HALL HIGH SCHOOL Academic Indicators 1999- 2009. Students meeting or exceeding the Illinois Learning Standards (reading, math, science) 2002………………………………..43%2003………………………………..58%2004………………………………..42%2005………………………………..45%2006………………………………..48%2007…………………………

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Miami ISD Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Advertisements

The Freshman On-Track Rate: A Leading Indicator of High School Graduation John Q. Easton Consortium on Chicago School Research July 2, 2008.
Cushing ISD STAAR End-of-Course. S ENATE BILL 1031  Requires end-of-course (EOC) assessment instruments in Algebra I, Algebra II, Geometry, Biology,
E.T.H.S. Extra Curricular Eligibility Seminar. 2.0 Grade Point Average From the Previous Semester (Including Summer School Classes with 2nd Semester)
Dec. 14, 2010 APS BOE Workshop Graduation Requirements High School Presented By: Division of Instruction PACESetters!
EXPLORE Academic Results 8 th Grade EXPLORE Test Results #1.
PACT Tests Administration Guide. What is the PACT Test? Palmetto Achievement Challenge Test Standards-based accountability For curriculum and teaching.
WHAT DO SMARTER QUESTIONS LOOK LIKE? COMPUTER ADAPTIVE TEST: ENGLISH.
Madison Rose Lane School School Improvement Plan.
1. 2 What tests will students have to take? High School COURSES with EOCs MathEnglishScienceSoc. Studies Algebra I Geometry Algebra II Eng. I-R&W Eng.
Average National Arabic Scale Scores for Grade 1 By Gender MalesFemales Grade Level Scale Score 550.
Evelyn CP School Foundation Stage Results (Specific Learning Goals – Reading, Writing and Number) Reading (Expected) 77%85% Writing (Expected)
Scientific Literacy College Success & Retention Work Hard STEM Programs STEM.
End of Course Assessments School Year English Language Arts, Math, Biology, and Government.
East Moriches UFSD New York State School Report Cards May 24, School Year.
EXPLORE and PLAN College Readiness Benchmark Scores The EXPLORE and PLAN College Readiness Benchmark Scores are based on the ACT College Readiness Benchmark.
State law and the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act require Report Cards for every local school, every school district and for the state.
1 Students in US Public Schools Taught by Teachers with No Major or Certification in the Subject Taught, DisciplineGrades 5-8Grades 9-12 Mathematics69%31%
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
HALL HIGH SCHOOL Academic Indicators Students meeting or exceeding the Illinois Learning Standards (reading, math, science) 2002………………………………..43%2003………………………………..58%2004………………………………..42%2005………………………………..45%2006………………………………..48%2007…………………………
Department of Research and Planning November 14, 2011.
Average National Arabic Scale Scores for Grades 1, 2 and 3 by School Type Grade Level Scale Score Grade Level Scale.
Welcome to My IEP Name Grade Date. Introduction Purpose of the Meeting The Purpose of this meeting is to determine if I continue to qualify for Special.
Comparisons of independent schools across time: QCEA 2005, 2006, and 2007 Key assumptions Summary of Results Arabic: All students, and independent school.
Slide 1 1. Profile Summary Report: Presentation Packet 2. Item Response Summary Report 3. Profile Summary Report Three reports to analyze student performance.
Academic Achievement Highlights San Francisco Unified School District August 2013.
Brad McMillen and Sonya Stephens Data and Accountability September 19, 2013.
OCTORARA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT 2014 Standardized Testing Data Review 11/17/2014 MAXIMIZING OPPORTUNITIES FOR SUCCESS.
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Lockhart Independent School District December
EXPLORE What is the EXPLORE? An assessment of academics as well as career interests. An assessment of academics as well as career interests. You will.
AIMS This test is to ensure student progress but what does it all mean?!?!
Stillman Valley High School S chool I mprovement P lan.
PSLE Performance (STANDARD) Subject NA 09 1 English Mathematics Science Chinese Malay
Gateway Academy to Innovation and Technology Offering TWO new Academies Fall 2014: Health Science & Engineering.
 Educator Effectiveness System  Comparative Measures  Resource for Professional Development.
Globalization. Innovation. Graduation.  Transition to Five Achievement Levels  School Performance Grades (A–F)  EVAAS as a Tool NC READY ACCOUNTABILITY.
Test Scores Comparison completed using Spring CRCT reports Natalie Hayes.
Millbrae Elementary School District
Why is it important to do your best on the ACT® test?
Illinois.
Beresford School District Report Card Data 16-17
Jackson County ACT Aspire for Grade 10
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
Evelyn CP School - Foundation Stage Results
You can use slides from this power point for your meetings with parents, students, and educators and school board members to talk about college and career.
Prepare for the ACT now! Hazelwood Central High School Library
Texas Academic Performance Report
EYFS Attainment 1. Levels % Good Level of Development England School
Embargoed Official 2018 MCAS Results
SVC Students: Who are they
ESSA School Index Reports
Mr. Joe M. Ximenez Board Presentation February 19, 2013
CAASPP Results Kern County.
Student STAARs.
INSTITUTE FOR RECRUITMENT OF TEACHERS
CLASS- 6 CLASS- 6 SYLLABUS – unit-2 SUBJECTS SYLLABUS ENGLISH
Education Services October 3, 2017.
CLASS- 4 CLASS- 4 SYLLABUS – Unit-2 SUBJECTS SYLLABUS ENGLISH
“Day D” April 15, 2016 LUNCH (2nd lunch) English Science Math
Barling Report to the public 2017
Year 5 Beat It.
Year 4 Beat It.
Year 3 Beat It.
MATH TALK POWER NUMBER 64 Set 1.
MATH TALK POWER NUMBER 27.
MATH TALK POWER NUMBER 36.
MATH TALK POWER NUMBER 25.
MATH TALK POWER NUMBER 64 Set 2.
Student First & Last Name + Senior (Graduation Year)
MATH TALK POWER NUMBER 16.
Presentation transcript:

HALL HIGH SCHOOL Academic Indicators

Students meeting or exceeding the Illinois Learning Standards (reading, math, science) 2002………………………………..43%2003………………………………..58%2004………………………………..42%2005………………………………..45%2006………………………………..48%2007………………………………..46%2008………………………………..51% 2009………………………………. 48%

ACT Scores Class of English Reading Math Science Comp Class of English Reading Math Science Comp * *---- first year all students were tested

Graduation Rate 1999……………..89% 2006……………92% 2000……………..88% 2007……………95% 2001……………..84% 2008……………82% 2002……………..91% cut score (75%) 2003……………..79% 2009……………83% 2004……………..88%2005……………..82%

Attendance Rate 1999……………..94% 2006……………95% 2000……………..95% 2007……………97% 2001……………..96% 2008……………99% 2002……………..97% 2009……………90% 2003……………..96% 2010…………… 2004……………..94%2005……………..96%

Students meeting or exceeding the Illinois Learning Standards- Reading 2001………………………………..58%2002………………………………..46%2003………………………………..58%2004………………………………..49%2005………………………………..51%2006………………………………..50%2007………………………………..43%2008………………………………..53% 2009……………………………… 55% (70%)

Students EXCEEDING the Illinois Learning Standards- Reading 2001………………………………..4%2002………………………………..8%2003………………………………..6%2004………………………………..6%2005………………………………..11%2006………………………………..11%2007…………………………………5%2008…………………………….10% 2009……………………………. 7%

Students meeting or exceeding the Illinois Learning Standards- Mathematics 2001………………………………..54%2002………………………………..33%2003………………………………..56%2004………………………………..39%2005………………………………..40%2006………………………………..44%2007………………………………..48%2008………………………….…50% 2009…………………..……..…45% (70%)

Students EXCEEDING the Illinois Learning Standards- Mathematics 2001………………………………..2%2002………………………………..3%2003………………………………..4%2004………………………………..1%2005………………………………..1%2006………………………………..3%2007………………………………..6%2008……………………………4.5%2009……………………………2%

Students meeting or exceeding the Illinois Learning Standards- Science 2001………………………………..50%2002………………………………..35%2003………………………………..51%2004………………………………..39%2005………………………………..45%2006………………………………..46%2007………………………………..47%2008……………………………48% 2009……………………………41% (70%)

Students EXCEEDING the Illinois Learning Standards- Science 2001………………………………..7%2002………………………………..6%2003………………………………..7%2004………………………………..5%2005………………………………..10%2006………………………………..5%2007………………………………..6%2008……………………………….6%2009……………………………….2%