Quality Measures Workgroup Recommendations QUALITY MEASURE WORKGROUP RECOMMENDATIONS Mar 2, 2011.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Quality Measures Vendor Tiger Team December 13, 2013.

Advertisements

Quality Measures Vendor Tiger Team January 30, 2014.

HIT Policy Committee Federal Health IT Strategic Plan April 13, 2011 Jodi Daniel, ONC Seth Pazinski, ONC.

Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Workgroup (WG)

ONC Policy and Program Update Health IT Standards Committee Meeting February 20, 2013 Jodi Daniel, Office of Policy and Planning, ONC.

Advanced Health Models and Meaningful Use Workgroup: Roadmap Charge Overview Paul Tang, chair Joe Kimura, co-chair.

DRAFT Stage 3 Update Paul Tang, Chair George Hripcsak, Co-Chair Meaningful Use Workgroup August 16, 2013.

Building the Digital Infrastructure for Vermont’s Learning Health System ONC HIT Policy Committee Testimony September 14, 2011 Hunt Blair, Deputy Commissioner.

Implementing the American Reinvestment & Recovery Act of 2009.

Accountable Care Quality Measures Subgroup October 28, 2013.

9/16/2010 Secretary's Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children1 NBS Quality Measures for Meaningful Use of EHR Presentation by.

Meeting Stage 1 Meaningful Use Criterion Carlos A. Leyva, Esq. Digital Business Law Group, P.A.

HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak, Columbia University, Co- Chair October 20,

Overview of Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Presentation to HIT Steering Committee May 24, 2012.

Meaningful Use, Standards and Certification Under HITECH—Implications for Public Health InfoLinks Community of Practice January 14, 2010 Bill Brand, MPH,

Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers 9/2013 From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 5: Clinical Quality Measures.

“Preserve and Improve the Health Status of all Californians” Medi-Cal Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program Medi-Cal Electronic Health Records.

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee June 5, 2013.

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.

Moderator Kevin Larsen, MD Medical Director, Meaningful Use Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology Washington, D.C. Using.

A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Esthee Van Staden September 2014.

HIT Policy Committee Accountable Care Workgroup – Kickoff Meeting May 17, :00 – 2:00 PM Eastern.

EHR for Meaningful Use Clinical Quality Measures Dr. Aneel Advani Associate Director for Informatics IHS Office of Information Technology Indian Health.

The CHIPRA Pediatric Quality Measures Program: Health Information Technology and Patient Safety Edwin Lomotan, MD, FAAP Office of Extramural Research,

Quality Measures Kenneth Salyards Substance Abuse Mental Health Services Administration U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Regional HIT Conference.

Stage 3 Update Paul Tang, Chair George Hripcsak, Co-Chair Meaningful Use Workgroup August 29, 2013.

Practice Management System Electronic Medical Records Accelerate Your Practice Stage 1 Meaningful Use with MVE 2014 Practice Management.

New Jersey Institute of Technology Enterprise Development Center (EDC) 211 Warren Street, Newark, NJ Phone: Fax:

August 10, 2011 A Leading Provider of Consulting and Systems Engineering Services to Public Health Organizations.

A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.

Interoperability Updates -National Interoperability Roadmap 8/20/2014 Erica Galvez, ONC Interoperability Portfolio Manager.

Universal Adoption of the EHR What is Meaningful Use and why should it be important to me?

Public Health Informatics and Technology Program Office Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services Public Health and Meaningful Use.

Data Intermediaries and Meaningful Use: Quality Measure Innovation, Calculation and Reporting Recommendations from Data Intermediary Tiger Team.

QMWG Measures Framework June 8, Core + Categorized Menu.

Q UALITY M EASURES W ORKGROUP Apr 12, Stage 1 CQMs Core Measures Alternate Core Menu Set Stage 1 Clinical Quality Measures.

Discussion with BEACON Council ODJFS/OHP Medicaid Provider Incentive Program.

Interoperability Framework Overview Health Information Technology (HIT) Standards Committee June 24, 2010 Presented by: Douglas Fridsma, MD, PhD Acting.

Making better healthcare possible ® Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Changing Seasons of Healthcare Conference WV-HFMA/WV-HIMSS September 27, 2012.

HIT Standards Committee Clinical Operations Workgroup Report Jamie Ferguson, Chair Kaiser Permanente John Halamka, Co-chair Harvard Medical School 20 August,

Jim Walker, MD Quality Measures Work Group CMIO, Geisinger Healthcare EHR Incentive Program Stage 3 Request for Comment: Approach and Questions October.

Unit 1b: Health Care Quality and Meaningful Use Introduction to QI and HIT This material was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department.

1 Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Value of Performance Benchmarking.

Draft – discussion only Advanced Health Models and Meaningful Use Workgroup June 23, 2015 Paul Tang, chair Joe Kimura, co-chair.

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Robert Anthony HIT Policy Committee March 7, 2012.

Bureau of Primary Health Care Update August 10, 2015 Bureau of Primary Health Care Health Resources and Services Administration U.S. Department of Health.

HITECH/MEANINGFUL USE Danielle Smith Trends and Issues in Healthcare December 2, 2014 Power Point Project.

Component 2: The Culture of Health Care Unit 7: Quality Measurement, Performance Improvement, and Incentive Payment Schemes Lecture 4 This material was.

Clinical Quality Public Hearing June 7, 2012 HIT Standards & Policy Committees Summary: June 20, 2012 Marjorie Rallins, Clinical Quality WG, HIT Standards.

Quality Measurement and Improvement Component 2 / Unit 7d.

Larry Wolf Certification / Adoption Workgroup May 13th, 2014.

Component 11/Unit 2a Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)

National Strategy for Quality Improvement in Health Care June 15, 2011 Kana Enomoto Director Office of Policy, Planning, and Innovation.

Federal Advisory Committees Introducing Future Topics and Adding Workgroups Discussion Document October 2009 ** Pre-decisional Draft Do not Disclose **

Overview of Meaningful Use Comments HIT Policy Committee July 16, 2009.

Quality Measures Workgroup David Lansky, PhD 1. Quality Measures Workgroup 2012 Stage 2 Quality Measure Development Stage 2 NPRM Review Alignment with.

HIT Standards Committee Overview and Progress Report March 17, 2010.

Creating an Interoperable Learning Health System for a Healthy Nation Jon White, M.D. Acting Deputy National Coordinator Office of the National Coordinator.

Series 1: “Meaningful Use” for Behavioral Health Providers 1/2014 Changes to Stage 1: Core Objective #10 Clinical Quality Measures (required for Stage.

HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak, Columbia University, Co- Chair October 27,

S&I FRAMEWORK PROPOSED INITIATIVE SUMMARIES Dr. Douglas Fridsma Office of Interoperability and Standards December 10, 2010.

By: Rebecca Cameron Amie Dennis Amy Everson Debborah Stokes.

ACWG Charge Make recommendations to the Health IT Policy Committee on how HHS policies and programs can advance the evolution of a health IT infrastructure.

Draft – discussion only Advanced Health Models and Meaningful Use Workgroup February 17, 2015 Paul Tang, chair Joe Kimura, co-chair.

QMWG Measures Framework Quality Measure Workgroup Report David Lansky Aug. 3, 2011.

Improving Adolescent &

Health IT Policy Committee Workgroup Evolution

How to receive your incentive dollars quickly

Presentation transcript:

Quality Measures Workgroup Recommendations QUALITY MEASURE WORKGROUP RECOMMENDATIONS Mar 2, 2011

Stage 1 Quality Measure Objectives EPs must report on 3 required core CQMs, and if the denominator of 1 or more of the required core measures is 0, then EPs are required to report results for up to 3 alternate core measures. EPs must also select 3 additional CQMs from a set of 38. It is acceptable to have a '0' denominator provided the EP does not have an applicable population. In sum, EPs must report on 6 total measures: 3 required core measures (substituting alternate core measures where necessary) and 3 additional measures from the menu set.

Stage 1 CQMs Objective Core Measures Alternate Core Menu Set Stage 1 Clinical Quality Measures

Stage 1 Quality Measures (Core/Alternate) Core Measures – Adult Weight Screening and Follow-up – Hypertension: Blood Pressure Management – Preventive Care and Screening Measure Pair: a.Tobacco Use Assessment b. Tobacco Cessation Intervention Alternate Core (if core measures do not apply) – Childhood Immunization Status – Preventive Care and Screening: Influenza Immunization for Patients  50 – Weight Assessment and Counseling for Children Adolescents Menu Set – 3 measures from a set of 38 specialty-related clinical quality measures

Stage 2 & 3 Measure Selection Stage 2 & Stage 3 Measures ONC de novo measures (balanced with Methodology, Evidence, Standards) Harmonization Process –HHS input (CMS, HRSA, CDC etc.) HITPC/QMWG suggested measures Additional 69 retooled measures (Total of 113 retooled measures – including 44 Stage 1 measures)

QMWG − Domain Framework for Stage 2 Clinical Appropriateness/Efficiency Population & Public Health Patient & Family Engagement Care Coordination Patient Safety

Projected Timeline (draft) 3/11, HITPC endorses QMWG recommendations 3/11 − 6/11, ONC to initiate measure development activities 6/11 − 12/11, Stage 2 measure concepts/specifications to be defined and put out for public comment 1/12 − 4/12, Development of de novo Stage 2 measures based on QMWG guidance to be completed

Policy Issues to Consider Framework for Stage 2 CQMs – Balance core measures with “specialty” measures – Inclusion of Stage 1 and “retooled” measure set Exchange and interoperability infrastructure to facilitate implementation of innovative measures (e.g.- standardized Transition of Care document, ability to incorporate longitudinal data) Available infrastructure for patient reported outcomes Available standards and vocabulary sets to adopt measures (Standards Committee)

Next Steps Recommendations will inform ONC on measure selection and harmonization process for Stage 2 and Stage 3 Meaningful Use Recommendations will inform measure development work in potential procurement process Recommendations will inform HIT Standards Committee Quality Workgroup on standards and necessary vocabulary sets for development and implementation of e-measures Inform other FACA groups regarding necessary exchange infrastructure to facilitate implementation of novel measures