Species richness: Taxonomic/phylogenetic perspectives.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OUR Ecological Footprint Recycle; pay tax for it. 2. Live near work; ride bike; minimize car use. 3. Buy energy-efficient furnace. 4. Programmable.
Advertisements

The Geography of Biological Diversity. Species-Area Curves S = species richness A = size of the sampling plot (eg. m 2 ) c and z are fitting parameters.
Trait-based Analyses for Fishes and Invertebrates in Streams Mark Pyron Stoeckerecological.com.
Null models in Ecology Diane Srivastava Sept 2010.
Community and gradient analysis: Matrix approaches in macroecology The world comes in fragments.
BIOGEOGRAPHY attempts to explain why species and higher taxa are distributed as they are, and why the diversity and taxonomic composition of the biota.
Patterns in space Log area Log species number productivity # species Habitat variety # species Latitude # species mainland Log area Log species number.
Evolution of Biodiversity
The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation. QUICK Think of the First Adaptive Radiation That Comes to Mind.
Commonness and rarity in species distribution Sophia Qian Niu Graduate seminar: Lost in space.
Fall 2010 IB Workshop Series sponsored by IB academic advisors What can I do with a B.S. in IB? Thursday, Oct. 27 4:00-5:00pm 162 Noyes Lab Career Center.
Chapter 53 Reading Quiz 1.A bunch of populations living close together and possibly interacting is called a ____. 2.Which type of interspecific interaction.
Evidence of Evolution. Voyage of the Beagle Charles Darwin’s observations on a voyage around the world led to new ideas about species.
Community Phylogenetic structure with R. Central question in community ecology What processes are responsible for the identity and relative abundances.
The neutral model approach Stephen P. Hubbell (1942- Motoo Kimura ( )
Evolution of Biodiversity
Levels of Ecological Organization in Freshwater Systems Population Community Ecosystem.
Evidence of Evolution. Voyage of the Beagle  Charles Darwin’s observations on a voyage around the world led to new ideas about species.
Prediction of richness (local vs regional curves to assess community saturation?) David Luther Biology 255 Oct. 7, 2003.
Elizabeth Selig Causes of the Latitudinal Gradient in Richness.
Community Assembly Rules
Vogelwarte.ch BIO 232 Macroecology, niche evolution and climate change by Niklaus. E. Zimmermann Today: Damaris Zurell.
How does phylogeny influence ecological patterns? As species of the same genus have usually, though by no means invariably, some similarity in habitats.
Population Distribution and Abundance. region biosphere landscape ecosystem community interaction population individual Evolutionary change driven by.
Chapter 24 Notes The Origin of Species. There is more to evolution than just explaining how adaptations evolve in a population. Evolution must also explain.
RATES OF DIVERSIFICATION. BACKGROUND Rapid rate of diversification often follows the adaptive radiation + (sexual) selection New niches Mutation New species.
Species Pools Bio 255 Seminar. Species Pools  What is a species pool?
OUR Ecological Footprint …. Ch 20 Community Ecology: Species Abundance + Diversity.
1 Geographic Ecology Chapter Outline Introduction Island Area, Isolation, and Species Richness  Terrestrial  Aquatic Equilibrium Model of.
Biodiversity, Ancestry, & Rate of Evolution (15.3)
Population GENETICS.
Population and Community Ecology. Complexity POPULATION ECOLOGY.
Macroevolutionary patterns and the fossil record Diversity changes Rates of evolutionary change Patterns of lineage diversification.
Plant Ecology - Chapter 16
Systematics Study of pattern and processes associated with biological diversity and diversification Taxonomy – study of classification (hierarchy, naming.
Speciation Chapter 18.
Adaptive Radiation. "Adaptive radiation refers to those evolutionary groups that have exhibited an exceptional extent of adaptive diversification into.
Underlying Principles of Zoology Laws of physics and chemistry apply. Principles of genetics and evolution important. What is learned from one animal group.
OBJECTIVES Species Diversity at scales above local Regional effects on local SD Equilibrium theory + Island Biog. Theory Regional SD Latitudinal SD Continental.
Chapter 10 The Geography of Diversity
Map from Holt et al. (2013) Science Terrestrial Zoogeographic Regions Published as “an update of Wallace’s zoogeographic regions” Biogeography.
PHYLOGENETIC DIVERSITY Methods and applications Divya B. PK lab, CES, IISc.
Species Richness Chapter 10. Species Richness The number of species in a community Some species are common, others are rare Easy to count common species,
Origins & Maintenance of Diversity A Hierarchy of Processes.
Chapt.: 21- The Species Concept “Species and Their Formation” How does one species arise from another? Is a new species always better adapted to.
Speciation Biology 10 at GI Biology 11. Speciation  The development of a new species  Usually the result of reproductive isolation How does this occur?
Evolution Pre-AP Biology. Charles Darwin Known as the Father of Evolution Known as the Father of Evolution Wrote book On the Origin of Species Wrote book.
Lecture 17: Biogeography Cont’d Historical Biogeography: Fossil Record: e.g. How assess disjunct distribution? a) Once widespread, now relictual… e.g.
Chapter 5 Evolution of Biodiversity. Earth is home to a tremendous diversity of species Ecosystem diversity- the variety of ecosystems within a given.
Chapter 4: Evolution, Biological Communities, and Species Interactions Advanced Environmental Science.
Chapter12 : Processes of Evolution
Biodiversity Gradients
The Living World Chapters 5, 8, 9. Ecology Individual- natural selection Population- evolution Community- interacting species Ecosystem- cycling of energy.
Ecology 8310 Population (and Community) Ecology Communities in Space (Metacommunities) Island Biogeography (an early view) Evolving views Similarity in.
CHAPTER 32 INTRODUCTION TO ANIMAL EVOLUTION Copyright © 2002 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings Section C: The Origins of Animal.
Unit 4: Biodiversity and Endangered Species Section 1: Evolution and Biodiversity.
1 Occupancy models extension: Species Co-occurrence.
Evolution Review Standard B-5:The student will demonstrate an understanding of biological evolution and the diversity of life.
17.3 Darwin and Natural Selection: What Darwin knew  Darwin understood the fossil record and explained it by combining the two popular ideas of gradualism.
OUR Ecological Footprint …. Fall 2008 IB Workshop Series sponsored by IB academic advisors Study Abroad for IB Majors Thursday, October 30 4:00-5:00PM.
OBJECTIVES: 1) EXPLAIN WHY DEFINING SPECIES IS DIFFICULT 2) IDENTIFY CAUSES OF SPECIATION 3) DESCRIBE MACROEVOLUTIONARY PROCESSES/PATTERNS SPECIATION &
Speciation. What is a species? Biological species concept – a population or group of populations whose members have the potential to interbreed in nature.
Evolution & Speciation
Development of New Species by Evolution
Fish Systematics: How does this stuff work??
BIODIVERSITY.
Bird species (left), mammals (right)
Ch 15 – Theory of Evolution
Chapter 18: Evolution and Origin of Species
Evolution Part 2 Pathways of evolution.
Presentation transcript:

Species richness: Taxonomic/phylogenetic perspectives

Phylogenetic information has been used in a variety of fields of research: systematics, evolution, comparative biology, biogeography, ecology Webb et al. (2002) reviewed applications of phylogenies in community ecology Themes related to species richness:  Diversification and history of species pools  e.g. McPeek and Brown (2000)  Local assembly of related species  e.g. Enquist et al. (2002)

Diversification and history of species pools Sample Literature Ricklefs and Schluter (1993)—Included several chapters looking at historical influences (e.g. coevolution, ecological radiation, range shifts) on species assemblages as inferred through phylogenies. Ricklefs and Schluter (1993)—Included several chapters looking at historical influences (e.g. coevolution, ecological radiation, range shifts) on species assemblages as inferred through phylogenies. Losos (1996)—Reviewed phylogenetic inferences including use of phylogenies to determine which species of Anolis lizards on Antillean islands were derived from colonization vs. in situ speciation Losos (1996)—Reviewed phylogenetic inferences including use of phylogenies to determine which species of Anolis lizards on Antillean islands were derived from colonization vs. in situ speciation Ricklefs and Bermingham (2001)—Used phylogenies to infer timing of colonization of bird species on Antillean islands, revealing that colonization and extinction were not balanced over evolutionary time Ricklefs and Bermingham (2001)—Used phylogenies to infer timing of colonization of bird species on Antillean islands, revealing that colonization and extinction were not balanced over evolutionary time Moritz et al. (2000)—Outlined an “integrated molecular approach” to the study of diversification of rainforest faunas that had revealed variation in the age of species and recent speciation centered on landscapes with spatial and temporal heterogeneity Moritz et al. (2000)—Outlined an “integrated molecular approach” to the study of diversification of rainforest faunas that had revealed variation in the age of species and recent speciation centered on landscapes with spatial and temporal heterogeneity Diversification hypotheses and models: Losos and Schluter (2000)—Area for speciation hypothesis Losos and Schluter (2000)—Area for speciation hypothesis Stephens and Weins (2003)—Time for speciation hypothesis Stephens and Weins (2003)—Time for speciation hypothesis Doebeli and Dieckmann (2000)—Speciation via ecological interactions Doebeli and Dieckmann (2000)—Speciation via ecological interactions Hubbell (2001)—Speciation proportional to abundance Hubbell (2001)—Speciation proportional to abundance

Local assembly of related species Sample Literature Elton (1946)—Compared genus to species ratios of local and regional faunas in Britain; attributed limited co-occurrence of congeners to competitive exclusion. Elton (1946)—Compared genus to species ratios of local and regional faunas in Britain; attributed limited co-occurrence of congeners to competitive exclusion. Graves and Gotelli (1993)—Used null models to test for assembly rules in Amazonian flocking birds; found that congeners flocked together less frequently than expected by chance. Graves and Gotelli (1993)—Used null models to test for assembly rules in Amazonian flocking birds; found that congeners flocked together less frequently than expected by chance. Tofts and Silvertown (2002)—Tested whether local segregation of congeneric plants was due to competitive interactions or dispersal limitation, by introducing the missing congener and monitoring performance; results suggested role of dispersal limitation. Tofts and Silvertown (2002)—Tested whether local segregation of congeneric plants was due to competitive interactions or dispersal limitation, by introducing the missing congener and monitoring performance; results suggested role of dispersal limitation. Webb (2000)—Introduced metrics for measuring relatedness of species in a sample relative to a species pool, in an explicitly phylogenetic context Webb (2000)—Introduced metrics for measuring relatedness of species in a sample relative to a species pool, in an explicitly phylogenetic context Similar to earlier methods of assessing phylogenetic uniqueness of sites for conservation planning, e.g. Vane-Wright et al. (1991), Faith (1992) Similar to earlier methods of assessing phylogenetic uniqueness of sites for conservation planning, e.g. Vane-Wright et al. (1991), Faith (1992) Palmer (in press)—Argues that “the number of species per genus or per family is a biased measure of evolutionary ramification” Palmer (in press)—Argues that “the number of species per genus or per family is a biased measure of evolutionary ramification”

McPeek and Brown (2000) Used phylogenies to interpret patterns of distribution, habitat use and morphology of Ennalagma damselfly species, and to infer modes of speciation and diversification Patterns addressed: Differing behavior and morphology of damselfly species in fish vs. dragonfly lakes Differing behavior and morphology of damselfly species in fish vs. dragonfly lakes Fish and dragonflies occur in different lakes and exert different predation pressures on Ennalagma Fish and dragonflies occur in different lakes and exert different predation pressures on Ennalagma Adaptations to dragonfly lakes (i.e., enhanced swimming ability) recently evolved with 2-3 independent origins Adaptations to dragonfly lakes (i.e., enhanced swimming ability) recently evolved with 2-3 independent origins Lower species richness of dragonfly lakes. Possible explanations: Lower species richness of dragonfly lakes. Possible explanations: Adaptations to dragonfly lakes evolved only recently and adapted lineages have not had time to diversify Adaptations to dragonfly lakes evolved only recently and adapted lineages have not had time to diversify Extinction is intrinsically higher in dragonfly lakes due to periodic drying Extinction is intrinsically higher in dragonfly lakes due to periodic drying Discontinuous patterns of speciation Discontinuous patterns of speciation Rapid, recent speciation within a lineage in Northeast likely the result of range expansion and development of reproductive isolation following glaciation Rapid, recent speciation within a lineage in Northeast likely the result of range expansion and development of reproductive isolation following glaciation More gradual speciation within another lineage in Southeast, with many species confined to coastal plain, likely the result of classic allopatric speciation More gradual speciation within another lineage in Southeast, with many species confined to coastal plain, likely the result of classic allopatric speciation Concluded that the many co-occurring species in fish lakes are ecologically very similar, probably all sharing the same niche and structured by neutral processes rather than niche differentiation.

Enquist et al. (2002) Using large datasets of rainforest plots and fossil assemblages, found that the relationships between species and higher taxa (genera, families) at a local scale could be fitted to power functions Using large datasets of rainforest plots and fossil assemblages, found that the relationships between species and higher taxa (genera, families) at a local scale could be fitted to power functions High taxonomic exponents = high genus:species or family:species ratios High taxonomic exponents = high genus:species or family:species ratios Tested whether the relationship between species and higher taxa at a local scale differed from that at a regional scale Tested whether the relationship between species and higher taxa at a local scale differed from that at a regional scale Built regional species pools by merging plots within continents, hemispheres, and for the entire world Built regional species pools by merging plots within continents, hemispheres, and for the entire world Species from pools were randomly reassigned to plots to generate random communities that were replicated 1,000 times Species from pools were randomly reassigned to plots to generate random communities that were replicated 1,000 times Taxonomic exponents of random communities were significantly higher than observed communities Taxonomic exponents of random communities were significantly higher than observed communities Suggested that these results could be explained by processes of dispersal limitation and local filtering of species. Patterns of residual variation appeared to support this explanation further: Suggested that these results could be explained by processes of dispersal limitation and local filtering of species. Patterns of residual variation appeared to support this explanation further: Negative correlation between residual genus & family richness and precipitation Negative correlation between residual genus & family richness and precipitation Positive correlation between residual family richness and elevation Positive correlation between residual family richness and elevation (No correlation of residual genus or family richness with stem density, maximum stem diameter, community biomass or latitude) (No correlation of residual genus or family richness with stem density, maximum stem diameter, community biomass or latitude) Compared taxonomic exponents of different size classes and found lower taxonomic similarity among larger classes, suggesting a role of competitive thinning among taxonomically similar species as they mature Compared taxonomic exponents of different size classes and found lower taxonomic similarity among larger classes, suggesting a role of competitive thinning among taxonomically similar species as they mature Found total biomass of plots to be related to richness (at all three taxonomic levels) by inverse power functions, suggesting that biomass remains relatively constant, i.e. increases in richness are accompanied by reduced biomass per taxon. Found total biomass of plots to be related to richness (at all three taxonomic levels) by inverse power functions, suggesting that biomass remains relatively constant, i.e. increases in richness are accompanied by reduced biomass per taxon.