Feasibility study of Higgs pair creation in gamma-gamma collider Hiroshima University Nozomi Maeda 19.April 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Γγ->HH Study Report Nozomi Maeda Hiroshima Univ.
Advertisements

Feasibility study of measurement of Higgs pair creation in a gamma-gamma collider Shin-ichi Kawada Advanced Sciences of Matter, Hiroshima University LCWS11.
Higgs branching ratios study Oct Hiroaki Ono (NDU) Oct ILC Physics WG general meeting.
Current limits (95% C.L.): LEP direct searches m H > GeV Global fit to precision EW data (excludes direct search results) m H < 157 GeV Latest Tevatron.
E + e -  ttH Past Experimental (simulation) Studies and BG cross-section by MadGraph Sep physics WG meeting S. Uozumi (Shinshu)
3.Phenomenology of Two Higgs Doublet Models. Charged Higgs Bosons.
Summary of Results and Projected Sensitivity The Lonesome Top Quark Aran Garcia-Bellido, University of Washington Single Top Quark Production By observing.
September 27, 2005FAKT 2005, ViennaSlide 1 B-Tagging and ttH, H → bb Analysis on Fully Simulated Events in the ATLAS Experiment A.H. Wildauer Universität.
Heavy Flavor Production at the Tevatron Jennifer Pursley The Johns Hopkins University on behalf of the CDF and D0 Collaborations Beauty University.
The new Silicon detector at RunIIb Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96.
On the Trail of the Higgs Boson Meenakshi Narain.
S. Martí i García Liverpool December 02 1 Selection of events in the all-hadronic channel S. Martí i García CDF End Of Year Review Liverpool / December.
Top Results at CDF Yen-Chu Chen/ 陳彥竹 中央研究院物理所 Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica Taiwan, ROC For the CDF collaboration ICFP /10/03-08.
Michele Faucci Giannelli, Mike Green, Veronique Boisvert, Fabrizio Salvatore, Tao Wu LCWS 08, Chicago, 18 November 2008 Sensitivity to the Higgs self-coupling.
Michele Faucci Giannelli, Mike Green, Veronique Boisvert, Fabrizio Salvatore, Tao Wu ILD Workshop, Cambridge, 12 September 2008 Sensitivity to the Higgs.
Heavy charged gauge boson, W’, search at Hadron Colliders YuChul Yang (Kyungpook National University) (PPP9, NCU, Taiwan, June 04, 2011) June04, 2011,
1 ZH Analysis Yambazi Banda, Tomas Lastovicka Oxford SiD Collaboration Meeting
1 Simulation study of e + e -  W H + W H - Introduction Observable to be measured Analysis framework Event selection Results Rei Sasaki (Tohoku University)
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
28 April 0 Yaxian Mao, Daicui Zhou, Yves Schutz In ALICE Physics Workgroup: High p T and photons ( for ALICE collaboration -- Wuhan)
1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.
Associated top Higgs search: with ttH (H  bb) Chris Collins-Tooth, 17 June 2008.
ESFA/DESY LC Workshop 1 Klaus Mönig and Jadranka Sekaric Klaus Mönig and Jadranka Sekaric DESY - Zeuthen MEASUREMENT OF TGC IN e  COLLISIONS AT TESLA.
Precise Measurements of SM Higgs at the ILC Simulation and Analysis V.Saveliev, Obninsk State University, Russia /DESY, Hamburg ECFA Study Workshop, Valencia.
Search for Invisible Higgs Decays at the ILC Akimasa Ishikawa (Tohoku University)
Higgs Properties Measurement based on HZZ*4l with ATLAS
A.Bartl (Univ. of Vienna) W.Majerotto HEPHY (Vienna)
Sensitivity Prospects for Light Charged Higgs at 7 TeV J.L. Lane, P.S. Miyagawa, U.K. Yang (Manchester) M. Klemetti, C.T. Potter (McGill) P. Mal (Arizona)
Trilinear Gauge Couplings at TESLA Photon Collider Ivanka Božović - Jelisavčić & Klaus Mönig DESY/Zeuthen.
14-18 November, PrahaECFA/DESY Linear Collider Workshop 1 TRILINEAR GAUGE COUPLINGS AT PHOTON COLLIDER - e  mode DESY - Zeuthen Klaus Mönig and Jadranka.
Simone Gennai SNS, INFN-Pisa1 Radion searches in CMS A first look to  hh G. Dewhirst, L. Fano, S. Gennai, S. Nikitenko.
Report on LHT at the LHC ~ Some results from simulation study ~ Shigeki Matsumoto (Univ. of Toyama) 1.What kinds of LHT signals are expected, and how accurately.
Taikan Suehara, 16 th general meeting of ILC physics (Asia) wg., 2010/07/17 page 1 Model 500 GeV Taikan Suehara ICEPP, The Univ. of Tokyo.
1 Top and Tau Measurements Tim Barklow (SLAC) Oct 02, 2009.
Physics at LHC Prague, 6-12 July, 2003 R. Kinnunen Helsinki Institute of Physics A/H ->  and H + ->  in CMS R. Kinnunen Physics at LHC Prague July 6.
Higgs Reach Through VBF with ATLAS Bruce Mellado University of Wisconsin-Madison Recontres de Moriond 2004 QCD and High Energy Hadronic Interactions.
Report on ttH Analysis S. Uozumi (Kobe) R. Yonamine (GUAS) K. Fujii (KEK) Mar PhysicsWG meeting.
Feasibility of Detecting Leptoquarks With the CDF Detector Althea Moorhead Mentor: Darin Acosta.
Higgs self coupling Djamel BOUMEDIENE, Pascal GAY LPC Clermont-Ferrand.
Taikan Suehara, ILC physics mini-workshop, 2009/01/21 page 1 SUSY and Tau-pair analysis with full simulation in ILD detector model Taikan Suehara ICEPP,
Jet Tagging Studies at TeV LC Tomáš Laštovička, University of Oxford Linear Collider Physics/Detector Meeting 14/9/2009 CERN.
Feasibility study of Higgs pair production in a Photon Collider Tohru Takahashi Hiroshima University for S.Kawada, N.Maeda, K.Ikematsu, K.Fujii,Y.Kurihara,,,
AA->HH Study -Current status of AA->4b BG- Shin-ichi Kawada (AdSM, Hiroshima University) 19th General KEK (2011/1/29)1 AA->HH subgroup : Experiment.
AA->HH Study AA->4b analysis & (preliminary) Summary Shin-ichi Kawada (AdSM, Hiroshima University) 22nd General KEK (2011/9/3)1.
Higgs boson pair production in new physics models at hadron, lepton, and photon colliders October Daisuke Harada (KEK) in collaboration.
Problem about Energy optimization & BG generator AA->HH group Hiroshima Univ. Nozomi Maeda.
Hiroshima Higgs Workshop 2006, Jan. 17 – 19, 2006 Higgs Searches at the Tevatron Kazuhiro Yamamoto (Osaka City University) for the CDF Collaboration 1.Tevatron.
On the possibility of stop mass determination in photon-photon and e + e - collisions at ILC A.Bartl (Univ. of Vienna) W.Majerotto HEPHY (Vienna) K.Moenig.
ATLAS Higgs Search Strategy and Sources of Systematic Uncertainty Jae Yu For the ATLAS Collaboration 23 June, 2010.
Kinematics of Top Decays in the Dilepton and the Lepton + Jets channels: Probing the Top Mass University of Athens - Physics Department Section of Nuclear.
Particle Physics II Chris Parkes Top Quark Discovery Decay Higgs Searches Indirect mW and mt Direct LEP & LHC searches 2 nd Handout.
29 August, 2007 Ashfaq Ahmad, Search for Charged Higgs at the LHC 1 Search for Charged Higgs at the LHC Ashfaq Ahmad (Stony Brook)
Jessica Levêque Rencontres de Moriond QCD 2006 Page 1 Measurement of Top Quark Properties at the TeVatron Jessica Levêque University of Arizona on behalf.
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
Higgs pair production in a Photon Collider Tohru Takahashi Hiroshima University for S.Kawada, N.Maeda, K.Ikematsu, K.Fujii,Y.Kurihara,,, 1 LCWS12 Arlington,
Background Shape Study for the ttH, H  bb Channel Catrin Bernius First year talk 15th June 2007 Background Shape Study for the ttH 0, H 0  bb Channel.
Search for a Standard Model Higgs Boson in the Diphoton Final State at the CDF Detector Karen Bland [ ] Department of Physics,
Taikan Suehara, 15 th general meeting of ILC physics (Asia) wg., 2010/05/15 page 1 Model 500 GeV Taikan Suehara ICEPP, The Univ. of Tokyo.
Search for Invisible Higgs Decays at the ILC Ayumi Yamamoto, Akimasa Ishikawa, Hitoshi Yamamoto (Tohoku University) Keisuke Fujii (KEK)
LEP Search for Single Top production and new fermions Mario Antonelli LNF-INFN Frascati ICHEP 2002 Amsterdam on behalf of the 4- LEP experiments.
Marcello Barisonzi First results of AOD analysis on t-channel Single Top DAD 30/05/2005 Page 1 AOD on Single Top Marcello Barisonzi.
11/18/2008 Global Design Effort 1 Summary for Gamma-Gamma Mayda M. Velasco Northwestern University November 20, 2008 LCWS08 -- UIC, Chicago.
AA->HH Study Event generation & Analysis of AA->4b BG Shin-ichi Kawada (AdSM, Hiroshima University) 21st General KEK (2011/7/16)1.
Bounds on light higgs in future electron positron colliders
Discrimination of new physics models with ILC
Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835
M. Ohlerich, A. Raspiareza, W. Lohmann DESY and MPI Munich
Experimental and theoretical Group Torino + Moscow
C.M.S.:.
Presentation transcript:

Feasibility study of Higgs pair creation in gamma-gamma collider Hiroshima University Nozomi Maeda 19.April 2009

PLC in ILC Photon Linear Collider (PLC) is gamma-gamma collision option in ILC. Measurement of basic physical quantity of Higgs at PLC has been studied. e.g.)the two photon decay width of Higgs. We study feasibility of mesurement of rare process at PLC.

 ->HH final state is 2particles include loop diagram 1. This process occurs at low energy(than e + e - ). 2. contribution to cross section is different. → Can PLC measure Higgs self-coupling constant ? Measurement of Higgs self-coupling constant = SM (1+  ) by  ->HH

Energy optimization L:Luminosity  :detection efficiency  :cross section  B :background suppression Higgs mass=120GeV  =-1  =+1

Background main background is  ->WW (   ~ 90pb) cf.) Signal:  = 0.044fb 0.044fb/90pb = 4.9× background supression is necessary. (+,+), (-,-)  ->tT does not occur. Optimum energy is below tT threshold.

Simulation Framework CAIN (Luminosity) BASES/SPRING (Integration, Generation) pythia (parton shower , hadronization) Analysis Quick Detector Simulator Helas (helicity amplitude) theoretical calc. program (helicity amplitude) Signal :  ->HH BG :  ->WW

Luminosity spectrum total luminosity of photon collision = 1.26×10 35 cm -2 s -1 effective cross section(Signal) = 0.013fb → 16event/year effective cross section(BG) = 11,600fb → 1.467×10 7 event/year  B <10 -6 is required.

Analysis choose HH->4b(Branching ratio = 0.43). background:WW->4quark → reconstruct particles, and try to distinguish them. Background :  ->WW W -> ud or cs or e … Signal :  ->HH H -> bB or WW * or gg …

Event reconstruction M 1, M 2 = reconstructed particle mass M = M H or M W  2j = 2jets mass resolution choose 2jets from 4jets, and reconstruct Higgs(or W-boson) from this 2jets. → 3 combinations for 1event. → choose a combination that has the smallest  2.

 2 distribution black:HH->4b red:WW->All Selection by  2 is not enough to suppress background. → b-tagging is necessary. mass distribution Mass(GeV) choose this region  (  ->HH)×10 5  2 distribution  (  ->HH)×10 5

b-tagging by simulation We tried to b-tagging by simulation. nsig method was used. L L Interaction Point Decay of b-hadron (  L : measurement error) nsig = L/  L noffv = # of tracks that has a certain nsig. → define the jet that has a certain noffv as b-jet.

b-tagging by simulation loose b-tag : nsig = 3, noffv = 1 tight b-tag : nsig = 3, noffv = 2 Definition

Event selection If PLC runs for 10 years... 16events/year×10years×0.132 = 21events → 4.6  Background : 10,000,000event -> 0event Signal : 50,000event -> 6,607event (  Signal =0.132)

Summary We study feasibility of measurement of Higgs self- coupling constant at PLC. If Higgs mass = 120GeV, optimized photon collision energy is 270GeV. No. of Signal event is expected 16events/year with PLC parameter(TESLA optimistic). Selection by b-tagging and kinematics parameters can suppress almost  ->WW.  ->HH can be observed with 4.6  in 10 years. Next plan, consider HH->bBWW * (B.R.=0.18).

Thank you for your attention.

b-tagging by simulation loose : nsig=3, noffv=1 # of b-tagged jets = 4,  BG = 9.23×10 -5  Signal = tight : nsig=3, noffv=2 # of b-tagged jets = 4,  BG = 1.50×10 -6  Signal = backup

Event selection # of loose b-tagged jets = 4 # of tight b-tagged jets ≧ 3 particle mass > 80GeV maximum charged particle mass > 2GeV Visible energy > 200 # of loose b-tagged jets = 4 # of tight b-tagged jets ≧ 3 # of loose b-tagged jets = 4 # of tight b-tagged jets ≧ 3  2 (H) 5  B = 2.0e-7  Signal = 0.18  B = 1.2e-6  Signal = 0.17  B = 1.4e-5  Signal = 0.27

b-tagging by simulation We tried to b-tagging by simulation. nsig method was used. define the track as “ off vertex track ” if L/  L is over a certain value(nsig). define the jet as b-jet if the number of “ off vertex tracks ” in a jet is over a certain value(noffv). assuming the distance between tracks and IP, L and the measurement error,  L L L Interaction Point Decay of b-hadron nsig method

Probability of miss identify for charm quark is the highest in b-tagging.