Although this work was reviewed by EPA and approved for publication, it may not necessarily reflect official Agency policy Jonathan Pleim, Shawn Roselle,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
POMI Po Valley Model Intercomparison Exercise CAMx model overview In cooperation with AMA - MI.
Advertisements

U.S. EPA Office of Research & Development October 25, 2011 Prakash Bhave, Golam Sarwar, Havala Pye, George Pouliot, Heather Simon, Jeffrey Young, Chris.
VISTAS Modeling Overview May 25, 2004 Mt. Cammerer, Great Smoky Mtns. National Park.
MODELING CHEMICALLY REACTIVE AIR TOXICS IN THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA USING CAMx Chris Emery, Greg Yarwood and Ed Tai ENVIRON International Corporation.
Incorporation of the Model of Aerosol Dynamics, Reaction, Ionization and Dissolution (MADRID) into CMAQ Yang Zhang, Betty K. Pun, Krish Vijayaraghavan,
Improving the Representation of Atmospheric Chemistry in WRF William R. Stockwell Department of Chemistry Howard University.
Atmospheric modelling activities inside the Danish AMAP program Jesper H. Christensen NERI-ATMI, Frederiksborgvej Roskilde.
Atmospheric Mercury Simulation with CMAQ Version Russ Bullock - NOAA Air Resources Laboratory* Kathy Brehme - Computer Sciences Corp. 5 th Annual.
Next Gen AQ model Need AQ modeling at Global to Continental to Regional to Urban scales – Current systems using cascading nests is cumbersome – Duplicative.
Session 9, Unit 17 UAM and CAMx. UAM and CAMx UAM - Urban Airshed Model Currently available versions:  UAM-V 1.24  UAM-V 1.30  Available from Systems.
CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.
Template CAMx Ancillary Input Development Chris Emery ENVIRON International Corporation, Novato CA November 14, 2012.
1 CCOS Seasonal Modeling: The Computing Environment S.Tonse, N.J.Brown & R. Harley Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University Of California at Berkeley.
Development of WRF-CMAQ Interface Processor (WCIP)
A Modeling Investigation of the Climate Effects of Air Pollutants Aijun Xiu 1, Rohit Mathur 2, Adel Hanna 1, Uma Shankar 1, Frank Binkowski 1, Carlie Coats.
Modelling the Canadian Arctic and Northern Air Quality using GEM-MACH Wanmin Gong and Stephen Beagley Science and Technology Branch Environment Canada.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology University of California, Riverside Bourns College of Engineering Evaluation and Intercomparison of N.
WRAP Update. Projects Updated 1996 emissions QA procedures New evaluation tools Model updates CB-IV km MM5 Fugitive dust NH 3 emissions Model.
1 Recent Advances in the Modeling of Airborne Substances George Pouliot Shan He Tom Pierce.
Implementation of the Particle & Precursor Tagging Methodology (PPTM) for the CMAQ Modeling System: Mercury Tagging 5 th Annual CMAS Conference Research.
Jonathan Pleim 1, Robert Gilliam 1, and Aijun Xiu 2 1 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division, NOAA, Research Triangle Park, NC (In partnership with the.
Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling System CMAQ Air Quality Data Summit February 2008.
Preliminary Study: Direct and Emission-Induced Effects of Global Climate Change on Regional Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter K. Manomaiphiboon 1 *, A.
Rick Saylor 1, Barry Baker 1, Pius Lee 2, Daniel Tong 2,3, Li Pan 2 and Youhua Tang 2 1 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Air Resources Laboratory.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Carolina Environmental Programs Models-3 Adel Hanna Carolina Environmental Program University of North Carolina.
Adaptation and Application of the CMAQ Modeling System for Real-time Air Quality Forecasting During the Summer of 2004 R. Mathur, J. Pleim, T. Otte, K.
Using CMAQ-AIM to Evaluate the Gas-Particle Partitioning Treatment in CMAQ Chris Nolte Atmospheric Modeling Division National Exposure Research Laboratory.
Prakash Bhave, Shawn Roselle, Frank Binkowski, Chris Nolte, Shaocai Yu, Jerry Gipson, & Ken Schere CMAS Conference – Paper #6.8 Chapel Hill, NC, October.
Assimilating AIRNOW Ozone Observations into CMAQ Model to Improve Ozone Forecasts Tianfeng Chai 1, Rohit Mathur 2, David Wong 2, Daiwen Kang 1, Hsin-mu.
Application of the CMAQ-UCD Aerosol Model to a Coastal Urban Site Chris Nolte NOAA Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division Research Triangle Park, NC 6.
Office of Research and Development Atmospheric Modeling Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory WRF-CMAQ 2-way coupled system: Part I David Wong,
Progress Towards a WRF- Chemistry Air Quality Prediction Model Georg A Grell With help from John Michalakes, Wei Wang, Tania Smirnova, Stu McKeen.
Session 5, CMAS 2004 INTRODUCTION: Fine scale modeling for Exposure and risk assessments.
U.S. EPA and WIST Rob Gilliam *NOAA/**U.S. EPA
An Exploration of Model Concentration Differences Between CMAQ and CAMx Brian Timin, Karen Wesson, Pat Dolwick, Norm Possiel, Sharon Phillips EPA/OAQPS.
William G. Benjey* Physical Scientist NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division Research Triangle Park, NC Fifth Annual CMAS.
Jonathan Pleim 1, Shawn Roselle 1, Prakash Bhave 1, Russell Bullock 1, William Hutzell 2, Deborah Luecken 2, Chris Nolte 1, Golam Sarwar 2, Ken Schere.
CMAQ Model Development: Current Model Configuration and Future Plans
Template Reducing Vertical Transport Over Complex Terrain in Photochemical Grid Models Chris Emery, Ed Tai, Ralph Morris, Greg Yarwood ENVIRON International.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling Division Photo image area measures 2” H x 6.93” W and can.
Evaluation of Models-3 CMAQ I. Results from the 2003 Release II. Plans for the 2004 Release Model Evaluation Team Members Prakash Bhave, Robin Dennis,
Diagnostic Study on Fine Particulate Matter Predictions of CMAQ in the Southeastern U.S. Ping Liu and Yang Zhang North Carolina State University, Raleigh,
THE MODELS-3 COMMUNITY MULTI- SCALE AIR QUALITY (CMAQ) MODEL: 2002 RELEASE – NEW FEATURES Jonathan Pleim, Francis Binkowski, Robin Dennis, Brian Eder,
Seasonal Modeling of the Export of Pollutants from North America using the Multiscale Air Quality Simulation Platform (MAQSIP) Adel Hanna, 1 Rohit Mathur,
Extending Size-Dependent Composition to the Modal Approach: A Case Study with Sea Salt Aerosol Uma Shankar and Rohit Mathur The University of North Carolina.
New Features of the 2003 Release of the CMAQ Model Jonathan Pleim 1, Gerald Gipson 2, Shawn Roselle 1, and Jeffrey Young 1 1 ASMD, ARL, NOAA, RTP, NC 2.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Carolina Environmental Programs Community Modeling and Analysis System (CMAS) Year 3 Adel Hanna Director, CMAS.
Robert W. Pinder, Alice B. Gilliland, Robert C. Gilliam, K. Wyat Appel Atmospheric Modeling Division, NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, in partnership with.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division October 21, 2009 Evaluation of CMAQ.
Further Developments and Applications for the Adjoint of CMAQ
Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division,
Office of Research and Development | National Exposure Research Laboratory Atmospheric Sciences Modeling and Analysis Division |Research Triangle Park,
___________________________________________________________________________CMAQ Basics ___________________________________________________Community Modeling.
Operational Evaluation and Model Response Comparison of CAMx and CMAQ for Ozone & PM2.5 Kirk Baker, Brian Timin, Sharon Phillips U.S. Environmental Protection.
VISTAS Modeling Overview Oct. 29, 2003
W. T. Hutzell 1, G. Pouliot 2, and D. J. Luecken 1 1 Atmospheric Modeling Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Implementation of an Online Photolysis Module in CMAQ 4.7 Christopher G. Nolte.
MRPO Technical Approach “Nearer” Term Overview For: Emissions Modeling Meteorological Modeling Photochemical Modeling & Domain Model Performance Evaluation.
Sensitivity of PM 2.5 Species to Emissions in the Southeast Sun-Kyoung Park and Armistead G. Russell Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of PM.
Jonathan Pleim NOAA/ARL* RTP, NC A NEW COMBINED LOCAL AND NON-LOCAL PBL MODEL FOR METEOROLOGY AND AIR QUALITY MODELING * In Partnership with the U.S. Environmental.
Higher Resolution Operational Models
On the Verification of Particulate Matter Simulated by the NOAA-EPA Air Quality Forecast System Ho-Chun Huang 1, Pius Lee 1, Binbin Zhou 1, Jian Zeng 6,
Office of Research and Development Atmospheric Modeling Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory WRF-CMAQ 2-way Coupled System: Part II Jonathan.
PREMAQ: A New Pre-Processor to CMAQ for Air Quality Forecasting Tanya L. Otte*, George Pouliot*, and Jonathan E. Pleim* Atmospheric Modeling Division U.S.
Development of a Multipollutant Version of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System Shawn Roselle, Deborah Luecken, William Hutzell,
Changes to the Multi-Pollutant version in the CMAQ 4.7
Deborah Luecken and Golam Sarwar U.S. EPA, ORD/NERL
Some thoughts on future air quality models from a WRF-Chem modeler
7th Annual CMAS Conference
CMAQ model as a tool for generating input data for HM and POP modeling
Presentation transcript:

Although this work was reviewed by EPA and approved for publication, it may not necessarily reflect official Agency policy Jonathan Pleim, Shawn Roselle, Jeffrey Young, Gerald Gipson, Prakash Bhave, Rohit Mathur USEPA/ORD NOAA/ARL Research Triangle Park, NC New Developments in The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Model

Outline  Two development tracks Community version Community version Air Quality Forecasting version Air Quality Forecasting version Synergistic development Synergistic development  New features of 2004 release  Future developments

Two Tracks  Community version Annual public releases (via CMAS) Annual public releases (via CMAS) Designed for retrospective modeling for policy and research Designed for retrospective modeling for policy and research Multiple configurations Multiple configurations  Air Quality Forecasting Operational Ozone and PM forecasts Operational Ozone and PM forecasts Integrated with NCEP forecast systems Integrated with NCEP forecast systems Single optimized configuration Single optimized configuration

CMAQ Modeling System SMOKE Anthro and Biogenic Emissions processing Fifth Generation Mesoscale Model (MM5) (WRF in 2005) CMAQ AQ Model- Chemical-Transport Computations Met-Chem Interface Processor (MCIP) Met. data prep NOAA Weather Observations EPA Emissions Inventory Hourly 3-D Gridded Chemical Concentrations

Eta-CMAQ AQF System PREMAQ Processor- Emissions, Met. data prep NCEP Mesoscale Meteorological Model (Eta) CMAQ AQ Model- Chemical-Transport Computations Eta-Postprocessor- Vertical interpolations Product Generator- Horizontal interpolations Weather Observations EPA Emissions Inventory Hourly 3-D Gridded Chemical Concentrations

WRF-CMAQ AQF System (coming in 2005) PREMAQ Processor- Emissions, Met. data prep NCEP Mesoscale Meteorological Model (WRF-NMM) CMAQ AQ Model- Chemical-Transport Computations Weather Observations EPA Emissions Inventory Hourly 3-D Gridded Chemical Concentrations

Synergistic Development Community release AQF system Faster gas-phase chemical solver (EBI) Aerosol model upgrades And efficiency improvements Modified minimum K z Updated Chem Mechanism (CB4) (coming in 2005) Mass conservation scheme New Photolysis model Fast TUV (coming in 2005) Modified cloud cover and convective cloud transport

CMAQ upgrades  The 2003 release and the 2004 release can be viewed as two parts of a comprehensive upgrade of the CMAQ model. Many important scientific advances were made for the 2003 release. Many important scientific advances were made for the 2003 release. Many efficiency improvements made for the 2004 release have dramatically cut model run times. Many efficiency improvements made for the 2004 release have dramatically cut model run times.

New Features of the 2004 CMAQ Release (version 4.4)  Aerosols Coagulation: Replaced numerical calculations for coagulation coefficients with look-up tables Coagulation: Replaced numerical calculations for coagulation coefficients with look-up tables Secondary Organic Aerosols: Improved the “initial guess” for the gas-particle equilibrium solver Secondary Organic Aerosols: Improved the “initial guess” for the gas-particle equilibrium solver About a factor of 2 speedup in Aerosol module Thermodynamics: Corrections to ISORROPIA reduce instabilities in dry conditions (w/ A. Nenes) Thermodynamics: Corrections to ISORROPIA reduce instabilities in dry conditions (w/ A. Nenes) Details of Aerosol changes will be presented by Prakash Bhave

New for 2004 (cont)  Gas Phase Chemistry Added new highly accurate generalized solver: ROS3 – a Rosenbrock solver by Sandu et al. (1997) Added new highly accurate generalized solver: ROS3 – a Rosenbrock solver by Sandu et al. (1997) QSSA discontinued since ROS3 is faster and more accurate QSSA discontinued since ROS3 is faster and more accurate The Euler Backward Iterative (EBI) replaces MEBI for CB4 and SAPRC99 The Euler Backward Iterative (EBI) replaces MEBI for CB4 and SAPRC99 EBI is mechanism specific but we have an EBI solver generatorEBI is mechanism specific but we have an EBI solver generator EBI about twice as fast as MEBI for CB4 w/o aerosolsEBI about twice as fast as MEBI for CB4 w/o aerosols

Corrections  Corrected error in PPM vertical advection which miscomputed flux divergence for non- uniform grid spacing Did not conserve mass Did not conserve mass About 10% error in ground-level concentrations About 10% error in ground-level concentrations  Corrected dry deposition velocity that was in flux form (velocity x air density) Correction reduces dry deposition flux by about 10% Correction reduces dry deposition flux by about 10%

Other Updates  The Plume-in-Grid feature now includes aerosols (see Godowitch’s poster)  Computational efficiency has been improved through collaboration with Sandia National Laboratory Improved MPP scalability through revision of the parallel I/O system Improved MPP scalability through revision of the parallel I/O system Code optimization Code optimization

Expected Upgrades for 2005  Extension of the aerosol module to include sea salt with heterogeneous interactions with gas- phase species  Updates to the CB4 gas-phase chemical mechanism  Linkage to the WRF meteorology model  A new hybrid local and non-local closure PBL model  New Photolysis model – Fast TUV  Generalized aqueous chemistry solver

 Minimum K z according to Urban LU  Mass conservation scheme Vertical velocity derived from mass continuity Vertical velocity derived from mass continuity  Modification of subgrid convective cloud transport  Modified cloud cover scheme AQF system to be described by Rohit Mathur Modifications for 2005 from AQF System Urban Fraction

Additional Capabilities for 2005 Release  Sulfate tracking model Accounting of production pathways Accounting of production pathways  Primary carbonaceous aerosols source apportionment Source types or geographic regions Source types or geographic regions  Toxics and Mercury will be included in release