Seeds for the panel discussion K. Z. Nanjo (ERI, Univ. of Tokyo) International symposium “Toward constructing earthquake forecast systems for Japan” 27.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Geophysical Observation Nerworks and Data Distribution in Japan Manabu Hashimoto DPRI, Kyoto Univesity.
Advertisements

Development Group Buddy Bernhard, Tarana Farhat, Ryan Lacey, Amy Lim, Sulaimon Paseda, Marshall Rogers-Martínez and Christine Sawyer.
Smoothed Seismicity Rates Karen Felzer USGS. Decision points #1: Which smoothing algorithm to use? National Hazard Map smoothing method (Frankel, 1996)?
Using E-Class Searching for positions according to job classification.
Intermediate Level Course. Text Format The text styles, bold, italics, underlining, superscript and subscript, can be easily added to selected text. Text.
Christine Smyth and Jim Mori Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University.
Iranian Broad-Band Seismic Network M. Mokhtari Director of National Center for Earthquake Prediction (IIEES) FSDN meeting Bangkok,
Manufacturing Variation Plotting a Normal Distribution.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , Testing.
Yan Y. Kagan, David D. Jackson Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA ,
UMass Lowell Computer Science Advanced Algorithms Computational Geometry Prof. Karen Daniels Spring, 2004 Project.
4. TESTS 5. CONCLUSIONS 2. METHOD We base the study on the method proposed by Zúñiga and Wyss (1995) which was originally intended for finding suitable.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , Forecast.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , Global.
Day 1-3. Variable Selection and GIS Processing 1.Discuss V mapping goals, targeted system (what is vulnerable?), framework 2.Choose data layers (criteria:
Seismic Instrumentation and Monitoring Needs of US Nuclear Power Plants Dr. Annie Kammerer Seismic Instrumentation Technology Symposium November 2009.
Tropical cyclone analysis and forecasting : products and tools
Obtaining MISR Data and Information Jeff Walter Atmospheric Science Data Center April 17, 2009.
RAPID SOURCE PARAMETER DETERMINATION AND EARTHQUAKE SOURCE PROCESS IN INDONESIA REGION Iman Suardi Seismology Course Indonesia Final Presentation of Master.
Annex I: Methods & Tools prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9 QUALITY.
Patterns of significant seismic quiescence in the Pacific Mexican coast A. Muñoz-Diosdado, A. H. Rudolf-Navarro, A. Barrera-Ferrer, F. Angulo-Brown National.
AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT. Process Centre receives Scenario Group Work Scenario on website in October Assessment Window Individual Work.
Letter of intent By to predefined format (Word file, see guidelines) Chair Scientific Committee Coordination EO To all members of.
CHE 165 Plant Design Introduction. Greensheet Review  Target is Study –Reported Verbally and in Text –Consists of Various Components  Most are submitted.
Strategy for the Dissemination of 2010 Census Results for State of Qatar Dr. Ahmed Hussein Mark Grice Pervaiz Ahmad Malik Dr. Ahmed Hussein Mark Grice.
Exploring Planet Earth Blind Thrust Fault Earthquake Rupture Animation (Northridge, 1994) Brad Aagaard, USGS
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA ,
The ISC Seismic Event Bibliography D. Di Giacomo 1, D.A. Storchak 1, N. Safronova 1, P. Ozgo 2, J. Harris 1 1 International Seismological Centre, Thatcham,
An Introduction to Seismic Eruption software and an associated classroom activity Michael Hubenthal, IRIS Educational Specialist.
MRAM. June 12th,  Last time: Discussed purpose for GIM1 Listed Proposal types to which we apply Review Criteria Covered Criteria in detail  Today:
Using IRIS and other seismic data resources in the classroom John Taber, Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology.
Application of the RI model to forecasting future large earthquakes in Japan Kazu Z. Nanjo (ERI, Univ. of Tokyo) International symposium “Toward constructing.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , Tohoku.
Southern California Earthquake Center Triggering Models vs. Smoothed Seismicity PG = 1.35/eqk PG = 10/eqk Information gain per earthquake Reference forecast.
Session 3 CPDP Formulation Process Project for Capacity Development for Implementing the Organic Law at the Capital and Provincial Level (PILAC 2)
1. Difficulty of point process model evaluation. 2. RELM and CSEP. 3. Numerical summaries (L-test, N-test, etc.). 4. Functional summaries (error diagrams,
Proposer: Mark Jones, SSE Panel Date: 20 th February : Mod Title: Amendment to AQ Values Present within Annex A of the CSEP NExA AQ Table Following.
Important topics related to earthquake hazard Calling for Bi-lateral collaboration.
GLOBAL EARTHQUAKE FORECASTS Yan Y. Kagan and David D. Jackson Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California Los Angeles Abstract We.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA ,
M= Math in STEM College and Career Ready- Conference Summer, 2015.
Agency on Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan A strategy for the dissemination of statistical information: the Kazakhstan experience.
4) Summary The ISC Event Bibliography includes publications linked to events in the ISC Bulletin. Earthquakes belonging to a catalogue (like the GCMT,
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA ,
EARTHQUAKE REPORT SOUTH AMERICA WEEK OF JANUARY 27 TH TO FEBRUARY 2 ND, 2016 OLIVIA HELPRIN.
SHORT- AND LONG-TERM EARTHQUAKE FORECASTS FOR CALIFORNIA AND NEVADA Kagan, Y. Y. and D. D. Jackson Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of.
EARTHQUAKE REPORT SOUTH AMERICA WEEK OF FEBRUARY 3 RD TO FEBRUARY 9 TH, 2016 OLIVIA HELPRIN.
A new prior distribution of a Bayesian forecast model for small repeating earthquakes in the subduction zone along the Japan Trench Masami Okada (MRI,
Jiancang Zhuang Inst. Statist. Math. Detecting spatial variations of earthquake clustering parameters via maximum weighted likelihood.
Abstract The space-time epidemic-type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model is a stochastic process in which seismicity is classified into background and clustering.
Introduction to “Toward constructing earthquake forecast systems for Japan” Haoshi Hirata (ERI, Univ. of Tokyo) International symposium “Toward constructing.
Responsibilities of researchers Asking ourselves what responsibilities do we have towards the scientific community and society? Research is regulated by.
H. Tsuruoka, K.Z. Nanjo, S. Yokoi and N. Hirata (ERI, Tokyo Univ.)
2010/11/01 Workshop on "Earthquake Forecast Systems Based on Seismicity of Japan: Toward Constructing Base-line Models of Earthquake Forecasting" Seismicity.
WP3 - Evaluation and proposal selection
Overview on the Work of WG 6
Improvement of Likelihood Model Testing
Update on the Status of Numerical Weather Prediction
D. Di Giacomo and D. Storchak
Poster Name [Align Center]
Earthquake report south America
K. Maeda and F. Hirose (MRI)
Dreamweaver Basics.
Statistical Models Based on the Gutenberg-Richter a and b values for Estimating Probabilities of Moderate Earthquakes  in Kanto, Japan M. Imoto (
K. Z. Nanjo (ERI, Univ. Tokyo)
Revised Art 12 reporting format
Seismic Eruption - forecasting future earthquakes
Chapter 9 Probability.
Locating an Earthquake's
Catalog data Japan test center’s authorized catalog is unified JMA catalog We prepare two methods to access JMA catalog outside Japan. One is FTP (anonymous.
Presentation transcript:

Seeds for the panel discussion K. Z. Nanjo (ERI, Univ. of Tokyo) International symposium “Toward constructing earthquake forecast systems for Japan” 27 May 2009 at ERI, Univ. Tokyo

Seeds  Proposed “Rules of the game”  Preparation for model submission  How to access data  Publication  How to access experimental results

Proposed “Rules of the game” -Testing regions Default regions (d≤30km) with grid spacing s=0.1° Invite test regions -Testing classes (Invite forecast models) 1-day forecast 1-year forecast 5-year forecast -Future earthquakes that will be forecast: The revised JMA bulletin. No declustering. Number of earthquakes in a predefined time window for each magnitude bin in the range 5.0≤M≤9.0 (0.1 magnitude unit steps) at each predefined grid node within a predefined testing region. -Forecast evaluation methods CSEP suite Invite forecast evaluation methods

Proposal  Test regions -1. inland Japan (d≤30km, s=0.1°) -2. All Japan (d≤100km, s=0.1°) -3. Kanto (d≤100km, s=0.05°) Two layers: 0-30 & km  Test classes -1 day: code submission -3 months: code submission -1 yrs; table or code submission -3 a -5 yrs: table or code submission) -Start time of the forecast periods 01/09/2009 for all the classes -Model & table submission deadline 01/08/2009 for all the classes 1. Default all Japan with d≤30km 2. Same with d≤100km 1. Default all Japan with d≤30km 2. Same with d≤100km 3. Kanto with d≤100km 4. Off Ibaraki with d≤100km proposed by Matsumura (not considered in the experiment)  Target Magnitude -M= M=

Proposal  Evaluation methods  CSEP official suite  Imoto’s likelihood method

Depth histograms All Japan M>2 events in % for d≤30km 80% for d≤60km 88% for d≤90km 90% for d≤120km Kanto M>2 events in % for d≤30km 78% for d≤60km 88% for d≤90km 93% for d≤120km

M C maps for seismicity in 2007 d≤0-30 km d≤30-60 km d≤60-90 km d≤ km -GR-based EMR method (Woessner & Wiemer, 2005) M C : magnitude at the deviation from the GR law -Collect the 200 nearest events to each node M C =0.6

Annual number of earthquakes  Japan (JMA)  All Japan  CA (ANSS: 31-43°, °)  Kanto

Preparation for model submission  Output -Grid node list: Forecast seismicity rates at location in the list -ForecastML: Output a numerical table containing the forecast rates in the format according the template  Helpful stuff (D. Schorlemmer) -A template to convert data to Forecast ML formatted table -Guideline for preparing a forecast model (CSEP webpage)  Submission -Program code that can create a data file formatted in the ForecastML -ForecastML formatted table  Each modeler and the Testing Center will work on a case- by-case basis on finding a solution

How to access data  Idea -Modelers may need the JMA data and/or GPS data for their model optimization and other purpose before model submission  How to access and share both data -H. Tsuruoka, ERI

Publication  Journal: Special issue in “Earth, Planet, Space”  Idea -Special issue in SRL 2007 for the RELM testing -Planned special issue in Ann. Geophys. for the Italian CSEP testing in 2009  Proposed contents -Preface -Result of the Japan testing since 2008 summer -Completeness study for Japan -Submitted forecast models -Submitted evaluation methods -Exploring the possibility of next-generation models  Proposed deadline for submission: 31/03/2010  Number of expected papers

How to access experimental results  Open to researchers but close to the public while models are under test  Password-protected webpage