UK LVL1 Meeting, RAL, 31/01/00Alan Watson 1 ATLAS Trigger Simulations Present & Future? What tools exist? What are they good for? What are the limitations?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATLAS ATLAS PESA Meeting 25/04/02 B-Trigger Working Group Status Report This talk:
Advertisements

ATLAS ATLAS PESA Meeting 25/04/02 B-Trigger Working Group Work-plan This talk:
ATLAS ATLAS PESA Meeting 20/11/02 B-Trigger Working Group Work-plan This talk:
SiD PFA Status and Calorimeter Performance Ron Cassell (SLAC) SiD Design Study Meeting 11/15/08.
Status of BESIII Distributed Computing BESIII Workshop, Mar 2015 Xianghu Zhao On Behalf of the BESIII Distributed Computing Group.
1 The ATLAS Missing E T trigger Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University of Oxford On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University.
Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
Types of Data SimTracks: generated particles SimHits: energy depositions in a detector volume Digis: Single-channel pieces of the detector’s raw binary.
Saclay, 04 / 11 / 2002 E. Perez 1 Simulation of the performances of the upgraded L1Cal  Short reminder  Performances (jets) (see Jovan’s talk for electron.
CalRecon Moments Analysis Studies I Tracy Usher1/17 A Brief History of Glast Release GR (Friday, July 15) –Effectively, the first DC-2 2M all-gamma.
August 98 1 Jürgen Knobloch ATLAS Software Workshop Ann Arbor ATLAS Computing Planning ATLAS Software Workshop August 1998 Jürgen Knobloch Slides also.
L3 Filtering: status and plans D  Computing Review Meeting: 9 th May 2002 Terry Wyatt, on behalf of the L3 Algorithms group. For more details of current.
SVX Software Overview Sasha Lebedev VTX meeting 09/07/ SVX Software web page:
LHCC Review, CERN, 19/10/99Paul Bright-Thomas, for Alan Watson 1 LVL1 Calorimeter Algorithm Updates Changes since the TDR: Greater “integration” of e/
2004 Xmas MeetingSarah Allwood WW Scattering at ATLAS.
1 A ROOT Tool for 3D Event Visualization in ATLAS Calorimeters Luciano Andrade José de Seixas Federal University of Rio de Janeiro/COPPE.
ATLAS and GridPP GridPP Collaboration Meeting, Edinburgh, 5 th November 2001 RWL Jones, Lancaster University.
0 Status of Shower Parameterisation code in Athena Andrea Dell’Acqua CERN PH-SFT.
5 May 98 1 Jürgen Knobloch Computing Planning for ATLAS ATLAS Software Week 5 May 1998 Jürgen Knobloch Slides also on:
ALICE Simulation Framework Ivana Hrivnacova 1 and Andreas Morsch 2 1 NPI ASCR, Rez, Czech Republic 2 CERN, Geneva, Switzerland For the ALICE Collaboration.
Fabiola Gianotti, 31/8/’99 PHYSICS and SOFTWARE ATLAS Software Week 31/8/’99 Fabiola Gianotti Software requirements of physics groups What should Detector.
News from Atlantis Event Display Qiang Lu, Mark Stockton, Juergen Thomas, Peter Watkins (Birmingham) Hans Drevermann (CERN) Andrew Haas (Columbia) Eric.
LVL1 Workshop, CERN, 16/07/99Alan Watson (by proxy) ATLAS Jet Trigger Algorithm Performance Requirements:  Good jet E T resolution Sharp threshold Minimise.
Andreas Morsch, CERN EP/AIP CHEP 2003 Simulation in ALICE Andreas Morsch For the ALICE Offline Project 2003 Conference for Computing in High Energy and.
The ALICE Simulation Strategy Andreas Morsch For the ALICE Offline Group Joint STAR/ALICE Offline Meeting Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY April.
A Technical Validation Module for the offline Auger-Lecce, 17 September 2009  Design  The SValidStore Module  Example  Scripting  Status.
Alan Watson ATLAS Overview week, Prague, 17/09/2003 Rx   Calorimeters (LAr, Tile) 0.2x x Mb/s analogue ~75m 0.1x0.1 RoI Builder L1 CTP.
ATLAS Data Challenges US ATLAS Physics & Computing ANL October 30th 2001 Gilbert Poulard CERN EP-ATC.
Alexander Richards, UCL 1 Atlfast and RTT (plus DCube) Christmas Meeting 18/12/2007.
9-13/9/03 Atlas Overview WeekPeter Sherwood 1 Atlfast, Artemis and Atlantis What, Where and How.
Navigation Timing Studies of the ATLAS High-Level Trigger Andrew Lowe Royal Holloway, University of London.
Full Dress Rehearsal (FDR1) studies Sarah Allwood-Spiers 11/3/2008.
1 Using Jupiter and Satellites Akiya Miyamoto KEK Jan 2006.
Cosmic Rays for ATLAS Commissioning Commissioning Meeting ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens May 2003 Halo+Cosmics group: M.Boonekamp, F.Gianotti, R.McPherson,
Andrei Gheata, Mihaela Gheata, Andreas Morsch ALICE offline week, 5-9 July 2010.
David Adams ATLAS Virtual Data in ATLAS David Adams BNL May 5, 2002 US ATLAS core/grid software meeting.
The CMS Simulation Software Julia Yarba, Fermilab on behalf of CMS Collaboration 22 m long, 15 m in diameter Over a million geometrical volumes Many complex.
Simulations and Software CBM Collaboration Meeting, GSI, 17 October 2008 Volker Friese Simulations Software Computing.
September 2007CHEP 07 Conference 1 A software framework for Data Quality Monitoring in ATLAS S.Kolos, A.Corso-Radu University of California, Irvine, M.Hauschild.
David Adams ATLAS DIAL: Distributed Interactive Analysis of Large datasets David Adams BNL August 5, 2002 BNL OMEGA talk.
CBM ECAL simulation status Prokudin Mikhail ITEP.
GLAST LAT Offline SoftwareCore review, Jan. 17, 2001 Review of the “Core” software: Introduction Environment: THB, Thomas, Ian, Heather Geometry: Joanne.
A New Tool For Measuring Detector Performance in ATLAS ● Arno Straessner – TU Dresden Matthias Schott – CERN on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Computing.
J.P. Wellisch, CERN/EP/SFT SCRAM Information on SCRAM J.P. Wellisch, C. Williams, S. Ashby.
Status of the LAr OO Reconstruction Srini Rajagopalan ATLAS Larg Week December 7, 1999.
PESAsim – the e/  analysis framework Validation of the framework First look at a trigger menu combining several signatures Short-term plans Mark Sutton.
MOORE MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) Track reconstruction in the Muon Spectrometer MuonIdentification MuonIdentification Reconstruction and.
The PESAsim analysis framework What it is How it works What it can do How to get it and use it Mark Sutton Tania McMahon Ricardo Gonçalo.
1 Software tools in Asia Akiya Miyamoto KEK 18-March-2005 Simulation and Reconstruction Session LCWS2005 Representing acfa-sim-j activity M.C.Chang 1,K.Fujii.
Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of photon reconstruction efficiency in H  events Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
John MarshallPandora Development1 J.S. Marshall University of Cambridge.
Pavel Nevski DDM Workshop BNL, September 27, 2006 JOB DEFINITION as a part of Production.
INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE Using of GANGA interface for Athena applications A. Zalite / PNPI.
Hardeep Bansil (University of Birmingham) on behalf of L1Calo collaboration ATLAS UK Meeting, Royal Holloway January 2011 Argonne Birmingham Cambridge.
Level 1-2 Trigger Data Base development Current status and overview Myron Campbell, Alexei Varganov, Stephen Miller University of Michigan August 17, 2000.
10 January 2008Neil Collins - University of Birmingham 1 Tau Trigger Performance Neil Collins ATLAS UK Physics Meeting Thursday 10 th January 2008.
Alan Watson (Birmingham) Level-1 Meeting, RAL, 18 June 2002 Secondary RoIs What are they? Why have them? Is our current design optimal?
Detector SimOOlation activities in ATLAS A.Dell’Acqua CERN-EP/ATC May 19th, 1999.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
Using direct photons for L1Calo monitoring + looking at data09 Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting February 18, 2010.
1 Calice TB Review DESY 15/6/06D.R. Ward David Ward Post mortem on May’06 DESY running. What’s still needed for DESY analysis? What’s needed for CERN data.
1 GlueX Software Oct. 21, 2004 D. Lawrence, JLab.
ANALYSIS TRAIN ON THE GRID Mihaela Gheata. AOD production train ◦ AOD production will be organized in a ‘train’ of tasks ◦ To maximize efficiency of full.
Online Database Work Overview Work needed for OKS database
Work report Xianghu Zhao Nov 11, 2014.
US ATLAS Physics & Computing
Level-1 Calo Monitoring
LVL2 Missing Et Trigger Status
BES III Software: Short-term Plan ( )
Presentation transcript:

UK LVL1 Meeting, RAL, 31/01/00Alan Watson 1 ATLAS Trigger Simulations Present & Future? What tools exist? What are they good for? What are the limitations? How do you use them Where are they available? What do you do? Information resources? Where are they going? The Architecture Task Force report PASO?

UK LVL1 Meeting, RAL, 31/01/00Alan Watson 2 What is currently available? ATRIG “Official” ATLAS package Full GEANT-based simulation Up-to-date & realistic model of e/ , , jet algorithms E T miss being updated  Currently lacks pulse history or BCID simulation  Sum E T trigger absent  Restricted to |  |<3.2 (FCAL being added)  Slow to run, event slower to generate datasets ATLFAST Fast, easy to generate datasets Models resolution, longitudinal shower development Models of all elements of LVL1 algorithms (e/  needs updating) PPR simulation includes pileup, pulse-history & BCID as options Easy access to simplified model of offline reconstruction  Trigger simulation “semi-private”  No transverse shower profile, detailed material simulation

UK LVL1 Meeting, RAL, 31/01/00Alan Watson 3 What is ATRIG? Input data Output of GEANT-based ATLAS detector simulation (DICE). Typically 3 different jobs are run:  Physics Monte Carlo produces 4vectors  DICE reads 4vectors (“KINE”) & produces “DIGI” output  Atrig reads DIGI and simulates trigger output First two are normally run centrally (i.e. not your problem) What is it used for?  Study performance of LVL1 and LVL2 trigger algorithms  As “filter” for higher-level trigger or offline physics or detector performance studies

UK LVL1 Meeting, RAL, 31/01/00Alan Watson 4 LVL1 Atrig Simulation What is in the calo trigger simulation?  Combine detector pseudo-digitisations into trigger towers  Simulate summing-chain noise, digitisation, pedestals, thresholds  Sum trigger towers to jet elements, truncate words  Execute e/ , , jet, ETmiss algorithms  Compare against thresholds, count “hits” & pass to CTP simulation  Produce list of RoIs for LVL2 It also summarises LVL1 results in a “column-wise ntuple”  You will probably want to add your own, with the quantities you are interested in......

UK LVL1 Meeting, RAL, 31/01/00Alan Watson 5 How to run Atrig Where? At CERN, on the Atlas Workgroup Server  Can install code & copy datasets to home system if you want :-) How? This is, by ATLAS standards, unusually well-documented:  To run the standard executable, follow instructions in: www-wisconsin.cern.ch/~atsaul/Docs/RunningAtrig.html  If you want to add/change code, see “Atrig Developer’s Guide”  You can find a list of datasets at atlasinfo.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/SOFTWARE/HELP/productions.html

UK LVL1 Meeting, RAL, 31/01/00Alan Watson 6 How to change parameters Where are they? The procedure for running Atrig will create a directory “0.0.nn/job”, where “0.0.nn” is the release number.  The parameter files can be found in “0.0.nn/job/AtrigPar/” There are two types: DICE parameters (which “detectors” to use, debug printing, etc)  job/AtrigPar/.dat Trigger parameters (thresholds, noise levels, trigger requirements)  job/AtrigPar/.tit Copy the file to your “job” directory & edit it to change values

UK LVL1 Meeting, RAL, 31/01/00Alan Watson 7 ATLFAST What is it? A “fast” simulation used to study possible physics reach of ATLAS  Models detector resolution & reconstruction by smearing 4vectors  Lacks detail of detector material LVL1 Simulation: Added by Mainz group (primarily Rolf Dubitzky)  Use parameterised detector response to fill trigger towers  Simulate pre-processor, e/ , , jet, ETmiss, SumET  Can add in pileup including pulse history

UK LVL1 Meeting, RAL, 31/01/00Alan Watson 8 How to Run ATLFAST Where? Best to run this on your own system  ATLFAST code & documentation can be found at  The LVL1 simulation package can be downloaded from These include source code, makefiles etc. I can probably give advice on installation etc (it wasn’t too hard)  Instructions for running this at Birmingham can be found at: atlfast_lvl1_guide.html

UK LVL1 Meeting, RAL, 31/01/00Alan Watson 9 What comes next? Object-Orientation Want something better-designed & more maintainable Some first attempts exist,such as  ATLFAST++ - unofficial C++ version, no trigger simulation Main effort should start this year  Architecture Task Force report submitted last year  Approval (or not?) April  Real work should start after that In the meanwhile?  PASO?

UK LVL1 Meeting, RAL, 31/01/00Alan Watson 10 Next Steps for LVL1? Need to plan first: Understand what trigger will do Understand existing code (though OO version will be very different) Study requirements for LVL1 calorimeter code  A rough study for the trigger code generally exists at We will have many specific requirements of our own Discuss/study general structure of LVL1 code Discuss with other trigger software people Read ATF report Try a testbed implementation in PASO framework?

UK LVL1 Meeting, RAL, 31/01/00Alan Watson 11 Summary Two distinct sets of tools exist  ATLFAST is more suitable for quick studies, or studies of wide range of physics processes  ATRIG required for detailed understanding of detector geometry Documentation for these exists  I’m trying to put together a set of links & LVL1-specific documents at Move to OO/C++ architecture  Must start this year  Can we put together a group to start work in LVL1 calo?