Identity theory. Theory of Mind : Mental states are. Something is in pain only if, and because,. The Identity Theory : Mental states are physical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Week 2, Lecture 3 Dualism: mental events, substance vs. property dualism, four arguments.
Advertisements

OBJECTIONS Functionalism. Something is a functional kind iff it can be analyzed in terms of a causal role (e.g., something is an F iff it play the F-role).
Since the laws of physics are the same in every reference frame, an object must have the same kinetic energy in all inertial reference frames. True False.
The ontological argument is based entirely upon logic and reason and doesn’t really try to give a posteriori evidence to back it up. Anselm would claim.
Philosophy of Mind Dualism: in addition to the physical/material body, there is an immaterial mind Dualism: in addition to the physical/material body,
Section 2.3 I, Robot Mind as Software.
Identity and Necessity
 French philosopher, mathematician and physical scientist (optics, physics, physiology)  Father of Early Modern Rationalist Philosophy  Early Modern.
Philosophy of Mind Matthew Soteriou. Functionalism and Qualia Critics of functionalist accounts of the mental often appeal to thought experiments in which.
Saul Kripke, “Identity and Necessity” Driving question: How are contingent identity statements possible? For example, we take it to be the case that it.
Summer 2011 Thursday, 07/07. Loose Ends: Wittgenstein’s Beetle Each of us carries a box with something that each of us calls a beetle. We can only look.
LECTURE 27 A FOURTH ARGUMENT FOR DUALISM THE “PURPLE GOO” ARGUMENT: SCORPIANS AND HUMANS.
© Michael Lacewing Hume’s scepticism Michael Lacewing
Identity and Necessity Saul Kripke. Kripke’s Puzzle How are contingent identity statements possible? –Since everything that exists is necessarily self-identical.
Modality Possible Worlds. Possibility and Necessity Triangles have three sides. The Wassermans have two kids.
Rationalism and empiricism: Key terms.  You will learn the meaning of various key terms related to rationalism and empiricism.
 Definition: The theory that mental states are really physical brain states  It is a contemporary materialist view  Materialists believe that reality.
Substance dualism: do Descartes’ arguments work? Michael Lacewing
CHURCHLAND 1 REDUCTIVE MATERIALISM also known as THE IDENTITY THEORY.
The Modal Argument. Review: The “Hard Problem”  Remember that there are three arguments that make consciousness a ‘hard’ problem. 1. Knowledge Argument.
The “Explanatory Gap” Where it is said that identity theory is not necessary false, but merely unknowable.
Laws of Nature Tooley’s Objection. The Underdetermination Objection Tooley’s example L1: Every 1-10 interaction results in a bond. L2: Every 1-10 interaction.
True/False. False True Subject May Go Here True / False ? Type correct answer here. Type incorrect answer here.
Is Belief in God Reasonable? Faith Seeking Understanding A posteriori arguments (based on experience): The teleological argument (from design) The cosmological.
Philosophy of Mind Matthew Soteriou. Physicalism The physicalist answer to the question of the relation between the mental and the physical: The mental.
Functionalism. The Pain Role : (i) An internal state, (ii) primarily caused by tissue damage, (iii) which can result from kicking, burning, etc. and (iv)
© Michael Lacewing Dualism and the Mind-Body Identity Theory Michael Lacewing
The Mind-Brain Type Identity Theory
Descartes I am essentially rational, only accidentally an animal ‘essentially’ = logically necessarily ‘essentially’ = logically necessarily Strictly speaking,
Epistemology Revision
2 March.
Substance dualism and mental causation Michael Lacewing
1. 3 x = x 3 2. K + 0 = K (3 + r) = (12 + 3) + r 4. 7 (3 + n) = n Name the Property Commutative of Multiplication Identity of Addition.
Place Identity Theory Correlation: Causation vs. Identity Token vs. Type Identity Phenomenological Fallacy Empirical Hypothesis Contingent.
© Michael Lacewing Hume and Kant Michael Lacewing co.uk.
© Michael Lacewing Substance and Property Dualism Michael Lacewing
Definitions Task – Introduction H/W Common errors – Use of Wikipedia. Use of a regular dictionary instead of a Philosophy dictionary (try Stanford Encyclopedia.
© Michael Lacewing Kant on conceptual schemes Michael Lacewing osophy.co.uk.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
OBJECTIONS Identity Theory. The Identity Theory The Identity Theory: Mental states identical to physical states of the brain. To be in pain is to have.
KNOWLEDGE IS A PRIORI AND A POSTERIORI By: Fatima Fuad Azeem.
Knowledge rationalism Michael Lacewing
Narrow narrow content Narrow content is whatever is shared by physical duplicates. It is a function (in the mathematical sense) from environments to broad.
Learning objective: To understand the objection that even if a zombie world is conceivable it may not be possible, and to evaluate how convincing this.
Identity theory. The Identity Theory : Mental states are physical states of the brain. Something is in pain only if, and because, its c-fibers are firing.
The zombie argument: objections Michael Lacewing
INTRODUCTION Identity Theory. The Identity Theory The Identity Theory: Mental states identical to physical states of the brain. To be in pain is for your.
Multiplication Timed Tests.
Mind body problem What is the relationship between mental states and the physical world? Zoltán Dienes, Philosophy of Psychology René Descartes ( )
Substance and Property Dualism
Standard and Expanded Form
The ontological argument
Arguments for The Existence of God
Truths and Possible Worlds
The Mind-Body Problem.
Minds and Bodies.
Descartes’ conceivability argument for substance dualism
The zombie argument: responses
Michael Lacewing Hume and Kant Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Rationalism.
Michael Lacewing The zombie argument Michael Lacewing
PHIL 2000 Philosophical Tools 1st Term 2016
Identity Recall Quine’s slogan: “no entity without identity”
The Mind Body Problem Our minds seem to be non-physical and different from our bodies. Our bodies seem to be something different from our minds. Are they.
True or False: Materialism and physicalism mean the same thing.
True or False: {image} is one-to-one function.
Michael Lacewing Physicalism Michael Lacewing
A Priori Arguments for God’s Existence
Тархи ба оюун \Brain and Mind\
The Mind Body Problem Our minds seem to be non-physical and different from our bodies. Our bodies seem to be something different from our minds. Are they.
Presentation transcript:

identity theory

Theory of Mind : Mental states are. Something is in pain only if, and because,. The Identity Theory : Mental states are physical states of the brain. Something is in pain only if, and because, its c-fibers are firing.

1.The Causal Objection 2.The Problem of Other Minds 3.The Super Stoic Objection 4.The Perfect Pretender Objection

necessary = true and could not have been false contingent = true, but could have been false a priori = known independently of observation a posteriori = known, but not independently of observation

The Necessity of Identity : For any x and y, if x is identical to y, then x is necessarily identical to y. Leibniz’s Law : For any x and y, if x is identical to y, then x and y have all of the same properties.

Kripke’s Argument 1)x is identical to y.[assume for CP] 2)y is necessarily identical to y. 3)[So] x is necessarily identical to y. 4)[So] If x is identical to y, then x is necessarily identical to y. 5)For any x and y, if x is identical to y, the x is necessarily identical to y.

The Modal Argument 1)If the Identity Theory is correct, then pain is identical to the firing of C-fibers. 2)If pain is identical to the firing of C-fibers, then pain is necessarily identical to the firing of C-fibers. 3)If pain is necessarily identical to firing of C-fibers, then pain could not have existed without the firing of C-fibers. 4)Pain could have existed without the firing of C-fibers. 5)The Identity Theory is incorrect.

The Parody Argument 1)If current chemical theory is correct, then water is identical to H2O. 2)If water is identical to H2O, then water is necessarily identical to H2O. 3)If water is necessarily identical to H2O, then water could not have existed without H2O. 4)Water could have existed without H2O. 5)Current chemical theory is incorrect.