Welcome!  Please complete the three “Do Now” posters.  There are nametags on the tables:  Please ensure that more than one district is represented at.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

A DEVELOPMENTAL CONTINUUM OF STANDARDS, CURRICULUM AND ASSESSMENTS, EXTENDING FROM THE EARLY YEARS INTO LATER SCHOOLING, CAN SUPPORT BETTER TRANSITIONS.
RESA Implementation Sessions Day 2 Process Welcome – Before we Begin… Connect to the Internet Visit the Wiki at
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 1 Welcome!  Please complete the four “Do Now” posters.  There are nametags on the tables:
1 Lodi Unified School District Monitoring and Accountability A District Program Improvement Update Board of Education Study Session August 19, 2008.
ON-DEMAND WRITING ASSESSMENT USING CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT IN SUPPORT OF LEARNING GRADES 1 TO 8 Begin with the End in Mind means to begin each task or project.
Massachusetts Initiatives New Massachusetts Curriculum Frameworks - CCSS Model Evaluation System for Teachers and Administrators – District Data Measures.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
Alternate Assessment on Alternate Achievement Standards Aligned to Common Core State Standards 1.
Coaching for School Improvement: A Guide for Coaches and Their Supervisors An Overview and Brief Tour Karen Laba Indistar® Summit September 2, 2010.
Customer Focus Module Preview
Preparing for the CCR Regional Sessions. Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education College and career readiness means an individual.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Discourse. Student Discourse How would you define student discourse? “IS considered student discourse” “IS NOT considered student discourse”
1-Hour Overview: The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation September
Teaching and Learning Elementary Math November 27, :30 am – 12:30 pm.
2012 Secondary Curriculum Teacher In-Service
EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, November 2013 NTI.
Grade 3-5 ELA Common Core Ambassadors August 13-17, 2012 Albany, NY.
DDMs for School Counselors RTTT Final Summit April 7, 2014 Craig Waterman & Kate Ducharme.
Leading Change Through a Walk-Through Protocol
Waiting Room  Today’s webinar will begin shortly. REMINDERS: Dial and enter the passcode # to hear the audio portion of the presentation.
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
English Language Arts Program Update Lisa M. White, ELA Coordinator School Committee Meeting March 5, 2012.
Introduction: District-Determined Measures and Assessment Literacy Webinar Series Part 1.
District-Determined Measures Planning and Organizing for Success Educator Evaluation Spring Convening: May 29, 2013.
Evaluator Workshop for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Rhode Island Model The contents of this training were developed under a Race to the Top grant from.
Educator Evaluation Spring Convening Connecting Policy, Practice and Practitioners May 28-29, 2014 Marlborough, Massachusetts.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
A significant and historic opportunity for states to collectively develop and adopt a core set of academic standards in Mathematics and English/Language.
1 PLCi Common Core Standards Initiative (CCSI) Oakland PLCi November 1, 2012.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
MVSA Ron Noble - ESE October 16, 2013 DDMs: Updates and Discussion.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
WELCOME WASHINGTON STATE FELLOWS! September 22, 2015 Jessica Vavrus, Assistant Superintendent of Teaching and Learning, OSPI Cindy Duncan, Assistant Superintendent.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Candidate Assessment of Performance Conducting Observations and Providing Meaningful Feedback Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
RIDE Educator Evaluation System Design ACEES Meeting December 6, 2010.
Welcome! March 2013 ELA Network
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
Overview and Update.  LBUSD is currently facing a unique set of challenges and opportunities. It is imperative that we look intensely and thoroughly.
AVID Leading College & Career Readiness Districtwide - Transforming Student Outcomes AVID's mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Supporting Effective Teaching: An Introduction to Educator Performance Evaluation Introduction to Educator.
College Career Ready Conference Participants will  Review components of the Grade 3 and the Grades 4 and 5 Condensed Scoring Rubric for Prose Constructed.
July 11, 2013 DDM Technical Assistance and Networking Session.
Calibrating Feedback A Model for Establishing Consistent Expectations of Educator Practice Adapted from the MA Candidate Assessment of Performance.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
For the Students Students in elementary school right now have always used technology, classes seem outdated and boring to most because of the lack of.
Learning Management System
DO PRINCIPAL SUPERVISORS MATTER? BUILDING THE CAPACITY OF AREA SUPERINTENDENTS National Principal Supervisor Summit May 2016.
The Planning Period and Beyond…
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
CCRS Implementation Team Meeting November, 2013
CCRS Implementation Team Meeting September, 2013
Evaluating the Quality of Student Achievement Objectives
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Discussion and Vote to Amend the Regulations
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Massachusetts College and Career Advising Professional Development
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
An Introduction to Evaluating Federal Title Funding
Presentation transcript:

Welcome!  Please complete the three “Do Now” posters.  There are nametags on the tables:  Please ensure that more than one district is represented at each table Name District

December 12, 2013 DDM Technical Assistance and Networking Session

Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 2 Today’s Agenda 2:30pm – 2:40pmArrival and “Do Now” Poster Activities 2:40pm – 3:20pm Table Talk 1 – Examining and Sharing Status of HS Writing-to-Text DDM 3:20pm – 3:30pmWhole-group Share 3:30pm – 4:10pm Presentation – Building a DDM Network Across Districts: Lessons from the Lower Pioneer Valley Educational Collaborative 4:10pm – 4:25pmGallery Walk 4:25pm – 5:00 pm Table Talk 2 – Writing-to-Text DDM Planning Poster and Networking 5:00pm -5:15pmWhole-group Share 5:15pm – 5:30pmClosing and Feedback Forms

Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 3 Intended Outcomes Participants will:  Connect with colleagues from other districts around the development of the HS Writing-to-Text DDM  Grow your network of colleagues that you can work with beyond these TA meetings  Identify opportunities and related next steps to collaborate with similarly situated districts

Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 4 Table Talk 1 (40 min.)  Conversation:  At your table, reflect on each district’s progress developing and piloting a Writing-to-Text DDM  See Agenda & Guiding Questions  Take-aways should include:  Areas of strength and challenge – reference poster  Complete Table Talk 1 poster and prepare for whole-group share

Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 5 Whole-group share (10 min.)  HS Writing-to-Text DDM  Areas of expertise and needed support

Developing a Regional Network for DDM Development: Writing to Text Field Example Technical Assistance Session 3 December 12, 2013

Background This is one example of a collaborative process used by multiple districts to develop a Writing-to-Text 10 th grade DDM Objective: reflect on LPVEC’s process and consider ways in which you might leverage a similar network or collaborative to support your DDM development process

District-Determined Measures Writing to Text Grade 10 West Springfield Agawam Ludlow Southwick/Tolland/Granville East Longmeadow Longmeadow Hampden-Wilbraham Regional Easthampton North Brookfield Lower Pioneer Valley Educational Collaborative

DDM 4-Step Cycle 1. Plan2. Develop 3. Revise4. Implement

1. Plan  Monthly Curriculum Directors’ meeting  Scheduled three full days to develop our Writing to Text Grade 10 DDM  District leaders invited English teachers, department heads, and classroom coaches – our content experts  District leaders and instructors met face-to- face for a full day to develop our rubric.  Used , Google Docs and Wikispaces for communication after the initial face-to-face.  Monthly Curriculum Directors’ meeting  Scheduled three full days to develop our Writing to Text Grade 10 DDM  District leaders invited English teachers, department heads, and classroom coaches – our content experts  District leaders and instructors met face-to- face for a full day to develop our rubric.  Used , Google Docs and Wikispaces for communication after the initial face-to-face.

Reflection Questions: Plan Reflecting on LPVEC’s WorkIndividual Notes How did the LPVEC group’s planning work benefit from engaging a regional network? What key logistical components made the planning work feasible for the LPVEC group? What aspects of this collaborative planning process feel most high leverage for your district?

2. Develop  All participating districts sent a team armed with the Massachusetts Curriculum Framework for ELA  Presented information from MA DESE’s Teacher and Administrator’s Evaluation System regarding DDMs to understand impact rating.  Content experts worked in groups to identify key College and Career Readiness standards to assess.  All participating districts sent a team armed with the Massachusetts Curriculum Framework for ELA  Presented information from MA DESE’s Teacher and Administrator’s Evaluation System regarding DDMs to understand impact rating.  Content experts worked in groups to identify key College and Career Readiness standards to assess.

2. Develop, cont.  Content Experts decided to go in a different direction than the planners had planned…..  They identified critical criteria that they believed aligned to the CCRs they had chosen to include in the rubric.  Planners re-wrote the afternoon’s agenda to assist working groups to develop levels of competencies for each section of the rubric.  By the end of the day, groups reported out, and the group compiled the information to create a very rough rubric.  Content Experts decided to go in a different direction than the planners had planned…..  They identified critical criteria that they believed aligned to the CCRs they had chosen to include in the rubric.  Planners re-wrote the afternoon’s agenda to assist working groups to develop levels of competencies for each section of the rubric.  By the end of the day, groups reported out, and the group compiled the information to create a very rough rubric.

The Rubric – One Component

Reflection Questions: Develop Reflecting on LPVEC’s WorkIndividual Notes How did the LPVEC group’s development work benefit from engaging a regional network? What aspects of this collaborative development process feel most high leverage for your district?

3. Revise  We recognized the need to homogenize the language throughout the rubric  Curriculum Directors came together for this challenge.  Our discussions led us to the understanding that our content experts needed to have the final voice.  We posted a comment period.  We recognized the need to homogenize the language throughout the rubric  Curriculum Directors came together for this challenge.  Our discussions led us to the understanding that our content experts needed to have the final voice.  We posted a comment period.

Reflection Questions: Revise Reflecting on LPVEC’s WorkIndividual Notes How did the LPVEC group’s revision work benefit from engaging a regional network? What aspects of this collaborative revision process feel most high leverage for your district?

4. Implement  We are here!  During this pilot year, we are collecting data.  Methods for scoring include double blind scoring – this requires having anchor papers and training teachers in consistent scoring procedures.  All processes are documented for technical manual.  We are here!  During this pilot year, we are collecting data.  Methods for scoring include double blind scoring – this requires having anchor papers and training teachers in consistent scoring procedures.  All processes are documented for technical manual.

Reflection Questions: Implement Reflecting on LPVEC’s WorkIndividual Notes How do you see implementation of this collaboratively developed DDM as benefitting from the support of a regional network? What key logistical components made implementation of a collaboratively developed DDM feasible for each district? What aspects of this collaborative implementation stage feel most high leverage for your district?

Thanks! Wikispace with supporting documents: Polly Parker Director of Curriculum/Staff Development Lower Pioneer Valley Educational Collaborative

Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 21 Gallery Walk/Transition (15 mins)  Where do you see points of commonality in the development stage of other tables’ Writing-to-Text DDMs?

Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 22 Table Talk Round 2 (35 min.)  Identify and chart common priorities  Determine up to five priorities the group will work together to address.  Record up to three action steps for each priority  Who will do what, when, and how?  Where will group members meet, virtually or in- person?  Which other districts might you invite to participate?

Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 23 Whole-group share (15 min.)  Share two of the areas of the DDM development and identification process that the group chose for collaboration

Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 24 Thank you!  Please complete the evaluation form on your way out.