NCSX VVSA / MCWF FDR A Systems Engineering Perspective Wayne Reiersen Bob Simmons NCSX VVSA / MCWF FDR May 19-20, 2004 PPPL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT ROLE OF KEY PERSONNEL Bernd Madauss International Space University Strasbourg February, 2011
Advertisements

Ensure Vendor/Engineer of Choice Product Quality
NCSX Vacuum Vessel Overview Paul Goranson WBS 12 Manager Vacuum Vessel Manufacturing Study Kickoff meeting April 29, 2003.
Trip Report on the visit to ICST of HIT, Harbin, China Derun Li Mike Green Steve Virostek Mike Zisman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (from December.
Designing a Product Product design is usually a problem that requires a creative Design and/or manufacturing solution.
Systems Engineering Management
COMP8130 and 4130Adrian Marshall 8130 and 4130 Test Management Adrian Marshall.
LSU 01/18/2005Project Life Cycle1 The Project Life Cycle Project Management Unit, Lecture 2.
Effective Methods for Software and Systems Integration
Romaric GUILLERM Hamid DEMMOU LAAS-CNRS Nabil SADOU SUPELEC/IETR.
Chapter 2: Overview of Essentials ISE 443 / ETM 543 Fall 2013.
Chapter 2 The process Process, Methods, and Tools
From Research Prototype to Production
September 30, 2003 NCSX Modular Coil Winding Form Prototype FDR1 NCSX Prototype Modular Coil Winding form FDR Phil Heitzenroeder PPPL September 30, 2003.
NCSX Management Overview Hutch Neilson, NCSX Project Manager NCSX Conceptual Design Review Princeton, NJ May 23, 2002.
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by.
SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 NSCX Poloidal Field Coils Michael Kalish.
NCSX Vacuum Vessel Joint Design Mike Viola PPPL July 1 st, 2003.
Project Life Cycle.
1 WBS 1 Design Analysis Status NCSX Analysis Meeting Dec 3, 2003.
NCSX NCSX Design Review Guide May 27, 2005 Wayne Reiersen NCSX.
NCSX VACUUM VESSEL PL Goranson Thermal Insulation Final Design Review July 31, 2006 WBS12 NCSX.
THE PROJECT LIFE CYCLE PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIFE CYCLE LSU 01/18/2005 PROJECT LIFE CYCLE 1.
Metrology Milestones Metrology Task Force –Vacuum vessel manufacture - P. Goranson –Mod. Coil Form manufacture - D. Williamson –Mod. Coil winding- S. Raftopoulos.
SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 NCSX Cryogenics Systems WBS-62 Steve Raftopoulos NCSX Cryogenic Systems WBS(62)
Progress to Date PPPL Advisory Board Meeting May 20101NSTX Upgrade – R. L. Strykowsky CD-0 Approved February 2009 The NSTX Upgrade Project organization.
NCSX NCSX TF Coil Procurement 1 February 3, 2006 Michael Kalish NCSX TF Coil Procurement.
Conceptual Design Requirements for FIRE John A. Schmidt FIRE PVR March 31, 2004.
NCSX Systems Engineering Management Plan Peer Review Bob Simmons May 15, 2003.
ITER- TBM Planning and Costing Activity DCLL TBM Mechanical Design ( ) & TBM-Port Interface ( ) Presented by Mo Dagher December
NSTX Response to the Lessons Learned Report NSTX TF Coil Repair Review September 3-4, 2003 Al von Halle.
NCSX Field Period Assembly (FPA) Operations, Cost and Schedule, Staffing, and Metrology Utilization Mike Viola Field Period Assembly Manager NCSX FPA Peer.
11/2/2005Mike Viola1 November Lehman Review November 2, 2005 NCSX VVSA NCSX Vacuum Vessel Fabrication Major Tool and Machine – S F 3 120° segments.
F. Dahlgren -SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 PF, TF, & Trim Coil Supports (WBS-15) Core Base Support Structure (WBS-17) F. Dahlgren NCSX Coil.
NCSX Field Period Assembly (FPA) Operations, Cost and schedule, staffing, and metrology utilization Mike Viola Field Period Assembly Manager NCSX FPA Peer.
1 MC Assembly over the VV FPA Station 3 FDR Review July 13, 2007 T. Brown.
NCSX NCSX Project Meeting Wayne Reiersen 15 December 2004.
NCSX Data Management Plan Peer Review Bob Simmons March 31, 2003.
NCSX NCSX Vacuum Vessel R&D, Risk Management and Manufacture NCSX Preliminary Design Review October 7-9, 2003 Princeton, NJ Mike Viola, Phil Heitzenroeder,
10/31/2007Mike Viola1 NCSX Field Period Assembly + + = October 31, 2007 Mike Viola Field Period Assembly Manager.
SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 NCSX Cryogenics Systems WBS-62 Steve Raftopoulos NCSX Cryogenic Systems WBS(62) Manager.
SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 NCSX Machine Assembly E. D. Perry.
How the NCSX Project Does Business
NCSX November 18-20, 2003NCSX Performance Baseline ReviewMichael Viola 1 NCSX Vacuum Vessel R&D, Risk Management and Manufacture Mike Viola, Phil Heitzenroeder,
1 Stellarator Core Metrology issues NCSX WBS-1 Meeting April 2, 2003 What are we measuring? When? How do we take the measurements? How do we correlate.
September 10, FY 2003 Plans Bob Simmons. September 10, Introduction Overview of Project and Engineering Plans Project Plans Engineering Plans.
AWB Dimensional Control Requirements for the Modular Coils and TF coils Field Period Assembly Peer Review October 11-12, 2006 Art Brooks.
NCSX VACUUM VESSEL PL Goranson Final Design Review November 17, 2005 Man Access Port /Lateral Supports NCSX.
Field Period Assembly Wayne Reiersen SC Project Review PPPL May 2006.
A View of NCSX Structural System and Load Path for the Base Support Structure.
NCSX 21 March 2003 Reiersen - 1 PDR Preparations Wayne Reiersen NCSX Engineering Meeting 21 March 2003.
9/28/20051 Mike Viola 1, T. Brown 1, P. Heitzenroeder 1, F. Malinowski 1, W. Reiersen 1, L. Sutton 1, P. Goranson 2, B. Nelson 2, M. Cole 2, M. Manuel.
Preparations for working on Station 1 November 22, 2005.
12/19/2006Mike Viola1 December Lehman Review December 19, 2006 Mike Viola Field Period Assembly Manager NCSX Field Period Assembly + + =
1 WBS 1 Preparation for FDRs NCSX WBS 1 Engineering Meeting March 17, 2003 What establishes the plan? What are near term deliverables? How will we status.
PPPL Stellarator Program Overview Hutch Neilson NCSX Project Manager NCSX Program Advisory Committee Meeting #6 Princeton, NJ December 9, 2002.
Collaborating for Quality Quality Assurance (QA) & Quality Control (QC) in the Accelerator Project (ACCSYS) Matthew Conlon ACCSYS QA/QC
LCLS-II Prototype Cryomodule Vacuum Vessel and HGRP Tom Peterson 4 December 2014 Design Review.
1 CD-2 ECP Preparations What is Needed. 2 Background As part of the CD-2 process, we need to establish a fully supported and documented cost and schedule.
1 VV Support Fixture FPA Stage 1 PDR Review August 10, 2005 T. Brown.
NCSX Strykowsky 1Independent Project Review (IPR) June 8-9, 2004 NCSX Project Review June 8-9, 2004 Cost, Schedule, and Project Controls Ron Strykowsky.
PXIE RFQ Engineering Design Steve Virostek Engineering Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory April 10, 2012 Project X Collaboration
SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 C. A. Gentile NCSX Startup (WBS 85) C.A.Gentile NCSX CD-4 Startup.
Collaborating for Quality through the Project Quality Plan Matthew Conlon ESS ACCSYS QA/QC Quality Learning & Planning.
Camera PDR/CD1 Planning 19 September 2008
Accelerator Readiness Review October 31, 2006
2K CB FDR Overview:  Agenda, Charge, Review Process
MRL 6 Artifacts (at End of TMRR) Page 1 of 6
Lockheed Martin Canada’s SMB Mentoring Program
DOE Review of the LCLS Project October 2006
Presentation transcript:

NCSX VVSA / MCWF FDR A Systems Engineering Perspective Wayne Reiersen Bob Simmons NCSX VVSA / MCWF FDR May 19-20, 2004 PPPL

19-20 May 2004NCSX VVSA / MCWF FDRReiersen 2 Systems Engineering “…the discipline of managing the development of complex systems” Translate physics requirements into engineering language Allocate performance Requirements to subsystems General Requirements Document (GRD) Subsystem Development Spec (SRD) Physics Requirements Document (PRD) Develop Pre-conceptual Design PVR Define characteristics of each part or assembly required for subsystem to work as designed Component Product Spec Fabricate part or assembly PDR FDR Develop Conceptual Design Develop Preliminary Design Develop Final Design We know what we have to do We know how we are going to do it We know it will work We are ready to build it Component MIT/QA Plan Define how required characteristics will be verified. Integrate in mfg process. CDR

19-20 May 2004NCSX VVSA / MCWF FDRReiersen 3 The Vacuum Vessel Sub-assembly (VVSA) and Modular Coil Winding Forms (MCWF) are the subjects of this FDR The VVSA is the long lead time procurement for constructing the VV The VVSA includes the field period assemblies, port extensions (to the first flange), spacers, and end pieces The Vacuum Vessel (WBS 12) also includes… NB transition port Removable port extensions Heating and cooling distribution Thermal insulation Local I&C A comprehensive FDR will be held for the other subsystem elements in Feb ‘05

19-20 May 2004NCSX VVSA / MCWF FDRReiersen 4 The Vacuum Vessel Sub-assembly (VVSA) and Modular Coil Winding Forms (MCWF) are the subjects of this FDR MCWFs are the long lead time procurement for constructing the modular coils The MCWFs include 18 winding forms (6 of each type) complete with a poloidal break The Modular Coils (WBS 14) also include the winding assemblies and local I&C A comprehensive FDR will be held for the other subsystem elements in September ’04 (Type C)

19-20 May 2004NCSX VVSA / MCWF FDRReiersen 5 SOWs, product specs, MIT/QA plans, mfg procedures, and travelers have been developed and refined during prototype fabrication Supplier QA Program Documentation Product Manufacturing, Inspection, Test, and Quality Assurance (MIT/QA) Plan Defines all steps in mfg process Defines all QC inspections and tests Identifies supporting procedures Identifies traveler to be used Statement of Work (SOW) Defines work requirements Defines QA program requirements Identifies deliverables Product Specification Defines product Identifies applicable models and drawings Defines technical requirements Defines how required characteristics will be verified Subject to NCSX approval Derived from SRD and subsystem design constraints Mfg procedures Travelers Subject to revision control Only minor modifications needed for the production articles Already reviewed

19-20 May 2004NCSX VVSA / MCWF FDRReiersen 6 VVSA and MCWF models and drawings have been completed The models are part of an integrated model of stellarator core Essential for establishing envelopes and avoiding interferences Facilitates interface definition with other stellarator core components The drawings are used to communicate information (e.g. tolerances and surface finishes) that cannot be readily incorporated into a model

19-20 May 2004NCSX VVSA / MCWF FDRReiersen 7 VVSA and MCWF drawings are in final review Work in progress Complete final design (model development) Generate drawings from models for procurement package Perform final checking  Checker  Weld engineer  Design integration  Cog engineer Perform final checking of clearances Approve drawings for fabrication Conduct VVSA / MCWF FDR Resolve issues Release final procurement package Review of models and drawings by suppliers Hardcopies of models and drawings provided to the Review Committee for their consideration Work in progress

19-20 May 2004NCSX VVSA / MCWF FDRReiersen 8 Final clearance checking of assy fit-ups is underway Many interference checks necessary Assembly fit-ups require following complex 3D trajectories  MC-to-MC to form 3-coil modules  Sliding a 3-coil module over VV and into mating 3-coil module  Sliding a 3-coil TF assembly over the 3- coil module  Concurrent positioning of completed field period assemblies and spacers (6 pieces) Interference with horizontal port Interference with vertical port These interferences were uncovered during interference checking and have been resolved

19-20 May 2004NCSX VVSA / MCWF FDRReiersen 9 Final clearance checking for the port extensions is also underway Clearance checking between long port extensions and modular coil assemblies is also complex  Multiple temperature conditions (MC RT/77K, VV RT/350C)  1 atm pressure loads and appendage loads cause deflections in the shell and port extensions – these are included in the tolerance budget  Clearances to TF/PF coils will also be checked Interference checks are important all along the way, but especially after all changes have been made

19-20 May 2004NCSX VVSA / MCWF FDRReiersen 10 VVSA design satisfies design criteria VV configuration is unique Highly shaped shell Numerous long, spindly ports High temperature (350C) bakeout Numerous loads analyzed Gravity 1 atm pressure Bakeout Disruptions (midplane and off-midplane) Design changes were incorporated as a result of analysis to make the design more robust Appendage weights will be administratively controlled Seismic and unbalanced loads are currently being analyzed Independent calculations provide confidence in these conclusions Design basis analyses are being formally documented and checked

19-20 May 2004NCSX VVSA / MCWF FDRReiersen 11 MCWF design also satisfies design criteria Several different and independent modeling approaches used Global linear models (Myatt and Fan) Local non-linear models (Freudenberg) Bounding values used for winding stiffness - MCWF stresses are within static allowables over the expected range of stiffness No potential changes in the winding design are expected to impact the MCWFs Winding pack envelope fixed Permanent clamps are spaced every 6” Fatigue properties will be established Custom alloys developed by suppliers Test coupons to be cut from prototype casting risers and tested Displacements under load preserve stellarator symmetry and appear to be acceptable (Strickler and Brooks) Design basis analyses are being formally documented and checked

19-20 May 2004NCSX VVSA / MCWF FDRReiersen 12 Mfg development and prototype fabrication efforts are drawing to a successful conclusion Roles and responsibilities within teams and with NCSX established Reporting framework established Weekly reports Earned value reports Periodic teleconferences and site visits 2-way transfer of CAD data is routine Quality requirements are understood and captured in MIT/QA Plans Prototype fabrication efforts have … Proven the manufacturability of the VVSA and MCWF designs Provided an objective measure to differentiate between potential suppliers Having two potential suppliers for each production contract has… Maintained downward pressure on costs Provided the project with options to mitigate schedule risks Prototyped how we are going to manage these contracts

19-20 May 2004NCSX VVSA / MCWF FDRReiersen 13 Design verification is a key element in our SE program Independent modeling approaches used throughout design development All design basis analyses will be formally checked Our suppliers have been involved in verifying the manufacturability of the VVSA and MCWF designs Fabrication of prototypes Review of models and drawings Advance flow solidification modeling and machining reviews of Types A and B Many topical peer reviews were conducted in the 2-month period preceding this FDR to uncover potential problems The NCSX Project is looking forward to the Review Committee’s expert input in the form of recommendations and responses to the charge questions