Cryogenic Summary - K. C. Wu Testing D2L102 in MAGCOOLJune, 02 Difference between D2L102 and D2L101 Operating Summary Cooldown to 100 K and 6 K Test Condition.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Refrigerators.
Advertisements

Refrigeration Flow Control
Focus Coil Update Roy Preece / Tom Bradshaw / Mike Courthold STFC – RAL VC 17 th Jan 2013.
The Use of Small Coolers for Hydrogen and Helium Liquefaction
1 Cooling the Hydrogen (Helium) Absorbers with Small Coolers Michael A. Green University of Oxford Department of Physics Oxford OX1 3RH, UK MICE Video.
Magnet Cooldown Scheme 17 th February 2012 Roy Preece (STFC RAL)
AMS-02 Cryosystem Phase III Flight Safety Review January 12, 2010 Phil Mott.
Coupling Coil Test Facility Update Ruben Carcagno Fermilab September 20, 2012.
February 17-18, 2010 R&D ERL Roberto Than R&D ERL Cryogenics Roberto Than February 17-18, 2010 CRYOGENICS.
Design pressure issues of Super-FRS dipole CrYogenic Department in Common System (CSCY), GSI, Darmstadt Yu Xiang, Hans Mueller* * Primay Beam Magnet Technology.
9 June 2006MICE CM-15 Fermilab1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel and Tracker Magnets since CM-14 Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
1 Superconducting Magnets for the MICE Channel Michael A. Green Oxford University Physics Department Oxford OX1-3RH, UK.
MICE Hydrogen System Implementation Tom Bradshaw Elwyn Baynham Iouri Ivaniouchenkov Jim Rochford.
Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication & Testing Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE CM24 at RAL June 1, 2009.
MICE collaboration meeting RAL 28 October 2004 Absorber R & D Plan by Wing Lau – Oxford University.
Update Hardware for conductive cooling of the quench resistors has been fabricated at LBNL. Preparation for installation to start this week. Installation.
Hydronic Mechanical Controls
ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle for the US Department of Energy Commissioning and Operation of the Horizontal Test Apparatus at SNS Presented at: CEC/ICMC.
CASIPP Design of Cryogenic Distribution System for CFETR CS model coil Division of Cryogenic Engineering and Technical Institute of Plasma Physics Chinese.
Fcal upgrade for sLHC: Cryogenics modifications – TE-CRG/ C.Fabre 1 ATLAS FCal Upgrade for sLHC: Modifications to the Calorimeter Cryogenic.
Learning, our way Examples of bad installation. CONTENT Installation related examples Installation related examples Application related examples Application.
Spectrometer Solenoid Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Roy Preece Rutherford Appleton Lab October 28, 2011 MICE Collaboration Meeting.
23 Jan 2007 LASA Cryogenics Global Group 1 ILC Cryomodule piping L. Tavian for the cryogenics global group.
LARP LQX and MQX Magnets Cryogenic Testing at Fermilab’s Industrial Building 1 Roger Rabehl Technical Division/Test & Instrumentation Department.
SOFT 2004 OVERVIEW OF CRYOGENIC TECHNOLOGY FOR THE THERMONUCLEAR FUSION P. DAUGUET, M. BONNETON, P. BRIEND, F. DELCAYRE, B. HILBERT, A. RAVEX Air Liquide.
ESS Cryogenic Distribution System for the Elliptical Linac MBL/HBL - CDS requirements Preliminary Design Review Meeting, 20 May 2015, ESS, Lund, Sweden.
LQS01 Test Preparation and Test Plan LARP Collaboration Meeting 12 LBNL - April 8-10, 2009.
CRYOGENICS FOR MLC Cryogenic Cooldown Scheme Eric Smith External Review of MLC October 03, October 2012Cryogenics for MLC1.
Utilities 14 October 2008 Martin Nordby, Gordon Bowden.
Cryomodule Helium Vessel Pressure -- a Few Additional Comments Tom Peterson 18 November 2007.
Spectrometer Solenoid Test Plan Workshop: Spectrometer Solenoid Overview Steve Virostek - LBNL February 17, 2012.
CRYOGENICS FOR MLC Cryogenic Piping in the Module Eric Smith External Review of MLC October 03, October 2012Cryogenics for MLC1.
Superconducting IR Magnets CHEN, Fusan May 11, 2007.
CM1 Thermal Cycle CM1 Warmup –1/4/12 (Wed.) to 1/6/12 (Fri.) (~50 hours) –Verified turbo interlock system works CM1 Cooldown –Began 1/9/12 (Monday) –At.
ERL: G-5/e-Gun Cryogenic & Pressure Safety Committee Review ERL G-5/e-gun Beam Line Vacuum Failure Analysis April 24, 2009.
Hall D Target System Review J. FochtmanSeptember 28,2011 Preliminary Design Work.
Solar Heating/Cooling/Dehumidifier Systems
1 HIGH ENERGY ACCELERATOR RESEARCH ORGANIZATION KEKB Review Committee/ NAKAI Hirotaka KEK Crab Cavity - Cryogenics - KEKB Crab Cavity Group - presented.
He3 dilution refrigerator
9/17/07IRENG071 Cryogenic System for the ILC IR Magnets QD0 and QF1 K. C. Wu - BNL.
Process Definition of the Operation Modes for Super-FRS Magnet Testing CSCY - CrYogenic department in Common System, GSI, Darmstadt Y. Xiang, F. Wamers.
Luigi Serio CRYOGENICS PERFORMANCE AND OPERATION L. Serio, on behalf of the LHC Cryogenics Operation and Cryogenics Performance Panel.
1 Small Coolers for MICE Michael A. Green University of Oxford Department of Physics Oxford OX1 3RH, UK MICE Collaboration Meeting RAL.
MAGNET#1MAGNET#2MAGNET#3 SATELLITE VB#1 SATELLITE VB#2 SATELLITE VB#3 PRECOOLER#1PRECOOLER#2 DISTRIBUTION VALVE BOX DVB CP#1CP#3CP#2 BUFFER DEWAR LHe 5m.
Cryogenic scheme, pipes and valves dimensions U.Wagner CERN TE-CRG.
Date 2007/Sept./12-14 EDR kick-off-meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface definition N. Ohuchi.
NML Cryogenic System Arkadiy Klebaner Cryomodule One Commissioning June 3, 2011.
8/29/07K. C. Wu - Brookhaven National Lab1 Major Components in ILC IR Hall Interchangeable Detectors.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 CEBAF Cryo & SRF Workshop April 3, 2014 Jonathan Creel Electrical / Cryogenics Engineer Cryogenics.
Cryogenics for SuperB IR Magnets J. G. Weisend II SLAC National Accelerator Lab.
Bruno Vullierme Sept LHC-CC09 - 3rd LHC Crab Cavity Workshop Slide 1 CRAB CAVITY INTEGRATION CRYOGENICS INSTALLATION.
MICE CC TEST, IN PROGRESS M. Tartaglia For the FNAL/LBNL Test Team 9/27/13.
Michael A. Green and Heng Pan
LCLS-II Technical Requirements
Design of the thermosiphon Test Facilities 2nd Thermosiphon Workshop
Cryogenic behavior of the cryogenic system
Cryogenic Heater Controls in C100 Cryomodules
What is Desuperheater Water heater and its Applications?
Small Coolers for MICE MICE Collaboration Meeting RAL Michael A. Green
What are the Symptoms of a Bad Car AC Expansion Valve
Mathew C. Wright October 2016
SHMS Cryogenics and Q2(Q3Dipole) Cool Down
Hot Water Systems Cylinders and Systems.
ESS elliptical cryomodule
Cryogenics – The Basics
Cryogenic behavior of the magnet
ESR2 Process Cycle Design
Cryogenics – The Basics
ESR2 Process Cycle Design
Presentation transcript:

Cryogenic Summary - K. C. Wu Testing D2L102 in MAGCOOLJune, 02 Difference between D2L102 and D2L101 Operating Summary Cooldown to 100 K and 6 K Test Condition – 12 atm, 4.50 K (force flow) Test Condition – 1.43 atm, 4.65 K (liquid cool) Discussion and Summary

Difference between D2L102 and D2L101 D2L102 reached 7500 A without quench using either force flow cooling (at ~ 4.50 K) or liquid helium cool (at ~ 4.65 K). The cryogenic test condition for D2L102 is basically the same as that for D2L101 Following improvements on the Feed Can are made for D2L102 –Reduce heat load to lead pots by connecting flow controller to two unused leads –Set up 1.23% slope for test bay –Install a jumper pipe to allow filling liquid helium from low elevation end (not used in this test) –Install superinsulation around the end of beam tubes and D2 end volume

Flow diagram for D2L102 – Capable of Feeding LHe from either high or low elevation ends

Operating Summary 6/1-3 Cooldown to 100 K 6/3-4 Cooldown to 6 K 6/4 Reach 6 K 6/4Test D2 via force flow cooling 6/5-6Switch to liquid cool 6/6-7Test D2 in liquid helium

Test Conditions Force flow cooling 12 atm, 4.50 K & 60 g/s Liquid helium cooling 1.43 atm & ~ 4.65 K in D2, Liquid level in end volume high elevation end: 75% (6 cm above coil) low elevation end: 95% (16 cm above coil) JT Valve Inlet condition: 12 atm & 4.0 K Liquid after expansion ~ 90 %

Sectional view of D2 with liquid level in high elevation end (left), Level gauge in end volume (right)

Tests Performed - D2L102 1 st test group (force flow cooling ~ 4.50 K), Shut off A(6/4) Strip Heater A(6/4) 1 st quench– 5944 A(6/4) 2 nd quench – 7213 A(6/5) Ramp– 7500 A (6/5) (at 7500 A ~ 30 min.) (Strip Heater due to P. S. fault) 2 nd test group (liquid cool ~ 4.65 K), Ramping A(6/6) Strip Heater A (6/7) Ramp A(6/7) (4 times) Quench A(6/7) (at 7500 A ~ 30 min.) (Strip Heater due to P. S. fault)

Cooldown from 300 – 100 K for D2L K Cooldown time ~ 43 hours compared with ~ 54 hours for D2L101. Faster cooldown rate is achieved using 60 g/s of helium flow compared with 45 g/s previously used. Note 60 g/s is essentially the maximum flow for MAGCOOL cooldown I.

Operating Condition for 100 K Cooldown of D2L102

Cooldown from 100 – 6 K for D2L102 Cooldown time (100 to 6 K) is ~ 17 hours compared with ~ 24 hours for D2L101. Faster cooldown rate is due to 1). temperature of D2L102 at the end of cooldown I is colder, 2). helium refrigerator is loaded more and recently cleaned and 3). reduction of heat load to lead pots.

Operating Condition for D2L102 in Force Flow Cooling

Operating Condition for D2L102 – Liquid Cool

Lead Flow vs Current During Powering of D2L102

Current leads Separate flow controllers for the 7500 A leads were not installed in time, both the (+) and (-) leads are driven by the same control –Since the (-) lead demands more flow than the (+) lead, flow suitable for the (-) lead will make the warm end of the (+) lead too cold –lead flow is carefully controlled by monitoring voltage across the (-) lead and temperature in the warm end of the (+) lead Lead flow used during ramping up becomes excessive after peak current is reached –Shall gradually reduce lead flow as soon as peak current is reached

Detailed lead flow control – for both force flow and liquid cool Main leads –Separate flow control was not installed in time for test, the (+) and (-) are controlled using one input –Tare flow is set at 0.30 g/s during ramping up –Tare flow is gradually reduced to 0.20 g/s after peak current is reached –The voltage across the (-) lead is ~ V at 7500 A. –The warm end of the (+) is controlled near 30 F (assisted with heater on the flag of the lead) Unused leads –0.030 g/s of lead flow when D2 is not powered (warm end become frosty at higher flow) –0.045 – g/s during ramping

Problem and area for improvement 6/5 - during switching from force flow to liquid cool, –Vent valve air line failed and prevent valve from opening –Both high pressure and low pressure relief valves –O-ring in the bayonet of the vent line leaked –Helium enters to the room –Cryogenic system recovers after the line warm up This upset causes minor helium loss and 12 hours delay but no other damage Insulation will be installed around the vent line to prevent liquid air from dripping onto the Feed Can

Summary D2L102 is powered to 7500 A without quench using either force flow cooling at ~ 4.50 K, or liquid helium at ~ 4.65 K The cryogenic condition between two force flow cooling and liquid cool are different but the magnetic performance for D2 is the same Thermal performance of Feed Can has been improved (no more quench in superconducting bus or lead)