Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Assessment Human Health Risk Assessment and Information for SRP July 28, 2009 Reeder.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Consumer Exposure Assessment at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: A ccomplishments and Opportunities for Global Collaboration Thomas Brennan.
Advertisements

Session III: Assessing Cumulative Effects of Endocrine Active Substances 9:15 - 9:30 Introduction” Rick Becker (Session Chair and Panel Moderator) 9:30.
Trichloroethylene (TCE) Toxicity Values Update Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting March 27, 2014 C. Mark Smith Ph.D., M.S. Deputy Director Office.
CE 510 Hazardous Waste Engineering
Regulatory Toxicology James Swenberg, D.V.M., Ph.D.
Carcinogen Classification Criteria Patricia Richter Ph.D., DABT Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee June 8, 2010.
Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment and Supplemental Guidance for Assessing Cancer Risks from Early-Life Exposures March 29, 2005 Hugh A. Barton,
Reeder Sams Senior Science Advisor National Center for Environmental Assessment (NCEA) Office of Research and Development (ORD) U.S. Environmental Protection.
William H. Farland, Ph.D. Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Science Office of Research and Development U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Biomarkers:
Michael H. Dong MPH, DrPA, PhD readings Human Exposure Assessment II (8th of 10 Lectures on Toxicologic Epidemiology)
Cumulative Risk Assessment for Pesticide Regulation: A Risk Characterization Challenge Mary A. Fox, PhD, MPH Linda C. Abbott, PhD USDA Office of Risk Assessment.
Toxic New Source Review Lance Ericksen Engineering Division Manager MBUAPCD.
Module 8: Risk Assessment. 2 Module Objectives  Define the purpose of Superfund risk assessment  Define the four components of the human health risk.
Sources of Uncertainty and Current Practice for Addressing Them: Toxicological Perspective David A. Bussard U.S. Environmental Protection Agency The views.
What Do Toxicologists Do?
Environmental Health XV. Risk Assessment Shu-Chi Chang, Ph.D., P.E., P.A. Assistant Professor 1 and Division Chief 2 1 Department of Environmental Engineering.
Environmental Decision-Making The Past is Prologue to the Future.
FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE
June 16-19, USEPA Cancer Guidelines: Mode of Carcinogenic Action 1 ICABR – Impacts of the Bioeconomy on Agricultural Sustainability, the Environment.
Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process Chapter 10.
TCEQ/NUATRC Air Toxics Workshop: Session V – Human Health Effects Nathan Pechacek, M.S. Toxicology Section Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
1 Uncertainty in Ecological Risk Assessments Larry Tannenbaum, U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine (USACHPPM)
Life Cycle Overview & Resources. Life Cycle Management What is it? Integrated concept for managing goods and services towards more sustainable production.
Environmental Risk Analysis
Cost-Benefit & Risk Analysis in Public Policy
Lynn H. Pottenger, PhD, DABT The Dow Chemical Company
The Role of Research in the Business of the Environmental Protection Agency Steven Bradbury, Director Environmental Fate & Effects Division Office of Pesticide.
(IAQ). What is Risk Assessment? Risk assessment: provides information on the health risk Characterizes the potential adverse health effects of human exposures.
Air Quality Management China City Mobilization Workshop Joseph Paisie USEPA Beijing, China.
Environmental Health Informatics William Sonntag Office of Environmental Information U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Presented to MIT Air Quality Symposium on Air Toxics August 4, 2004 Presented to MIT Air Quality Symposium on Air Toxics August 4, 2004 EPA Risk Assessment.
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 John Vandenberg Associate Director for Health National Center for Environmental Assessment.
The Perchlorate Contamination Challenge: EPA’s Part in Pro-Active Partnership William H. Farland, Ph.D. Director National Center for Environmental Assessment.
1 New NAAQS Review Process Briefing for EPA Staff Kevin Teichman, ORD and Lydia Wegman, OAQPS April 5, 2007.
RISK ASSESSMENT. Major Issues to be considered in designing the Study 1.- Emission Inventory What is the relative significance of the various sources.
Module 3 Risk Analysis and its Components. Risk Analysis ● WTO SPS agreement puts emphasis on sound science ● Risk analysis = integrated mechanism to.
Quantitative Assessment of Cumulative Impacts: Challenges and Progress Lauren Zeise Cal/EPA Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment CAPCOA Workshop:
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division S.T. Rao Director, NERL/AMAD U.S.
CALIFORNIA’S AIR TOXICS PROGRAM: IMPROVEMENTS TO ASSESS HEALTH RISK Update to the Air Resources Board July 24, 2014 California Environmental Protection.
Risk Assessment.
The new EC impact assessment: what for? EUROPEAN TRADE UNION CONFEDERATION Sophie Dupressoir.
Chapter 15.3 Risk Assessment 2002 WHO report: “Focusing on risks to health is the key to preventing disease and injury.” risk assessment—process of evaluating.
Air Toxics Risk Assessment: Traditional versus New Approaches Mark Saperstein BP Product Stewardship Group.
Environmental Risk Analysis Chapter 6 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternCallan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management, 4e.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
Part 1d: Exposure Assessment and Modeling Thomas Robins, MD, MPH.
DoD Comments to NRC Committee on Improvements to EPA Risk Analysis Yvonne P. Walker, MS, MSE, CIH Director, Environmental Programs Navy Environmental Health.
George M. Woodall, PhD NCEA Toxicologist Leland Urban Air Toxics Research Center October 18, 2005 EPA Reference Values: Regulatory Context.
1 Nanoscale Materials Stewardship Program Environmental Summit May 20, 2008 Jim Alwood Chemical Control Division Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
Who’s Risk Is It? Risk-Based Decision-Making in Indian Country Ms. Marilyn Null Deputy for Community-Based Programs U.S. Air Force.
NUATRC/TCEQ Air Toxics Workshop October Air Toxics Air Toxics: What We Know, What we Don’t Know, and What We Need to Know Human Health Effects –
RISK DUE TO AIR POLLUTANTS
Ozone Data and Outreach Stan Belone Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Air Quality Program.
Notice: The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and may not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental.
Environmental Risk Analysis Chapter 6 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 Elizabeth Southerland Director of Assessment & Remediation Division Office of Superfund.
Perspective on the current state-of-knowledge of mode of action as it relates to the dose response assessment of cancer and noncancer toxicity Jennifer.
Michael P. Holsapple, PhD, Fellow ATS HESI Executive Director Future of Chemical Toxicity Testing in the US Monday, 21 June 2010 National Press Club, Washington,
Abstract A step-wise or ‘tiered’ approach has been used as a rational procedure to conduct environmental risk assessments in many disciplines. The Technical.
Acute Toxicity Studies Single dose - rat, mouse (5/sex/dose), dog, monkey (1/sex/dose) 14 day observation In-life observations (body wt., food consumption,
Considerations for Developing Alternative Health Risk Assessment Approaches for Addressing Multiple Chemicals, Exposures and Effects External Review Draft.
Risk CHARACTERIZATION
HSPD-7 Critical Infrastructure Identification, Prioritization and Protection: designates EPA as the sector-specific lead agency for critical water infrastructure.
New Ecological Science Advice for Ecosystem Protection The EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office supports three external scientific advisory committees.
1 Risk Assessment for Air Toxics: The 4 Basic Steps NESCAUM Health Effects Workshop Bordentown, NJ July 30, 2008.
EPA Experience in Problem Formulation
The Clean Air Act By Jessi Walker Per 2.
Beyond Science and Decisions: Problem Formulation to Dose Response
Strategies for Integrated Human and Ecological Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Assessment Human Health Risk Assessment and Information for SRP July 28, 2009 Reeder Sams, Ph.D., Chief HPAG National Center for Environmental Assessment Office of Research and Development

National Center for Environmental Assessment Basic Principles of Risk Assessment at EPA The starting point for risk assessment is a critical analysis of available scientific information. Quantitative estimates of risk are, to the extent possible,  Biologically-motivated,  Data-driven. When there is insufficient data, default methods are used that  Protect public health,  Ensure scientific validity (i.e., scientifically plausible and extensively peer reviewed), and  Create an orderly and predictable process. Implementation of these principles involves extensive peer review.

Risk Assessment / Risk Management Dose-Response Assessment Risk Characterization Exposure Assessment Hazard Identification Risk Management Decisions Political Considerations Economic Factors Social Factors Statutory and Legal Considerations Public Health Considerations Risk Management Options

Toxicity Testing Risk Assessment Methods, Models for Extrapolation Research on Exposure Research on Mode of Action (TK/TD), dose-response, etc Dose-Response Assessments (IRIS,Criteria Docs); Communication, support Guidelines for Interpretation Data Generation Data Synthesis And Modeling Assessments Application Risk Assessments and Management EPA Labs NCER Others (e.g., NTP, NCI) NCEA/ RAF, NCER NCEA Regulatory Programs, Regions Methods, Models, Data Needs Research Assessment Application 5

Dose-response Assessment Risk Characterization Exposure Assessment Hazard Identification Risk Management Decisions Political Considerations Economic Factors Social Factors Statutory and Legal Considerations Public Health Considerations Risk Management Options Human Health Assessment at EPA NCEA occupies a critical position in EPA’s Office of Research and Development between: the researchers in ORD labs who are generating new findings and data on human health AND the risk managers in the EPA program offices and regions who must make regulatory, enforcement, and remedial action decisions

Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Assessment Conducting human health risk assessments and management of the Agency’s Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) (e.g., tetrachloroethylene [perc], methyl tertiary butyl ether [MTBE], methanol, trichloroethylene [TCE], acrylamide, inorganic arsenic and 72 others underway) Producing Integrated Science Assessments for air contaminants under Clean Air Act  Ozone – completed March 2006  Lead – completed September 2006  Particulate Matter -- underway  Nitrogen Oxides -- completed July 2008  Sulfur dioxide -- completed September 2008  Carbon Monoxide -- underway NCEA’s Human Health Assessment work focuses on:

Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Assessment Providing risk assessment research, methods, guidelines, training materials, and technical and regulatory support to EPA’s Program Offices and Regional Offices and the public  Uncertainty analysis  Identification of possible modes of action  Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetics (PBPK) Modeling  Approaches to quantification  Approaches for Assessing Risk of Environmental Exposures to Age-Susceptible Populations (children, elderly)  Less than Lifetime Assessments  Approaches for cumulative risk assessment NCEA: Human Health Assessment (continued)

EPA’s Human Health Risk Assessment Tools Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) Exposure Factors Handbook Child-Specific Exposure Factors Handbook A Framework for Assessing Health Risk of Environmental Exposures to Children Approaches for the Application of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Models and Supporting Data in Risk Assessment (Final Report) EPA’s Benchmark Dose Software (BMDS)

Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Assessment Reference Dose (RfD)/Reference Concentration (RfC) for non-cancer effects Cancer risk: Hazard characterization, oral slope factors, and oral and inhalation unit risks Improvements in transparency, public participation, and consistency The new IRIS process was established on May 21, 2009 EPA’s Integrated Risk Information System IRIS provides qualitative and quantitative health effects information on over 540 substances Addresses chronic exposures Many high-profile, first applications of risk assessment guidelines and science policy

Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Assessment Preparing for Change NAS/NRC Consultations 2007Toxicity Testing in the 21 st Century: A Vision and a Strategy 2007Applications of Toxicogenomic Technologies to Predictive Toxicology and Risk Assessment 2008Phthalates and Cumulative Risk Assessment 2008 Science and Decisions-Advancing Risk Assessment 2009Toxicity Pathway-Based Risk Assessment: Preparing for Paradigm Change, May 11-13, 2009

Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Assessment Conclusions Human health risk assessment approaches are evolving in the presence of better understanding of biological mechanisms. Significant uncertainties remain and are being addressed. Questions remain about the direction of risk assessment. Challenges for risk assessors:  Evaluate when additional data are important for decision-making  Consider the scale of assessment  Integrate information from various paradigms Concepts of risk are changing, and continue to evolve.