QM08, Jaipur, 9 th February, 2008 Raghunath Sahoo Saturation of E T /N ch and Freeze-out Criteria in Heavy Ion Collisions Raghunath Sahoo Institute of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Zi-Wei Lin (ECU) 28th WWND, Puerto Rico April 10, Update of Initial Conditions in A Multiple Phase Transport (AMPT) Model Zi-Wei Lin Department.
Advertisements

Mass, Quark-number, Energy Dependence of v 2 and v 4 in Relativistic Nucleus- Nucleus Collisions Yan Lu University of Science and Technology of China Many.
Physics Results of the NA49 exp. on Nucleus – Nucleus Collisions at SPS Energies P. Christakoglou, A. Petridis, M. Vassiliou Athens University HEP2006,
First Alice Physics Week, Erice, Dec 4  9, Heavy  Flavor (c,b) Collectivity at RHIC and LHC Kai Schweda, University of Heidelberg A. Dainese,
K*(892) Resonance Production in Au+Au and Cu+Cu Collisions at  s NN = 200 GeV & 62.4 GeV Motivation Analysis and Results Summary 1 Sadhana Dash Institute.
2010/10/18ATHIC2010, Oct 18-20, Wuhan1 Systematic study of particle spectra in heavy-ion collisions using Tsallis statistics Ming Shao, Zebo Tang, Yi Li,
In relativistic heavy ion collisions a high energy density matter Quark-Gluon Plasma (QGP) may be formed. Various signals have been proposed which probe.
Phase transition of hadronic matter in a non-equilibrium approach Graduate Days, Frankfurt, , Hannah Petersen, Universität Frankfurt.
DNP03, Tucson, Oct 29, Kai Schweda Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for the STAR collaboration Hadron Yields, Hadrochemistry, and Hadronization.
STAR Patricia Fachini 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory Motivation Data Analysis Results Conclusions Resonance Production in Au+Au and p+p Collisions at.
Measuring initial temperature through Photon to dilepton ratio Collaborators: Jan-e Alam, Sourav Sarkar & Bikash Sinha Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre,
Statistical Model Predictions for p+p and Pb+Pb Collisions at LHC Ingrid Kraus Nikhef and TU Darmstadt.
STAR STRANGENESS! K0sK0s    K+K+ (Preliminary)         
STAR Looking Through the “Veil of Hadronization”: Pion Entropy & PSD at RHIC John G. Cramer Department of Physics University of Washington, Seattle, WA,
Nu XuInternational Conference on Strangeness in Quark Matter, UCLA, March , 20061/20 Search for Partonic EoS in High-Energy Nuclear Collisions Nu.
System size and beam energy dependence of azimuthal anisotropy from PHENIX Michael Issah Vanderbilt University for the PHENIX Collaboration QM2008, Jaipur,
5-12 April 2008 Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics STAR Particle production at RHIC Aneta Iordanova for the STAR collaboration.
Resonance Dynamics in Heavy Ion Collisions 22nd Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics , La Jolla, California Sascha Vogel, Marcus Bleicher UrQMD.
Statistical Models A.) Chemical equilibration (Braun-Munzinger, Stachel, Redlich, Tounsi) B.) Thermal equilibration (Schnedermann, Heinz) C.) Hydrodynamics.
DPG spring meeting, Tübingen, March Kai Schweda Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for the STAR collaboration Recent results from STAR at RHIC.
WWND, San Diego1 Scaling Characteristics of Azimuthal Anisotropy at RHIC Michael Issah SUNY Stony Brook for the PHENIX Collaboration.
Marcus Bleicher, CCAST- Workshop 2004 Strangeness Dynamics and Transverse Pressure in HIC Marcus Bleicher Institut für Theoretische Physik Goethe Universität.
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL Masashi Kaneta for the STAR collaboration Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. First results from STAR experiment at RHIC - Soft hadron.
May, 20, 2010Exotics from Heavy Ion Collisions KE T and Quark Number Scaling of v 2 Maya Shimomura University of Tsukuba Collaborated with Yoshimasa Ikeda,
Thermal Production of particles at RHIC (Test of Chemical Freeze-out at RHIC) Jun Takahashi for the STAR collaboration SQM2008, Beijing, China.
Spectra Physics at RHIC : Highlights from 200 GeV data Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez ISMD ‘02, Alushta, Ukraine Sep 9, 2002.
Nu Xu1/12 ”DNP“, Newport Beach, California, December , 2012 Energy Dependence of the High Moments from Transport Model Simulations Xiaofeng Luo.
QM’05 Budapest, HungaryHiroshi Masui (Univ. of Tsukuba) 1 Anisotropic Flow in  s NN = 200 GeV Cu+Cu and Au+Au collisions at RHIC - PHENIX Hiroshi Masui.
In-Kwon YOO Pusan National University Busan, Republic of KOREA SPS Results Review.
Matter System Size and Energy Dependence of Strangeness Production Sevil Salur Yale University for the STAR Collaboration.
Jaipur February 2008 Quark Matter 2008 Initial conditions and space-time scales in relativistic heavy ion collisions Yu. Sinyukov, BITP, Kiev (with participation.
Higher moments of net-charge multiplicity distributions at RHIC energies in STAR Nihar R. Sahoo, VECC, India (for the STAR collaboration) 1 Nihar R. Sahoo,
M. Oldenburg Strange Quark Matter 2006 — March 26–31, Los Angeles, California 1 Centrality Dependence of Azimuthal Anisotropy of Strange Hadrons in 200.
Statistical Model Predictions for p+p and Pb+Pb Collisions at LHC Ingrid Kraus Nikhef and TU Darmstadt.
Do small systems equilibrate chemically? Ingrid Kraus TU Darmstadt.
Study the particle ratio fluctuations in heavy- ion collisions Limin Fan ( 樊利敏 ) Central China Normal University (CCNU) 1.
Introduction The statistical model approach is established by analysis of particle ratios of the high energy heavy ion collisions in GSI-SIS to CERN-SPS.
Energy Scan of Hadron (  0 ) Suppression and Flow in Au+Au Collisions at PHENIX Norbert Novitzky for PHENIX collaboration University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
System size dependence of freeze-out properties at RHIC Quark Matter 2006 Shanghai-China Nov System size dependence of freeze-out properties.
CCAST, Beijing, China, 2004 Nu Xu //Talk/2004/07USTC04/NXU_USTC_8July04// 1 / 26 Collective Expansion in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions -- Search for.
M. Djordjevic 1 Theoretical predictions of jet suppression: a systematic comparison with RHIC and LHC data Magdalena Djordjevic Institute of Physics Belgrade,
Masashi Kaneta, First joint Meeting of the Nuclear Physics Divisions of APS and JPS 1 / Masashi Kaneta LBNL
HIRSCHEGG, January , 2005 Nu Xu //Talk/2005/01Hirschegg05// 1 / 24 Search for Partonic EoS in High-Energy Collisions Nu Xu Lawrence Berkeley National.
Nucleon-Nucleon collisions. Nucleon-nucleon interaction at low energy Interaction between two nucleons: basic for all of nuclear physics Traditional goal.
Robert Pak (BNL) 2012 RHIC & AGS Annual Users' Meeting 0 Energy Ro Robert Pak for PHENIX Collaboration.
9 th June 2008 Seminar at UC Riverside Probing the QCD Phase Diagram Aneta Iordanova.
Masashi Kaneta, LBL Hadron Spectra in Au+Au Collisions by STAR Experiment at RHIC Masashi Kaneta for the STAR collaboration LBNL.
Two freeze-out model for the hadrons produced in the Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions. New Frontiers in QCD 28 Oct, 2011, Yonsei Univ., Seoul, Korea Suk.
Heavy-Ion Physics - Hydrodynamic Approach Introduction Hydrodynamic aspect Observables explained Recombination model Summary 전남대 이강석 HIM
School of Collective Dynamics in High-Energy CollisionsLevente Molnar, Purdue University 1 Effect of resonance decays on the extracted kinetic freeze-out.
Olena Linnyk Charmonium in heavy ion collisions 16 July 2007.
R. Lednicky: Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia I.P. Lokhtin, A.M. Snigirev, L.V. Malinina: Moscow State University, Institute of Nuclear.
Bulk properties of the system formed in Au+Au collisions at √s NN = 14.5 GeV using the STAR detector at RHIC Vipul Bairathi (for the STAR Collaboration)
21 st June 2007 RHIC & AGS Users’ Meeting Recent RHIC Results on Bulk Properties Richard Hollis.
Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook, ISMD, Kromĕříž, Roy A. Lacey What do we learn from Correlation measurements at RHIC.
Budapest, 4-9 August 2005Quark Matter 2005 HBT search for new states of matter in A+A collisions Yu. Sinyukov, BITP, Kiev Based on the paper S.V. Akkelin,
Hyperon Polarization in Heavy ion Collisions C. C. Barros Jr. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Brasil Strangeness in Quark Matter 2013 University.
Itzhak Tserruya Initial Conditions at RHIC: an Experimental Perspective RHIC-INT Workshop LBNL, May31 – June 2, 2001 Itzhak Tserruya Weizmann.
24 Nov 2006 Kentaro MIKI University of Tsukuba “electron / photon flow” Elliptic flow measurement of direct photon in √s NN =200GeV Au+Au collisions at.
Bulk properties at RHIC Olga Barannikova (Purdue University) Motivation Freeze-out properties at RHIC STAR perspective STAR  PHENIX, PHOBOS Time-span.
Christina MarkertHirschegg, Jan 16-22, Resonance Production in Heavy Ion Collisions Christina Markert, Kent State University Resonances in Medium.
24 June 2007 Strangeness in Quark Matter 2007 STAR 2S0Q0M72S0Q0M7 Strangeness and bulk freeze- out properties at RHIC Aneta Iordanova.
QGP-Meet’06, VECC, Kolkata. 6 th Feb-2006 RAGHUNATH SAHOO, INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS, BHUBANESWAR TRANSVERSE ENERGY PRODUCTION AT RHIC OUTLINE: Introduction.
Japanese Physics Society meeting, Hokkaido Univ. 23/Sep/2007, JPS meeting, Sapporo, JapanShinIchi Esumi, Inst. of Physics, Univ. of Tsukuba1 Collective.
Helen Caines Yale University Strasbourg - May 2006 Strangeness and entropy.
PHENIX Results from the RHIC Beam Energy Scan Brett Fadem for the PHENIX Collaboration Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics 2016.
Hadron Spectra and Yields Experimental Overview Julia Velkovska INT/RHIC Winter Workshop, Dec 13-15, 2002.
What do the scaling characteristics of elliptic flow reveal about the properties of the matter at RHIC ? Michael Issah Stony Brook University for the PHENIX.
Strange hadrons and resonances at LHC energies with the ALICE detector INPC 2013 Firenze, Italy 2 -7 June 2013 A. Badalà (INFN Sezione di Catania) for.
1 Strange Resonance Production in p+p and Au+Au Collisions at RHIC energies. Christina Markert, Yale University for the STAR Collaboration QM2004,
Presentation transcript:

QM08, Jaipur, 9 th February, 2008 Raghunath Sahoo Saturation of E T /N ch and Freeze-out Criteria in Heavy Ion Collisions Raghunath Sahoo Institute of Physics, India SUBATECH, France Introduction Heavy Ion Collisions and Particle freeze-out Motivation What do data say on E T /N ch ? Statistical Thermal Model & E T /N ch Studies with √s NN and centrality. Summary Outline

QM08, Jaipur, 9 th February, 2008 Raghunath Sahoo 2/14 hard ( high - p T ) probes soft physics regime Space-time evolution in HI collisions Theoretical description of the whole process is difficult, as different degrees of freedom (dof) are important at various stages. Thermal model uses hadronic dof at freeze-out.

QM08, Jaipur, 9 th February, 2008 Raghunath Sahoo 3/14 FREEZE-OUT Freeze-out process depends on :  flow velocity gradient  thermal velocity (1)  expansion rate (controlled by vel. gradient)  local scattering rate (2) 1 & 2 depend on particle species  Concept of “differential freeze-out”  Different particles decouple from the fireball at different times. A series of freeze-outs corresponding to specific reaction channels. We focus on : Chemical freeze-out (at T ch  T c ): Inelastic flavor changing collisions processes cease Kinetic freeze-out (at T fo  T ch ): End of elastic scatterings ; kinematical distributions stop changing Reactions with lower cross-sections switch-off at higher densities/temp., while those with larger cross-sections last longer, e.g. charmed/strange particles decouple earlier than other hadrons.

QM08, Jaipur, 9 th February, 2008 Raghunath Sahoo 4/14 E T / N ch production with √s NN PHENIX : PRC 71 (2005) E T /N ch for top 5% central events with √s NN. Region I : lowest energy to SPS energy. Steep increase in the ratio with √s NN. Increase in √s NN results in increase in. Region II : SPS energy to higher energies. The ratio is very weakly dependent on √s NN. Increase in √s NN results in increase in particle production, instead of increasing. Might be, the system is equilibrated and strongly interacting in this region. Extrapolation of the ratio to LHC  E T /N ch = 0.92 ± 0.06 GeV. /  E T /N ch I II

QM08, Jaipur, 9 th February, 2008 Raghunath Sahoo 5/14 E T /N ch Vs N part Hydrodynamic flow effect is reflected in the peripheral collisions. If the expansion is isentropic, dN ch /d  will remain constant, whereas dE T /d  will decrease due to the performance of longitudinal work due to generated pressure. E T, N ch and all show similar centrality behavior. Growth in E T is due to particle production. Let’s understand the data………….. STAR: PRC 70 (2004)

QM08, Jaipur, 9 th February, 2008 Raghunath Sahoo 6/14 E T /N ch & Freeze-out E T /N ch ~ 800 MeV from AGS to RHIC: independent of centrality of the collision and the center of mass energy. If the freeze-out is assumed to occur at all energies and impact parameters in A+A collisions, on a fixed decoupling isotherm, then the energy per particle will always be the same.  Energy pumped into the system goes for particle production, instead of increasing energy per particle. Thermal model calculations (PRL 81, 5284, 1998) (Cleymans & Redlich) at chemical freeze-out. STAR Preliminary Is it related to freeze-out?

QM08, Jaipur, 9 th February, 2008 Raghunath Sahoo 7/14 What is expected ? T ch is independent of centrality and shows saturation at higher energies. T ch ~ T c  Chemical freeze-out coincides with hadronization. T kin is centrality dependent STAR: PRL 92 (2004) J. Cleymans et al. Phys. Rev. C 73 (2006) T ch is a lower limit estimate for a temperature of pre- hadronic state. U. Heinz et al. nucl-th/

QM08, Jaipur, 9 th February, 2008 Raghunath Sahoo 8/14 The Statistical-Thermal Model Thermal model: particles and resonances up to m < 2 GeV B, s, Q are conserved Chemical freeze-out with no dynamics  Observables are functions of T and  B.  The E T (from expt.) is related to the primordial energy E (from thermal model): =  /4 { - m N }  Final state N ch (from expt.) is also related to the primordial number of hadrons N (from thermal model). Freeze-out Criteria:  E/N = 1.08 GeV  s/T 3 = 7  n B + n Bbar = 0.12 fm -3 √(p 2 + m 2 ) – m for nucleons √(p 2 + m 2 ) + m for anti-nucleons √(p 2 + m 2 ) for all others E =  Data: All FO criteria tell almost the same story !!! J. Cleymans et al. Phys. Rev. C 73 (2006) 34905

QM08, Jaipur, 9 th February, 2008 Raghunath Sahoo 9/14 The Excitation Function of Baryon dominance at low energy => ~ n m and at higher energies although the dominant particles are pions, at chemical freeze-out most of the pions are hidden in the mesonic and baryonic resonances. The average thermal mass corresponds to the  -meson mass. Different freeze-out criteria show similar behavior of with √s NN.

QM08, Jaipur, 9 th February, 2008 Raghunath Sahoo 10/14 The Excitation Functions N decays /N ~1 at very low √s NN, as very few resonances are produced. It becomes independent of √s NN around SPS and higher energies with a value ~ 1.7. N ch /N decays starts around a value of 0.4 and shows energy independence at SPS and higher √s NN. At low √s NN, baryon dominance at mid-rapidity  N ch /N decays ~ N p /(N p +N n ) = 0.45 for Au + Au. The √s NN independence of the ratios is a direct consequence of saturation of T ch at high energies and  B becoming very small at high √s NN.

QM08, Jaipur, 9 th February, 2008 Raghunath Sahoo 11/14 Lines of constant E T /N ch At low energy E T /N ch is almost independent of  B : A consequence of taking out m N in the definition of E T, which supposed to play a role at low energy. At chemical freeze-out, T and  B could be estimated from the experimentally measured E T /N ch.

QM08, Jaipur, 9 th February, 2008 Raghunath Sahoo 12/14 E T /N ch and Freeze-out J. Cleymans, R. Sahoo, D.P. Mahapatra, D.K. Srivastava & S. Wheaton Phys. Letts. B 660 (2008) 172 E T /N ch behaves like T ch Saturations in all discussed observables have been observed around SPS and higher energies !!!!! For different initial conditions, collisions evolve to the same freeze-out condition. Thermal model: E T /N ch is a lower limit estimate for in the pre-hadronic state.

QM08, Jaipur, 9 th February, 2008 Raghunath Sahoo 13/14 Summary E T /N ch has been studied with centrality of the collision and with √s NN using statistical HG model. A constant E T /N ch (~0.8 GeV) has been observed from AGS to SPS to RHIC, which is related to the freeze-out of the fireball. The statistical thermal model explains the centrality and CoM energy behavior of E T /N ch production quite satisfactory. Saturations in various observables have been observed around SPS and higher energies.

QM08, Jaipur, 9 th February, 2008 Raghunath Sahoo 14/14 In Collaboration with: J. Cleymans, S. Wheaton CERN-UCT Research centre, Cape Town, SA D. P. Mahapatra, IoP, Bhubaneswar, India D.K. Srivastava, VECC, Kolkata, India We acknowledge the financial support of the SA-India Science & Technology agreement. I thank the organizers for giving me the opportunity to talk on our recent work in this conf. Acknowledgements