if… I saw a teacher do…

 Role-Playing Form pairs or groups of three. Brainstorm feedback (positive and negative) that you would want to give Mr/s. Smith. Take turns being Mr/s. Smith while the other group member(s) frame the feedback using coaching stems. Giving Critical Feedback to a Peer 23

 Share strategies and coaching language you have collected today that you think will be useful to you during observations. OR  Ask a question you still have about collecting and submitting evidence or the observation process in general. Debrief 24

Reflecting 20 minutes 25

 Take two sticky notes.  On one sticky note, jot down your WORST fear about observation. Think: “If observation is an absolute train wreck, what would that look like?”  On the other sticky note, jot down your BEST hope about observation. Think: “If observation turns out to be the best thing that has ever happened in our school, what would that look like?” Hopes and Fears 26

Wrap-Up 5 minutes 27

 Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting. The fourth module supports participants in the use of the MSFE TEPG Rubric, evidence, and student data to monitor progress toward their professional goals. Participants will explore when and how to revisit their professional goals, check in on student progress, and collaboratively determine appropriate midcourse adjustments to their practice. What’s Next 28

 Read Leveraging Teacher Talent: Peer Observation in Educator Evaluation, by Catherine Jacques at AIR’s Center on Great Teachers & Leaders. Consider especially the benefits and challenges on page 2. Do these resonate for you as a peer observer?  Schedule and participate in a peer observation  Bring your professional goal(s) and SLO(s) to Module 4  Module 4 will take place DATE Assignment 29

Presenter Name XXX-XXX-XXXX 1234 Street Address City, State