Single GEM Measurement Matteo Alfonsi,Gabriele Croci and Bat-El Pinchasik June 25 th 2008 GDD Meeting 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GEM Chambers at BNL The detector from CERN, can be configured with up to 4 GEMs The detector for pad readout and drift studies, 2 GEM maximum.
Advertisements

INFN Trieste, October 2008 Summary of measurements on: CsI coated ThGEM triple CERN.
Standard GEM Charging Up Simulation: First test of the approach Matteo Alfonsi, Gabriele Croci, Serge Duarte Pinto, Leszek Ropelewski, Rob Veenhof, Marco.
1 First observations on CsI -coated ThGEM in Trieste presented by Gabriele Giacomini phone meeting 06/08/2008.
Maximilien Chefdeville NIKHEF, Amsterdam RD51, Amsterdam 17/04/2008
GEM Detector Shoji Uno KEK. 2 Wire Chamber Detector for charged tracks Popular detector in the particle physics, like a Belle-CDC Simple structure using.
New Readout Methods for LAr detectors P. Otyugova ETH Zurich, Telichenphysik CHIPP Workshop on Neutrino physics.
Edda Gschwendtner1 RF test of a small TPG detector prototype F. Ambrosino,C. D’Addio, F. Caspers, U. Gastaldi, E. Gschwendtner, E. Radicioni, G. Saracino.
D. Peterson, “ILC Detector Work”, Cornell Group Meeting, 4-October ILC Detector Work This project is supported by the US National Science Foundation.
RF test of the GEM detector prototipe Detector description RF test area (LINAC3) detector working conditions RF field measurement Detector measurements.
Status of simulation studies of IBF for GEMs
Rate and Gain Measurements of the 1-m long GEM detector Aiwu Zhang EIC tracking R&D weekly meeting.
Measurement of gas gain fluctuations M. Chefdeville, LAPP, Annecy TPC Jamboree, Orsay, 12/05/2009.
C.Shalem et al, IEEE 2004, Rome, October 18 R. Chechik et al. ________________RICH2004_____________ Playa del Carmen, Mexico 1 Thick GEM-like multipliers:
Chamber parameters that we can modify and that affect the rising time Number of ionisation clusters produced in the drift gap: Poisson Distribution Probability.
Fabio Sauli-CERN 1 IEEE-NSS Rome 04 F. Sauli, T. Meinschad, L. Musa, L. Ropelewski CERN, GENEVA, SWITZERLAND PHOTON DETECTION AND LOCALIZATION WITH THE.
1 First observations on CsI -coated ThGEM in Trieste presented by Gabriele Giacomini phone meeting 06/08/2008.
Systematic studies on the rate capability of MWPC operated in Xe/CO 2 D. Gonzalez-Diaz for the CBM-TRD group March, 2008.
Chevron / Zigzag Pad Designs for Gas Trackers
15/07/2010Rui De Oliveira1 Update on large size GEM manufacturing Rui de Oliveira.
A. Bamberger1 Experimental study of double GEM readout using MediPix2 chip A. Bamberger, M. Debatin, J. Ludwig, M. Titov, N. Vlasov.
E. Pozdeyev1 Ion Back-Bombardment in RF Guns Eduard Pozdeyev BNL with contributions from D. Kayran, V. Litvinenko, I. Ben-Zvi.
GEM: A new concept for electron amplification in gas detectors Contents 1.Introduction 2.Two-step amplification: MWPC combined with GEM 3.Measurement of.
Test Beam the μ-RWELL Test Beam the μ-RWELL G. Bencivenni (a), R. de Oliveira (b), M. Gatta (a), G. Felici (a), G. Morello (a), M. Poli Lener (a) (a),
Geant4 Simulation of Neutrons interaction with GEM-foil and gas Gabriele Croci, Matteo Alfonsi, Serge Duarte Pinto, Leszek Ropelewski, Marco Villa (CERN)
TPC R&D status in Japan T. Isobe, H. Hamagaki, K. Ozawa, and M. Inuzuka Center for Nuclear Study, University of Tokyo Contents 1.Development of a prototype.
DEVELOPMENT OF A THGEM-BASED PHOTON DETECTOR FOR CHERENKOV IMAGING APPLICATIONS Silvia Dalla Torre INFN - Trieste On behalf of an Alessandria-CERN-Freiburg-Liberec-Prague-Torino-TriesteCollaboration.
Ionization Detectors Basic operation
Lab tests of Thick GEMs (THGEM) Lab tests of Thick GEMs (THGEM) S. Dalla Torre, Elena Rocco, L. Ropelewski, F. Tessarotto May – August 2007.
F.Murtas1IMAGEM DDG GEM technology for X-ray and Gamma imaging IMAGEM l Detector setup l First results on X-ray imaging l First results on Gamma ray imaging.
1 IBF in aligned, misaligned and FLOWER THGEMs The IBF problem Standard THGEM configuration COBRA and extra electrode Misaligned holes FLOWER THGEM solution.
GEM basic test and R&D plan Takuya Yamamoto ( Saga Univ. )
Study of a charge distribution on a readout board with a triple GEM chamber MPGD group T. Uchida, M. Sekimoto, T. Murakami, M. Tanaka, S. Tanaka, N. Ujiie,
Plans for MPGD Radiation hardness tests for full detectors and components Matteo Alfonsi,Gabriele Croci, Elena Rocco, Serge Duarte Pinto, Leszek Ropelewski.
1 GEM R&D Activity in USTC Yi Zhou University of Science & Technology of China.
Electron tracking Compton camera NASA/WMAP Science Team  -PIC We report on an improvement on data acquisition for a Time Projection Chamber (TPC) based.
High rate studies of TRD at GSI (update) D. Gonzalez-Diaz, GSI
Standard GEM Charging Up Simulation Gabriele Croci, Matteo Alfonsi, Serge Duarte Pinto, Leszek Ropelewski, Rob Veenhof, Marco Villa (CERN), Elena Rocco.
A.Ochi*, Y.Homma, T.Dohmae, H.Kanoh, T.Keika, S.Kobayashi, Y.Kojima, S.Matsuda, K.Moriya, A.Tanabe, K.Yoshida Kobe University PSD8 Glasgow1st September.
1 Two-phase Ar avalanche detectors based on GEMs A. Bondar, A. Buzulutskov, A. Grebenuk, D. Pavlyuchenko, Y. Tikhonov Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics,
Simulation study of Ion Back Flow for the ALICE-TPC upgrade Taku Gunji Center for Nuclear Study University of Tokyo 1 RD51 Collaboration Meeting at SUNY,
Electron Transmission Measurement of GEM Gate Hirotoshi KUROIWA (Saga Univ.) Collaboration with KEK, TUAT, Kogakuin U, Kinki U, Saga U Introduction Motivation.
Construction and Characterization of a GEM G.Bencivenni, LNF-INFN The lesson is divided in two main parts: 1 - construction of a GEM detector (Marco Pistilli)
Report on very preliminary measurements of 10x10cm 2 Triple-GEM detectors with New Single Mask technique Overview Hole geometry Experimental setup Transparency.
A.Ochi Kobe University MPGD2009 Crete 13 June 2009.
1 A two-phase Ar avalanche detector with CsI photocathode: first results A. Bondar, A. Buzulutskov, A. Grebenuk, D. Pavlyuchenko, R. Snopkov, Y. Tikhonov.
1 Fulvio TESSAROTTO GDD meeting, CERN, 01/10/2008 Trieste THGEM news New THGEM test in the COMPASS hall New THGEM test in the COMPASS hall Preparation.
Results on a Large Area triple-GEM Detector at LNF 5 th RD51 Collaboration Meeting Freiburg, 25 May 2010 D. Domenici - LNF.
Update on THGEM project for RICH application Elena Rocco University of Eastern Piedmont & INFN Torino On behalf of an Alessandria-CERN-Freiburg-Liberec-
Gas Electron Multiplier
R&D Collaboration, CERN – September 10, Micromegas Performance and Ageing studies David Attié MPGD. Towards an R&D Collaboration,
Performances of a GEM-based TPC prototype for the AMADEUS experiment Outline: GEM-TPC in AMADEUS experiment; Prototype design & construction; GEM: principle.
NSCL Proton Detector David Perez Loureiro September 14 th 2015.
Larger Pixels, New Insights
Micromegas TPC and wire TPC First measurements in a magnetic field
Quality Control Chamber Production
Gabriele Croci (CERN) GDD Meeting March, the 20th 2008
Single GEM Measurement
Updates on the Micromegas + GEM prototype
WG1 Task2 New structures, new designs, new geometries
THGEM: Introduction to discussion on UV-detector parameters for RICH
Same geometry, but different size of the rim
Numerical simulations on single mask conical GEMs
Numerical simulations on single mask conical GEMs
THGEM report – january, 22nd 2009
PHOTON DETECTION AND LOCALIZATION WITH THE
Development of Gas Electron Multiplier Detectors for Muon Tomography
Gain measurements of Chromium GEM foils
Presentation transcript:

Single GEM Measurement Matteo Alfonsi,Gabriele Croci and Bat-El Pinchasik June 25 th 2008 GDD Meeting 1

In the last presentation.. 2

Disagreements between measurements of these days and literature J. Benlloch et al. /Nucl. Instr. and Meth. in Phys. Res. A 419 (1998) 410) S Bachmann et al. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., A, 438(CERN-EP ):376– p, Apr

Picture of the GEM used last time and of a Standard Stock GEM GEM used last timeStock GEM (measured this week) Dimensions measured again with Rui’s microscope: they are STANDARD GEM in all aspects!! 4

Stock GEM Parameters Standard GEM (10x10 cm 2 active area) –Pitch 140 µm –Outer(Inner) Hole Diam. 70(50) µm –Thickness 50 µm Wide Drift Gap Geometry –2 mm Induction gap –13.5 mm drift gap Standard Gas Ar/CO 2 70%/30% 8.9 keV X-Rays from the side 13.5 mm 2 mm X-Rays 5

Pulse Height Spectrum The Gain is evaluated using (Rate Method) Energy Resolution: 23% Ed = Ei = 3kV/cm ∆V GEM = 520 V Flux = 1.1kHz (beam from side) 6

Voltage Scan Drift Field = 3 kV/cm; Induction Field = 3 kV/cm, Flux = 2.5MHz 7 G ≈ 500V !!!

Drift Scan 8 GEM Voltage = 500 V; Induction Field = 3 kV/cm two weeks ago: 3x3 cm 2 GEM beam on cathode

Induction Scan Drift Field = 3.0 kV/cm; GEM Voltage = 500 V 9

Gain measurement using ionization current We used this setup to measure the ionization current We fixed the rate to a value where we can read the ionization current We reversed also the polarity of our HV supply to cross-check measurement keV X-Rays V drift  Keithley V TopGEM to HV V BottomGEM = 0 V anode = 0 E drift E GEM V TopGEM : 0

Gain from ionization 11 G ≈ 500V !!! Ionization current about 170pA Another comment: you start to collect all ionization already at 0.03 ÷ 0.04 kV/cm.  In the drift scan the transparency slope for low fields can’t be explained only by recombination

Simplified setup without using anode: electrons collected on bottom I drift = I prim [1 + f coll (G − 1) f fb ] I top = I prim [ − 1 + f coll + f coll (G − 1) (1 − f fb )] I bottom = − I prim f coll G 12 I prim : ionization current f coll : collected fraction of primary electrons f fb : fraction of ions reaching the cathode G : absolute gain 8.9 keV X-Rays V drift < 0 V TopGEM  Keithley V BottomGEM > 0 V anode = 0 E drift E GEM I drift I top I bottom Not measured N.B.: Induction field reversed, so the electronic charge is collected on bottom

13 Ionization current Drift scan with GEM Voltage = 20 V (no multiplication for sure!) Induction Field = kV/cm X-Rays ? ? ?? The slight rise of ion current on cathode can be explained as edge effects (no walls on active area borders!): as drift field increases, ions produced outside the active area are “pulled” inside Ionization current about 3.7nA (maximum allowed I XRAY ≈ 4mA used now) Current on bottom ≈ 0 (Transparency ≈ 0)

Transparency and Gain Voltage scan with Drift Field = 1.0 kV/cm Induction Field = kV/cm No multiplication up to V GEM ~ 140  You can measure here transparency disentangled from gain and compare it with simulation!!

backup 15

X-Rays ? ? ??

Ionization Current Measurement Ionization Current on Drift Electrode Top GEM Current (when measurable) No X-Rays We found a mean value for the ionization current around 150 pA 17

GAIN Measurement: Two Methods Comparison Rate Method Ed = 1.9 kV/cm ; Ei = 3 kV/cm Ionization Method Ed = 1.7 kV/cm ; Ei = 3 kV/cm It seems that the two results are compatible 18

Simulation Comparison Simulations ????? 19