Modelling benefits-oriented costs for technology enhanced learning Diana Laurillard CQU Rockhampton Colloquium 13 June 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Our vision for a pedagogic planning tool Practical assistance for lecturers designing blended learning activities Both literature-based and adaptable in.
Advertisements

Building online support for HE teachers as digital innovators Diana Laurillard London Knowledge Lab Institute of Education OER in the disciplines 26 October.
What The Research Says: Can Apps for Teachers Drive Learning Innovation? 21 March 2014 Teachers building community knowledge of learning innovation Diana.
Teaching and Learning Analytics for MOOCS Diana Laurillard London Knowledge Lab Institute of Education.
Using training packages to meet client needs Facilitator: Gerard Kell.
Challenges in Improving Course Delivery Technology in Developing Countries: The Case of the IDE at UNISWA By Prof. C. W. S. Sukati 1.
London Grid for Learning schools conference 30th april 2012.
Presentation Why we are considering Trust Status.
Dr Jo Maddern Centre for the Development of Staff and Academic Practice Institute of Education, Graduate and Professional Development INSPIRING TEACHING,
Open Educational Resources / production workshop / february 2009 Except where otherwise noted, this work is available under a Creative Commons Attribution.
ELearning Applying Information Technology to Enhance Learning in Schools and Communities Presentation by Matthew Mitchell WSU Center to Bridge the Digital.
Outline: Can technology enrich quality, improve productivity
The learner experience Institutional change Online teaching practice: Re-designing for learning.
Developing a Pedagogical Planner Leanne Cameron Macquarie University.
Quality Assurance practice in web-supported learning Jill Fresen A study at the University of Pretoria Jill Fresen A study at the University.
CISB444 - Strategic Information Systems Planning
PowerTeacher Gradebook. Introduction The Stamford Public School district acquired the Pearson PowerSchool suite of student information management tools.
Consistent Teacher judgement
Promoting Learning Styles Through ICT By Miss T.Magi (E-learning Specialist: Butterworth)
The Education Adjustment Program Profile – Revised.
Reflections on developments with learning technologies: York’s journey and some discussion on sector trends ( ) HeLF 10th anniversary meeting.
Embedding information literacy into the curriculum - How do we know how well we are doing? Katharine Reedy (Open University) Cathie Jackson (Cardiff University)
Diana Laurillard Head, e-Learning Strategy Unit Overview of e-learning: aims and priorities.
LDSE Consultation Session 9 March 2011 The Commonwealth Club, London Partners Institute of Education Birkbeck London Met London School of Economics Oxford.
HOW TO DESIGN A SIMPLE ONLINE COURSE April 28, 2009 ED 641 STEPHEN CHESKIEWICZ, MS.ED AND IMPROVE STUDENT SUCCESS.
Developing a Strategy for Technology Enhanced Learning at UEL.
Working with and Learning from Pedagogical Expertise Diana Laurillard 8-11 August 2006.
The New Junior Cycle – An Introduction. Starting in September, your son/daughter will do the current Junior Certificate exam in all subjects except English.
Chaffey: Internet Marketing, 2nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2003OH 4.1 Chapter 4 Internet marketing strategy.
Jan 2013 cc: by-nc-sa Learning design for online courses The Pedagogical Patterns Collector, the Learning Designer, and MOOCs Diana Laurillard.
Apply online at The Kingston College Framework for Technology Integration in Curriculum Planning and Delivery The Curriculum.
Supporting A-level Geography Students Online …at Kingston College 2004/5 LSDA Q Project.
Learning design as a foundation for the future success of e-learning Diana Laurillard 2007 European LAMS Conference University of Greenwich 5 July 2007.
1 Reusable Learning Objects Reusable Learning Objects: Overview Reusable Learning Objects: Overview.
Building Change Capability ‘To put in place the processes and people to support change within STFC’ Draft Blueprint Design v0.1 Project Manager: Steve.
Personalising learning in a connected world Niel McLean, Executive Director, Institutional and Workforce Development, Becta BETT 08 Friday, 11 January.
Blackboard Learn Assessment and Feedback Ulster E-Learning Conference 20 th January 2011 Alan Masson & Fiona McCloy Access and Distributed Learning, University.
Decision flow for Module Planner v9.4 JISC D4L project A User-oriented Planner for Learning Analysis and Design.
The New Studies of Religion Syllabus Implementation Package: Session Two.
Role of the Online Tutor – In-time responsiveness to students in a large-enrolment unit Tim Griffin School of Social Sciences and Psychology.
Facilitating reflective practice – experiences to date. Dr Alan Masson Director: CETL(NI) for Institutional E- learning Services (CIES), University of.
Using Blackboard for blended learning Delivering the Geography curriculum at Kingston College This talk will give an overview of the assessment features.
Good Practice Conference “…collating, disseminating and encouraging the adoption of good practice…”
© Crown copyright 2007 The Framework for secondary science - planning Subject leader development meeting for science Summer 2008 Slide 0.1.
Strategies for Managing the Online Workload CADE 2003 St. John’s Newfoundland June, 2003.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
EU-Mexico Policy Dialogue and Seminar in Higher Education International credit mobility: objectives, challenges and tools in Erasmus+ Maria Sticchi Damiani.
Developing Evaluation Rubrics Cynthia Conn, Ph.D. Associate Director Office of Academic Assessment Paula Garcia, Ph.D. Research & Assessment Coordinator.
Developing networked learner support in UK higher education Perspectives from the NetLinkS project Phil Levy, UK-Nordic Conference 1997.
Re-engineering Assessment Practices in Scottish Higher Education [REAP] Dr David Nicol, Project Director Centre for Academic Practice and Learning Enhancement.
26 December 2015 Moodle Implementation at The University of Waikato The Good, The Tough & Lessons Learned.
Project Management Training
Prometeus-Mallorca (Nov18&19,2001) EML: definition What is an Educational Modelling Language? (Provisional definition:) … a semantic rich information model.
Dr Ayo Oyeleye Birmingham School of Media. Personalised Learning is about promoting personal development through self-realisation, self-enhancement and.
Implementing flexible curricula A workshop to explore approaches for: critically reflecting on changing drivers and needs for flexible curricula and for.
Applying Laurillard’s Conversational Framework to Blended Learning Blogging and Collaborative Activity Design R Papworth, R Walker & W Britcliffe E-Learning.
‘Unlocking the VLE': a Collaborative approach to developing online learning resources to support and scaffold learning Exploring and Sharing Innovative.
4 September 2007 Distributive Leadership for Learning & Teaching 1 Total Curriculum Management (TCM) An Integrated Curriculum Using Distributed Content.
Audition. Based on - Audition is a leading edge people matching tool, transforming selection and recruitment into a science more than an art. What is.
Institute for Open Distance Learning IMPLICATIONS OF POLICY ON CAPACITY BUILDING FOR STAFF MOVING INTO DISTANCE EDUCATION Lindiwe J Shabalala
Design and Development 101 School of Education June 6, 2012.
Planning Literacy Learning Essential Skills Practitioners Level 3.
Designs and testing for a ‘pedagogic planning tool’ A User-oriented Planner for Learning Analysis and Design - Overview Review meeting 23 January 2007.
Strategic Information Systems Planning
Teacher This presentation explores using K-7 Math to support a whole-school approach to mathematics via the Common Core curriculum. Please allow about.
Evaluating Digital Learning Implementation with the CWiC Framework
Comp 20 - Training & Instructional Design
Using NCAT’s Course Planning Tool
Learning design as a foundation for the future success of e-learning
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module One: Introduction SBIEP Module one: Introduction - The standards-based reform movement has.
Presentation transcript:

Modelling benefits-oriented costs for technology enhanced learning Diana Laurillard CQU Rockhampton Colloquium 13 June 2006

Course Outline Distribution of resources Course Schedule/Calendar Session plans and learning activities Public plans Lecturer’s plans Data Publish to staff and students Data Students Data Learning Design Information Flow Key Initial conditions: Course curriculum Resources Experience Data Distribution of resources: - Optimal distribution of staff and student time across teaching/learning methods? - Benefits - costs analysis - Is there a role for TEL?

Modelling lecturer practice and learner experience to plan for the ambition of affordable personalised learning Planning for radical change… How will lecturers and learners distribute their time? How will personalised learning be affordable? What proportion of learning should be online?

No consistency in costing new technology methods across institutions No consistency in the parameters to be used for comparing the costs of new technology with the costs of traditional methods, within an institution No critical literature: studies do not comment on discrepancies Costing models give little help in measuring costs for a particular institution, department, or course No agreement on how best to compare benefits of new technology against traditional methods Problems in the existing costing literature

Define benefit parameters that can differentiate between old and new methods Define the cost parameters that can be associated with comparative benefits Focus on the major cost driver of staff time Represent value to the learner in terms of use of their time Support the local exploration of the cost-benefit relationship Represent technology-specific benefits Represent benefits in terms of improvements in learning User requirements for a benefits-cost analysis of learning design at c User requirements for a benefits-cost analysis of learning design at course level

Provide template with default parameters - learning/teaching methods - learning activity types - student numbers - group sizes and calculation of implied staff resources A support tool for A support tool for modelling resource distribution for a course Support customisation of parameters Generate plan for Course including time and learning activity requirements and constraints for online components

Type of learning activity, definitions linked to learning process framework (initially CF); editable Worked example for traditional course, showing distribution of student time across type of learning activity; editable Default figures for staff time needed for each type of teaching method, linked to explanations of estimates, case examples, how each method contributes to type of learning activity; editable Student numbers; editable Generates resulting cost breakdown and calculates cost per student in terms of staff time Default figures for staff time costs, group sizes, etc; editable Blank template for new design for comparison Course design 1 shows default data for a traditional course Yellow cells are for user input

Design 1: Distribution of teacher and learner time for traditional teaching methods

Staff time distributed over traditional methods £1.03 per student hour

Design 1: Distribution of teacher/learner time for traditional teaching methods at a cost of ~£1 per student hour

Design 2: Distribution of teacher/learner time for an increase in personalised learning higher staff-student ratio less time in large groups more individual formative assessment more learner discussion more active learning

Staff time redistributed to give less whole class, more active learning Groups adjusted to smaller sizes £1.34 per student hour

Design 2: Distribution of teacher/learner time for an increase in personalised learning higher staff-student ratio less time in large groups more individual formative assessment at a cost of £1.34 per student hour = 30% increase in cost

Design 3: Distribution of teacher/learner time for an increase in personalised learning with same conditions higher staff-student ratio less time in large groups more individual formative assessment but using e-learning to support one third of the learning experience

Staff time redistributed over traditional and e- learning methods Define amount of re-use & shared use of resources Maintain group sizes through use of online activities and resources £0.97 per student hour

Design 3: Distribution of teacher/learner time for an increase in personalised learning with same conditions higher staff-student ratio less time in large groups more individual formative assessment using e-learning to support one third of the learning experience and deploying 20% as re-usable learning objects at a cost of ~£1 per student hour = original cost

Modelling tools: Do not describe the system. They are planning tools to clarify thinking to help identify the key parameters to experiment with alternative plans to define what it takes to realise a plan They allow us to understand how to deliver personalised learning in a way that is affordable Discussion: How useful would such a tool be?