MAKING INFORMAL ARGUMENTS SAMPLE TEXT SET: REALITY TV MINI-UNIT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
“10 Things Every Writer Needs to Know” Jeff Anderson ‘Practicing and Applying Motion, Models, and Focus to our Writing’ November 5, 2012.
Advertisements

Checking For Understanding
I can summarize key articles of the UDHR from previous learning
Opinion Writing in Grades 1-3: Conserving Water Adapted by Angel Peavler and Jean Wolph from NWP i3 College Ready Writers Program materials KWP RSPDI.
Should Elementary Students Have PE Everyday? Adapted from a framework developed by National Writing Project i3 College Ready Writers Program (January 2015)
Should [topic/inquiry question]? Adapted from a framework developed by National Writing Project i3 College Ready Writers Program (January 2015) A Mini-Unit.
How to write so people will agree with you.
Opinion Writing in Grades 1-3: Are Rules Important? Lesson sequence by Angel Peavler, KWP RSPDI Team A mini-unit adapted from NWP i3 College Ready Writers.
Focus on Evidence Based on work by Sabrina Back Co-Director, Mountain Writing Project, Hazard, KY (Adapted by Jean Wolph from Sabrina Back’s LDC module)
Opinion Writing in Grades 1-3: RECYCLING
Socratic Seminar #1 WHY ETHNIC STUDIES?
Writing a Persuasive Essay
Socratic Seminar #1 UNIVERSAL CONCEPT: ETHNIC STUDIES
Opinion Mini-Unit NAME / SCHOOL Lessons adapted from materials developed by Jean Wolph, Louisville Writing Project and the National Writing Project i3.
Is hip hop simply music or something more?
Opinion Writing in Grades K-3 Should _______________[insert research question]? Adapted by [name and organization, school or district] A mini-unit adapted.
Writing a Persuasive Essay
THE ARGUMENTATIVE (SYNTHESIS) ESSAY A QUICK GUIDE.
The Best Pet Adapted from materials developed by Abby Carter Second Grade Teacher South Todd Elementary Todd Co., KY.
Opinion Writing in Grades 3-5: Cell Phones in Elementary School Adapted by Jean Wolph, Kentucky Writing Project, from a materials developed by Harold Woodall,
Reality TV A mini-unit designed to introduce text-based argument drafting i3 College Ready Writers Program National Writing Project 2014.
Opinion Writing in Grades 1-3: [Topic] Adapted by Angel Peavler and Jean Wolph from NWP i3 College Ready Writers Program materials KWP RSPDI.
Teen Brains Adapted from Teen Brains mini-unit by Beth Rimer, Ohio Writing Project by Perry Public Schools teachers Beth Rimer, Ohio Writing Project for.
Close Reading Lesson “How the brain reacts” by Marcel just & tim Hayer
ERWCERWC xpository eading riting ourse. Reflective Questions  The ERWC course will increase your academic preparation for college.  The following questions.
Reflection: TOPIC: Are people naturally “good” or are they forced to be “good” by social rules and legal institutions? INTRODUCE EVIDENCE: Why do you believe.
Conclusions (in general… and for this assignment).
Opinion Writing in Grades 4-5 Adapted by Harold Woodall, EKUWP RSPDI Team.
Synthesis Unit Points for Exploration Ohhhhh!…so my sources ARE having this conversation you keep talking about!
Strategic Reading Step 2 SCAN. Review from yesterday Preview- practice with Hamlet Oedipal Complex.
Adapted from Edward Wevodau Colleyville Heritage High School.
“THE SCARLET LETTER” BY NATHANIEL HAWTHORNE ENGLISH III, UNIT 3.
Closure Activities Thurmont Middle School,
Introduction to the ERWC (Expository Reading and Writing Course)
School Start Time Adapted from a presentation by Tom Fox, National Writing Project (June 16, 2014) A Mini-Unit on Teaching Argument.
Charting New Territory Helping Students Understand Argument MOSAICS Academy February 11, 2013.
Reading Strategies Marking the Text: METACOGNITIVE MARKERS.
Lisa Johnson Lincoln County Middle School Language Arts.
Beginning Synthesis Figurative Language, Outlining.
Opening the Door to Argument: Short Sequences that Engage Students Jean Wolph, Louisville Writing Project and i3 College Ready Writers Leadership Team.
Opinion Mini-Unit Cyndi Wiles & Kristi Britt / NTES Lessons adapted from materials developed by Jean Wolph, Louisville Writing Project and the National.
Socratic Seminar By participating in Scholars will practice academic behavior and language that will be expected in a 21 st century classroom & worksplace.
Individual Rights vs. Group Rights: Are the rights of the individual more important than the common good?
The american dream.
Study: Reading Key to Success. Before reflection Before reading “______(article title)_______,” I should reflect on how I feel about reading and how much.
TLCD PRACTICE. FIND THIS QUOTE IN THE TEXT “Ironically, putting principles first is the key to doing better in all other centers” (Covey 26).
+ Drafting Paper Two Monday, October Working with Supplemental Texts/Discussing Connections Pair up and discuss the two texts you chose and the.
The College Ready Writers Program Monett School District at Missouri State University presents.
Smart Reading Strategies Webinar Presentation. How to use this recording Watch Do activities Webinar slides & further resources:
Argumentative Essay with a Counterargument. Argumentative Essay  Your Salem Witch essay is a one-sided argument  Your thesis statement answers the question:
Unit 2: Reading Strategically Session 1 Everything in RED font needs to be copied into your Reader’s Notebook!! Put the date at the top of a new sheet!
The Argumentative Essay Introducing the Counter-Argument.
Lisa Johnson Lincoln County Middle School Language Arts Lessons created using a process developed by the National Project i3 College Ready Writers Program.
ARGUMENT IS EVERYWHERE! Using the Writer’s Notebook in Routine Argument Writing A process designed to introduce and reinforce argument writing i3 College.
Module 4 Unit 1. Lesson 1 Reading and Talking with Peers: A Carousel of Photos and Texts about…
Making Informal Arguments
Higher Education What are your thoughts about the cost of higher education and its accessibility for all students?
Tuesday, September 3, 2013 Objective: I can ask open-ended research questions and develop a plan for answering them. (22a) Language objective: I can write.
What Should We Do About Homelessness?
Connecting Evidence to a Claim was developed by Jean Wolph.
Socratic Seminar By participating in
Having Second Thoughts
Meaningful Discourse that Cultivates Understanding
How to write so people will agree with you.
Session 4: Studying the Decisions of Memoirists
Wednesday, April 20 QW – 5 minutes – ½ page Driverless Cars-
Connecting Evidence to a Claim was developed by Jean Wolph.
Week of March
They Say/I Say: The Secret Ingredient Melissa Bergman and Jess Shumake
Reading Reactions Write about what is happening in your book
Presentation transcript:

MAKING INFORMAL ARGUMENTS SAMPLE TEXT SET: REALITY TV MINI-UNIT

Notebook READINGWRITING

QUICK-WRITE WRITING: Write your first reaction to the words Reality TV. It can be about your interaction with Reality TV, how you feel about Reality TV, what you’ve heard about Reality TV, etc.

TEXT #1 READING: In the reading side of the notebook, create a T-chart: I See (images, words, color, placement) I Say (what are you thinking about Reality TV based on what you see)

TEXT #1 ADD TO WRITING: - Add to your initial writing about Reality TV with new information from the image. Sentence frames: - This image makes me question… - Now I am thinking… - I’m wondering… - Just as I was thinking earlier…

TEXT #2 READING: As you read through the text, mark key insights and important facts: Put a * (star) by key insights from the research Use an F to mark facts that seem important or compelling Choose two or three places you marked in the text and respond to these in your READING NOTES.

TEXT #2 ADD TO WRITING: Add to your writing about Reality TV with new information from the research. Include references to specific insights and facts from their research as you add to your writing. Sentence frames: - On the other hand… - A different way of looking at… - This ____ makes me wonder… - Further supporting my thinking is… - Something I never considered is…

TEXT #3 Read through the text a first time: Underline/highlight lines or thoughts that stick out because they support, challenge, or extend your thinking about Reality TV.

TEXT #3 Read through the text a second time: Code the text for argument elements: C = claim being made R = reasons E = evidence and/or explanation CC = counterclaim

TEXT #3 Respond to two or three underlines or codes in your READING NOTES, using the following chart: It Says (write actual lines from the text here) I Say (write your response and response and thinking to the text lines)

TEXT #3 ADD TO WRITING: Add to your writing about Reality TV with new information from the article. Include specific lines as you add to your writing. Sentence frames: I understand,…However, I still… In some ways I still believe…but… Although this article states… I used to think,…but now I am thinking…

Composing an Argument On an index card, compose a claim based on your reading and writing about Reality TV. Using your previous writing as a resource, create a “fast draft” of an argument based on your claim about Reality TV.

Reflecting on Our Writing Experience Below your fast draft, jot some quick notes about your writing experience:  What was easy about composing this fast draft?  What was challenging about composing this fast draft?  What were some things you did as a writer, which you might have to teach students how to do? Turn and talk with a partner: share what you found easy and challenging (perhaps share some of your writing to illustrate your experience).