Aug 5 20025391_5071 Top stop by charm channel analysis using D0 runI data OUTLINE physics process of top to stop Monte Carlo simulation for signal data.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Data Analysis II Beate Heinemann UC Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Hadron Collider Physics Summer School, Fermilab, August 2008.
Advertisements

Current limits (95% C.L.): LEP direct searches m H > GeV Global fit to precision EW data (excludes direct search results) m H < 157 GeV Latest Tevatron.
Tau dilepton channel The data sample used in this analysis comprises high-p T inclusive lepton events that contain an electron with E T >20 GeV or a muon.
1  trigger optimization in CMS Tracker Giuseppe Bagliesi On behalf of  tracking group Workshop on B/tau Physics at LHC Helsinki, May 30 - June 1, 2002.
1 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory The 13th Annual International Conference on Supersymmetry and Unification of the Fundamental Interactions Durham, 2005.
The Matrix Method Data-driven method of estimating the W→lv and QCD multijet contributions to sample S’.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
Daniele Benedetti CMS and University of Perugia Chicago 07/02/2004 High Level Trigger for the ttH channel in fully hadronic decay at LHC with the CMS detector.
Status of  b Scan Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing L b scanners CLEO Meeting 05/11/02.
1 Viktor Veszprémi (Purdue University, CDF Collaboration) SUSY 2005, Durham Search for the SM Higgs Boson at the CDF Experiment Search for the SM Higgs.
1 Techincolor and Heavy Top/B search Tulika Bose Meenakshi Narain (Brown University) Work done in the context of Les Houches 2007.
22. April 2004, New Phenomena MeetingChristian Autermann - Resonant Slepton Production1 Overview R-parity violating Supersymmetry Cross section and Run.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.
2004 Xmas MeetingSarah Allwood WW Scattering at ATLAS.
W+jets and Z+jets studies at CMS Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology - HCP Evian-les-Bains Analysis Strategy Analysis Overview:
August 30, 2006 CAT physics meeting Calibration of b-tagging at Tevatron 1. A Secondary Vertex Tagger 2. Primary and secondary vertex reconstruction 3.
Study of the to Dilepton Channel with the Total Transverse Energy Kinematic Variable Athens, April 17 th 2003 Victoria Giakoumopoulou University of Athens,
Commissioning Studies Top Physics Group M. Cobal – University of Udine ATLAS Week, Prague, Sep 2003.
F. Ahmadov Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia Institute of Physics, ANAS, Baku, Azerbaijan 41th ITEP Winter School of Physics February.
LHC France 2013, 3 rd April ATLAS results on inclusive top quark pair production cross section in dilepton channel Frédéric Derue, LPNHE Paris Rencontres.
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
1 ttbar Cross-Section Studies D. Jana*, M. Saleem*, F. Rizatdinova**, P. Gutierrez*, P. Skubic* *University of Oklahoma, **Oklahoma State University.
Alex Melnitchouk DPF conference - May Search for Fermiophobic Higgs in the h   Channel DPF 2002, Williamsburg Alex Melnitchouk (Brown University)
Study of Standard Model Backgrounds for SUSY search with ATLAS detector Takayuki Sasaki, University of Tokyo.
B-Tagging Algorithms for CMS Physics
FIMCMS, 26 May, 2008 S. Lehti HIP Charged Higgs Project Preparative Analysis for Background Measurements with Data R.Kinnunen, M. Kortelainen, S. Lehti,
DPF2000, 8/9-12/00 p. 1Richard E. Hughes, The Ohio State UniversityHiggs Searches in Run II at CDF Prospects for Higgs Searches at CDF in Run II DPF2000.
1 EPS2003, Aachen Nikos Varelas ELECTROWEAK & HIGGS PHYSICS AT DØ Nikos Varelas University of Illinois at Chicago for the DØ Collaboration
1 Single top in e+jets channel Outline : - Data and MC samples - Overview of the analysis - Loose and topological cuts - MC efficiencies and expected number.
W/Z Plan For Winter Conferences Tom Diehl Saclay 12/2001.
Search for the Higgs boson in H  ZZ (*) decay modes on ATLAS German D Carrillo Montoya, Lashkar Kashif University of Wisconsin-Madison On behalf of the.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
Study of pair-produced doubly charged Higgs bosons with a four muon final state at the CMS detector (CMS NOTE 2006/081, Authors : T.Rommerskirchen and.
JPS 2003 in Sendai Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation ~ Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment ~ 2. Event selection 3. mass.
Study on search of a SM Higgs (120GeV) produced via VBF and decaying in two hadronic taus V.Cavasinni, F.Sarri, I.Vivarelli.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
5/28/2002UTA group meeting1 An update of top to stop analysis How to estimate W->e cross section? Why the w to e cross section I used is so big? Next Choose.
Puu Oo Cone, Hawaii Gordon Watts University of Washington For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
A search for the ZZ signal in the 3 lepton channel Azeddine Kasmi Robert Kehoe Southern Methodist University Thanks to: H. Ma, M. Aharrouche.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
University of Iowa Study of qq->qqH  qq ZZ Alexi Mestvirishvili November 2004, CMS PRS Workshop at FNAL.
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
Mark OwenManchester Christmas Meeting Jan Search for h ->  with Muons at D  Mark Owen Manchester HEP Group Meeting January 2006 Outline: –Introduction.
Stano Tokar, slide 1 Top into Dileptons Stano Tokar Comenius University, Bratislava With a kind permissison of the CDF top group Dec 2004 RTN Workshop.
Z  BF using  hadronic events Silke Duensing Aug 8th, 2003.
EPS Manchester Daniela Bortoletto Associated Production for the Standard Model Higgs at CDF D. Bortoletto Purdue University Outline: Higgs at the.
1 Reinhard Schwienhorst, MSU Top Group Meeting W' Search in the single top quark channel Reinhard Schwienhorst Michigan State University Top Group Meeting,
SEARCH FOR DIRECT PRODUCTION OF SUPERSYMMETRIC PAIRS OF TOP QUARKS AT √ S = 8 TEV, WITH ONE LEPTON IN THE FINAL STATE. Juan Pablo Gómez Cardona PhD Candidate.
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
DPF Conf., Oct. 29, 2006, HawaiiViktor Veszpremi, Purdue U.1 Search for the SM Higgs Boson in the Missing E T + b-jets Final State at CDF V. Veszpremi.
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov* *National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
Search for Pair Produced Stops Decaying to a Dileptonic Final State at CMS David Kolchmeyer.
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
H->WW->lνlν Analysis - Improvements and results - - Data and MC - Higgs Working group meeting, 6 January 2011 Magda Chełstowska & Rosemarie Aben.
A Search for Higgs Decaying to WW (*) at DØ presented by Amber Jenkins Imperial College London on behalf of the D  Collaboration Meeting of the Division.
Top quark search update
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
NIKHEF / Universiteit van Amsterdam
Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835
Searches at LHC for Physics Beyond the Standard Model
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
SUSY SEARCHES WITH ATLAS
Tim Scanlon Imperial College, London on behalf of the DØ Collaboration
Experimental and theoretical Group Torino + Moscow
Top to stop data analysis update
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Northern Illinois University / NICADD
Presentation transcript:

Aug _5071 Top stop by charm channel analysis using D0 runI data OUTLINE physics process of top to stop Monte Carlo simulation for signal data sample events selection QCD background estimate signal significance optimization conclusion Physics process produce, one top quark decays to top squark (if it exists), the other top decays to b and w, w then decays to 2 jets. Top squark (stop) decays further to charm and neutralino (LSP). The final state is 4 jets and missing Et.

Aug _5072 If the branching ratio from top to stop is b, the standard model decay is 1-b, considering the symmetry of and, the total cross section is 2b(1-b), here is production cross section. Stop search status

Aug _5073

Aug _5074

Aug _5075 Data sample Using missing_et trigger data collected in (RunI B) at D0. The data was reconstructed by RECO version 12 with jet-finding algorithm of cone size 0.5. It includes run number and total 1,556,505 events. The integrated luminosity (all bad run and duplicated run are removed). Event selection CLEAN CUT : total scalar transverse energy is between 0 and 1800 GeV; primary vertex is (-60,60)cm veto MainRing events scalar transverse energy at MainRing region > -10GeV JETS CUT: at least 4 jets > 15GeV at least one of the four jets is central ( ). only leading jet is removed in ICD region ( ) all jets >15GeV must have good quality:

Aug _5076 Ht CUT QCD ELIMINATION:

Aug _5077

Aug _5078 VETO (top group loose cut): Prezap:Only central toroid muon is considered, fot posrzap: both central and end toroid magnets muons are considered. Muons are required to have >15GeV and not A-stub. If Hfrac>0.6 & Efrac>0 or Hfrac=1, that muon is good but will be vetoed only when it is isolated (with closest jet > 0.5 in distance) For Monte Carlo sample, the muon will be rejected by rate

Aug _5079 HOT CELL: If one of the cells are removed by AIDA and this cell is within DR=0.5 of the axis of the jet in space, this event will be removed if this jets has and

Aug _50710 MissingEt TRIGGER EFFICIENCY:

Aug _50711 VERTEX CONFIRMATION: The misidentified vertex may give rise mismeasured large, these events are likely collected by our cuts as candidates of our new physics. To eliminate these events, we must confirm if the vertex is the true interaction point. An event is a good candidate of our signal if the following criteria applies: (1) At least one of the four jets is central (2) There are good tracks in the event corresponding to the central jet and their distance is less than 0.4 (3) More than half of these good tracks emanate from (-60,60) (4) There are more tracks coming from primary vertex than coming from 2nd/3rd vertices. Using jet_85 and jet_max data (STA/DST) to get jetpointing efficiency. All jets are required to have <20GeV in order to avoid misvertex. Two leading jets pass all the trigger requirements and one jet also pass jetpointing criteria, the ratio of the two jets give the efficiencies.

Aug _50712 W+jets decay modes selection: : Use ISAJET lepton ID and then require invariant mass (78,82) : Use ID and also require the invariant mass of the two objects be within (78,82) and: hadronically decay : Require the final product have two leptons and both have the same ID=11 leptonically decay: Exclude all the above three kinds of decay modes, the remaining is this decay mode. QCD estimate: QCD Use jet_85+jet_max data to make spectra at low region (20,40) but high region(110,130). Use spectra func h=

Aug _50713 We can change the least square problem to a 2-d linea r regression to get the best fitting of the spectra. The error is greatly reduced.

Aug _50714 Signal significance optimization: Let = 60,70,80,90,100,110,120,130,140 GeV =40,50,60,70,80,90,100,110,120 GeV = 70GeV arc1=0.5, arc2=0 Apply all the cuts to background sample and data, calculate merit function signal/sqrt(phy bkg+QCD) to get the best significance. Preliminary results :

Aug _50715

Aug _50716 Next: double check all the code and cuts improve acceptance and reduce errors Use equal-probabilities test to set limit at 95%CL