LumiCal background and systematics at CLIC energy I. Smiljanić, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proposal for a new design of LumiCal R. Ingbir, P. Ruzicka, V. Vrba October 07 Malá Skála.
Advertisements

GUINEA-PIG: A tool for beam-beam effect study C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Daresbury, April 2006.
LCWS 2005 SLAC, March 19 Low Angle Bhabha Events and Electron Veto. Comparison Between Different Crossing Angle Designs Vladimir DrugakovNC PHEP, Minsk/DESY.
TESLA R&D: LCAL/LAT Achim Stahl DESY Zeuthen Cracow Tel Aviv Minsk Prague Colorado Protvino UCL London Dubna.
P hysics background for luminosity calorimeter at ILC I. Božović-Jelisavčić 1, V. Borka 1, W. Lohmann 2, H. Nowak 2 1 INN VINČA, Belgrade 2 DESY, Hamburg.
I. Božović-Jelisavčić, LCWS10, Beijing, March LUMINOSITY MEASUREMENT AT ILC I. Bozovic-Jelisavcic (on behalf of the FCAL Collaboration)
August 2005Snowmass Workshop IP Instrumentation Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY Measurement of: Luminosity (precise and fast) Energy Polarisation.
August 2005Snowmass Workshop Instrumentation of the Very Forward Region of a Linear Collider Detector Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY.
Effect of the Shape of the Beampipe on the Luminosity Measurement September 2008 Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University DESY.
1 LumiCal Optimization and Design Takashi Maruyama SLAC SiD Workshop, Boulder, September 18, 2008.
Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Krakow2006.
Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Cambridge ILC software tools meeting.
Jan MDI WS SLAC Electron Detection in the Very Forward Region V. Drugakov, W. Lohmann Motivation Talk given by Philip Detection of Electrons and.
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle LCWS 2004 Paris April 19 th 2004.
BeamCal Simulations with Mokka Madalina Stanescu-Bellu West University Timisoara, Romania Desy, Zeuthen 30 Jun 2009 – FCAL Meeting.
Luminosity Monitoring and Beam Diagnostics FCAL Collaboration Workshop TAU, September 18-19, 2005 Christian Grah.
Analysis of Beamstrahlung Pairs ECFA Workshop Vienna, November 14-17, 2005 Christian Grah.
March 2004LCWS Stanford Instrumentation of the Very Forward Region of a Linear Collider Detector Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY.
Instrumentation of the very forward region of the TESLA detector – summary of the Workshop on Forward Calorimetry and Luminosity Measurement, Zeuthen,
ILC Meeting Vancouver July What Does Beam-strahlung Tell Us? William Morse - BNL.
Simulation of physics background for luminosity calorimeter M.Pandurović I. Božović-Jelisavčić “Vinča“ Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Belgrade, SCG.
2. December 2005Valencia Workshop Very Forward Region Instrumentation Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY Basic functions: - Hermeticity to small polar angles - Fast.
Ivan Smiljanić Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia Energy resolution and scale requirements for luminosity measurement.
Trilinear Gauge Couplings at TESLA Photon Collider Ivanka Božović - Jelisavčić & Klaus Mönig DESY/Zeuthen.
1Frank Simon ALCPG11, 20/3/2011 ILD and SiD detectors for 1 TeV ILC some recommendations following experience from the CLIC detector study
Karsten Büßer Instrumentation of the Forward Region of the TESLA Detector International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics Aachen, July 19th.
Beam-Beam Background and the Forward Region at a CLIC Detector André Sailer (CERN PH-LCD) LC Physics School, Ambleside 22st August, 2009.
ILC-ECFA Workshop Valencia November 2006 Four-fermion processes as a background in the ILC luminosity calorimeter for the FCAL Collaboration I. Božović-Jelisavčić,
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Electron Detection in the SiD BeamCal Jack Gill, Gleb Oleinik, Uriel Nauenberg, University of Colorado ALCPG Meeting ‘09 2 October 2009.
TESLA R&D: Forward Region Achim Stahl DESY Zeuthen Cracow Tel Aviv Minsk Prague Colorado Protvino UC London Dubna.
A Luminosity Detector for the Future Linear Collider Ronen Ingbir Prague Workshop HEP Tel Aviv University.
HEP Tel Aviv University LumiCal (pads design) Simulation Ronen Ingbir FCAL Simulation meeting, Zeuthen Tel Aviv University HEP experimental Group Collaboration.
Pad design present understanding Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel-Aviv Sep.05 1.
February, INP PAN FCAL Workshop in Cracow W. Lohmann, DESY The BCD (Baseline Configuration Document) The next calendar dates Where we are with FCAL.
1 Some results from LumiCal Monte Carlo Studies Michał Karbowiak, B. Pawlik, L. Zawiejski Michał Karbowiak (*), B. Pawlik, L. Zawiejski Institute of Nuclear.
1 Calorimeters of the Very Forward Region Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University DESY Collaboration High precision design March 5 th 2008.
Gordana Milutinovic-Dumbelovic Vinca Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Belgrade Ivanka Bozovic-Jelisavcic, Strahinja Lukic, Mila Pandurovic Branching ratio.
HEP Tel Aviv UniversityLumical - A Future Linear Collider detector Lumical R&D progress report Ronen Ingbir.
16 February 2009CLIC Physics & Detectors Konrad Elsener 1... some issues regarding the forward region... (“picking up” from Lucie Linssen, 29 Sept 2008)
The Luminosity Calorimeter Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University Desy ( On behalf of the FCAL collaboration ) June 11 th 2008.
1 LumiCal Optimization Simulations Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University Collaboration High precision design May 6 th 2008.
The Very Forward Region of the ILC Detectors Ch. Grah FCAL Collaboration TILC 2008, Sendai 04/03/2008.
Beam-Beam interaction SIMulation: GUINEA-PIG C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay CARE 05, Geneva, November 2005.
Polycrystalline CVD Diamonds for the Beam Calorimeter of the ILC C.Grah ILC ECFA 2006 Valencia, 9 th November 2006.
Systematic limitations to luminosity determination in the LumiCal acceptance from beam-beam effects C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay LCWS06, Bangalore, 9-13 March.
Impact of electromagnetic deflection due to beam-beam effect on Bhabha scattering C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Krakow, February
Fast and Precise Luminosity Measurement at the ILC Ch.Grah LCWS 2006 Bangalore.
Tungsten-Silicon Luminosity Detector with Flat Geometry Ronen Ingbir Tel Aviv University High Energy Physics Experimental Group.
Correction methods for counting losses induced by the beam-beam effects in luminosity measurement at ILC Ivan Smiljanić, Strahinja Lukić, Ivanka Božović.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
1/24 SiD FCAL Takashi Maruyama Tom Markiewicz SLAC TILC’09, Tskuba, Japan, April 2009 Contributors: SLAC M. BreidenbachFNALW. Cooper G. Haller K.
September 2007SLAC IR WS Very Forward Instrumentation of the ILC Detector Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY Talks by M. Morse, W. Wierba, myself.
1 LoI FCAL Takashi Maruyama SLAC SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, 2009 Contributors: SLAC M. BreidenbachFNALW. Cooper G. Haller K. Krempetz T. MarkiewiczBNLW.
HEP Tel Aviv University Lumical R&D progress report Ronen Ingbir ECFA - Durham2004 Lumical - A Future Linear Collider detector.
Octobre 2007LAL Orsay Very Forward Instrumentation of the ILC Detector Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY.
FCAL Workshop Munich -17 October 2006FCAL Workshop Munchen -17 October 2006 Four-fermion processes as a background in the luminosity calorimeter M.Pandurović.
FCAL Krakow meeting, 6. May LumiCal concept including the tracker R. Ingbir, P.Růžička, V. Vrba.
1 Impact de l’effet faisceau-faisceau sur la precision de la mesure de la luminosité à l’ILC Cécile Rimbault, LAL Orsay SOCLE,19-20 Novembre 2007, Clermont-Ferrand.
Very Forward Instrumentation: BeamCal Ch. Grah FCAL Collaboration ILD Workshop, Zeuthen Tuesday 15/01/2008.
Potential and challenges of the physics measurements with very forward detectors at linear colliders Ivanka Bozovic Jelisavcic [on behalf of the FCAL Collaboration]
Initial proposal for the design of the luminosity calorimeter at a 3TeV CLIC Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University March 6th 2009
Beam-Beam interaction SIMulation: GUINEA-PIG
BeamCal Simulation for CLIC
Summary of the FCAL Workshop Cracow, February 12-13
The Optimized Sensor Segmentation for the Very Forward Calorimeter
Report about “Forward Instrumentation” Issues
Calorimeters of the Very Forward Region
The Very Forward Region of the ILC Detectors
Workshop on Forward Calorimetry Prague, April 16 Impact of Bhabha scattering on the BeamCal performances Vladimir Drugakov NC PHEP, Minsk/DESY Zeuthen.
Presentation transcript:

LumiCal background and systematics at CLIC energy I. Smiljanić, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences

Layout of the Forward Region I. Smiljanić, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences

Calorimetry in the Forward Region LumiCal  Precision luminosity measurement  L/L~10 -3 (10 -4 GigaZ) BeamCal  Beam diagnostics, veto to SM processes in new particle searches (SUSY)‏ GamCal  Beam diagnostics, instantaneous luminosity measurement CHALLENGES: High precision, high radiation dose, high occupancy, fast read- out I. Smiljanić, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences

Luminosity Calorimeter Geometry: r min = 80 mm r max = 195 mm tungsten thickness = 3.5 mm silicon thickness = 0.3 mm Segmentation: 30 layers, 64 radial divisions, 48 azimuthal divisions; azimuthal cell size -131 mrad; radial cell size mrad; z position = 2270 mm (Every fourth segment is drawn) I. Smiljanić, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences

Luminosity measurement at ILC Integrated luminosity can be determined from the total number of Bhabha events produced in the acceptance region of the luminosity calorimeter and the corresponding theoretical cross-section. Note that  is bias of  I. Smiljanić, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences

The aim of study The aim of this work is to test background to signal ratio in LumiCal at CLIC energy. Signal is originating from simulated Bhabha events and background is simulated using WHIZARD and BDK generators. All simulated events will go through full detector simulation using Mokka package. I. Smiljanić, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences

Programs I. Smiljanić, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences BARBIE (fast LumiCal simulations) – GEANT based FORTRAN routines defining geometry, materials and physical properties; built-in BHLUMI generator for generating Bhabha events; WHIZARD - designed for the efficient calculation of multi-particle scattering cross sections and simulated event samples. WHIZARD supports the Standard Model (optionally, with anomalous couplings), the MSSM, Little Higgs models, Zprime models, and supports gravitinos and gravitons. BDK - 4-f event generator. It includes gamma and Z exchange, but not W exchange. Only l+ l- f+ f- final states can be produced. BHWIDE - event generator for Bhabha scattering at wide angles

Physics background from 2-photon processes Background electron spectators carry high energy going along the beam pipe, whereas low energetic ffbar pairs are mainly deposited in the LCAL. Simulations will be performed using 4-f (2 gamma) processes generated by BDK and WHIZARD generators. I. Smiljanić, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences

How well do we know B/S? 2-gamma topology is described differently with WHIZARD and BDK Simulation studies are influenced by statistics 4-f (2-gamma) cross sections described differently with different generator (WHIZARD vs. BDK) We do not (always) simulate all processes (i.e. hadronic background)‏ Different cross-sections (in particular for signal) at 500 GeV and 1 TeV can be taken into account through simple scaling WHIZARDBDK 500 GeV0.534 nb4.467 nb 1 TeV0.239 nb5.490 nb 3 TeV0.036 nb5.902 nb Cross sections for I. Smiljanić, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences

Event selection Bhabha events are identified by 2 electromagnetic cascades carrying the full beam energy, originating from collinear and coplanar Bhabha particles. Characteristic topology of Bhabha events allows us to establish a set of criteria to distinguish signal from physics background. Criteria intended to use here are: asymmetric angular cuts (next slide); later stage relative energy, No crossing angle. I. Smiljanić, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences

Signal and background will be additionally affected by the beam-beam interaction effects. They will modify both initial state, through beamstrahlung, and the final state through electromagnetic deflection, resulting in the total suppression of the Bhabha cross-section (BHSE) of order of 4.4%. In order to reduce this hard- controlled effect (to 1.5%), asymmetric theta cuts are used *. Asymmetric cuts * Cécile Rimbault (LAL Orsay, France), Impact of beam-beam effects on precision luminosity measurements at the ILC, LCWS 07 These cuts are applied subsequently to forward and backward sides of the detector, in order to reduce systematics for the IP position and relative position of forward and backward detector. LumiCal angular acceptance for geometry used is mrad. Therefore, cuts are set as follows: cut 1: mrad; cut 2: mrad. I. Smiljanić, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences

Asymmetric cuts + relative energy cut This is what I would like to 3 TeV I. Smiljanić, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences

Current progress ee→eell background 3TeV cms energy generated by BDK now running in Mokka I. Smiljanić, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences

Conclusion It will be very interesting to see the background behaviour at the CLIC energy, at 3 TeV cms. Open question at the moment is which program to use to generate background events. Perhaps, after asymmetric cuts applied, this question will become irrelevant, like in cases at lower energy (500 GeV and partly at 1 TeV). One of goals of this study is to check for that. I. Smiljanić, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences

Backup slides

I. Smiljanić, ILC ECFA Workshop, Warsaw, 9-12 June 2008 Asymmetric cuts + relative energy cut

More systematics … Beam-beam interactions Modification of initial state: Beamstrahlung  √s’≤√s,  ini ≠ 0, E elec ≠ E posit Modification of final state: Electromagnetic deflection  Bhabha angle reduction (~10 -2 mrad) + small energy losses Total Bhabha Suppression Effect (BHSE) ~1.5% Luminosity spectrum reconstruction To control the  BHSE from beamstrahlung at the level of 10 -2, variations in the rec. lumi spectrum  x/x need to be known with the precision of Beam parameters control Bunch length  z and horizontal size  x should be controlled at the 20% level to keep the  BHSE from EM deflection at the level of QUITE A TASK IN REALISTIC BEAM CONDITIONS…