Smarter Balanced Assessments Student Reports and Instructional Implications.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Square Peg and Round Hole… As parents and educators, the change in grading systems requires a fundamental switch in our thinking… 4=A 1=F 2=D 3=B.
Advertisements

Smarter Balanced Assessment: What do parents need to know?
Welcome to Smarter Balanced Math Assessment Claims EDUCATIONAL SERVICE CENTER - NORTH LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Spring 2014 Facilitator Name.
Score Reporting for Interim and Summative Assessments: Claims & Targets Nancy Thomas Price, Comprehensive Assessment System Coordinator.
WHAT DO SMARTER QUESTIONS LOOK LIKE? COMPUTER ADAPTIVE TEST: ENGLISH.
ESCN – Principal Meeting Secondary Mathematics January 21, 2015.
Smarter Balanced Assessment: What do parents need to know? Paramount Unified School District Parent Presentation, Grades Great Things Are.
Introduction Understanding “The Why”
Learning targets Learning Goals, Learning Targets, Success Criteria,
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Grade 2- Module 4.
Evaluating Student Growth Looking at student works samples to evaluate for both CCSS- Math Content and Standards for Mathematical Practice.
Presented by: COMMON CORE Standards Plus ®. A nonprofit group of educators All Learning Plus instructional materials are developed by educators. Our mission.
Understanding California’s New State Assessment Cambrian School District August 20, 2015.
Parent Training California Assessment for Student
Changes to Assessing and Reporting Shawn Whyte Assessment Coach.
Math Assessments In Common Core Presented by: Elk Grove Unified Schools District.
Communications Tips for Teachers. Welcome! These tips were gathered from a variety of online resources available to help educators communicate about Common.
Curriculum and Learning Omaha Public Schools
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP)
Tran Keys, Ph.D. Research & Evaluation, Santa Ana USD
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) 1 California Department of Education, September 2015 EL SEGUNDO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT.
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) 1 California Department of Education, September 2015.
Assessment and Reporting in the Middle Years Div. LOGO Prairie Rose School Division 2009.
CCSS Mathematics Fellows Tamara Smith Regional Mathematics Coordinator Olympic ESD Complete the Math Task on the Table.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
Welcome Back!. Today’s Schedule 9:00-11:00Math 11:00-11:45School Team Collaboration 11:45-12:15Lunch Break 12:15-2:15Writing 2:15-3:00School Team Collaboration.
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment: Here’s What!, So What?, Now What? Local District South Secondary Level.
Elementary Math: Grade 5 Professional Development Fall 2011.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Professional Development Resources Derrick Chau, Ph.D. - Director of Secondary Instruction Oscar Lafarga - Student Testing.
Dear Parents and Guardians: Soon you will be receiving a Score Report from the California Assessment of Performance and Progress (CAASPP) that will provide.
Cambrian School District September 17, 2015
Welcome Principals Please sit in groups of 3 2 All students graduate college and career ready Standards set expectations on path to college and career.
Alaska Measures of Progress (AMP) Summative Assessment Framework 1.
Understanding the 2015 Smarter Balanced Assessment Results Assessment Services.
+ SOUTH DAKOTA PRINCIPAL EFFECTIVENESS MODEL PROCESS OVERVIEW PE WEBINAR I 10/29/2015.
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) 1 California Department of Education, September 2015.
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress CAASPP.
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress
Smarter Balanced Assessments Common Core Standards and the 8 Step Instructional Process What Parents Should Know.
Understanding AzMERIT Results and Score Reporting An Overview.
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) and California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Parent Academy 10/1/2015.
Smarter Balanced Assessments Student Reports and Instructional Implications.
What Are The Implications For Teaching and Learning? PLAYA DEL REY ELEMENTARY PARENT MEETING 2/26/14 Smarter Balanced Assessment Exploration.
Walnut Valley Unified School District “Understanding Your Child’s 2015 CAASPP Report” California Assessment and Accountability System Performance and Progress.
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress CAASPP Insert Your School Logo.
Smarter Balanced Scores & Reports. The new assessment, Smarter Balanced, replaces our previous statewide assessment, the New England Common Assessment.
California Assessment of STUDENT PERFORMANCE and PROGRESS
Welcome to SBAC Claims: ELA
What Evidence Tables Can Do For You!
An Overview of the EQuIP Rubric for Lessons & Units
2015–16 CAASPP Parent Retreat
Session 4 Objectives Participants will:
An Overview of the EQuIP Rubric for Lessons & Units
Smarter Balanced Assessment (SBA) Results for PGUSD
Smarter Balanced Assessments
Connection: …between formative and summative assessment (including use of data)
September 21, 2017 Prepared by Matthew Binder
Office of Strategy, Innovation and Performance
(Introduce new electronic score reports)
Welcome Reporting: Individual Student Report (ISR), Student Roster Report, and District Summary of Schools Report Welcome to the Reporting: Individual.
History of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Understanding the CAASPP Student Score Reports
Elementary Mathematics
Presentation transcript:

Smarter Balanced Assessments Student Reports and Instructional Implications

Testing Irregularity Scores are not reliable. Scores were not used for the NSPF. – Scores are not reflected in school performance ratings. – Scores do not influence teacher evaluations for

To be prepared to engage in dialogue, with parents, regarding student SBAC reports. Participants will: identify talking points when sharing report results with parents. use threshold ALDs to bring meaning to the numbers. Learning Target 1 Success Criteria 1 Conversations with parents and guardians. What do these scores mean?

To gain a deeper understanding of the alignment among claims, targets, and standards for instructional conversations with staff. Participants will: Identify connections among claims, targets, and standards. Identify instructional implications after reviewing task models. Success Criteria 2 Learning Target 2 Supporting Teachers 1.What is the thinking behind the questions designed to collect evidence? 2.How do my interpretations and expectations of the standards compare with those of test developers?

Reporting Achievement Level Descriptor The student has met the achievement standard and demonstrates progress toward mastery of the knowledge and skills in mathematics needed for likely success in future coursework. Level 4: exceeded Level 3: met Level 2: nearly met Level 1: not met 1

Level 4: exceeded Level 3: met Level 2: nearly met Level 1: not met Advanced Partially Proficient Novice Nevada’s Descriptors

Proficient

Claim 1 Claim 2 and 4 Claim 3 3 Performance Categories (*Aligned to Claims)

Claim Level Descriptors 3 Descriptors: Below Standard At/Near Standard Above Standard 4 Levels

Claim 1Claim 2Claim 3Claim 4 English Language Arts – ELA

Infinite Campus View

Role-playing… Partner activity… Take turns playing the role of a principal and a parent. As the principal, review the reported scores with the parent.

What was my child able to do and where might we go from here? Meeting with your child’s teacher would be helpful. However, let’s look at the Threshold Achievement Level Descriptors that describe minimum performance required. It’s not everything tested; but, gives us a starting place.

Threshold Achievement Level Descriptors (ALDs) 2 Skim and scan threshold ALDs” for mathematics, grade 5. Discuss how these descriptors may help to facilitate BEGINNING conversations with parents/guardians.

To be prepared to engage in dialogue, with parents, regarding student SBAC reports. Participants will: identify talking points when sharing report results with parents. use threshold ALDs to bring meaning to the numbers. Learning Target 1 Success Criteria 1 Checking for Understanding… 1.How comfortable do you feel identifying and sharing talking points with parents? 2.How comfortable do you feel sharing threshold ALDs with parents?

Conversations with parents… Moving on to instructional leaders supporting teachers.

To gain a deeper understanding of the alignment among claims, targets, and standards for instructional conversations with staff. Participants will: Identify connections among claims, targets, and standards. Identify instructional implications after reviewing task models. Success Criteria 2 Learning Target 2 Supporting Teachers 1.What is the thinking behind the questions designed to collect evidence? 2.How do my interpretations and expectations of the standards compare with those of test developers?

Evidence Based Design - Claims 3

Overall Claim Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 3 Claim 4 Claim 1: Concepts and Procedures !: Claim 2: Problem Solving Claim 4: Modeling and Data Analysis !: Claim 3: Communicating Reasoning !:

4

Yellow Pages

Circle all “NF” (Number and Operations – Fractions) standards throughout the document. Circle the claims that are associated with the “NF” standards. ❶ ❷ Yellow Pages

❸ ❹ For Claim 1 only, read the circled targets and corresponding NF standards. For Claim 1 only, circle the targets that align with the NF standards. Yellow Pages

What did you notice about the alignment?

Understanding Claims Targets Salmon Pages 5

Understanding Claims Targets

Claim 1 Concepts and Procedures Target A Target B Target C Target D Target E Target F Target G Target H Target I Target J Target K Standards: 5.OA.1; 5.OA.2 Standards: 5.OA.3 Standards: 5.NBT.1,5.NBT.2,5.NBT.3, 5.NBT.4 Standards: 5.NBT.5, 5.NBT.6, 5.NBT.7 Standards: 5.NF.1, 5.NF.2 Standards: 5.NF.3, 5.NF.4,5.NF.5, 5.NF.6, 5.NF.7 Standards: 5.MD.1 Standards: 5.MD.2 Standards: 5MD.3, 5.MD.4, 5.MD.5 Standards: 5.G.1, 5.G.2 Standards: 5.G.3, 5.G.4

How did you solve the problem? Using the alignment document, discuss connections this task model has to Claim 1, target(s), and standard(s). ❶ ❷

Task Model – Item Specifications 1

Mathematical Practices Claims 2,3,and 4

Scan Mathematical Practices Claim 2 – Aligned to Mathematical Practices 6 Golden Pages Green Pages

Using the alignment document and the mathematical practices document, what connections do you see between Claim 2 targets and MPs 4 and 5?

Difference Between Claim 1 and Claim 2 Alignment Between Targets and Standards

Claim 2: Skim and Scan the NF Standards in Claim 2 (Pages 6 and 7)

Task Model – Claim 2

Share how you solved this task. Review and discuss the connections between the mathematical practices and this task. Identify which mathematical practices you utilized when solving and discussing the solution to this task. ❶ ❷ ❸

2 Task Model – Item Specifications

Discuss instructional implications. ❶

For Claim 3 ties predominantly to MPs 3,6 Read Mathematical Practices 3,6 Read the Targets for Claim 3 (pp. 9-11) Discuss connections between Mathematical Practices and Targets Read the Standards Pink Pages MPs: Golden

Task Model – Claim 3

Share how you solved this task. Review and discuss the connections between the mathematical practices and this task. Identify which mathematical practices you utilized when solving and discussing the solution to this task. ❶ ❷ ❸

3 Task Model – Item Specifications

Discuss instructional implications. ❶

For Claim 4 ties to MPs Read Mathematical Practices 2,3,4,5 Read the Targets for Claim 4 Discuss connections between Mathematical Practices and Targets Skim and scan the associated standards Blue Pages MPs: Golden

Task Model – Claim 4

Share how you solved this task. Review and discuss the connections between the mathematical practices and this task. Identify which mathematical practices you utilized when solving and discussing the solution to this task. ❶ ❷ ❸

4 Task Model – Item Specifications

Discuss instructional implications. ❶

Lay out all task models for Claims 1,2,3,and 4. Discuss instructional implications.

To gain a deeper understanding of the alignment among claims, targets, and standards. Participants will: Identify connections among claims, targets, and standards. Identify instructional implications after reviewing task models. Success Criteria 2 Learning Target 2 Checking for Understanding… 1.How comfortable do you feel in identifying connections among claims, targets, and standards? 2.How comfortable do you feel in identifying instructional implications when looking at item specification task models?

Handout – Resource Page