Implementation progress of SPD activities within the competence of the Ministry of Education and Science [as at 31/12/2006] EU Structural Funds for Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Information and Publicity in programming period.
Advertisements

Child Protection Units
Pilot exercise on result indicators Operational Programme "Entrepreneurship and Innovation" DG REGIO Evaluation Network Meeting Brussels, 22 June 2012.
1 FOUNDATION FOR LIFELONG LEARNING DEVELOPMENT INNOVE Lea Orro, Member of the Management Board,
1 MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTORATE GENERAL PROGRAMMING OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT Operational Programme Regional Development.
College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.
Adam Tyson, European Commission DG HE, Dublin, 22 April 2013
EUROPEAN COHESION POLICY AT A GLANCE Introduction to the EU Structural Funds Ctibor Kostal Sergej Muravjov.
Ministry of Education and Religious Affairs General Secretariat for Research and Technology EEA Financial Mechanism Research within Priority.
Quality assurance in IVET in Romania Lucian Voinea Mihai Iacob Otilia Apostu 4 th Project Meeting Prague, 21 st -22 nd October 2010.
1 MINISTRY OF LABOUR, SOCIAL SOLIDARITY AND FAMILY ESF HEAD OF MISSION MANAGING AUTHORITY FOR SECTORAL OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME FOR HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT.
COHESION FUND MONITORING COMMITTEE 11 April 2008 Jurijs Spiridonovs Ministry of Environment Head of Project Development Department.
Structural Funds We have to act now! Javier Güemes Acting Director European Disability Forum.
EQUAL Community Initiative Programme for Malta Conference co-financed by the EU: European Social Fund (ESF) Co-financing Rate: 75% EU Funds;
ERDF for Education And Science Ministry of Education And Science 1st of October 2013.
Ministry of Welfare 18 June 2008 Implementation of EU Structural Funds activities within the competence of the Ministry of Welfare and results achieved.
Project acronym: TEACH Ref. Project: EACEA Harmonization of Preschool Teacher Education Curricula in Serbia.
Administrative Territorial Reform in Latvia The Ministry of Regional Development and Local Government.
OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME “DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPETITIVENESS OF THE BULGARIAN ECONOMY” Republic of Bulgaria Ministry of Economy and Energy April 2006.
Careers Education in Estonian Schools Tiina Trampärk Careers education specialist.
AMU DoQuP FINAL REPORT MD, PhD, Associate Professor G.Ahmadov Azerbaijan Medical University Bishkek, April 22, 2015.
Regulatory requirements in the current programming period Funchal, 18 November 2010.
Massa Carrara Province Vocational training Service Funds: European Social Fund (ESF) Continuing Vocational Training National Funds ex Law 236/93 and Law.
Leonardo da Vinci Partnerships: an opportunity to work together Italian National Agency for LLP - Leonardo da Vinci Sectoral Programme.
GUIDE FOR APPLICANTS 2005 What’s new in Tempus ? Tempus.
Institutional structures for Structural Funds assistance Ministry of Finance September 10, 2003.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
EU European Territorial Cooperation Legal Package - State of play Vicente RODRIGUEZ SAEZ, DG Regional Policy, European Commission Deputy Head.
Struktūrfondu vadošā iestāde – Finanšu ministrija 1 1 Communication Strategy of EU Funds Sanda Rieksta Head of Information Division, Deputy Head.
Guidance in LLL concept – from strategies to practice Tereza Listová, MoEYS, NGF Silvie Pýchová, EG, ELGPN.
MONITORING SYSTEM OF EU STRUCTURAL FUNDS: PHYSICAL INDICATORS International Conference for New Member States February 1-2, 2012, Vilnius (Lithuania) European.
CHAPTER V Health Information. Updates on new legislation (1)  Decision No.1605/2010/QĐ-TTg approving the National Program for Application of information.
Paulius Baniūnas Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Lithuania EU Structural Support Management Department Monitoring and Analysis Division SYSTEM OF.
Ministry of Economy, Energy and Tourism 1 OP Competitiveness Progress of Implementation 2010.
EQUAL Community Initiative Programme for Malta Conference co-financed by the EU: European Social Fund (ESF) Co-financing Rate: 75% EU Funds;
1 POLAND Polish experience with communicating implementation of Structural Funds Integrated Regional Operational Programme Rafał Nowak 8 October 2008,
Indicators achieved for EU Structural Funds activities by 31 December 2007 Andris Liepiņš State Undersecretary 18 June 2008.
ROMANIA MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION National Centre for Development of Vocational Education and Training Implementation Unit of Phare.
1 December, 2004 Agency for Vocational Education Development Riga Support of ESF in Education and Continuing Training.
Structural Funds Managing Authority – Ministry of Finance 1 Technical Assistance Ilze Aleksandroviča Head of Control and Development Division EU Funds.
Initial eligibility assessment and ex-post monitoring of State aid in EU funds co-financed projects.
SF Managing Authority – Ministry of Finance 1 EU Structural Funds Annual Implementation Report 2005 Iveta Baltiņa Ministry of Finance Head of EU Funds.
EU Funds in Latvia Aleksandrs Antonovs Ministry of Finance Deputy director of Department of EU Funds December 4, 2006.
Absorption progress of EU Structural Funds within the competence of the Ministry of Economics 14/06/2007.
Experience of Accessing EU Financial Support in Lithuania 4th PG Funding Meeting , Paris.
Implementation progress of Activities within the competence of the Ministry of Health.
Social inclusion of excluded young people and prevention of re-offending behavior
FREE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Presentation on the Status of Conditional Grants Public Hearings on Conditional Grants 03 May 2006.
ASSESSMENT OF FINANCIAL REFORM IN GENERAL EDUCATION.
The procedures for project under Measure 1.2 submission for SF financing Joint Seminar “Capacity building for designing projects dealing with sustainable.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity Structural Funds Information Team Brussels, 30 June 2005 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO.
Croatia: Result orientation within the process of preparation of programming documents V4+ Croatia and Slovenia Expert Level Conference Budapest,
Katowice – the capital city of the Silesia region: Highly urbanized The highest population density in Poland – 4,64 mln people 12 cities with population.
DG Justice and Consumers Project Modifications DG Justice and Consumers.
Albanian Qualifications Framework Ejvis Gishti, NAVETQ Kiev, March
Joint Action Plans (Art CPR). 2 Purpose of the presentation Present the “Joint Action Plan”, a potential approach on a management more focused on.
ERDF for Education and Science th March 2011.
SOCIAL INCLUSION IN EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA TOWARDS MAINSTREAMING AND RESULTS SOCIAL INCLUSION IN EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA TOWARDS MAINSTREAMING.
Specific objective „To increase support for general education institutions to develop students’ individual competences” Measure No „Support.
„Support to create new jobs”
Ministry of Finance Contribution of the Operational Programmes to the implementation of the NSRF objectives Boriana Pencheva Director Management.
Operational Programme Education for Competitiveness
Тowards regionally-based standards of qualifications
ESF ASSISTANCE TO LITHUANIA’S OBJECTIVE 1 AND EQUAL PROGRAMS
COHESION FUND MONITORING COMMITTEE
Polish experience, Integrated Regional Operational Programme
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Human resource and Work flow of the Research Office, RUPP
Josip Juraj Strossmayer University in Osijek
Role of Evaluation coordination group and Capacity Building Projects in Lithuania Vilija Šemetienė Head of Economic Analysis and Evaluation Division.
Presentation transcript:

Implementation progress of SPD activities within the competence of the Ministry of Education and Science [as at 31/12/2006] EU Structural Funds for Education

Prezentējamā tēma Absorption progress of ERDF funds incl. in 2006:  One open tender completed  42 agreements signed on implementation of open tender projects for LVL 6.4 M  9 agreements signed on implementation of national programme projects for LVL 2.5 M  Implementation of 30 projects completed  Structural Funds repayments carried out for LVL 2.5 M In the programming period

Prezentējamā tēma Absorption progress of ESF funds incl. in 2006:  3 open tenders launched repeatedly  ~ 500 projects evaluated  274 agreements signed on implementation of open tender projects for LVL 11.6 M  3 agreements signed on implementation of national programme projects for LVL 3 M  Implementation of 157 projects completed  Structural Funds repayments carried out for LVL 3.1 M In the programming period

Prezentējamā tēma In 2007  Reallocation of funds within Measure 3.2 carried out  139 project applications screened [average duration of quality screening 1 month]  Submitted to the ESF Steering Committee for approval list of projects with 18 projects for 709 thousand LVL [for the whole amount available] in the Activity “Development and implementation of pedagogical correction programmes”  Approved in the ESF Steering Committee support for 19 projects for 781 thousand LVL [for the whole amount available] in the Activity “Integration of youngsters with special needs into mainstream education system” for the whole funding available under the Activity  Proposal submitted for taking up overcommitments of ESF funds in the amount of LVL 1.86 M ESFERDF  As a result of reallocation of funds under the order of the Monitoring Committee additional funds of LVL 1 M allocated to Measure 2.5  Approved overcommitment within the Activity “Provision of modern research equipment and infrastructure to state research institutions” of ERDF funds in the amount of LVL 1.5 M  Amendments to the National Programme “Provision of modern research equipment and infrastructure to state research institutions”, submitted to the ERDF Steering Committee, providing for implementation of 4 new projects

Prezentējamā tēma Progress of output indicators Measure 1.4 “Development of education, health care and social infrastructure” IndicatorPlanned in PC2006Total Number of education institutions provided with modernised technological training equipment and infrastructure (93% of planned) 30 (103% of planned) Number of reconstructed education establishments (77% of planned) 13 (100% of planned) Increase in number of training programmes in VET provided with appropriate and up-to-date training equipment and necessary infrastructure 20% 13.5 % (67.5% of planned) 16.5% (82.5% of planned) Increase in number of study programmes in science and technology intensive branches, provided with appropriate and up-to-date equipment and necessary infrastructure 50% 20.5% (41% of planned) 47.5% (95% of planned)

Prezentējamā tēma Measure 2.5 “Development of public research” Indicator Planned in PC 2006Total Number of research projects supported50 42 (84% of planned) 42 (84% of planned) Number of research centres supported12 5 (41,6% of planned) 18 (150% of planned) Number of purchased research equipment (106,5% of planned) 778 (389% of planned) Increase in number of applied research projects carried out by research centres 20% (100% of planned) 20% (100% of planned) Number of research fields with increased competitive capacity 7 n/a7 (100% of planned)

Prezentējamā tēma Conclusions on progress for indicators in Measures 1.4 and 2.5  There is reason to believe that the values of indicators in Measure 1.4 will increase, since there are 7 projects in implementation stage in 2007  The number of projects actually to be implemented under the Measure 2.5 is 84% of the planned, because as a result of an open tender financially more intensive projects were supported compared to initially planned levels – 42 projects (instead of planned 50) for 99% of available funding. The value of the indicator will not change, since repeated tenders will not be launched  In 2007 within the National Programme “Provision of modern research equipment and infrastructure to state research institutions” 4 additional projects have been approved that will have their contribution to progress in terms of indicator values reached

Prezentējamā tēma Measure 3.2 “Development of education and continuing training ” IndicatorPlanned in PC2006Total Number of projects developing and starting the implementation of study programmes (48% of planned) 142 (118% of planned) Number of projects for doctoral and post-doctoral studies 5 Planned value reached already in (100% of planned) Number of projects promoting development of lifelong learning 7 Planned value reached already in (114% of planned) Number of projects developing new continuing training programmes (47.5% of planned) 38 (47.5% of planned)

Prezentējamā tēma Measure 3.2 (continued) IndicatorPlanned in PC2006Total Number of projects for teacher and academic staff internship in enterprises (122.5% of planned) 98 (122.5% of planned) Number of projects for teachers and academic staff training (40% of planned) 152 (60.8% of planned) Number of projects providing student training internships (7.8% of planned) 183 (15.3% of planned) Number of projects addressing guidance and counselling support in education institutions (33.5% of planned) 139 (69.5% of planned)

Prezentējamā tēma Measure 3.2 (continued) IndicatorPlanned in PC2006Total Number of students continuing studies/ training in new or updated programmes (29% of planned) (129% of planned) Number of teachers trained14, (45.2% of planned) (45.2% of planned) Number of persons graduating from doctoral or post-doctoral studies (20.9% of planned) 120 (26.6% of planned) Number of lifelong learning networks established 6 Planned value reached already in (100% of planned) Number of regional officials and lifelong learning coordinators trained (83.3% of planned) 150 (100% of planned)

Prezentējamā tēma Measure 3.2 (continued) Indicator Planned in PC 2006Total Number of adults trained in continuing training 3500 Implementation of respective activities of projects was not launched It is planned to train 3761 adults in the projects Number of teachers/ HPE academic staff received internship in enterprises 3300 Implementation of projects was not started Implementation of projects started recently, thus it is not possible to find out the current value of indicators Number of students in VET and HPE received training internship (2.2% of planned) 2075 (9.4% of planned) * comment with output indicators Number of social partner representatives trained (101% of planned) 808 (101% of planned) Number of teachers trained in guidance and counselling (103% of planned) 3819 (103% of planned) Number of pupils and students participated in guidance/counselling measures (159% of planned) (267% of planned)

Prezentējamā tēma General problems  Functional interference in operation of the EU Structural Funds management information system – difficulties in creating reports and recording reached values for indicators  Long period of adopting decisions on approval of Structural Funds claims [in particular for ERDF activities] preventing approval of actual progress for indicators

Prezentējamā tēma Conclusions on progress for indicators in Measure It is forecasted that the value of one indicator – number of students received training internship – will not reach the level planned in Programme Complement.  The reasons to be mentioned are (1) seasonal nature of internships, as well as (2) problem of attracting social partners. SMEs who are the main partners in these projects are able to provide only a limited number of internships for students at the same time. On the other hand project implementors have given preference to larger projects looking for more beneficial positions of administrating such projects. The problem has been solved by reallocation of funding to activities with higher financial absorption capacity, creating preconditions for increase in values of other indicators. 2. In specific cases the result will be achieved in the planned amount or even exceeding the set values, however, the output indicator level will not be sufficient.  The reason for that is financially more instensive projects compared to what was planned initially. As a result the planned output levels will be achieved in a smaller number of projects.

Prezentējamā tēma Conclusions (continued) 3. In specific cases there are problems of methodological nature for registration of indicator value. In activities for training of teachers, one teacher is attending several training courses, and it is done within several projects or even several activities.  The problem will be solved by the final beneficiaries of the SF funding requiring to define in details in the final reports for winding-up of a project the target group reached. 4. The values of indicators have been reached in the planned amount or already exceeded, and exceeding the set indicator values is to be forecasted.  The main reasons for that being (1) reach of the target group, i.e., the target group is reached by investing comparatively smaller financial and other resources, and (2) activity of project applicants.

Prezentējamā tēma Measure 3.3 “Combating social exclusion”  It is planned that the values of all indicators set will be exceeded, since as a result of reallocation of funding the activities have received additional funding, and in May 2007 the evaluation of projects from repeatedly launched tender was completed Indicator Planned in PC 2006Total Number of projects addressing the development and implementation of pedagogical correction programmes 10 1 (10% of planned) 11 (110% of planned) Number of projects addressing the integration of pupils with special needs 20 Approved projects were in implementation stage 15 (75% of planned) Number of pupils involved in pedagogical correction measures (12.4% of planned) 158 (47.9% of planned)

Thank you! 14 June 2007, Riga