PSB MD C. Bracco, G.P. Di Giovanni. Outline Aim MD1: – Matching – Trajectories – Transmission MD2 – Matching – Trajectories – Transmission Next steps.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kicker SloW (KSW) magnets and Generators PSB 160 MeV H - injection L. Feliciano TE/ABT.
Advertisements

1 MICE Beamline: Plans for initial commissioning. Kevin Tilley, 16 th November. - 75days until commissioning Target, detectors, particle production Upstream.
BI Outlook for BI Day 2012 Based on latest (last Monday) feedback from EN/EL XXX As foreseen originally Partially ‘As foreseen originally‘ Postponed.
Beam current4 A Beam pulse length1.5 ms Power input/structure 35 MW Ohmic losses (beam on)1.6 MW RF power to load (beam on) 0.4 MW RF-to-beam efficiency.
Space Charge meeting – CERN – 09/10/2014
Beam dynamics meeting, 2007/05/14Lars Fröhlich, MPY Dark Current Transport at FLASH Start-to-end tracking simulation analysis of beam and dark current.
Transfer Line Linac4 to PSB: Injection Aperture Limitations.
Machine operator priorities for Linac 2 and 3 G Bellodi, BE-ABP-HSL G Bellodi, BI- BOSS-2 meeting, 10 June 2015.
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.
BI SW for LINAC4 On behalf of BE/BI/SW BI software development process Specifications List of BI Systems – Not covered: PSB ring systems Conclusions Lars.
PSB h- injection Layout issues –Are 3 or 4 KSW needed –Geometry of the injection –Element lengths and locations Element performance specifications H 0.
ESS DTL beam commissioning
Linac 4 PSB BI LTB LT L4T m from PIMS to foil: m new line (to BHZ20) m present Linac2 line Active elements : 4+2bendings; quads,
1 BLM 2 BLM 4 BLM 2 BLM 2( BLM+SEM)3 BLM 2 BLM 4 BLM 3 BLM1 (BLM+SEM)3 BLM 2 BLM 1 SEM 1 BLM 1 (BLM+SEM) 1 BLM BPM 1 BLM 2 BLM 4 BLM2 BLM 2( BLM+SEM)3.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.
Linac4 FBCT’s 18/ L4 BI BCT review Lars Søby On the behalf of: M. Andersen, D. Belohrad, L. Jensen, Franco Lenardon and J. C. Allica Santamaria.
ATF2 beam commissioning status and beam time request Toshiyuki Okugi 2008 / 11 / 12 ATF2 Commissioning Meeting.
Machine status – December 28  Machine status - overview  Blue ring: ramp development  Yellow ring: obstruction update  Set-up and ramp-up.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Storage Ring Commissioning Samuel Krinsky-Accelerator Physics Group Leader NSLS-II ASAC Meeting October 14-15, 2010.
Specifications for PSB Injection System Upgrade C. Bracco, J. Abelleira on behalf of BTP Acknowledgments: E. Benedetto, C. Carli, V. Dimov, L.M. Feliciano,
Optics considerations for ERL test facilities Bruno Muratori ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory (M. Bowler, C. Gerth, F. Hannon, H. Owen, B. Shepherd, S. Smith,
The Stripping Foil Test Stand in the Linac4 Transfer Line
Bruno Muratori (for the EMMA team) STFC, Daresbury Laboratory EMMA commissioning 02/09/08.
Beam Instruments PSB + Transfer Lines B. Mikulec, J-F. Comblin.
Design options for emittance measurement systems for the CLIC RTML R Apsimon.
Beam position instabilities in the PSB injection line J. Tan, M. Bozzolan, L. Søby, B. Mikulec, G.P. Di Giovanni, O. E. Berrig, E. Benedetto BI Technical.
Operational considerations Reported by B.Goddard CERN TE/ABT The work described is that of many colleagues, in particular M.Aiba, J.Borburgh, C.Carli,
K.Hanke / TDR Meeting / 13 June 2006 Linac 4 Diagnostics L4: K. Hanke, M.Pasini (requirements, specifications, integration) AB/BI: U.Raich et al. (technical.
PSB-PS TRANSFER AT 2 GEV - CONCEPTS AND OPTICS W. Bartmann, J. Abelleira et al. ABT LIU Review, 20-Nov-15.
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
E. Benedetto, 24/04/14, LIU-PSB Meeting, MDs planning for 2014 MDs planning for 2014 E. Benedetto Thanks: G. Rumolo, B. Mikulec and the RF, OP, ABP, BI.
L4 BCC – 1 Sep 2011 F. Roncarolo, U. Raich L.Soby, J.Tan, C.Zamantzas, F. Lenardon, C.Vuitton, G-J.Focker.
Some ideas to optimise PSB injection chicane Wim, Brennan, Jan, Masamitsu.
PSB H - injection system commissioning J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, E.Carlier, B.Goddard, K.Hanke, B.Mikulec, J.Hansen, C.Maglioni, A.Newborough, D.Nisbet,
Tools in CTF3 Simona Bettoni for the CTF3 operation team.
STABILITY STUDIES OF THE PSB-TO-PS TRANSFER W. Bartmann, J. Abelleira With many inputs from: O. Berrig, J. Borburgh, S. Gilardoni, GP di Giovanni, B. Goddard,
LINAC4 emittance measurements BI Day Divonne, 24 th November 11/24/2011 B.Cheymol, E. Bravin, D. Gerard, U. Raich, F. Roncarolo BE/BI 1.
Status of the BI Work Package in the LIU-PSB frame Jocelyn TAN, BE-BI Thanks to the contributions of the WU holders: J. Belleman, P. Odier, F. Roncarolo,
The Preparation for CSNS Accelerator Commissioning Sheng Wang June 8, 2015, Dongguan.
B. Marchetti R. Assmann, U. Dorda, J. Grebenyuk, Y. Nie, J. Zhu Acknowledgements: C. Behrens, R. Brinkmann, K. Flöttmann, M. Hüning,
LEIR re-commissioning and other operational aspects First ideas for new tools and organization First draft re-commisisoning plan H. Bartosik, A. Huschauer,
ESS Front End diagnostic
Wim Weterings Remy Noulibos
Aperture measurements during LHC commissioning 2017
Experience with beam instrumentation at Linac4
J.-L. Sanchez Alvarez(PSB-EIC)
Online check lists Half Sector Test
Steering algorithm experience at CTF3
Options and Recommendations for TL and Dumps
Status on Work for Splitter FS and Dilution System FS
BE-BI Software for LINAC4
Emittance growth AT PS injection
Status of the BI Work Package in the LIU-PSB frame
LINAC 4 source & LEBT measurement results
HALF SECTOR TEST: a test for the future PSB injection
Preliminary Electron Transportation Channel Project for EIC Facility (FAIR, Germany) Dmitry Berkaev Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Russia, ,
MD Studies for LIU PS Injection
Thursday morning – optics correction
LINAC4 commissioning plans etc.
Beam-Based Alignment Results
Tuesday 9th November 10:02 Fill beams dumped
Considerations on Beam Diagnostics Physics
Wednesday 10:00 test of the un-squeeze to 90 m at 4 TeV.
Injector Commissioning C
FEL-Beam-Dynamics Group
commissioning and measurements
Optics Measurements in the PSB
Slice emittance measurement at TTF
Transfer Line for EIC.
Presentation transcript:

PSB MD C. Bracco, G.P. Di Giovanni

Outline Aim MD1: – Matching – Trajectories – Transmission MD2 – Matching – Trajectories – Transmission Next steps

Aim Verify the impact of a “matched optics” on the trajectory fluctuations Clarify if there is enough flexibility to compensate an optics mismatch with the existing layout

PSB MDs November 13 th 2016 Re-matched line assuming initial conditions calculated by M. Bozzolan: Quadrupoles at end of the LTB and BI line (no QN30 and QN40!) LTB.QDW60 = A  9.30 A BI.QNO10 = A  A BI.QNO20 = A  A BI.QNO50 = A  A BI.QNO60 = A  A LTB.QDW60 = A  9.30 A BI.QNO10 = A  A BI.QNO20 = A  A BI.QNO50 = A  A BI.QNO60 = A  A

Trajectories BPM30 BPM40 BPM50 Ring1 Ring2 Ring3 Ring1 Ring2 Ring3 Ring1 Ring2 Ring3 An improvement in the vertical oscillations after matching to new initial conditions (±2.5 mm  ±0.25 mm) Optics change

Transmission Before matching After matching LT-LTB

Transmission Before matching After matching

Layout

PSB MDs November 19 th 2016 Re-matched line assuming initial conditions: Quadrupoles at the beginning of the LT line  c ’ = 1 LT.QFN10 = A  A LT.QDN12= A  A LT.QFN20 = A  A LT.QDN22 = A  A LT.QFN30 = A  A LT.QDN32 = A  A LT.QFN40 = A  A LT.QDN42 = A  A LT.QFN10 = A  A LT.QDN12= A  A LT.QFN20 = A  A LT.QDN22 = A  A LT.QFN30 = A  A LT.QDN32 = A  A LT.QFN40 = A  A LT.QDN42 = A  A

Trajectories BPM30 BPM40 BPM50 An improvement in the vertical oscillations after matching to new initial conditions (±2.5 mm  ±0.25 mm) Optics change Ring3 Ring2 Ring1

Transmission Before matching After matching LT-LTB

Next Steps Initial conditions? – MADX calculations (measured trajectories + quadrupole misalignment  match using  0 and  0 as variables) – Measurements? Non calibrated kicker (fixed slit) Quadrupoles: unipolar PC, unknown optics Not possible to perform reliable measurements in LTE! Possible using SEM grids in LTB line? Additional BLMs to discard appearance of hot spots?

Linac 4 BCT + BLM BCT Profile MonitorsStripping Foil Test Stand Location SourceDTLCCDTLPIMS Dump 3 MeV 50 MeV 100 MeV 160 MeV Linac4 Layout Transfer Line to PSB Transfer Line to PSB QFQD Enough diagnostics?

Conclusions There evidences of an optics mismatch between Linac 2 and the TL Re-matching the optics allowed to reduce the trajectory oscillations but transmission got worse Not possible to measure reliably the optics with LTE line Next steps: calculate initial conditions  rematch optics  steering to optimise transmission (MD) Possibly adding BLMs along the line (large beta) Calculations with SC