 Educator Effectiveness System  Comparative Measures  Resource for Professional Development.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Essential Questions: What are the components of the (SPP)? How is PVAAS used as part of the calculation for the School Performance Profile (SPP)?
Advertisements

Burton Secondary EOC/STAAR Data INDEX 1 STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT STARR SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE All Students=3-8 grades spring administration.
Huntington Hills School Provincial Achievement Test Results for Spring 08.
Overview of Wyoming Accountability in Education Act (WAEA)
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Portfolio Mid-Year Accountability Status Report March 3 rd, 2013.
Chronic Absence in Oregon Attendance Works The Children’s Institute The Chalkboard Project ECONorthwest.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
Average National Arabic Scale Scores for Grade 1 By Gender MalesFemales Grade Level Scale Score 550.
End of Course Assessments School Year English Language Arts, Math, Biology, and Government.
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN
Gifted Indicator. Reported in 2014, counts as Indicator in 2015 Progress: Value-Added Performance Index Inputs.
KCS Achievement Data. District-wide Achievement District Achievement  Achievement plots will be included for the following subjects  Algebra I  Algebra.
Average National Arabic Scale Scores for Grades 1, 2 and 3 by School Type Grade Level Scale Score Grade Level Scale.
NH Commissioner’s Task Force Meeting September 21, 2010 NH DOE 1 Commissioner's Task Force Meeting: September 21, 2010.
Mohawk Jr-Sr High School PSSA/PVAAS Act 82 – Teacher Evaluation Law Beginning in this applies to all teaching professionals (non-teaching.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
Jefferson ITBS – Reading Data Grades 3-5 Multiple Targets ALL LSES SPED %
Charles R. Drew Academy Aldine Independent School District 1910 W. Little York Rd. Houston, Texas “Academic Achievement and Growth, End of Story”
IOWA ASSESSMENTS – RED OAK RESULTS JANUARY THIS IS ALL STUDENTS NOT JUST FULL ACADEMIC YEAR – WHICH IS USED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.
MEADOW WOOD ELEMENTARY. “GOOD IS THE ENEMY OF GREAT. AND THAT IS ONE OF THE KEY REASONS WHY WE HAVE SO LITTLE THAT BECOMES GREAT. WE DON'T HAVE GREAT.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
Iowa Demographics While total K-12 enrollment in Iowa is decreasing, high school ag ed enrollment and FFA membership has continued to increase since the.
HALL HIGH SCHOOL Academic Indicators Students meeting or exceeding the Illinois Learning Standards (reading, math, science) 2002………………………………..43%2003………………………………..58%2004………………………………..42%2005………………………………..45%2006………………………………..48%2007…………………………
1 CENTRAL CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS WORK SESSION AUGUST 14, 2008 JIM KARLIN DATA ANALYST.
MCAS Progress and Performance Index Report 2013 Cohasset Public Schools.
Chronic Absence in Oregon Attendance Works The Children’s Institute The Chalkboard Project ECONorthwest.
Performance Wisconsin Student Assessment System
UNBRIDLED LEARNING: College/Career Ready for All
Spring 2016 PARCC and MCAS Results: Newton Public Schools
Percent of Applicants and Enrollees by Range of Grade Point Averages, 2016 GPA Scores
Perceptions, Rankings and CASD
2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS
Urban Charter Schools in California March 2015
Number Talks Second Grade.
Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in Minnesota March 2015
SPED SLAM Math/Sci.
Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in Florida March 2015
Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in Colorado March 2015
Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in New York March 2015
NECAP PRESENTATION.
Urban Charter Schools Impact in Washington DC March 2015
Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in Michigan March 2015
School-Wide Achievement Mathematics
IFs and Nested IFs =IF(R3<60,”F”,”P”)
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in Georgia March 2015
Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in Pennsylvania March 2015
DAT Scores for Dental School Applicants, 2000 to 2017 (1 of 2)
DAT Scores for Dental School Enrollees, 2000 to 2016 (1 of 2)
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
SPED SLAM Math/Sci.
Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in Missouri March 2015
PVSD PDE School Performance Profile
Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in New Mexico March 2015
College/Career Ready for All
Percent of Applicants and Enrollees by Range of Grade Point Averages, 2017 GPA Scores
Percent of Applicants and Enrollees by Range of Grade Point Averages, 2018 GPA Scores
DAT Scores for Dental School Enrollees, 2000 to 2018 (1 of 2)
NANTUCKET PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Chronic Absence in Oregon
Media Briefing School Progress 2012 Results Mary L. Gable- Assistant State Superintendent Division of Academic Policy July 10, 2012 Meeting the requirements.
DAT Scores for Dental School Applicants, 2000 to 2018 (1 of 2)
Richmond County School System Mission/Vision
Dixon Elementary # Dixonscholars
Presented by: Chesley Taylor
Findley Oaks Elementary Data Overview
SPED SLAM Math/Sci.
Mayra Perez, Ed. D. October 10, 2016
Presentation transcript:

 Educator Effectiveness System  Comparative Measures  Resource for Professional Development

Academic Performance Score 24 Categories Equaling 100% Academic Achievement  Math – 7.5  Reading – 7.5  Science – 7.5  Writing – 7.5  Grade 3 Reading – 10%

 Closing the Achievement Gap  All Group/Super Subgroup  (ELL, ED, SPED….)  Math – 1.25  Reading – 1.25  Science – 1.25  Writing – 1.25  Equaling – 50% Not Included This School Year

 West Hill Math Example  67%  100%-67% = 33% Achievement Gap  Must close one-half of achievement gap over 6 years.  16.5% Over 6 years = average increase of 2.75% each year.  Year 1 – 69.75%  Year 2 – 72.5%  Year 3 – 75.25%  Year 4 – 78%  Year 5 – 80.75%  Year 6 – 83.50%

 Academic Growth  Math - 10%  Reading - 10%  Science - 10%  Writing - 10%  Equals - 40%  Other Indicators – Attendance 10%

Our Building Level Academic Score for 2012/2013 is ??????

We are not certain…… But our initial preview score is: 70.6%  Which means we are……..  No Designation  This is Great!!!