Doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0212r3 Submission Feb 2016 TG ax Enterprise Scenario, Color and DSC Date: 2016-02 Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0868r0 July 2014 Johan Söder, Ericsson ABSlide 1 UL & DL DSC and TPC MAC simulations Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Dynamic Sensitivity Control V2
Doc.: IEEE /1012r0 Submission Sept 2013 Dynamic Sensitivity Control Improvement to area throughput Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/1426r1 November 2014 Gustav Wikström et al., EricssonSlide 1 DSC and legacy coexistence Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1225r1 Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax Date: Slide 1Huawei Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0025r0 Submission Jan 2015 Dynamic Sensitivity Control Roaming Date: 2015-January Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.
Discussion on The Receiver Behavior for DSC/CCAC with BSS Color
Doc.: IEEE /0516r0 Submission April 2015 CCA for Clauses 16, 17 and 19 Date: 2015-April Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1 NOTE: Includes.
Doc.: IEEE /0543r0 Submission May 2015 TG ax Scenarios Proposed additions for frequency re-use Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/1148r1 Consideration of asynchronous interference in OBSS environment Date: Authors: September 2014 Slide 1Koichi.
Doc.: IEEE /0861r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury Impact of CCA adaptation on spatial reuse in dense residential scenario Date: Authors:
Further Considerations on Enhanced CCA for 11ax
Doc.: IEEE /1207r1 Submission Imad Jamil (Orange)Slide 1 OBSS reuse mechanism which preserves fairness Date: Authors: September 2014.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0085r1 Jan 2015 John Son, WILUS InstituteSlide 1 Legacy Fairness Issues of Enhanced CCA Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0050r0 January 2015 Yu Wang et al., EricssonSlide 1 Modeling components impacting throughput gain from CCAT adjustment.
Doc.: IEEE /1443r0 SubmissionEsa Tuomaala Adapting CCA and Receiver Sensitivity Date: Authors: Slide 1 November 2014.
Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Discussion on OFDMA in IEEE ax
Submission doc.: IEEE /0374r1 Mar 2015 John Son, WILUS InstituteSlide 1 Further Considerations on Legacy Fairness with Enhanced CCA Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1290r0 Submission Nov 2013 Dynamic Sensitivity Control for HEW SG Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.
Doc.: ax Submission Sept 2014 Slide 1 Effect of CCA in residential scenario part 2 Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1108r0 Technical Feasibility for LRLP September 2015 Chittabrata Ghosh, IntelSlide 1 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0804r0 Submission July 2015 TG ax Outdoor Enterprise Scenario and DSC Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.
Doc.: ax Submission July 2014 Slide 1 Proposed Calibration For MAC simulator Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1207r0 Submission Imad Jamil (Orange)Slide 1 OBSS reuse mechanism which preserves fairness Date: Authors: September 2014.
Doc.: IEEE /0637r0 Submission May 2014 James Wang et. al., MediaTekSlide 1 Spatial Reuse and Coexistence with Legacy Devices Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0523r0 Submission April 2014 Imad Jamil (Orange)Slide 1 MAC simulation results for Dynamic sensitivity control (DSC - CCA adaptation)
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/1138r1 Month Year Filip Mestanov (Ericsson)Slide 1 To DSC or not to DSC Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1081r3 September, 2015 Jing Ma, NICTSlide 1 Further consideration on receive behavior based on the cascading structure.
Doc.: IEEE /0680r1 SubmissionJiyong Pang, Huawei TechnologiesSlide 1 Reference Box5 Calibration Assumptions and Parameters Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission Eduard Garcia-Villegas Drivers of the dynamic CCA adaptation Authors: Nov Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0779r2 Submission June 2014 Dynamic Sensitivity Control Practical Usage Date: 2014-July Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0866r0 July 2014 Johan Söder, Ericsson ABSlide 1 Traffic modeling and system capacity performance measure Date:
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Discussion on ax functional requirements
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE /1122r0 Submission Identifiers in HE PPDUs for power saving Slide 1 Date: Authors: Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al. September.
Doc.: IEEE /0294r1 Submission Dynamic Sensitivity Control Channel Selection and Legacy Sharing Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide.
Doc.: IEEE /0645 Submission May 2012 Open-Loop Link Margin Index for Fast Link Adaptation Date: Authors: Slide 1Yong Liu, Marvell,
Doc.: IEEE /0635r1 Submission May 2014 Dynamic Sensitivity Control Implementation Date: 2014-May Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0042r2 January 2016 Geonjung Ko, WILUSSlide 1 BSS Color Settings for a Multiple BSSID Set Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Submission May 2004 Masahiro Takagi and Tomoko Adachi, TOSHIBASlide 1 Simulation Scenarios and Comparison Criteria for Coexistence.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0871r1 Jul Jiyong Pang, et. al. Huawei Further Calibration Results towards Integrated System Level Simulation Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1034r0 Submission September 2015 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Notification of Operating Mode Changes Date: Authors: Slide 1.
DL-OFDMA Procedure in IEEE ax
Secondary Channel CCA of HE STA
Simulation results for spatial reuse in 11ax
Simulation-based evaluation of DSC in enterprise scenario
Month Year doc.: IEEE /1081r0 September, 2015
TG ax DSC Summary Date: Authors: July 2015 April 2013
TG ax A Unified Approach to Spatial Reuse
TG ax Indoor Enterprise Scenarios, Color, DSC and TPC
Performance Evaluation of OBSS Densification
Proposed response to 3GPP ED request
Simulation Analysis of ED Threshold Levels
The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator
Further Study of Time Varying Interference and PHY Abstraction
The need and complexity of in-home entertainment scenario with OBSS
Stray and Overlapping STAs
Stray and Overlapping STAs
Increased Network Throughput with Channel Width Related CCA and Rules
TG ax A Unified Approach to Spatial Reuse
Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
Potential of Modified Signal Detection Thresholds
TG ax A Unified Approach to Spatial Reuse
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
TG ax Scenarios Proposed additions for frequency re-use
Consideration on System Level Simulation
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission Feb 2016 TG ax Enterprise Scenario, Color and DSC Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1

doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission Background The Enterprise scenario uses four 80MHz channels. Estimating the relative signal strengths between the APs, APs and STAs and STAs can indicate what to expect with respect to OBSS Color and DSC are then added to investigate spatial reuse. Similarly, 9 channel re-use is examined. Feb 2016 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 2

doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission Topography Feb 2016 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 3 STAs

doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission 4 Channel re-use Feb 2016 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 4

doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission Interference UL Feb 2016 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 5 Most susceptible

doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission Feb 2016 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 6 Wanted signal at each STA (64) Unwanted signal at each STA from inter BSS STAs (64) Wanted signal at each STA (64) Unwanted signal at each STA from BSS AP Of all 4096 combinations Only 6 have SNIR < 20dB Of all 64 combinations Only 2 have SNIR < 20dB No Shadowing

doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission Feb 2016 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 7 Of all 4096 combinations 33 have SNIR < 20dB (varied ) Of all 64 combinations 5 have SNIR < 20dB (varied 3 -7) With 5dB Shadowing Wanted signal at each STA (64) Unwanted signal at each STA from inter BSS STAs (64) Wanted signal at each STA (64) Unwanted signal at each STA from BSS AP

doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission Feb 2016 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 8 Interference DL

doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission Feb 2016 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 9 Interference DL due to inter BSS STAs

doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission Feb 2016 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 10 Interference DL due to inter BSS AP

doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission UL Traffic Interference from inter BSS STAs, 4096 combinations –6 to 50 links <20dB SNIR Interference from inter BSS AP, 64 combinations –2 to 7 links <20dB SNIR DL Traffic Interference from inter BSS STAs, 4096 combinations –88 to 490 links <20dB SNIR Interference from inter BSS AP, 64 combinations –26 to 39 links <20dB SNIR (36 no shadowing, ) Under legacy conditions, ALL 4096 and 64 combinations SHARE, Note that inter-STA interference <2% UL actually overlap, ~10% DL BUT ~ 50% interference from AP to AP on DL 4CH Signal Summary AP TX 20dBm, STA TX 15dBm, Wall 7dB, Shadow 5dB Feb 2016 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 11

doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission Using DSC or Color should improve OBSS performance in this particular scenario and improve the TOTAL throughput somewhat. What if we also change the settings slightly? –STA TX is 15dBm, what if it was 18dBm? –Wall loss is 7dB, what if it was 3dB? –BOTH are quite legitimate possibilities. Next slides show that the OBSS changes significantly. Feb 2016 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 12

doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission UL Traffic Interference from inter BSS STAs, 4096 combinations –100 to 250 links <20dB SNIR (cf 6-80) Interference from inter BSS AP, 64 combinations –2 to 11 links <20dB SNIR (cf 2-7) DL Traffic Interference from inter BSS STAs, 4096 combinations –88 to 400 links <20dB SNIR (cf ) Interference from inter BSS AP, 64 combinations –4 to 14 links <20dB SNIR (cf 26-39) 4CH Signal Summary AP TX 20dBm, STA TX 18dBm, Wall 7dB, Shadow 5dB Feb 2016 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 13

doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission UL Traffic Interference from inter BSS STAs, 4096 combinations –190 to 400 links <20dB SNIR (cf 6-80) Interference from inter BSS AP, 64 combinations –20 to 28 links <20dB SNIR (cf 2-7) DL Traffic Interference from inter BSS STAs, 4096 combinations –1424 to 1634 links <20dB SNIR (cf ) Interference from inter BSS AP, 64 combinations –50 to 60 links <20dB SNIR (cf 26-39) Very susceptible to wall loss! 4CH Signal Summary AP TX 20dBm, STA TX 15dBm, Wall 3dB, Shadow 5dB Feb 2016 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 14

doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission UL Traffic Interference from inter BSS STAs, 4096 combinations –768 to 1046 links <20dB SNIR (cf 6-80) Interference from inter BSS AP, 64 combinations –19 to 31 links <20dB SNIR (cf 2-7) DL Traffic Interference from inter BSS STAs, 4096 combinations –1340 to 1740 links <20dB SNIR (cf ) Interference from inter BSS AP, 64 combinations –37 to 45 links <20dB SNIR (cf 26-39) 4CH Signal Summary AP TX 20dBm, STA TX 18dBm, Wall 3dB, Shadow 5dB Feb 2016 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 15

doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission This investigation shows the amount of OBSS, and how it changes with shadowing and slight changes in settings. We can use this to check simulation results as we can see the amount of interference that is present. Under legacy CCA conditions, all STAs and APs are SHARING. Now we look at how DSC and Color work. –How close to two independent networks do we get? What does this tell us? Feb 2016 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 16

doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission DSC –STA measures the Beacon signal (wanted DL signal) and sets effective CCA Threshold 20dB lower. (DSC Margin = 20dB) –AP sets its effective CCA level at 10dB below the lowest received wanted signal. Color –STA/AP looks at color bits in preamble to determine if signal is from same or inter BSS. –If not same BSS, ignore signal. –(A variation is to only reject if the inter BSS signal is lower than a set threshold) “Blocked” and “Share” terminology “Blocked” – Transmission allowed when SNIR < 20dB, then both signals fail. “Share” – Transmission prevented when SNIR < 20dB, standard contention. DSC and Color Feb 2016 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 17

doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission DSC and Color results 4CH – example A Feb 2016 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 18 Using a Color threshold can Result in over protection Simply reject and correct signals are blocked, but works. DSC gets it right And shares OBSS signals Color and DSC same result for DL. Signals are blocked.

doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission DSC and Color results 4CH – example B Feb 2016 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 19 Using a Color threshold can Result in over protection Simply reject and correct signals are blocked but works. DSC gets it right And shares OBSS signals Color and DSC same result for DL. Signals are blocked.

doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission DSC DL –“Dynamic” is in use and each STA sets its own effective CCA level (in this scenario STAs are static, but allows for mobility) –In every case, signals “Share” when the SNIR is <20dB Color UL –Setting or finding a threshold level may be a challenge if trying to “share” rather than “block” –Simplest, and best(?) is to ignore OBSS signal level. BUT result is that this results in blocking. DSC and Color DL –Exactly same results. –DSC AP could adjust its effective CCA according to latest UL signal from the STA but marginal (if any) improvement in this scenario as AP to AP interference is high. DSC and Color Results Comparisons Feb 2016 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 20

doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission Why we are at it, let’s look at the 9CH case Under legacy conditions, still 100% overlap, With color or DSC, two totally independent networks Feb 2016 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 21

doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission 9 Channel Re-Use Feb 2016 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 22

doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission DSC and Color results 9CH – example A Feb 2016 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 23 Totally independent networks

doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission DSC and Color results 9CH – example B Feb 2016 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 24 Almost totally independent networks

doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission Color –Provides improved OBSS performance UL and DL –Will block UL and DL ‘overlapping’ packets rather than share. –Only works if ALL STAs and APs in OBSSs have the feature –Will NOT work with legacy OBSS STAs and/or AP. –Relies on the OTHER DEVICES having the feature as well DSC –Provides improved OBSS performance UL and DL –Shares ‘overlapping’ packets UL, blocks DL –Works with OBSS legacy STAs and/or legacy AP Results presented are for the ‘wanted’ BSS, other BSS can be legacy. –DSC is implemented by the STA, can be independent DSC or Color? Feb 2016 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 25

doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission Both Color and DSC provide improvements in SR Color will not work until ALL STA/APs have the feature –Color is already in the 11ax SFD DSC works and presents a good incentive for a vendor to adopt. Does not rely on other STAs having it. Unclear if DSC is in the SFD? “The amendment shall include one or more mechanisms to improve spatial reuse by allowing adjustments to one or more of the CCA- ED, Signal Detect CCA, OBSS_PD or TXPWR threshold values. The constraints on selecting threshold values are TBD” –As the threshold value setting is TBD, is present SFD text sufficient to allow DSC text to be proposed/accepted? DSC proposes a specific (dynamic) method to select the threshold value. Discussion and Conclusions Feb 2016 Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 26